Thank god there is no gun control in Texas. That way everyone stays save

Look at this idiot blatantly lying.

> I object that you clearly want my expensive hobby regulated.

Actually, I work as a specialist arms seller, and the US is my most profitable market. . Doesnt change the fact that every time some fucktard starts shooting up a place, if they're dark-skinned they become a "terrorist", if they're white, they're "mentally ill"

Republicans have to lie. It's the only way they "win."

>HURR DURR FACTS ARE RACIST

this isn't even debatable city like oakland and detriot have dozens of shootings day

yeah but 99% of the time the blacks are shooting other blacks.

it's utter racism

>facts
>stormfront propaganda
pick one

yea he made all these guys up

Attached: gun.png (538x747, 674K)

>Ah shit, here we go again.

Attached: 1564859444386.jpg (1242x1209, 156K)

Wouldn't it then make sense to enact a total gun ban to keep firearms out of the hands of blacks?

Attached: gun 2.jpg (777x382, 75K)

>guns=cars
nope

the FBI is stormfront?

What's really interesting is how the majority of shootings are usually located within large dense populated cities. Wonder what the common denominator here is?

what is it this time?
>rage-filled virgin
>nigger-hater
>anti-zog-nutcase
>shadalay rebel
>angry fanboy

It's fun watching you stormfags pretend you've never had this discussion before.

Is this a map of where your relatives live or something?

>my opinion is better than yours and I won't listen to you until you say about my opinion, not yours.
nope

no wait niggers have to be the scapegoat
along with mexicans
mommy

strawman harder faggot

but enough about Yea Forums

badoom

Probably because mass shooting usually happen in cities, which are usually blue. So someone decided to make that connection and a bunch of gun nuts took that to mean liberals are all mass shooters. Don't pretty much all the shooters end up being hard core conservatives though?

way to avoid presented facts

ok fine
guns should be treated like cars

that means you agree you need gun insurance if you're going to operate a firearm

hasn't anyone told you? facts are taboo these days.

>strawman
I see you don't know what that is stormfag

>Don't pretty much all the shooters end up being hard core conservatives though?
no this is not the case
with a few exceptions almost all of them are hard core left

facts don't matter to rwnj's
they "win" though lies and intimidation

already have one, and it's designed to prevent whiny gun grabbers that believe no one has a right to their own property from stealing my shit.

Attached: 315134.jpg (640x362, 21K)

clearly i do cause you are straw manning again

2020 here comes Donny part 2

>he strawmans his argument against his original strawman

You don't like tiny hands?

Attached: 160303_pol_trumphandcolor.jpg.crop.promo-xlarge2.jpg_1718483346.jpg (600x340, 25K)

>all of them are hard core left
source: my hard core left nut

Just because Trump gets away with writing blatant lies every few hours doesn't mean you will.

its funny
this whole threat is looking at this guy as the retard smearing shit on the walls
and he thinks he is doing Einstein calculations

Using the logic in this postyou should have to have at least basic liability insurance to operate a firearm.
If you don't believe that, then call that post out as bullshit.
It's one or the other. You brandishing a weapon is not "insurance."

evidence has been posted
both images of a lot of the shoots as well as a fbi map of location

but yea keep saying its a lie with no evidence

noooo you weren't supposed to bring that up

>evidence of what?
That Your President subscribes to stormfag propaganda like you? We knew that.

here why that doesnt work

there no NO law stopping me from buying a car
i dont need insurance to own a car
i dont need it to even drive it
i only need it if i want to take the car in to the public street

so yea....its pretty much exactly like guns are now

Do you have a source I could look at that demonstrates that?

"no way to prevent this"

(continues to be an asshole to others)

Maybe if people treated each other better, this wouldn't happen? Not saying people who do this aren't messed up people, but I'm sure it stems from being treated poorly by others at some or all points of their lives, if not then why target other people? Maybe this is all just karma

"Strawmanning" means I am ascribing positions that aren't there.
You clearly got your "information" off stormfront or some other right-wing forum, because it's a typical white nationalist talking point. If I am categorizing you in error, then stop repeating their propaganda.

