For what reason should we capitulate? Why should we simply roll over and accept what society has become...

Then you are the problem. When the day of the rope comes, you will be hanged with the rest of the degenerates and abusers.

He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral.

Attached: 1557518426891.jpg (507x640, 680K)

Soon, brother. The time is near.

They've been saying that for 2500 years, probably more. My genetics are proliferating though, so it's all good.

Attached: e1324.jpg (445x599, 42K)

Then it will end with you.

Attached: 4c56057e030bbb4c25f568a4d91dbb510a674a9225204d43ec1cf24da5802a3a.jpg (625x483, 56K)

I am willing to fight, and that's all it takes. Those such as yourself, the capitulators of the world, will not live to see the New Dawn.

FPBP

Fag OP blown the fuck out

Yawn I'm getting bored with the cliches. Let's step it up: You speak of rifles, fighting and anger. Do you consider yourself radicalized? If so, are you self-radicalized or did you have help?

Attached: aquinasbotticelli.png (400x500, 299K)

>hi I don't understand war
That's what you sound like OP

Attached: 1565306874095.jpg (233x250, 9K)

The new dawn will be when stormfags like you are sent to prison and forced to suck and fuck gangs of black men.

Attached: Gay-Porn-Interracial-Bareback-Sex.jpg (768x432, 39K)

The day will come. Your kind will not be spared.

I am. I've looked around at the world and have grown disgusted with what I have seen. The rise of degeneracy in our society has even led many to consider pedophilia as nothing more than an "alternative sexuality" that should be respected and tolerated. I have run out of patience, and I have run out of tolerance. Some day I will find every man who feels the same, and we will come together to destroy what (((they))) have built.

Your taunts are meaningless. You will be buried with the others.

Same, I've been taught that we must tolerate others. "It's okay as long it's two consenting adults", "we must celebrate our differences", etc. Now, I understand that tolerance is a form of evil in itself, we've been duped, brainwashed and shamed into this suicidal form of thinking.

Attached: (((tolerance))).jpg (736x576, 81K)

>I am. I've looked around at the world and have grown disgusted with what I have seen. The rise of degeneracy in our society has even led many to consider pedophilia as nothing more than an "alternative sexuality" that should be respected and tolerated. I have run out of patience, and I have run out of tolerance. Some day I will find every man who feels the same, and we will come together to destroy what (((they))) have built.
So you care so much about what other people in the world do that you seek to destroy the structure that which supports the things you disagree with? I understand disagreeing with things, I disagree with you. But you are not obligated to respect or tolerate anything. That's a cultural thing and something that (You) choose to abide by or not. Nobody can MAKE you feel anything or do anything, how you respond is your own choice. I suppose this leads to my next question which is: What is it that so obviously hurts you so much?

Attached: sdfsdfsfd.jpg (1136x1371, 1.86M)

There is a grand difference between tolerance and mercy. While we should certainly show grace and mercy towards those who do wrong, we should not allow them to pervade our society. It needs to remain stigmatized, and kept out of the eyes and minds of our children.

As transsexuals and pedophiles are allowed to read storybooks to kindergartners while dressed as demons, we should know that we have failed, and we must drive these people back into the dirt.

Because your not strong enough to fight. Not physically, not mentally or financially. Three slackjaws agree to fight a bully. One gets distracted by basketball or some other nonsense. One gets addicted to drugs and last one gets caught up in the struggle to live life. We are kept unhealthy on purpose. We are kept uneducated on purpose and we are kept oppressed on purpose.

The myth of the individual being allowed to keep to his devices is pushed quite often these days, however it is impossible to take any form of action, even in your own home, without supporting or disrupting the current establishment. When you go to work for a corporation, send your child to public school, and pay for the goods and services that we have allowed to be ,monopolized in our nation, you support the establishment. Our educational system exists to create workers, not thinkers, that will not question their lot in life. Our children are even taught things such as the equality of culture and race, sexuality, and religion, which are simply untrue. As we send our children into this world, it is shaped by activists who work against them, telling them to accept the things that they don't like and move on. All the while those who do not accept the agenda of those in power are demonized and mocked.

