Eurocucks shut down sadpanda/exhentai

this is legit an issue. banning loli drawings is never the answer. people will become frustrated and find that they no longer have a safe non harmful outlet and will start to seek out the real thing.

this tbh. people who think they're protecting children by being oversensitive bitches about this kind of thing are doing the opposite

>While it's not clear what law they're referring to, specifically, it's possibly the European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, which the European Parliament voted into law in April 2019.

God fucking damn it. Someone should take over for him then. The donations alone...

it is a big issue.

The science is pretty clear that this is correct.

good...

one day every spic will be executed.

I'm sorry, what? Spic hentai?

WHAT THE FUCK?

>The science is pretty clear that this is correct.
>offers no “science” ,reports, studies, tests, or even hypothesis

Know what “bullshit” smells like?
Smells exactly like your post

IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE IT'S GONE

>wants to look at degenerate pictures of children being molested
>pleading the moral high ground
Pic one faggot

yep and who knows how long E-Hentai will stay up... run by the same guy that ran sadpanda.

>I HATE GOOGLE!
>I unironically do.

Attached: F0153F18-BC31-4291-B26A-39189F6901F1.jpg (629x340, 51K)

Did anyone archive it? Is all that loli just gone forever?

Google says “you’re a cunt”

Definitive and unrefutable.

>there are no studies

OH GOD OH FUCK OH SHIT OH JESUS IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT WHAT IS THIS BULLSHIT

He said 2020 tops.

Leaving soon, if this thread is still up in a couple hours I'll post what I know of. In the meantime
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201601/evidence-mounts-more-porn-less-sexual-assault

should do.

>Having sex with kids isn't rape
...k

>psychology
Psychology isn’t science faggot.

Non repeatable results.

You’re a fucking moron

At least we still have nhentai.

Typical atheist liberal faggot.

Using Jewish psychology in order to excuse their own deviance of wanting to fuck children - and why it’s ok for them to watch CP.

Attached: 6D558ED1-35F8-443D-842D-C47A1F2EDF64.jpg (600x861, 60K)

God I hope it is

That is literally one of the most retarded articles I’ve read.
Flawed premise, flawed conclusion, flawed methodology, no indication or causation vs causality.

You could attribute any social change over the last 20 years to the increasing availability of porn according to that article

Retarded in the extreme.

i never could access it, always linked to sad panda and couldnt see shit. wont be missed.

Attached: C8D4E3BF-1844-439E-9163-A42504BE8B3A.jpg (250x188, 11K)

so many little girls get raped in japan huh

The needed steps for that were:
Clear all cookies
Login on forums.e-hentai.org
go to Exh
fap on

Does the European legislation mention an attempt at reduction in child molestation?

No.
Of course not.

It’s banned because it’s offensive.

Pathetic attempt to justify you looking at simulated kiddie porn

I would like to ban comments like this, please.

They're offensive.

They do have higher than the global average

Correlation = Causation

japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/09/21/national/social-issues/reported-child-abuse-japan-exceeds-30000-cases-first-half/#.XTuHqiXTXYU

ya, too many fucking steps to access a fucking fap board. and for what? its like they were scared of the FBI to begin with if you had to have that many steps just to fap.

Construct a legal argument to the European courts and you could.

You won’t , because your using false equivalency in a pathetic attempt to “win” an online argument, and would similarly have your petition to ban my comments thrown out for equally spurious reasons.

Loli material, in contrast, is offensive to the public decency. Undeniably so.

Kill yourself faggot. Hang the Dutch instead for being pussies.

I find this comment offensive. Please ban it.

Yup .

So, you agree it should be banned?

That backfired on you, didn’t it faggot.

Never heard of this site until now. What did it have?

I've been looking for a good hentai torrent tracker, actually. Preferably stuff with egglaying, insect rape, and more brutal tentacle porn.

False equivalency faggot

It was the arm of e-hentai where all the advertiser-unfriendly material wound up. Bestiality, gore, and pedoshits mostly. Some stuff that artists WAAAAHA BALETE PLEASE too. And stuff the community found objectionable that wasn't illegal - oftentimes vore, for example.

Leave us alone. ):

You're just trying to win an "argument" in the "interblagosphere". Make your case to the "overlords of morality" and you can "lwaschagne".

Ok.
We will.

Right after you show how it contravenes the law.

No they haven't. It's still up for me

It's offensive to you and other moral fags. But that's not an objective truth for everyone. If you banned everything that people could call offensive then you'd have to ban everything. So being perceived as offensive shouldn't be a strong enough reason to ban anything.

I will, after you make the law recognizing how it offends public decency and sensibility.

Honestly, have you no shame, posting such filth as this?

>trying to win

No, no, faggot.

