Explain why you believe any regular citizen should be allowed to own a weapon meant for war that could be used in the next mass shooting / terrorist attack
Explain why you believe any regular citizen should be allowed to own a weapon meant for war that could be used in the...
because freedom, and the fact that the military will hurt it's own civilians, i need protection.
Something something protect ourselves from a tyrannical state
No further explanation needed. Gun-tards love corruption from a private organisation interfering in politics and love to see school children shot every single day of the year.
Because we are at War! America is a nation of War. We go to War with anything and everyone for everything. Every American citizen is an expert at War by the age 10. Its what makes America the greatest nation in the world our force our strength.
The NRA is a terrorist organisation. Far from 'protecting' americans they are happy to make money from the murder of schoolchildren.
2nd Amendment. No further explanation needed.
they need effective tax units
tyranny only works in fucktards gene cesspools like the middle east
Republi-tards think like this
Because OP is a faggot
this is OP
to thin out incapable, prey-like faggots like you that we shouldn't have to share resources with
Oh for christ sake, will you SHUT THE FUCK UP..
.......and everybody loves to watch it.
Regular citizens don't use their guns for mass shootings or terrorists attacks. If you take away anything that has been misused by bad people you can't have planes, cars, trucks, gasoline, anything pointy, tools, electricity, rope, wire, swimming pools,or plastic bags. To name just a few things.
Regular citizens are not currently allowed to own weapons meant for war (without special licensing which is really difficult to obtain).
Did Australia have the equivalent of a 2nd Amendment? No.
jimmies rustled, amigo?
Fuck you, that's why.
the biggest joke... 2nd ammendment is the reason innocent people are dying.. because everyone, even psychopaths have the right to own a gun.
The right to bear arms is not so much to protect yourself from other citizens. Its meant to offer a balance so that we can rise up if needed. Otherwise we are just slaves in a tyrannical government hand
The military is made of its own civilians. Your argument is dumb and you should feel bad for thinking it wasn't.
>"designed for war"
>literally just designed to throw the little metal thing harder
So of I put a wood stock and take off the pistol grip you'll stopp pissing yourself?
Wrong.
>Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(d), it is unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person “has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution.”
Fucktard gene cesspool sounds like most of America to me
If you honestly think gun control works then go walk around the streets of Britain late at night by yourself, enjoy getting stabbed nigger
fuck you, they will absolutely kill fellow civilians if ordered to by a tyrannical government
They aren't. Weapons made for war have something called a Selector Switch that allows FULL AUTOMATIC fire. The weapons you are talking about are Semi-Automatic, and ARE NOT MEANT FOR WAR
which weapons are not meant for war?
Then you shoul probably go out and get one then. You know, before you get shot. What a tragedy THAT would be, amirite?
but you could go to war even with a revolver.. or a semi automatic.. who says you only are allowed full automatics in a war?
So move to Fag Australia
DumbFuck, before this event, the military weren't allowed to carry their guns in the USA. Now they are, so this won't happen again.
because it's in our basic rights as an american citizen
because it's fun as fuck to own and use
because hunting for sport is actually a thing real men do in their spare time
I could go to war with a pen knife too asshole. But that and semi-automatics weren't designed for war
The US might not have a huge problem with shootings if they started to follow their own laws. The taco shooter got caught in high school with a list of students he wanted to kill. He legally wasnt allowed to have a gun (but they sold him one). The dayton shooter was a leftist extremist who supported antifa, bernie, warren.
>doesn't understand how hated this man is among gun owners
cnn taught confirmed
Because owning guns and being able to rise up against a tyrannical government is what the country is founded on, but people should have to pass a safety test and have a license for ownership and purchase including passing a background check. No reason you cannot enforce better policy while keeping guns. Canada has as many if not more guns than USA but better policy.
this is the most ignorant post i've read in long while. please use your brain more often.