Anti-semites, racists, nationalists, "homophobes" and "Islamophobes" are all demonized by the popular culture around us despite our legitimate grievances. The mass immigration of Muslim refugees here is unsustainable, and their value system is incompatible with the west, not to mention barbaric and crude. Did you know that they consider unbelievers to be "less than dogs, " and refuse to treat them as humans under Shariah law? That's why things such as the Jizya tax and Dhimmi slaves exist.

When you refuse to fight against the dominant culture, it will work to destroy you. This is because those in power care not for your interests. They want power and resources for theirselves, and will gladly destroy you to take what you have.

Attached: 1564735315918.jpg (600x450, 87K)

Looking back on the time when liberalism was actually a revolutionary ideology, the thing that gets me is how tame some of the conditions were.

Like, what was British oppression in America? Tax policy, that’s about it. Fuck Mel Gibson, no British burned down any Colonial churches, not with the whole village inside. It was just about taxes.

Now, if a few young congresswomen of colour complain about actual oppression, about the way the US is rotten from the core, and how it seeps into everything else in American life, they’re called radicals.

I think the Founding Fathers would tell us to revolt. (And then tell us to ship our black comrades to Haiti.)

Struggle will temper us. The weak will die, or they will become strong.

>Now, if a few young congresswomen of colour complain about actual oppression
What oppression do you speak of?

What a hair splitting bunch of nonsense. Jesus totally redefined what people are supposed to think of as evil. He was NOT pushing the status quo. He’s a revolutionary, through and through.

This Archbishop, let’s be clear, would turn Mary Magdalene away. Jesus brought her close.

Not gonna lie, this made me laugh.

I don’t want to get into a fight. But reality check: literal concentration camps at the border. Literal. Concentration. Camps.

Is the word “society” in the Bible? “Nation”? Democracy? Genocide? Child-welfare?

And if it’s not in the book, it bad.

For those who wish to invade us? They deserve worse. Our homes are not theirs. This is our land, and they would do well to keep to theirs.

Christianity is the reason why the white race is going extinct in the first place. How can you call yourself a traditionalist or a nationalist yet embrace an alien Semitic faith and ideology forcibly imposed on our ancestors?

Neo-Paganism is the way. A return to the old ethno-centric doctrines which made the white race great, not the universalist cancer of Christianity.

This speaks straight towards me. I knew I wasn't alone feeling this way. We'll fight to the death for our country. We'll meet someday, my brother.

So you’re Indigenous?

Not liking what other people represent is something that all people will always have to accept. That's just the human condition, it always has been. The dominant culture is the dominant culture not because people are brainwashed. The dominant culture is the dominant culture because that's what these humans naturally think and do. It's what they WANT. It's what they want to think, believe and do. Sure, it's no fun being in the minority but we go through that rinse cycle every election and both sides know what it feels like to be on the "losing" ideological side via popular vote. The powers that be just ride the cultural tide, they sometimes fan the flames, sure. But they don't steer culture, they just figure out how to make it work for their short-term agendas.

What about the churches importing in huge volumes of non-whites? Why don't you have anything to say about that?

My thoughts exactly. We have failed to protect and preserve our values, the education system has been subverted by these godless, foul sodomites who have brainwashed entire generations. Now these brainwashed drones are in positions of power, they try and dictate what is right and wrong.

Wow that is some victimization complex. Poor you.

Pagan gods are degenerate. Christ was a wise man, and when he comes back the Earth will overflow with blood.

We won this land through conquest, and we should not simply roll over to those who ant to take it from us. We have built a civilization for ourselves that was, at one time, one of the greatest in the world. To let the unwashed hordes come in and ruin it is simply because of "white guilt" is an incredibly ignorant position.

I do. It's disgusting, and they do not understand the way of Christ.

