Can someone explain to me why zoomer bitches are so damn fine?

Can someone explain to me why zoomer bitches are so damn fine?

Ten years ago, I went to a university known across my country for a favorable ratio of extremely attractive women to men. And yet the hottest girls from 10 years ago literally can't. hold. a. fucking. candle. to the hottest of today. I know it's not just because I'm older now; it's way easier for me to get laid now than it's ever been in my life.

So what the fuck is it? Is it clothes? The hair? The makeup? Plastic surgery? Fucking juice cleanses?

Posting pics of bad bitches until someone gives me an answer I like. Thanks in advance.

Attached: Mussolini_Ruins_Things.jpg (742x1100, 179K)

Attached: ass.jpg (751x752, 424K)

Attached: ass1.jpg (1080x1061, 606K)

Attached: ass2.jpg (750x933, 339K)

Attached: ass3.jpg (750x747, 120K)

Attached: boat.jpg (640x799, 127K)

Attached: bonnieloucoffey.jpg (640x640, 75K)

its literally just makeup and girls showing off more online

Duly noted

Attached: gg3.jpg (1920x1080, 234K)

Girls showed off plenty of facebook when that was the medium of choice.

Attached: kori.jpg (1080x722, 76K)

Ave DVCE

Attached: saluto al DVX.jpg (480x360, 13K)

Attached: DVX.jpg (783x1070, 197K)

Buon giorno tutti

Attached: Mussolini_Approves.png (505x485, 189K)

Boomer and zoomer are fucking stupid ways to describe whatever coded generational bullshit you're talking about.

Attached: 1200px-Iván_el_Terrible_y_su_hijo,_por_Iliá_Repin.jpg (1200x943, 325K)

Like wtf is this, for example?
They didn't make girls like this before.

Attached: ktl.jpg (640x795, 52K)

I totally agree. It was bait to get more replies.

Attached: mini2.jpg (1173x734, 156K)

Youre getting swayed way too much by what are obviously doctored and curated images, these days anyone can do the angles and the minor work necessary to make them look like models. past that its just clothing and how more sexually open people are that gives off that impression. I'm sure if you took women back then and made them dress and gave them the same sort of lens to stand behind they'd look exactly the same.

Jolly good show

Yeah photoshop is definitely a factor. But even in candids, I'd say the difference is still pronounced.

Attached: nina.jpg (1080x1080, 83K)

buona sera

Attached: stamma.jpg (411x225, 32K)

your most candid no makeup pics still have a small level of work done on them. id say body wise we've moved to a point where fitness has become well accepted and workouts for developing these sorts of bodies is well known as well, im sire thats a major plus people have now.

Fitness probably has a lot to do with it, Sire.
Women literally didnt do anything except 20 mins of elliptical when I was in school, and thats if they worked out at all.

Attached: nina1.jpg (1080x1080, 83K)

Attached: nina2.jpg (1080x1350, 121K)

Two reasons
1. The Internet, like information has made it much easier and accessible than ever before to look at what you really want.
2. Added hormones and antibiotic in food have made children develop faster and "better" than before.

Just look at your children if you have any. The food they're eating has a bunch of shit in it that may or may not be as great as we think it is. Only time will tell of they actually live longer, healthier lives or they begin to drop of multiple cancers in a few decades

As someone who recently started drinking milk as a workout supplement, Im inclined to agree with you on the second point.

Attached: mini3.jpg (1080x1345, 1.34M)

Mussolini isn't abad bitch.

Shut the fuck up, nerd.

Attached: mini.jpg (750x1051, 72K)

Attached: mini4.jpg (1080x718, 86K)