Attached: 36qoy53.jpg (500x500, 57K)

you ultimately can't stop stupid user
that's why it's so tragic

wow ......do you think these are arguments?
>BUT BUT TRUMP UH UH BUT STORM FROMT HURR DURR I GOT HIM BOYZ

what state do you live in where you don't need insurance to drive a car user?

>implying gun owners are dumb enough to brandish a weapon
>brandish
Well by that logic, I would be cited and charged for brandishing my automobile on a daily basis.

Attached: 1234534521435.jpg (625x351, 45K)

except i posted a map from the fucking FBI and you just ignored it

so you know my source isn't stormfront
you are just a lying fuck

It's fun watching you racists deny who and what you are when cornered, absolutely. That's why I keep coming here.

Attached: 2019-269.jpg (516x500, 112K)

>enter uninsured vehicle
>it wont start
Well shit

You are virtually brandishing your weapons in these threads, user, any time someone suggests tightening gun restriction. And then you threaten "civil war" like a spoiled kid who got told "no."

>i forgot to replace my strawman with a 12V car battery
Well fuck.

White people are the least racist contemporary demographic on Earth

no state requires a car to drive
you only need it if you take the car on the street

an example
the company i work for buys vans with no license or even registration to transport between the building on the compony lot

this i completely legal

You're a racist, user. You use racist talking points because you don't believe blacks should be treated as equals to whites. Just. Admit it.
It's Yea Forums. It's OK.

Can we ban smartphones too? Texting while driving is responsible for a large number of fatalities on the road.

Attached: image.jpg (1500x2000, 1.02M)

>virtually brandishing
>in these threads
>on a shitposting board
oh dear, what do we do!

and what exactly does insurance do? nothing. totally fucking nothing.

Where did he say anything about a civil war? If you're going to have arguments jn your own head you don't have to bother coming on Yea Forums

You sound like you're from some retarded Southern state, but you're probably one county over.

Pardon..?

>what does insurance do?
helps politicians compensate and cope for their incompetent ability to balance a budget.

They might be but you're not. You're obsessed with the concept of social diversity.

Hmmm

Attached: puzzle-thumb.jpeg.jpg (640x360, 53K)

no just ban all motor vehicles. i want to live in a safe world. no fun allowed

If you are going to use the argument that guns are comparable to cars, then you are arguing for gun insurance.
Do you really want to go there?

Again... pardon? Is this really the best leftys can come up with?
Nigger, I'm Canadian.

So you believe that firearm use should be restricted to certain areas?

Usually a common reason why cars don't start: Battery is either dead and needs to be recharged, or the cells are no good and needs to be replaced. Second in line is a crappy alternator or a bum starter motor.

>I'm Canadian
that's even worse.

I'm a centrist and that was my first post in this thread.. you know what they say about assuming, right kid?

Sell the gun. Or take it to a police station so it can be properly disposed of.
Hey you asked.

>Another nazi terrorist
For fuck's sake people

you can tell this is one of those people
who spends his days condescending to black people as if there children who need protection

FBI information was posted

and you simple ignore it meaning there no point in continuing

you will call anything you dont like a "racist talking point" no mater how true it is

because you think everything is a attack on black people and you haft to run to there rescue

simple put you think whites are superior and you must protect the lesser races

YOU ARE A DISCUSSING RACIST

what are per capital racial statistics?

>do you really want to go there?
Gun insurance? I mean, sure?

It's where you BTFO gun nuts always go eventually
durr liberals can't stop us their pussies who don't shoot guns
CIVIL WAR MAW CRANK UP THE CHARLIE DANIELS

Hey thats what ronald reagan did!

>Nigger, I'm Canadian.
Oh good. You can't shoot guns anyway.
Nevermind.

My bad. So you agree that full social diversity is the key to our country being on top?

Radicals on both sides are doing it. Your viewpoint is not bolstered by the same thing being done by both.

I enjoy a higher standard of living than you.

not argueing for anything
simple saying just like cars you cant take your gun out in public with special permission

so there is a fair comparison to cars

Attached: A6085C61-0AEF-45BC-8444-5AADF647CB86.jpg (733x705, 68K)

Yawn

>cherrypicked FBI information was posted
>at stormfag.com

go on

You are pants-on-head fucking autistic.