Even though mostly semi-auto is used at war, to conserve ammunition, and that almost every weapon used in a mass shooting is a semi-automatic weapon, that is, by your standards, not made for war.
People will always find ways to kill each other, and if they can't shoot people, they'll just rent trucks and run them over like in Europe.
Here's you,
Still not getting it.
2nd Amendment isn't some "law," mehoff.
It's a Constitutional Amendment.
Think of it as a "Super Law."
Know the difference.
Military uses full autos with burst capabilities. G18 handguns and similar ones.. What average citizens are you talking about cause last I checked you need a bunch of permits for that shit.
!Yea Forums
>Think of it as a "Super Law."
So i guess you are in the "Super Militia" ?
Because it's my God damn right and if you think otherwise then do something about it other than bitch and moan
>military is made of its own civilians
>military
>civilian
>military is civilian
>civilian: a person not in the armed services or the police force.
Your an retart an faggit.
>The right to bear arms is not so much to protect yourself from other citizens. Its meant to offer a balance so that we can rise up if needed.
It's both, the SCOTUS has clarified this repeatedly. As far as defense from individuals, there are feasible limitations to the weapons that are allowable. But for defense against a tyrannical govt, there are no real limitations. Other than the fact that a population with any reasonable armament can hold back the US military indefinitely, barring the use of WMDs.
>muh freedoms
Explain to me why I should take these fake identical tube people seriously? Just ban guns, you're gonna do it anyway, you're cheating and have all the power through your shadow government. Just do it. What are you so scared of? :)
weak and predictable
Its pretty fucking simple tbh. Every swinging dick for 500 years has all he wants.
No u just gonna say nah. Nevermind give em back so we can rule you like china.
Kek
Come fucking take it
that strawman reply
LMAO... Shut the fuck up. Shall not be infringed, Faggot.
weak and predictable
this retarded
this retarded
all the while jailing an innocent retarded man
>Soviet Union
>Nazi Germany
>China
>Cambodia
These cou tries used their military to suppress and murder civilians. You're fucking retarded.
that strawman reply
weak and predictable
Because you dick juice snorting fuck, those are freedoms. Also, if you knew any remote thing about guns, your cum guzzling dumbass would know that’s not a weapon of war.
Canadafag here.
I think theres just something wrong with you americans.
I own a bunch of guns (legally). I even legally own a hand gun.
We dont have weekly shoppiny mall/school shootings (just your regular big city gang violence lol) You guys are just fucked.
Because weapons legally owned are semi auto, handicapped as it is. Sure they got helicopters, m4s and tanks but we have ranks!!! Ask how guerilla warfare worked against the greatest milataru force the world has ever known. Wars are won by force of violence and conviction. They need to be aware we won't roll over, we will fight if we have to. These glory pussies make all gun owners look bad . They bought they legally and used the one thing that a law can't fix, matters of the soul.
that strawman argument
weak and predictable
that strawman reply
weak and predictable
sure kid
Self defense, property defense, defense against tyranny, it is a property right, defending your family, training for defense in a militia.
Where did you get the authority to dictate other people's property and decide what a " good " reason is ?
explain to me why legal citizens of a nation shouldn't be entitled to the same weaponry used by the military and police, how do you expect us to fend off a Pol Pot-esque genocide without equal weaponry and yes i mean everything from pistols to tanks, jets, nukes and navy vessels, i think if you can afford it then you should be allowed to own it.
The AR-15 was a civilian weapon before a military weapon. How's dick taste?
Nobody has to explain shit. Go fuck yourself.
Why don't they just make psych tests for gun licenses mandatory so anyone who likes guns and is normal is unaffected and most sick fuckers are filtered out?
welp looks like that's going back into my wordfilters, it was a nice run not having to filter faggots
Here in canada i can go to the hardware store and buy a semi auto 30-06.
Shall Not Be Infringed.
uhh... neat?