>Not liking what other people represent is something that all people will always have to accept
Even when those people are tyrants, thieves, and murderers? I don't think you understand what you are saying, nor the dire state that our society is in.
> The dominant culture is the dominant culture not because people are brainwashed
Our media, religious centers, industry, and economy have been dominated by an ethnoreligious cult for a long time, and with the rise of John D. Rockefeller it has only gotten worse. Did you know that the UN was started on land that he donated, that he had a close relationship with almost every major politician and businessman in his era, that he set fourth political ideologies to be employed in the future, and that most of the US presidents in the last seventy years were part of a think tank that he created? Manipulation of the population on a large scale exists, and it is palpable. Most simply refuse to see it.

>. But they don't steer culture, they just figure out how to make it work for their short-term agendas.
You are a fool. Their agendas have existed for centuries, and we have played into their hands over and over again.

You are correct. Do not let anyone tell you otherwise.

>He was NOT pushing the status quo
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." He was a revolutionary, but he was revolting against human ignorance and sin.
And what did Jesus do? He saved her, he did not tolerate the demons that dwelled in her now did he? You're trying that shitty kikery with "oh Jesus was only about love man!" Wrong. Jesus was full of just anger, he always spoke the truth, if he lived in our times first thing he'd do would be to call out the current pope for being a dirty pagan. He would never tolerate gay parades, he'd shame them and tell them the truth that they are degenerate and sinful which they'd obviously deny.

>colour

>us
>our

Nice larp, you common trash. Sheer ignorance

Attached: 1557953290187.gif (1000x1000, 208K)

Do you think the Pagan Vikings were more manly or a 2000 year old hippy who let the Romans crucify him without a fight?

>Christianity is the reason why the white race is going extinct in the first place.
Christianity has been rejected and in decline since the 50's. That's when white race started to decline too.
>yet embrace an alien Semitic faith and ideology forcibly imposed on our ancestors
Alien? My father is a Christian, his father is a Christian, his father was a Christian, his father was a Christian, his father was a Christian. Do you get where I'm going with this? You sound like one of those "Americans are not the real Americans, natives are the real Americans, you're just invaders/immigrants".
>Neo-Paganism is the way
What's neo-paganism? A bunch of literal larpers. You have no dogma, no theology, no moral code, you cannot even talk about the metaphysics.
>A return to the old ethno-centric doctrines
You do realise that pagans often adopted foreign dieties and customs right? Romans literally accepted EVERY god into their pantheon, they even adopted Y*hweh as some version of Jupiter or something. Paganism is ironically the most inclusive, in Christianity you have a strict moral code, what you can and cannot do. Paganism has an outline of "live and let live" how cucked can one get with that mindset? The truth is we've been living under your neo-paganism, except under the name of secularism.
>made the white race great
Again, pagans didn't care about skin colour, no religion I can think of really cares about race.
>universalist cancer of Christianity.
Once more, pagans adopted foreign gods and foreign customs. The 10 commandments forbid adopting foreign customs and foreign gods. Paganism is the weak religion, it's been conquered by Christianity. It took well over 1500 years to bring down Christianity. Remember, we've been living without Christian values for well over 60 years and look at the white race now.

OK I'll bite.
>Even when those people are tyrants, thieves, and murderers? I don't think you understand what you are saying, nor the dire state that our society is in.
There will always be criminals and tyrants. I don't think you understood what I wrote. Unless you think that some fantastical earthly paradise is attainable - which it isn't - then yes, people will ALWAYS have to accept it.
>Our media, religious centers, industry, and economy have been dominated by an ethnoreligious cult for a long time, and with the rise of John D. Rockefeller it has only gotten worse. Did you know that the UN was started on land that he donated, that he had a close relationship with almost every major politician and businessman in his era, that he set fourth political ideologies to be employed in the future, and that most of the US presidents in the last seventy years were part of a think tank that he created? Manipulation of the population on a large scale exists, and it is palpable. Most simply refuse to see it.
And some people see conspiracy where it doesn't exist. Human culture is ever changing, when it changes in a direction that you disagree with it doesn't mean that it's a worldwide conspiracy. It only means that you are in the minority.
>You are a fool. Their agendas have existed for centuries, and we have played into their hands over and over again.
You are a fool. The hands of power change every generation, as do their changing values. Sometimes you are the bug and sometimes you are the windshield. It sounds like you are the bug today because you don't like being a minority.