We don't even have to register our rifles, haha. You're cute though.

OK. Gun insurance. Required to operate a firearm. I agree. It's a good idea.
I just don't think your ammosexual buddies are going to sign on.

Diversity is an irrelevant buzzword. If it gets results, sure.

because only cowards carry, right?
Yeah no, that's not how it works around here, skippy.

>durr both sides durr
You really can't take responsibility for what YOUR side is doing, can you?

>Turns out of a baby grows up with a gun in the house he won’t immediately start murdering people
Wow what a stunning conclusion

>higher standard
well, prepare to be disappointed more often because you set your own bar too high to live.

Do you even know what insurance is?

When I see you shouting down the "civil war" types in these threads, I'll believe you're sincere. Otherwise, it's obvious you're an enabler.

Firearms are illegal in Canada. You're breaking the law.

:0
Wow that was fucking brutal!

>Diversity is an irrelevant buzz
So you really aren't in favor of it.

POINT AND MATCH FAGGOT

i even called what you would do and you did it

holy shit you are to easy to predict

how does it feel to know you have posted so many times and presented NOTHING

in fact to anyone reading this its clear storefront is a white supremacist site

im willing to bet if they checked they dont even post anything about guns

so its you made that up to

no you lied about it being a stormfront talking point to accuse anyone you disagree with as being a racist

because you are a white supremacist who feels guilty about feeling "better" than other races

>Elliot Rodger

He's white.

Also 20 victims? what lol
he had 6 victims and one of them was stabbed.

Gun nuts have a certain cowardice about them, yes. Good point.

>plebbit spacing
Argument now invalid.

so?

Using the argument in this postyou would have to carry basic liability
insurance to operate a firearm. Do you want that? Yes. Or no.

Yeah well, Timothy McVeigh didn't need a gun to trash an entire building and take out a few dozen people with him. Please tell me more about how guns are big n bad?

you literally think there's no use for a gun other than mass shootings

maybe that's the problem with you

No, they're not. I own a couple.
Give me your definition of diversity user

Do we have the right to defend ourselves?

If the answer is yes then you have a right to bear arms. If the answer is no, we are not citizens we are subjects.

It's really that simple.

user your post is a red flag.
Just admit you're a racist and move on. You don't want whites to be the kind of criminals you imagine blacks to be. That's why you're deflecting like this, using know white nationalist talking points.
Your ass ain't talking its way out of this.

people have been spacing like that before reddit existed. please leave with your fucking boogeyman bullshit, it's not an argument

>i got caught in a lie and he knows im a white supremacist

we all hear you loud and clear

We're not talking about explosives user.

There isn't. Gun culture overhypes the "need" for a weapon, and we're fucking sick of paying the price just for your stupid fetish, ok?

>liability insurance
The Law? Your retarded idea would only apply if people were shooting past each other's guns and damaging each other's guns to the point where a mediator needs to settle financial conflicts. What ththe fuck are YOU on about?

fun fact the worlds oldest and most famous gun store in is London

guns are not even illegal in the UK

user, it's pretty obvious you don't support full social diversity, so no. Non-whites trigger you.

Then you should be reported to the RCMP.

>your retarded idea
you mean this poster'sis that you?
lol?

The argument in 's post is saying that gun control measures are flawed and ineffective, and they only go after law abiding folks who are not inclined nor determined to commit crimes that may or may not involve taking other people's lives. While at the same time, those who are inclined and determined to carry out such acts, won't give a shit about gun control measures and other laws to do whatever it is they want to do.

"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

all 3rd world shit holes literally no comparison

You can buy a gun that doesn't work. Big deal.

I'm not the same user that you're under the impression you're replying to.
>It's that easy!

actually, there is gun control in texas. in order to carry a handgun concealed or openly, a license is needed. long guns can be carried openly without a license, but that doesn't mean you won't get fucked with by police.

there has been no deflecting
FBI information was posted
>HURR DURR I DONT LIKE IT SO ITS RACIST
ignoring this started with you accusing a whole race of being a problem

so just because america doesn't have drug cartels, we don't have to do anything about the problem of gun ownership contributing to homicide rates?

