Do you think the future is Communism? If so, why???

Do you think the future is Communism? If so, why???

Attached: 1459471412625.jpg (500x333, 21K)

Yes, when there are no more markets to exploit for cheap labor. Ironically, the Chinese are busy dong that now.

How do you envision this utopia happening?

>implying America's capitalist fueled military industrial complex isnt involved in as many, if not more, deaths.

who said that the result would be utopia? i didn't. I'm thinking that things are likely to be pretty fucked up.

no there's been a rise of libertarianism, capitalism and, especially in Europe, nationalism.

yes, because of the inherent contradictions within capitalism.

>no commie can contradict this

Attached: 993.gif (800x667, 1.23M)

nah, the nationalists who had been hiding before are just louder now. doesn't mean an increase, just more exposure.

Nahhh zi hooe not, the media and Soros wants that.

But seeing as Orwell's wet dream is in this technology, we will probably end up with communism the way it always is. A few rich leaders and loads of wageslavs.

Because people are so fucking dumb.

No it's awful, failed and gets a lot of people killed.

Communism:
>rich getting richer
>middle class so-so
>poor getting poorer

Capitalism:
>rich getting richer
>middle class so-so
>poor getting poorer

In communism it's more out there, with capitalism it's more concealed, but the results are about the same.

>there's been a rise of libertarianism

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

xD nice meme, isn't that from like 2013?

very original and insightful, big thinkie

Attached: 1449958273900.jpg (480x359, 34K)

>implying you commies can meme

heh yeah lefties can't meme xD

Attached: 1443138329753.png (1436x1580, 702K)

woah nice strawman

With communism the lazy people live in shit conditions.
the useful people get tiny apartments.
the smart people get houses.
and the people that run it all are corrupt assholes that have it all.

Attached: 1548355270017.jpg (620x465, 51K)

Nah

tfw you're main source of information is steven chowder

Marxist Economist is an oxymoron for a reason. It's just like a Creationist Biologist. A few exist, sure, but no one takes them seriously.

Attached: 1513639265438.jpg (839x382, 52K)

Talk to anyone who lived in the soviet bloc

>the majority of russians said the end of the USSR was a bad thing

did any of your old family members were citizens of commie country?
they told me from their experience that only rich get richer and middle class is not exsisting because everyone else is poor and need to cheat the system in every single way to survive

I heard that too.the good workers got big houses.

1. The older folks have rose tinted glasses. They aren't living in the best conditions right now, being a kleptocracy and all that. I'm sure they'd change their tune if things went back to the soviet system.
2. People like to feel powerful. They were feared back in the cold war, I'm sure that felt cool.
3. Alot of the younger generation never experienced the shit under the soviet system, so of course they think it wasn't bad.

Attached: 1527457334539.jpg (460x418, 49K)

the pole was immediately after the collapse but okay, it's interesting how when presented with conflicting evidence to your ideology you don't even check the poll but just reflex react to it with some on the spot thought up excuses

>gulags were great
>famine even better
>secret police? yes please!
>breadlines? fuck yes!
I honestly question how anyone would think it was better unless they were mentally damaged.

Attached: 1456378573586.jpg (900x439, 97K)

>Implying the Military Industrial Complex is Capitalist.
>Implying these companies are not also foreign.

Attached: 1565417695960.gif (400x224, 1.88M)

same shit different flies,lol.

>Thing that has never succeeded at any point in history being the future

this meme shows what level of discourse you're on here, go read some books, ben shapiro isn't the be all end all of knowledge

How can you honestly defend gulags and secret police? The ability to criticize those in power keeps the system from becoming corrupt and out of control.

at what point in my reply did i defend gulags and secret police?

You are defending the soviet system, yes? An integral part of it was killing off any opposition and terror

i didn't defend the soviet system, i pointed out a poll which contradicted a statement you made

Communism has no future.

End thread

It’s literally the only future you’ll have once humans leave earth.

The commies and turd worlders are undercutting robots in industries. I expect first worlders to go with robots over the troublesome turd world raping, robbing and pillaging their nations.

Attached: 1531100566182.jpg (502x720, 47K)

Then what system do you support?

one with a good education system to prevent people turning out getting their info from memes and YouTube such as yourself

He's right though. The libertarian right is basically the power faction in the us Republican party right now.

Or, you know, they opened a history book.

But according to every communist I've talked with, every time communism collapses/turns into a murderfest, it wasn't real communism!

Attached: 1536889211266.png (384x274, 249K)

xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD got 'em again

Yes, communism will inevitably win.

Attached: tenor.gif (498x301, 1.52M)

Sure is doing a great job today!

Attached: 1531098802848.jpg (525x500, 83K)

LOL, well good luck to ya user. Honest question though, I actually mean no disrespect. But why is every communist that I have met, either Autistic/retarded (I knew one with kleinfeldters), or just really beta/cuckish?
There seems to allways be something really wrong with them, usually that they are social outcasts etc.

Im genuinly interested, it seems that the weak usually resort to these sorts of stupid ideas. Kek

The problem is that you don't know what communism and socialism is. Communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society. Socialism is lower-stage communism in Marxian terms, which is the transitional stage between capitalism and communism. Under socialism, the state controls all the major centers of economic power.

The USSR and every other one of those states with a communist party in power had socialism. China, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Vietnam and the DPRK have socialism now. Every single one of these acknowledge that they do not have communism yet, but socialism as they still have a state and money.

The goal of socialist states is to eventually have communism, but that's in the very distant future. Under socialism, things are produced to be used and consumed, not according to profit. A socialist state's main goal is to improve the living standards for its citizens, which they have succeeded in doing every single time.

There you go, those are the Marxian definitions of communism and socialism.