What if americans don't want to ban guns because they want to kill eachother till there is no one left.
When everyone is dead by logic there can't be any more mass shootings
What if americans don't want to ban guns because they want to kill eachother till there is no one left.
When everyone is dead by logic there can't be any more mass shootings
We don't want to ban guns because otherwise we'd end up as bad as the EU. Where mean words, wrong think, and misgendering someone lands you in prison. We have our own problems sure, but not like that.
Also SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
you mean with no crime
No, Americans simply fetishize guns to such an extent and have such a deep distrust for government that they feel it necessary to arm themselves against "government tyranny" (yes, some people actually think this!)
In reality, it's the corporations that have corrupted the government and are pushing for their own dominance of the tax farm.
>No crime
Oh you. That's hilarious. Unless you're lucky to live in one if the few EU countries with a tiny migrant population, there's plenty of violent crime all around you. Gun crime may be down, but it still exists on a smaller level in most EU countries. But overall violent crime is as high as ever. To think otherwise would make you a fool.
You're not wrong about the companies. But government tyranny is a very real threat. Look at Venezuela. Capitalist to communist in sub 30 years where the military is running people over in riot vehicles
You should also read up on the 2nd amendment and it's reason for being there. It was there exclusively for fighting off a would be tyrannical government. Something the colonials had just done against England.
Unless you're Switzerland. Which last I heard they're still trucking along.
banning guns is a shitty knee-jerk reaction solution to faggots that hate seeing people they get pissed at literally die. It's a total hypocritical move on their end.
Because banning alcohol worked so well, right? what makes people believe that the same on firearms will yield better results?
Sorry, Elizabeth, Stacy, Bethany, and the rest of you soccer moms, I'm still hanging on to mine, that I legally went through due process and purchased with my own hard earned money. Your feelings aren't worth jack shit to me.
In reality, I bought mine incase I have to deal with niggers who pull this shit. The chance of that literally occurring to me in person is slim, but it's still a chance.
>You don't need written permission to defend yourself
>But government tyranny is a very real threat
It's a stretch for me to actually believe that but just for arguments sake, let's say it's true. The fact is that having guns is not going to do anything to stop a government like the US from carrying out whatever they want. 99% of these armchair-rebels would roll over immediately if the government even hinted at a threat. And the rest wouldn't have a chance at any sort of defense.
All that "tyranny talk" does is encourage nutjobs to collect guns and go on shooting sprees every once in awhile.
Besides, they've already got control so there will be no need for actual army-boots-kicking-down-doors tyranny.
Funnily enough, that's the exact argument the English had. "British power is absolute, throw down your guns and do as you're told." Look how well that worked out for them. I won't argue hypotheticals here with you, but every single nation that has willingly given up it's arms have eventually come to regret it.
I swear to god I saw this guy yesterday in Georgetown Texas.
>Fat on a scooter in flip-flops and O2 bottle.
>MAGA hat but no machine gun.
>Infowar and NRA stickers on scooter flying POW/MIA flag.
>Eating whataburger
These fucking people are not a cartoon - they are real and they vote.