Are you going to address the content, dipshit? i have no idea what this little post was meant to convey

No user. The argument in is a flawed comparison.
If you care to use that flawed comparison anyway, then you need to accept that the restrictions to using a car would apply to guns.

not the same guy but i am a gun owner, and i have a CHL, and yes, i think some form of insurance should be lawfully required.

There are more guns in private citizens hands in the us, that if they said tomorrow 'guns are banned, turn them in' youd still only end up with law abiding citizens turning them in, and criminals whos whole endgame is to do harm would still be armed, and deadly. Its a nice dream, but it just doesnt work in reality.

the only solution is to find a way to more accurately assess a persons mental wellbeing before allowing the purchase of guns. private sellers should also be REQUIRED to provide proof that they did the proper bg check on the buyer, because a shocking amount of private sales are not checked, i was at a gun show literally 2 hours ago and half the booths there did no form of verification. cash for gun. this wasnt just handguns, and old rifles, there were 1500$ AR-15s with high end optics and shit being sold with absolutely no check. Guns being in the hands of the people is not the issue. the ease of aquiring them for people unfit to hold them is the issue.

Thomas Jefferson never experienced mass shootings, user.

wtf makes you think it doesn't work?

Dont use that disgusting term,refer to them as niggers.

He killed 6 and injured 13 or 14 I believe? They use injured in their victim counts because they were a victim of the attack, you can be a victim and still be alive.

I pointed out your "argument" is a known white nationalist talking point and I don't even see you denying this.

Or you know, just ignore every single thing in my post and backtrack towards cars and guns = comparing oranges and apples. Jesus fucking christ.

I don't have to. You can't even accept the comparison is valid yourself, as you balk at the idea of gun insurance.

Why do Amricans shoot each other and not, as required in the 2nd ammendment, this Russian traitor who ruins the country?

Please take Chris Domer off that list. He was a hero.

It doesn't take a crisis actor (aka victim) to figure out how control measures are inadequate and only do more harm than good.

Thank you. Very reasonable.

mate you're replying to a post about gun ownership in canada, can you calm down long enough to make a point?
relax, the election is still over a year away

It's already against the law to be on your phone while you're driving, but the law is not enforced enough.

Cops would profile at least 6 of them as white.

Because firing a weapon is illegal in the UK. Even the police can't.

You shouldn't have made such a comparison if you weren't willing to accept the responsibility of the consequences user.

While on the subject of driving, can we also ban people who drive slow on the passing lane?

you support infringement of the constitution. good to know.

>a crisis actor
which says a lot about your fantasy world take on all this lol

Define diversity and we will talk. If you're honestly unable to do that, thats bot my problem.
My local RCMP detachment number is 1 2504924300. Feel free to phone them up for any clarification you might need as a recipient of American education.

>I pointed out your "argument" is a known white nationalist talking point

this is a lie plan and simple

no one think this
only you do because you are admitting to browsing storefront and other white supremacist sites

you are accusing other to deflect that you just spent the last half hour telling everyone what YOU see these sites proving my point

you are a white supremacist that feels guilty

that doesnt really change the point of the quote. removing the guns still only disarms those who have no desire to do harm while making the act of violence risk free for those who do.

Yes just create a power vaccuum during arguably the most volatile period in US politics, real smart.

Still doesn't excuse your backpedaling because you wanted to prove a retarded argument and feel you want to win

Next time mark your posts with a yellow star. I could give fuck all what some conservative canadian says about this country.

Who determines what qualifies as 'unfit' user?

do you think car insurance mostly pays for damage to cars, instead of hospital bills and injury lawsuits?

>fantasy world
whatever you say.

there is no part of the constitution that states crazy people should be allowed to carry a gun, or that you should not be held responsible for killing someone.

>Define diversity
You know what it is. It's looking like you don't want all people of color in positions of power in society. Just admit it, that's fine.

holy shit this is stupid
we have hunting lodges in the uk you dipshit

and no we dont leave the country to do it the forests of the kingdom are rich with game

I will. You're going to have to spend a night in jail with a moose.

and there is no part of the constitution that says "x shall be infringed whenever it becomes too scary to handle in life"

Attached: 123523423.jpg (750x500, 63K)

>massive deflection
>projection

Blacks are equal to whites in all ways, both physically and mentally.