“Have already won”, because of your argumentative style of using false equivalency to try and prove your points.

>I'm going to link an article that encompasses all child abuse and not just sexual and see if anyone bothers to read it so I can pretend my point is valid.

I hope there is an increase in child sex trafficking after this. Better get to it fellas.

That would be your job, faggot

I have already won, because of your lazy arguments showing you can't conterpoint my poitns. K thx.

niggerfaggotjewcunt

So literally the law dictates morality.

So you agree if the law said that your remarks were offensive, they would suddenly be offensive.

QED "NANNY STATE! MOMMY I'M OFFENDED!"

No wait, that's e-hentai.

More false equivalency, faggot.

Nobody is arguing “anything anybody says or does that anyone else perceives as offensive should be immediately banned”.
You are the one saying that. And you sound retarded.

We’re talking about explicit material depicting underage children engaged in sexual acts.
If you think “it’s the same” then you’re just more justification for why it needs to be banned

So when are they going to ban "violent" video games? Murder is immoral and illegal too after all.

You made a glib and retarded comment about child molestation rates in Japan assuming they were low, but they are not low.

Now you cope like a faggot.

Kek rekt

>So literally the law dictates morality
Are you new to society or something?!
Like, is this your it’s day out of Plato’s cave?

Seems like it

oh look selling drawings of fictional characters is illegal now. guess ill have to move underground and stop paying tax / reporting my earnings because my job became illegal over night

This comment is explicit because I said so. It should be banned. I'm offended. Someone tell the nanny state to change my poopy diaper. Derhurhur.

any felony that can be committed sitting quietly in a room alone with nothing but pencil and paper is a fucking joke.
this is literal thoughtcrime, and I hope you faggots all get cancer for perpetrating it
the eurofags never had freedom of speech, ever
America still only mostly has it, thanks to overreach of obscenity laws.
kill yourself you fucking bastard

Attached: 1539343679606.jpg (617x800, 69K)

After all the millennials and zoomers that grew up with niggers like Jack Thompson reeing about vidya die. We won't let it happen, at least not in America, we'll push back.

That is the argument presented. It's badong because the gnodab moral arbiters with guns and ships said dis is bad stuff. I just called the spade a spade.

Dumbass. Is this your first day hearing about how people like Plato died?

Actually that's leftist propaganda and not at all true. Check your facts, retard.

Attached: 1559243785367.jpg (480x360, 20K)

We would have entered some weird alternate universe where reasonable commentary was deemed ‘as offensive as pictures of children being molested’ , but yeah, sure, why not

40+TB

does a mega or site rip actually exist? inquiring for science

How much shit did you guys download last night? I only got about 12GBs of toddlercon, loli and some cool artbooks and stuff. I really hate myself for being a bookmark fag all these years. I didn't think it would get shut down so soon.

"Reasonable commentary"

Pictures of children being molested don't offend
> some group of people here

But your remarks offend
> some group of people here

In the real world, you think you have the moral high ground because pictures of children enjoying sex are banned by
> some group of people here

But you're not offended by
> your retarded and offensive remarks

Nobody's advocating to fuck a kid IRL. The drawn and purely fantasy works were hurting nobody. Your remarks offend me, therefore I demand you pass a law censoring them so I can put them in jail.

“Thin end of the wedge” is not a recognised legal defence - you gormless retards

Yeah, now they'll have to go out and kidnap real little girls to fulfill their fantasies.
Hooray! :D

Would the internet archive or way back macine have it saved?

We only had 10 hours to prepare. Most just snatched up shit for themselves. There's no publicly available completely rip that I know of. We're really unorganized right now but I think eventually as a community effort, we can reconstruct most of the site by pooling together all the stuff we've collected.

This

Oh, look! Another person who considers the law and morality to be one and the same! DERHURHUR

images are just another way to communicate. some people have weird desires and enjoy playing out their fictions in images rather than writing. you can't ban people talking about shit. you can't ban people writing about shit. but oh! if they should dare *draw* that shit, ban? fuck you you moralizing shitbeaver, chipping away at the rights of man so you can feel a little false moral height. perhaps you should put your fucking efforts into helping actual kids, dumb ass, instead of other ones that only exist in a bunch of fat artfags heads

Attached: 1545399245099.png (500x522, 147K)

"legal defense". we're arguing the morality of banning human thought in the first place, not discussing what is or isn't defensible in a court - you "gormless retard"

>therefore I demand you pass a law censoring them so I can put them in jail.
Not how the law works retard.

ITT legally illiterate Ameritards misunderstanding European law.

No wonder you’re all butt hurt, angry and confused.