Those pagan vikings got conquered by that "old hippy"'s followers and the only reason why we know of their paganism is because that "old hippy"'s followers allowed to preserve it. Now answer that question yourself.

>>Inside every one of us is the blood of soldiers.

HAHAHAHAHA, Your family probably made sammiches and shoes for soldiers. Your great granny was a courtesan or lowly wench and your great great grandad was a farmer.

Attached: 1565208936898.jpg (600x778, 118K)

>There will always be criminals and tyrants
But there was a time where they were not accepted under the false gods of "inclusiveness" and "tolerance." Paradise may not be attainable, but stability is.

>And some people see conspiracy where it doesn't exist
And some people refuse to see what is right in front of their eyes. The evidence mounts, but they cal those who speak the truth "crackpot" and "madman" as the world around them dies, refusing to take a stand against their tyrants.

>The hands of power change every generation, as do their changing values
Even if that were true, why should I quietly roll over as my culture, my rights, and my heritage is stolen from me?

Vikings were never conquered by Christians, they were subverted into accepting it by Christian missionaries. Just like how whites have been cucked by propaganda and bullshit, same way the Vikings (and Romans, and other pagan cultures) fell to Christianity.

Just because an idea won out doesn't mean it's good. So is atheism and leftism better than Christianity in your eyes because the former won out over the latter?

Your kind fought wars and died to us, because your pagan gods are weak. Like you.

>And some people refuse to see what is right in front of their eyes. The evidence mounts, but they cal those who speak the truth "crackpot" and "madman" as the world around them dies, refusing to take a stand against their tyrants.
Like global warming?
>Even if that were true, why should I quietly roll over as my culture, my rights, and my heritage is stolen from me?
Rolling over is your choice, nobody is telling you to lay down and die. And stop with your "I am a victim here" complex
>and my heritage is stolen from me?
By whom? The invisible illuminati that's controlling everyone else's minds? You are alive. You still have your culture and your identity. You are here. Nothing was stolen, stolen implies intent. Just because your ideas and values are less popular than a century ago doesn't mean they have been "stolen". It just means that the majority of culture has changed and you haven't. And there's no judgement call there, I'm not claiming you're right or wrong, no moral high ground. It's just a fact of majority/minority.

>day of the rope
Surprise surprise, it's another useful bootlicking underman.

>Like global warming?
Glabal warming exists. I think the claim of human impact on it is dubious, but whether or not that's true we have more important issues to deal with for the time being. Al Gore said we'd be dead twenty years ago and here we are.

>Rolling over is your choice, nobody is telling you to lay down and die. And stop with your "I am a victim here" complex
That's a conflicting statement. If I am not allowed to complain, or do something to retaliate, then what options exist besides "roll over and die?"

>By whom? The invisible illuminati that's controlling everyone else's minds?
Quite a strawman, but in a sense, yes. There is a conscious effort to destroy white heritage and culture under the guise of "guilt" and "equality." We are currently treated as second-class citizens in the societies that WE built because we made great things while most other races sat around and had sex with goats.
>You still have your culture and your identity.
And I am constantly demonized for that. "Whites have always oppressed other races" and blah blah blah simply because we built something whilst they lived in squalor. Us and our children should be entitled to the things that we and our ancestors created. They are not.

>Just because your ideas and values are less popular than a century ago doesn't mean they have been "stolen"
They have been misappropriated along with the rest of our civilization. The ideas that we created are turned against us because it gave us prosperity and created a just inequality. There are those who work to subvert us because they see us as a threat and want us gone.
> It's just a fact of majority/minority.
And what should be done when others are forcing you into a minority status in your home? Were thieves and degenerates to enter your house and claim that they own your things because they are now the majority, should you allow them to have it without a fight?

Attached: 1564733480603.png (1158x1621, 355K)

Your failure to tolerate situations unfavorable to you indicates your inability to adapt and thrive. It might even be in your nature to roll over, if I am to speak towards your penchant for invoking naturalistic argumentation.