Like i said, if diversity gets positive results, that's all that matters. If it doesn't I'm not interested. So with that in mind, what exactly is your idea of "diversity"?
I prefer diversity based on merit.

canadian liberals aren't afraid to admit that canadians need guns for wildlife control

Seriously, the UK's gun laws are already fairly restrictive without the need exaggerate it.

Are you really that dumb and don't know that every single established government system has plans for what happens if smth to the leader happens? There won't be a "power vaccuum". Lol, someone vacuumed your brain.

You need insurance to drive a car sober.

At least I'll be able to take it down with my unregistered 100% legal rifle

I am winning. You're going to have to have some kind of gun insurance if you want to fire a weapon. You gave us the idea, we're going to push for it.

Threads like these and similar argument threads makes me question the first amendment and freedom of opinions

Attached: 6pYbKZk.jpg (1338x2000, 489K)

strawman. :)

i know people who have literally been interred in mental hospitals for violent acts who later PASSED background checks for guns(if you have ever bought one, they ask directly if you have, if you answer yes, its an automatic rejection)

Persons who are not of sound judgement should not carry.
persons who are prone to fits of rage, should not carry.

>liberals hire people to be mass shooting victims
yep fantasyworld

nice try but you just spent half an hour telling everyone what is on stormfront

we KNOW you are a racist

Just because the vaccuum exists for a split second doesn't mean it doesn't exist at all. My point is that no matter how much you hate Trump, you'll have to contend with whoever is next in line. Quite frankly, I don't want Pence to be President.

why is "something" the only word you abbreviated?

and who the fuck has ever abbreviated "something" as smth?

also, why is captcha asking me to identify stairs in pictures now? are we training walking robots now?

99.1% of Shootings are justified.

Because faggots

are you even aware where you are right now? you appear to be deeply confused. I never said anything about taking guns away or anything being 'scary'. i carry myself, because i was nearly a victim of a mass shooting. That still doesnt mean just anyone is fit to carry.

Nobody can just walk into a gun store, buy a gun and then go shoot someone with it.
That's what your post sounded like user. We weren't talking about game or "hunting lodges" (christ that sounds gay af)

Pence is weak and will be replaced by someone pretty soon.

Guess what, you suggesting we should have gun insurance doesn't equal to "Illegal to operate a firearm without insurance"
>hurr but i'm winning cause i'm that speshul
Thank the fuck goodness you're not in position of authority or power to suggest these abysmal proposals.

Attached: o3WhIgc.jpg (500x179, 15K)

>if diversity gets positive results,
It does user.

I don't understand how gun insurance would work differently than criminal liability. Please explain.

That's going too far user.

The government shouldn't have the right to take away my phone.

Don't tread on me...

>I prefer diversity based on merit.
And yet here we are in a society that is mostly white. It's not based on "merit," is it?

There is no "try."
You are a white nationalist.

Wow golly gee Bill it's almost like more crime happens where there are
>MORE PEOPLe

Attached: 1533449790213.png (640x400, 8K)

Liberals: "look at the gun situation in any other country, like canada! why can't we have that?!"
Liberals when they hear canadian liberals supporting gun ownership: "fuck off canada"

see also: healthcare, policing, electoral system, trade, finance, economy, employment, racism, sexism

If you are comparing guns to cars, then you cannot leave out the restrictions that go into operating a vehicle, user. You dun goofed.

If you had a handgun on you, and you shot a man who was threatening your life, he dies.

even if you are found to be absolutely, unwaveringly innocent of any crime, you are still on the hook for 60k+ in legal fees, not counting time missed from work, etc. the insurance is for you, not them. theres actually places that offer something akin to it, for a monthly fee they have lawyers that only do self defense cases that will represent you for free. i believe every gun owner should be enrolled in such a thing.

>Thank the fuck goodness you're not in position of authority
I don't have to be. I vote for those who share my worldview, and they're being elected, and winning for me.

So what is your definition of diversity? I want to keep these positive results. What is diversity to you?

