Porn teaches you to stare at the most sensitive portions of an image. You look at the ass, the tits, the dick, etc...

Porn teaches you to stare at the most sensitive portions of an image. You look at the ass, the tits, the dick, etc. Then once you go in real life, you're in the same mode. It's training you to look at those sensitive areas and that's why you stare at women/men or potentially can't help but sneak a quick glance at a certain place once in a while. That habit came from porn.

Attached: butt.jpg (800x800, 122K)

Err, no we're sexual beings. I don't even watch porn but I look at women's ass and tits still.

I'm pretty sure people have been glancing and tits and asses long before porn even existed.

I never once looked at a lady until porn trained me to

You two are on Yea Forums. You're looking at porn or at least still images of (almost) naked individuals that are intended to highlight certain sensitive areas of the body. Regardless, people are posting images that are sexual here and they have the same effect I described in the OP. You can't say you don't watch porn. You're right fucking here.

And what about before porn. No one looked at each other in a sexual way, ever?

Funny thing about "focal points" on another person's body.

Psychopaths like dhamer typically stare at mouths rather than eyes.
The saying goes that you can get just as much nuance from the lips that you do the eyes.

Seems like we are teaching ppl to be psychopaths
-isolated
-wealth of knowledge
Both due to TV computers
-those canned ways to find a job, write a resume, speak at a job interview.....all about process, not humanistic enough

Now porn and focal points.
I know the incels will want to do pov and like it when they can see the eyes and face of the pornstar.
But those people who just care about boobs, butts, cunts, and
Mouths
Around
Cocks.

>You can't say you don't watch porn.
I never claimed not to. All I said was that there's no parallel between the things you described.

That phrase was intended for the first reply, not the second. How could there not be a parallel? When you look at a woman in a picture and when you look at a woman in real life, the same shit is fired in your brain. It sees a woman. If you keep looking at naked women on your phone (which means you might keep looking at her vagina), then you're ought to do that in real life to. This connection makes 100% sense.

I can't say for sure. Probably many people did that. You have to admit though that porn is making it a lot worse. Staring at women, especially their more sensitive areas, has been a problem for a lot of people e.g. incels. I recommend you read the above.

>I can't say for sure
I'd say you can't say shit. Everything you're claiming is middleschool level pseudoscience:

>shit is fired in your brain
>It sees a woman

People glance at tits and asses, not because porn has programmed them to, but because they're naturally curious. You know - the very reason people seek out porn in the first place?

You got it all ass backwards (no pun intended).

Thank you Professor Potato for spelling evolution as wrong as you can. E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N not P-O-R-N. You fucking retard.

Funny thing about "focal points" on another person's body.

Psychopaths like dhamer typically stare at mouths rather than eyes.
The saying goes that you can get just as much nuance from the lips that you do the eyes.

Seems like we are teaching ppl to be psychopaths
-isolated
-wealth of knowledge
Both due to TV computers
-those canned ways to find a job, write a resume, speak at a job interview.....all about process, not humanistic enough

Now porn and focal points.
I know the incels will want to do pov and like it when they can see the eyes and face of the pornstar.
But those people who just care about boobs, butts, cunts, and
Mouths
Around
Cocks.

Evolution of biological characteristic of our minds that makes us (in)voluntarily have that urge to sneak glances at certain areas? Sure, it might be just slightly natural to want to do so considering how sexual humans really are, but to say that evolution carried it so prominently into our generation would imply that that craving somehow benefited us and exercised a "survival of the fittest" type of atmosphere, which it didn't. The craving to extremely impolitely glance into certain areas is not a neurological characteristic that will advance your survival in anyway.

I phrased that strangely, you're not wrong. I'd ignore that sentence and focus on the second: "Probably many people did that." Moreover, I'd like to add that we agree completely - humans are sexually curious creatures and it's probable that many of them naturally have a tendency to look in certain areas that are sensitive or more commonly sexualized - but to claim that porn isn't at least a tiiiiiny bit responsible for strengthening the neurological connection of "See woman, look at (sensitive area)" is just extremely hard to believe.

>but to claim that porn isn't at least a tiiiiiny bit responsible for strengthening the neurological connection of "See woman, look at (sensitive area)" is just extremely hard to believe.
Alright, maybe a tiny bit.

I'm glad we reached common ground. To expand on this a bit more, my original claim was that porn _taught_ this kind of behavior.

Let's establish one thing that is irrefutably true: porn is an addiction. I used to do watch it everyday and masturbate to it 3 times a day for years. Addiction as we all know is hard to overcome; that's why I don't fap never, I fap once or twice a month regardless of my strongest efforts.

Let's also agree that children are being influenced and exposed to the internet at younger and younger ages. All of my nephews and nieces have massive iPads and they're all 2 or younger.

Put two and two together. They will find porn earlier (not obviously at 2 years old), the addiction will start sooner, and because it's sooner, it will teach them earlier, therefore it will become more prominent in the future. Because it's likely to be a much earlier discovery in their lives than the generation prior, it will literally teach them to have those urges. How is this not essentially a pandemic?

Retarded pseudoscience.

>Let's establish one thing that is irrefutably true: porn is an addiction.
For 99.9% of people this is just plain bullshit.

Porns pretty cool

Attached: 14_05_58-Tur -.png (1197x1656, 745K)

Fuck. The quads of truth. You win. I hereby declare this thread deceased.

no no, keep it alive

Attached: tumblr_pf0ty0VNYY1xb481ho1_1280.png (853x1280, 591K)

GET OUT OF HERE BEN SHAPIRO YOU SEXLESS FUCK

There's a context for that. Porn makes you think sexually even when the context doesn't support it.

This is weird bait, is it anti porn bait? I cant tell the notion is too stupid. Instincts created porn, not the other way around.

OP here, I guess I was wrong about this. Sorry

Attached: 1552602201288.jpg (736x490, 272K)

Are you really claiming that the POSSIBLE increase in a reproductive related urge is a pandemic for a species that requires reproduction to exist? Also I think you're being intellectually dishonest in conflating the porn watching habits of us on Yea Forums versus society as a whole, sure they probably also get on average more sexual imagery shown to them but not on the level we do.