>Your failure to tolerate situations unfavorable to you indicates your inability to adapt and thrive
No creature on Earth simply tolerates unfavorable conditions. They work their way out of them. A cornered rat will escape, a freezing lizard will find heat, and yes, a man who has found that the world has turned against him will fight back. Adaptation and thriving are about finding a way to make your environment favorable to you.

>No creature on Earth simply tolerates unfavorable conditions
Exactly no creature? Are you absolutely sure?

>a man who has found that the world has turned against him will fight back
What is suicide?

>Adaptation and thriving are about finding a way to make your environment favorable to you
Incorrect. You spoke under the lens of biology, and as such, you must defined adaptation as it pertains to an organism. The basic definition? "The process in which a living thing changes slightly over time to be able to continue to exist in a particular environment".

I suppose next you'll tell me that the mitochondrial DNA in your body is a result of your ability to hold a rock. Figures.

>Exactly no creature? Are you absolutely sure?
Fine. No creature that I know of. Does that make you feel justified in assuming the best answer is to roll over and accept it?

>What is suicide?
So you advocate for all people to commit suicide rather than face and conquer adversity?

>you must defined adaptation as it pertains to an organism
And is it not fitting? All words have many meanings. I'm simply using the most pertinent one.

>I suppose next you'll tell me that the mitochondrial DNA in your body is a result of your ability to hold a rock

Nice ad hominem. Do you have any real points to make, or will you continue with non-arguments and contrivances?

>Does that make you feel justified in assuming the best answer is to roll over and accept it
Only if you insist that you were wrong at least once about something you said with utter conviction.

>So you advocate for all people to commit suicide rather than face and conquer adversity
Who said that? I didn't say that. You absolutely said that, though. You posited that a man who has found that the world has turned against him will fight back. Assume such dire circumstances. Why, then, do people kill themselves? "What is suicide?", this is what I said.

For you to invoke such a rash and brazen strawman... actually, that's par for the course, it's to be expected for someone who suggest that there be a "day of the rope".
>And is it not fitting
Suggesting that flight or fight is the process of adaptation? No. It's not fitting at all. It's not even pertinent. And now you're going to play semantics and forego any sense of concreteness whatsoever, after having spent some of your time railing against some imagined world where lies are truth. How backwards.

>Nice ad hominem
I haven't called you a neanderthal yet, stone-tosser. Well, now I have.
>Do you have any real points to make
I do, but you'll shrug those off as well. In the end, I've come to watch a spectacle.

I don't care about your shitty politics, I just like the artstyle

Attached: rock_the_boat.jpg (550x360, 61K)

Gonna assume you're at least party talking about progressivism.

Go ahead and roll over. Literally everything you do at this point results in progressivism winning. You argue with liberals? You lose because they're almost definitely better educated than you. You go radical and kill liberals? You cause a national holiday to be created in their honor and have the entire world spit on your grave.

In the same way the legalization of slavery was inevitable, whatever social issue you're attempting to debase is similarly inevitable. Either let it happen or just die already. There's no third direction.

Attached: 1564151505285.jpg (750x696, 35K)

look mommy! i posted it again! can i have tendies now?

Attached: 29e.jpg (680x1020, 81K)

You'll die too. They'll not rest while anyone thinks differently than them.

>You lose because they're almost definitely better educated than you
Laughable. Have you ever seen one of them argue?

>Only if you insist that you were wrong at least once about something you said with utter conviction.

Show me animals that simply tolerate unfavorable conditions. I'll wait.

>Who said that? I didn't say that. You absolutely said that, though. You posited that a man who has found that the world has turned against him will fight back. Assume such dire circumstances. Why, then, do people kill themselves? "What is suicide?", this is what I said.
So what point are you making?

>I haven't called you a neanderthal yet, stone-tosser. Well, now I have.
Good job. Feel better about yourself yet?

>I do, but you'll shrug those off as well. In the end, I've come to watch a spectacle.
I haven't shrugged off anything. I've made a conscious effort to rebut your arguments that I disagree with.