There's a difference between someone being interred into a mental hospital and being deemed unfit to own one without being put into a mental hospital. The latter is what I'm worried about, because the government will be the one determining who qualifies as unfit, not medical professionals.

>says no one can buy guns
>point our you can in fact buy guns
>massive straw man

nice one dumbass

who wudda thunk. but no one seems to accept that as a valid reason. Oh well.

people. it's hard to have a shooting without a person holding the gun.

Which society would that be? I'd love to move there.

Dollar amounts. You could choose basic liability limits that pay for medical care or for if you get sued.

It's completely based on merit. Which is why rich white people treat poor white people like shit

this is why i said earlier, a better way to find out needs to be had, because right now, theres literally nothing but a 15 dollar fee and a 15 minute wait keeping ANYONE without a felony from owning one

go back to stormfront fag we are tired of hearing about your favorite site

You shouldn't have a gun though. You're like a Canadiapublican.

>You dun goof'd
You misread the argument and thought guns should be insurance required, when the whole point was that gun control measures DON'T. WORK.
>You dun goof'd.

>So what is your definition of diversity?
Why wouldn't it be obvious, user?

Guns are illegal in the UK. It's fun watching you walk around in your fantasy world.

You need insurance to drive a car on a public road (in some states). Not to drive a car. Dipshit.

I don't even know if it's possible to have such a system given the beauracratic clusterfuck that is our government.

I'mma stop you riiiiight there.

Attached: 23452345.jpg (1242x1052, 66K)

I smell someone trying to virtue signal.

1/10 this guy wouldn't shoot up his school

The US. We're just barely beginning to become a diverse society user. For roughly 50-60 years now. Before that it was unabashedly white racism running this country.

doesn't answer the question, who determines that?
if you're already upset that people are passing background checks when they shouldn't be, then what's the point of arguing for more criteria?

also, should people who are not of sound judgement or prone to rage, not be allowed self defence?

how about this: i'd argue that having a baby is a far greater responsibility than owning a gun, isn't it? what's the criteria for banning people from having babies?

>durr your the real stormfag
lol no

And why would it be? Diversity is quite the umbrella term. Care to be a little specific with your definition, considering that it's a "good thing"? What is this good thing? You're rather vague arent you?

I know what you think your point was.
You still dun goofed.
Using your argument, guns should have restrictions similar to cars.

you carry for self defence?

what kind of people are not fit enough to deserve self defence?

So you wouldn't be able to use your gun in any public areas. Good.

That would be killers insurance, not gun insurance..

Why are you so obsessed with specifics, user? I don't think you favor a society where all colors run it, not just whites.

because, and this is just a fact of life, im sure you will cry racism, but its because minority cultures in the USA value being hard, fighting, and blind to the crimes of others in your neighborhood above becoming well educated, tolerant, and driven to succeed.

this generation is the way it is because the last was the same way, and those before them. Its all they know.

some of the more vocal ones like to preach that its because of evil white people keeping them down, but theres very little truth to that, maybe in the past it was true, but it hasnt been for a long time.

people are just too dumb to understand that if 51% of your population acts like thugs, most people, white or not, are going to see you as thugs. this is a culture problem, not a racism problem.

i don't think you know how this works

I patterned my example directly off car insurance.

it probably isnt. im not entirely sure that some of these attacks werent orchestrated by people within our government, either way taking them away is neither realistic, nor ever likely to happen.

Daily reminder that governments kill more people than private citizens.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide

freemansperspective.com/death-by-government/

You want to ban weapons so that your government has a monopoly on violence? Statistically, you won't be any safer.

>im sure you will cry racism
your example is an utter stereotype

So diversity based on colour, not of opinion, merit, mindset or experience? Yeah, fuck diversity.

>If 51% of your population acts like thugs,
according to stormfront

go on

Well they don't. And that'll be that until then, no matter how much you or whoever will cry and complain about it. Back in the 50's everybody complained about cars and how much of a hazard they are, and we still use them to this day and how we heavily depend on them to make ends meet. But it seems all you care about is 'muh insurance, and you're deluded enough to think that i dun goof'd? Hilarious. Good luck with the "reee guns should have law enforced insurance policies!" concept.

background checks currently consist of the dealer calling a person on a computer who really only checks for criminal charges. "who determines it" is an impossible question to answer, 'how is it determined' is a much more realistic block.

and even the candiaberals disapprove of your dirty gun grabbing fetish

The private sector isn't doing anything to self-police the problem user.
Maybe you should if you DON'T want government to step in and take over.

