Someone please tell me the difference in the shooters in a mass shooting vs the doctors in an abortion clinic...

you're quite literally taking away someone's shot at life
they could've been born as an insect or a fish, but they got the lucky draw and became a human
but no, some faggot had to take away that and send him straight into non existence
even a minute in the real world only to be killed would be better than that
it would be a shitty, short life

take all your past life experiences, all the people you've loved, all the events you've seen in the world, everything
then just forget about all of it, and die, all you knew in life was just sitting in a stomach for days on end, then life just said "nah fuck off, you were a mistake"

You take away someone's "shot at a life" every time you jerk off. Or every time you go a day without successfully impregnating a woman. Every time you use birth control. All that shit.

If you eat beef you're contributing to the death of something with more sentience than a fetus.

Stop being such an emotional twat and think rationally.

>they could've been born as an insect or a fish, but they got the lucky draw and became a human

Humans can't procreate with fish and insects wtf are you saying

Attached: 1548763352348.jpg (1024x810, 56K)

1) No human being has a right to use another’s organs. If I’m dying of kidney failure, I can’t force you to give me one of your kidneys, even if it will save my life. That’s because you have control over your body. I can’t even force my own MOTHER to give me one of her kidneys. If I had a sketchy surgeon knock you out and attach my blood vessels into your kidneys, you would be within your right to cut me off, even if it meant I would die.

So why does a fetus have a right to use the mother’s organs to stay alive? Why does an incomplete human being have more of a right to another’s organs than a living person?

2) In regular people, doctors do not use heart beat to determine life or death status - you use brain function. Dead heart + living brain = do aggressive CPR. Dead brain + living heart = dead patient, harvest organs for transplant. There is still cellular life, but the brain is what we consider valuable human life.

This is why a fetus is not considered the same as a human. It does not have a developed central nervous system. It has cellular life, but until week 20-26 or so, it’s brain is too underdeveloped.

This is why the vast majority of doctors (people who know far more about human life than you) consider the 20 week cutoff as the ethical time to obtain an abortion.

He's retarded. I mean, not in that particular way, but yeah, he's a fucking retard.

"They could have been an insect or a fish". Or they could have ended up dumb as a fuck'n hammer like OP, in which case they should be grateful they were aborted.

I believe he is referring to the 'spirit'
so he must think your soul flocks from body to body and it's luck of the draw on what body you get be it human or animal.

is there a difference between denying something becoming, in all likelihood, a breathing, living human being with brain function and everything, and someone that has death of the brain and will never "function" again?

>People trying to have meaningful conversation on Yea Forums
pic related

Attached: cvbbmwwe4rzz.png (403x448, 53K)

No, there is no difference. “Denying the opportunity to become life” is an a meaningless appeal to emotion.

Assuming that the 'human life' value is the same in both, there's an insanely large amount already spent resources on the mass shooting victims, adult pontential, especially in young adults, is therefore 'more cultivated', and thus more valuable.

This makes murdering an adult worse than murdering a fetus.

"in all likelihood".

there's this dumb bitch i know and once, she whined through facebook messaging that "she didn't want to live this life anymore" and i shut her up by suggesting that if she could have a new "life", the chances that it would end up remotely as good as the one she had were pretty bad.

a lot of people fantasize about "reliving their life" or going back to a particular point and trying again from there, but they don't consider how much it could possibly go bad from that point and if it was just some random new life, it would most likely fucking suck and be horrible. forget hindu reincarnation, just random human. even random WHITE human in a DEVELOPED nation... it would PROBABLY fucking SUCK.

youtube.com/watch?v=x7UZl3sh9eo

The way I gotta was a day that was the last week I was going on the day and then my friend got to get it up

The victims of shooters are the ones being violated, while the fetuses are the ones doing the violating.

the majority of the aborted babies were future criminals and or future shooters themselves

You can terminate the fetus up to the point where it can survive outside the womb, at which point you can still have it removed, just not killed.