I’m loving this

Attached: F7634BE2-EE05-4D3D-93BA-F1E8E16965CD.png (1022x1530, 1.87M)

Wayback machine can't get past the panda. Even if it could, it would just be wiped by the government.

>European law.
what do you faggots know, you've never had free speech in the first place

The copes you faggots employ to justify to yourselves that it’s fine you like to look at pictures of children being raped.

Well, cope more faggots

ITT: Legally illiterate dumbasses argue law is morality, then try to weasel out by throwing random insults. Meanwhile, George Orwell laughs from beyond the grave.

Hold on, I'll make some popcorn.

>eurocuck

whatever you say is invalid cuck

well the normal e-hentai is still up so it looks like the stuff that was pinning the fjords from the main site is missing

No one is arguing that but you , you fucking idiot.

>misunderstands the argument
>posits a false representation of the argument
>claims victory because their argument doesn’t make sense

Or, you can’t look at loli porn anymore.

So sad for you pedo

Attached: DF4AFEAA-4DC2-4DF2-9A9E-C0CCF8BEB6D7.jpg (512x512, 33K)

>literal ad hominem

Nobody cares about your opinion

I've been using nhentai for years now.
y'think it's also in danger of going down?

lost

Was it just loli or did that site have yaoi/bara too?

> Denies the argument
I'm sorry you were raped as a little girl. If you're at least a 7 I'll rape you now.

Tits or GTFO, next dumb bitch please.

it is fine.
are you coping when you see someone drink in a movie?
are you coping when you see someone do drugs in a movie?
are you coping when you watch a murderer strangle someone in a movie?
fuck you, man. it's just imaginary shit, and that you get bent over it doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to fap to shit that gets us off
you fucking puritans should die off and let the world relax

Attached: 1553806342328.jpg (400x400, 17K)

exhentai had EVERYTHING.

You could have just said “I give up, you win”
It’s 6 and half a dozen at this point

>thin end of the wedge
Not a legal defence

rip gods own archive

DERHURHUR DEGREE AND TITS OR GTFO

>again claiming that legal defenses are required to disagree that things should be illegal in the first place

So you admit you like to mince words instead of admitting you're wrong. I'm sorry about your mental gymnastics not winning a gold, hon.

First of all you are wrong it doesn't depict children, it depicts youthful looking anime or cartoon characters that you may attribute any age to, however they aren't real. Any sexual depiction of real human children drawn or otherwise is strictly prohibited in the US already.
If I draw a stick figure fucking another stick figure and say that one is a loli then is that illegal? Is the legality based on how good of an artist someone is? Where is the line going to be drawn?

btw go fuck your false equivalency bs. I never tried to equivocate any statistical data retard. You probably just flunked out of the debate team after picking up a few bs catch phrases

When e-hentai shuts down within the next year nhentai is going down with it. N just stole and downscaled all their shit from E. When there's no new stuff from E, N will either have to restructure their entire site or just stay up until they have no new content and can't keep the lights on. This is of course they don't just get shut down anyway by the law or the site owner gets tired of having to work, either of which could happen at any time. It's in danger and there's a very small chance that it'll survive past 2020.

Love how mad you are.

I was indifferent to the law before.
Now I’m 100% for it

Attached: 85B792F2-4710-4317-B678-7DF227D0ED65.gif (400x240, 1.99M)

If anyone is willing to share, why not start threads where we can post what pics have been lost here?

You all come from europe you ameritards. The difference is that your lineage was corrupted by native, spic and nigger blood. You're a bunch of mutts.

Attached: american.gif (480x228, 263K)

>if I do this other thing, legally distinct, but ‘roughly in the same ballpark’
Thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence

Attached: 96F0C249-AC90-4D76-81C2-3AC918E276CD.png (500x396, 115K)

This.

You are getting owned in this “debate”

Though it’s a little one sided to call it a “debate”

You’re just getting told.

let us not pretend you're not the same asshat that's shitting all over the thread now resorting to samefagging since noone will eat your shit position

Shame. If that were to happen then it would be the second hentai site that dies on me.

I really miss the old Pururin...

>no one will eat your shit
You’re eating my shit right now.

The site is getting banned.

Eat more shit

Attached: 1C97539A-4C52-4A35-A4C1-86AB90215C9C.gif (480x228, 610K)

yes, we lack your inbred ability to feel moral superiority while legislating to chip away at your freedoms
remember when the obscenity of offending your royalty is passed again, and some asshat just keeps exclaiming that the thin end of the wedge isn't a legal defense to speaking ill of your betters

/h/ and other websites are more dedicated to that kind of thing. Yea Forums would rather "debate" the legality of drawings than actually help the community because they're all normalfags here. None of them downloaded shit and half of them probably never heard of the site until today. If you have stuff and actually want to help, go to /h/ and learn more on how to share it.