Right

Left wing and ethnic

Any sources user?

We are a mostly white society user. That is not because of "merit."

Omg, no good guy with a gun stopped them?!

Attached: redneck.png (297x235, 64K)

Lol you derp. What’s your solution? Ban them? Heroin is banned here, and you’re right, we’ve never seen it since. Oh wait...

>El Paso
>Libtard city
Yup.

Then don't compare guns to cars. Tell this poster to fuck off

No, its because a white baby comes out when two white people fuck.

you are trying to ascribe it to purely self defense and thats falsehood.

yea, i do carry for that reason, others may too, but there are people who carry and use it for the intimidation factor, sometimes because they have to validate themselves by scaring people, sometimes because they intend criminal act.

everyone is entitled to self defense, but if you have chosen to do something so heinous that they will not allow you to carry, sorry, you are not entitled to carry, you chose to take those actions, you dont get to pick and choose the consequences.

So you think heroin should be like guns?
Legal with no restrictions?

What’s your solution then idiot? Stand with no gun and say “hey, excuse me, don’t do that. Hey, guns are illegal so can you please surrender to the authorities?”

check out this guy thinking "virtue signalling" is actually going to be a phrase

go on buddy, you're just way ahead of the curve, it'll catch on

And they keep other non-white babies from participating in society when they grow up.

You're not my mom and I don't have to do jack shit for you. Go attend a Never Again movement or something.

having lived in and around these neighborhoods for the better part of 20 years, no its not a stereotype, its just a reality of life in 'the hood'.

Then enjoy being a hypocrite who can't even call out shit on his own side.

There are restrictions sperg. Just like any law, it can be broken. Think.

>muh cool stories
>their niggers
lol ok

What kind of restrictions should heroin have?

i mean, it was just an example figure for illustration, but you sure do seem to have a lot against stormfront, which is odd since you seem to be singularly well informed on whats there;o

lol. whatever you say retard. enjoy trying to infringe on peoples rights because your morals outweigh everything else.
>hypocrite

Attached: 1562599086486.png (400x394, 144K)

Citation?

I am thinking. You're making a logical fallacy by comparing the war on drugs to gun control.

i don't think you understand how computers work
or the process of any check
or the policies that define the processes
or the laws that govern the policies

but of course it's a question of who, not how

maybe we can get a wizard of oz if that makes you feel safer?

It's a well known white nationalist talking point actually. Is that who you want to be associated with?

i bet you say "HEY HEY HEY now" or some form of it when someone around you describes someone as 'the black guy over there' dont you

Yeah, all of those white-only zones are totally unfair. Oh wait, those are no-white zones.

Call this poster out anonyou don't agree with him.
Why aren't you doing it?

>HEY HEY HEY
IT'S FAAAAT ALBERT

What's the issue with ethno-nationalism exactly? We have no issue with Turkey doing it.

i understand perfectly well how all of them work, ive been through the whole process.

If you think its at all effective, you are delusional.

user it's really quite enjoyable watching you apologists spin your web of self-denial.

Not even close to an argunent

You literally sound like one of those survivalist RV types from the 1990s. Only you probably don't have an RV and you eat at Wendy's.

Hello Boris. Want to eat my scrotum?

Good goy.

what did you get b& at /pol/ for?

you can't say everyone is entitled to self defence, but also that some people are not entitled to self defence.

what other means of self defence should be limited based on a person's history? like if someone gets convicted of assault for punching someone, should that mean they're never allowed to punch someone in self defence?

because no one owes you anything.

When will american law enforcement put a stop to this and start confiscating?

>ethno-nationalism
which is just racism rebranded
you'll make up another term when you get spanked
you always do

Or you're a hypocrite who can't even call out your own side chicken
bock bock bock

GO USA!
GO CHEVY!