More powerful than an ar-15. Oh and we dont shoot up schools and malls weekly. Something wrong with america
afraid of words
lmao
weak and predictable
You're right. Americans are
weak and predictable
Yeah i know. But hey, you guys are our brothers to the south. We hate seeing it happen
no, fuck off
Unfortunately for Americans the mass shootings will never end, gun crime will continue to worsen.
There are too many guns in the system and too many idiots to use them. The time that you could have put a stop to this came and went a long time ago all because some believe it is a ‘right’.
Well things fucking change America. You can’t complain about mass killings, and send ‘thoughts and prayers’ and cry for your dying children when you will do absolutely nothing about it.
How dumb does a person have to be to even say that it’s ‘nothing to do with gun laws’ no of course not it’s the people isn’t it..... The people with the fucking GUNS!!
Your bed has unfortunately been made, so just lay in it.
not afraid of words, it just gets tiresome to come back with someone wanting to contribute nothing but the same 3 lines
>sure kid
>stay mad kid
>weak and predictable
>a weapon meant for war
false premise
stopped reading
he keeps replying
how pathetic are canadians?
sure kid
stay retarded the dems need you
oh look another one who wants to suck my cock
Weapons are meant to fight an oppressive government or invading force, just like how the founding fathers did.
Nearly 2 million people are protected from attacks and death due to gun ownership. Even if twice the number of people die in twice the number of mass shootings, it's not worth the losses from an oppressive Socialist force...a political alignment littered with countless death already.
More guns equals less crime, because it strikes fear in the cold black hearts of those willing to commit crime in the first place.
And you keep denying, how dumb are americans? Oh wait, regular weekly meaningless shootings. Enough said
Also: Is there a reason why on Chrome when I tried to post this I got an error message stating "Connection Error," yet through a different browser I was able to post this no problem?
posting seemed down site wide there for a couple minutes
I agree. It has to do with social norms and mental instability. The gun is merely a means to an end.
And no. Less guns don't mean there'll be less people killed. Never underestimate the ruthless capacity of a psychopath on a mission.
another reply
I think it wants to suck my cock
That is were my money go #liberalismismentaldisorder
the AR 15 has been available since 1965 to the public.
these shootings are recent developments.
hmmm...
whats changed?
In denial and he wants his dick sucked by a dude. You're farther gone than i thought.
Please dont shoot me
you must be some kind of stupid ..... at that time no one was carry on base
this shit happens 200+ times a year faggot. its NORMAL now. Fuck off.
>I think theres just something wrong with you americans.
Yeah, a specific subset of Americans, who have shit cultural values that glorify violence. The majority of us are not like this at all. Take these shit-tier people, put them anywhere in the world, and watch the violent crime rate skyrocket.
barely entertaining
it must suck to be canadian.
I mean LARPing as a canadian would be pathetic.
btw prove that I live in america.
if you don't mind
that you on the left ?
Hypothesis based on nothing:
- Kids and young adults feel misplaced and not belonging. This is due to a few things, like not having a proper parental figure who'll teach the child healthier ways to vent their anger, or a positive self outlook on their life and the lives of others.
- Prescription medications are often used to address a deeper underlying problem. Now a big problem is brought to a fever head.
- A media destined to justify its existence (when it's totally useless now) fuel anger and hate in the most irresponsible ways, creating extremists who believe a war is underway. They further glamorize these monsters by giving them a soap box and making them feel like something with actual worth. This is happening on both sides, but most apparent in Left-wing mainstream media who as of late are openly calling for violence against white men.
- Less guns accessible in locations where attacks are happening. The sad truth is if more people looking to protect others had guns, the kill count would never enter double digits, and arguably attacks wouldn't happen since the attackers would fear being put down before they can make their statement.
I dont need to, its obvious
"weapon meant for war" ? Yeah I've pretty much given up on getting a 9K33 Osa mobile AA to convert into a bitchin' amphibious RV w/ a roof fishing platform kinda like a pontoon boat.
They're really just no way to get these.