Untitled

youtube.com/watch?v=fMcpKJ18nmo

short 3 minute video. moon landing destroyed. such easy fakery to prove. Good luck refuting this. Try not to be a reality denier when watching.

We never went to the moon.

Literal brainwashed retards.

Attached: 260px-Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg (260x262, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt0205873/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
youtu.be/P6MOnehCOUw
youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs
youtube.com/watch?v=S9HdPi9Ikhk
nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Jesus fucking H fucking cunting Christ

You really are a monumental, dim, fucking thick cunty-fuck aren't you?

Humankind if doomed. For fucking fuck's sake don't EVER breed

Attached: bait-lesson.jpg (600x600, 102K)

HAHAHAHAHA. Typical sheep with no arguments and just insults. did you even watch the video?

*this is bait because i cant face lies and reality, so i dont refute anything*

kys

Attached: x8atafte6w0dbcnbmul1.jpg (1120x1120, 243K)

Can you provide a source of evidence that didn't come from some random YouTube channel? Or any YouTube channel for that matter.

I wish Buzz Aldrin was here so he could punch you in the face

>Thousands of people working on the project both with NASA and outside contractors. You'd think there would be more whistleblowers with verifiable credentials.
>The Russians tracked the missions on their own equipment and listened to the communications. If anyone, they would've been the first to call bullshit but they didn't.
>It's not that we can't build another Saturn V. The problem is that we can't build one to the original 1969 specs because a lot of the components just aren't made anymore, the suppliers are out of business or have been bought out by other aerospace companies. Yes, a lot of blueprints are missing; however, NASA expected to do a clean sheet rocket anyway for any future missions to the moon or beyond.
>Going to Mars; especially if you expect a return trip, is many orders of magnitude harder than going to the moon. You just plain out need a different solution.

lol trash argument. maybe take in the information being presented to you and try to refute it? rather than going "beep boop youtube so its wrong"