Attached: 7xpluwk22bp21.jpg (960x955, 82K)

Only like 7% of the population of El Paso can pass the background check needed to get a license to carry. Only 4.2% of the TX population has a permit to carry. If you do the math, there could be 500 people in that Walmart and you shouldn't expect someone to be there legally carrying yet.

Where are the columbine dudes
Or the colorado movie shooter

Biased, dumb list

Gun control will become a real thing once the NRA finally collapses. It's currently being propped up by Russian money.

Attached: rooskiebitch.jpg (1200x630, 191K)

takes a hypocrite to call others a hypocrite, clown.

Isn't texas open carry?

>Gun control will become a real thing once the NRA finally collapses

>I forgot that Gun Owners of America exist.

>YOU ARE A DISCUSSING RACIST
>A DISCUSSING RACIST
>DISCUSSING RACIST
>DISCUSSING

I've laid all my card on the table here.
You are the hypocrite who won't call out your own side.

It's disgusting now many NRA members have committed mass murder.

i love 'MURICA

the greatest clown entertainers on the planet

Attached: clownz.jpg (220x277, 25K)

Statistics about capital letters used by racists

Because we still live in a mostly all-white society. Because systemic racism is a real thing.

Many areas are non-white and those areas have the worst crime.

>Gun Owners of America
You just named the next Russian Stooge Organization.

mate you're ass backwards

i'm the one telling you that you don't think background checks are effective

you're the one asking for more checks, as if they're super effective, and increasing the amount of checks will make them more effective

maybe this is why liberals can't agree with other liberals, because they can't even form a consistent argument

Well unfortunately, it's a shitty hand. gg though. no redo's.

NRA members aren't speaking out against America's lax gun laws user.

Sounds like what MSNBC or CNN would tote about.

So you're a white nationalist, basically.

It's a winning hand user.
You're the one with the deuce on your face.

i don't think you grasp the point of a "non-white mass shooters" list

Holy shit, 99% of the people in this thread don’t know how to raise an argument. All of you are retarded

I don't understand what your two favorite news outlets have to do with this.

>el paso
>libtard city

Pick one
Clearly you’ve never been to el paso

And you do.
And let me guess, your argument is "do nothing."

Isn't that where Beto is from?

Crime rates aren't related to being a white nationalist, at all. Its statistically increased crime rates are directly related to economic value. Good effort.

and yet you're making stereotype after stereotype about people of color

open carry does not mean you can carry a gun without a license

4.2% of 500 is 21. Could have been 21 cunts waiting to pop you fucking nugget

some people are not entitled to carry a life taking machine.
it is a tool for self defense, you can quit referring to it AS self defense anytime you are ready to actually discuss something without trying to misrepresent even the most basic parts of it.

Again, if you've been to a base-level college class in any legitimate establishment, you'd understand how economic differences relate to criminal activity.

You need the total population of mass shooter to know what percentage of the are white vs non white. That list of 12 or whatever dudes could be 2% of historical mass shooters

Niggers commit the most crime because it has been proven through genetics and science that they lack impulse control by and large.

and blacks are criminals, right?

Attached: 015.jpg (136x160, 2K)

>because it has been proven
at kkk.com

Being able to interpret data correctly is a skill that isn't hard to learn, yet people like you exist and prove that wrong daily.

It's not racist if its empirical data

Cunt

>imagine being this retarded
actually i said that the method of determination needs to be redone entirely, because whats in place now doesnt work, but its cute that you wanna ignore that to push your rehearsed rebuttals.

"In 2010 and 2018, El Paso received an All-America City Award. El Paso ranked in the top three safest large cities in the United States between 1997 and 2014,[15] including holding the title of safest city between 2011 and 2014.[16]"

"safe" meaning "no guns" (without irony)

Again, this shows that there's too few weapons. If everyone would have had a gun this would not have happened. So, mandatory weapons for everyone above the age of 12.

And to make sure they're being used, mandatory training. There are enough people on death row that are waiting to be executed.

>Being able to interpret data
at stormfag.com

go on

as long as you're not a felon you don't need a license

gunstocarry.com/gun-laws-state/texas-gun-laws/

But I want to use my gun to hurt you.

Tell that to El Paso exactly right now.