You know as well as everyone else that there is something deeply wrong with the world. Your sarcasm will mean nothing when they come for you.

You just combined 2 people into 1. I don't think either of us will be dying any time soon, not if this is the level of comptetence that we have to observe.

>Show me animals
Okay. Sea sponges.

>So what point are you making
"Why, then, do people kill themselves?".

>Feel better about yourself yet
Yes.

>I haven't shrugged off anything
You're saying it's laughable that someone be better educated than you, if at least they specifically be a liberal... while having already been corrected and having accepted being corrected at least once by at least someone who could be classified as liberal in the utmost technical sense.

You disagree, but you don't disagree with integrity. As is to be expected from an underman.

As is to be expected from an underman.

>Sea sponges
And is that an animal that is important in any way? The vast majority (and almost every one of them that can be compared to a human) work through their problems in one way or another.

>"Why, then, do people kill themselves?"
Because they are weak, and unfit for this world.

>You're saying it's laughable that someone be better educated than you
Never said that, don't know where you got that from.

>And is that an animal that is important in any way
You said you weren't shrugging off anything, but you're suggesting that sea sponges are not important in any way. Take a moment to think about that, again if you'd even thought about it before typing it out. Sea sponges are not important in any way. Sea sponges.

Sea sponges.

>The vast majority (and almost every one of them that can be compared to a human) work through their problems in one way or another
Okay, wait, stop. Are you honestly going to move the goalpost like this? You asked for animals that simply tolerate unfavorable conditions. This is what you asked for. Now that you have been made aware of one, you suggest it is not important at all (?).

Before I even continue this, take that in. You asked for animals that simply tolerate unfavorable conditions. You were told of one, and your response was that they aren't important in any way. What? What about animals that simply tolerate unfavorable conditions? You even state that the vast majority will work through their problems one way or another, which is of course incorrect as well, but regardless, you state that the
>vast majority
will. So there are some that do not in lieu of your own admission. Furthermore, you make the excuse that almost every one of them that can be compared to a human make up almost every one of the vast majority of animals that work through their problems one way or another. If I say frogs, what is your response? They are more like humans than sea sponges. I'm not sure what their importance has to do with the fact that they are, exactly, an animal that will simply tolerate unfavorable conditions if introduced to them.

And all of that happened right after you erroneously suggested that sea sponges are important. You made an incorrect claim while moving the goalpost in what you must've figured was your favor. That's amazing. Amazingly terrible.

Anyways, I digress on account of your incredible feats of ineptness. You did all of that, and then go on to say that people are weak for killing themselves.

Now, there's an irony in the fact that some human beings, you say, are weak. This is because some human beings kill themselves when introduced to unfavorable conditions. This would suggest that your former statement, the one that says
>a man who has found that the world has turned against him will fight back
is incorrect in at least 2 ways. So there are
>multiple
fronts on which this sweeping statement disagrees with reality. I don't know if I have to delve into that, but I have a feeling you would rather shrug this off as well.

>Never said that
>>You lose because they're almost definitely better educated than you
>Laughable
>Have you ever seen one of them argue
>implying it is laughable that they are better educated than you because you have seen one of them argue
About that.

I've had fun arguing here, but I've gotta go mow my lawn and fix some stuff up. I want to close with this: To capitulate and accept a world that wants you dead is stupid. If you continue to live with that mindset, you will only make things worse for yourself, and the people you care about.

>capitulate
>accept
>capitulate a world that wants you dead
>accept a world that wants you dead
>capitulate and accept a world that wants you dead
Which one is it? I hope you know what you just did. It was very stupid. I want you to know how stupid it was. I want you to understand that. I want it to be unavoidable. I want it in big, bold letters. So very stupid. Capitulate and then accept in that order, in the same sentence. Did you not see that?

>If you continue to live with that mindset
Are you opening up to the idea that the quality, and thus the virtue, of man need not be bound by his nature? Perhaps this was just an unconscious admission.

You go mow your lawn, underman.

Imagine not getting paid for being a niggerfaggot