>You’re eating my shit right now.
oh shit you got me

Attached: gotcha.jpg (698x470, 48K)

>remember when the obscenity of offending your royalty is passed again,

The thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence

Attached: CB79F861-CDA0-4D8C-8A96-B06393F7D888.jpg (644x482, 59K)

I think most of mine came from rule34, I should have checked sad panda sooner.

Attached: 043wTUY.png (720x571, 225K)

why didn't that brony faggot tenboro give us the weekend at least?

Attached: 1564129393157.png (1280x720, 1.1M)

Thin wedge of the penis is not a legal way to assault your anus, you buggery loving lazy shitsucking faggot nigger jew cunt shit sucker.

Just saying, "Thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence." Doesn't constitute a valid argument, you have to show why my statemeant fits that statemeant with a counterpoint.
Trying to disprove something with a negative is not proof retard. You need to follow up with a positive summary of your point.

You mad because they didn't apologize to alan turing for 60 years, faggot?

Is there anything more left to say?

Why yes....
“He Mad”

Attached: EA2C699A-F552-434F-A6FC-B9B7688EB9D6.jpg (638x370, 29K)

>m...muh freedoms!

Do a bit of research. Europe made tons of legal pedo romantic movies of all kinds, that are sometimes considered as art by modern critics. This would never have happened in Muhfreedomzland EVER.

So, even when it’s self evident, you want me to baby step you through each bullet point?

How about fuck off.

Try arguing your validation without using “thin end of the wedge” arguments.

How bout dat?

Look, you posted a nigger, which you clearly identify with.

not him, but I am. well, not so mad over a lack of apology, but that motherfucker was brilliant and they fucking rekt him for nothing
I'd rather have a happy fag advancing the sciences than some anxious hatemongers being self righteous assholes

>Americans
>research
Pick one

They steal Euro and Nazi scientists to do their research for them

> Try arguing your validation without using “thin end of the wedge” arguments.
Rubber, meet glue.

yeah, you guys raped kids and had no laws keeping speech free, now you're in here feeling superior that dumb americans didn't rape kids and still have the freedom to draw them naked
you guys are dumb. not all eurofags, but the ones in this thread

Oh look, you posted a Mad, mad comment, which you clearly identify with.

Attached: 7A0EA6F4-EC57-4099-AEFE-58E5CF9ACAD7.jpg (319x243, 16K)

It's hard to stop hurling obscenities for the one rare post, but I wholeheartedly agree. The underlying point, my good sir, is that the law dictating morality and following "general sensibility" led to losing one of the greatest minds of all time. We literally would not be having this conversation without Turing, or - at best - would be having it in a substantially different form.

Oh, look, a dumb nigger. I see you continue to identify with shitstains on the face of the earth.

Show me where I argued with a “thin end of the wedge” argument.

>calling god a nigger

Attached: sjmPEEs.jpg (600x900, 56K)

Ok I will just say, they are drawings and you as well as everyone else are retarded for thinking they depict children.

Low effort comments get low effort responses

Attached: 872C5C27-0158-43B3-BF6D-857179D17567.jpg (370x300, 21K)

You're going to have to make that question without using "thin", "edge", "of", "the", or "wedge" before I'll answer it.

That is not a valid argument.

seriously. this guys never used a thin wedge in his life. his wedge is obtuse in ways that defy imagination

Oh look, a dumb nigger and his failure-to-interbreed gay lover. You really identify with some garbage.

>they are drawings
Not relevant to whether they’re ‘offensive’ or not.

Like what? I only know the unpronounceable one that starts with an "M", something like Madadlzalenza, that was made in the 70's, which I downloaded, but never watched.

You write and resonate like a retard. And I never spoke about rape, I spoke about romance.

Go shove a burger down your fat ass you childish, brainless mutt.

Attached: 1563186595678.jpg (640x628, 61K)

It was/is valid.

QED

be mad elsewhere, swine

Attached: 4c.png (432x429, 52K)

Attached: mari.png (321x532, 355K)

This comment is offensive. Please make it illegal so we can all move on with our lives, thanks.

So, by inference, you identify with Fucking children?

Sounds about right.

QED - the drug you're on? Kids today, listen to their crap music.

Jim Mad-as-Hell-en 2019

Be mad elsewhere, sand nigger faggot jew cuck.

the anti-loli faggot is arguing that fucking a kid is romance not rape
what even is this thread?

Attached: q4crtsl572421.jpg (600x654, 125K)

Go hire a lawyer and argue it in the European courts, faggot.

I'm mostly into boys, so there's Les Amitiés Particulières, For the love of a soldier, lots of obscure Dutch and Danish movies too but I forgot their names. There's also plenty of great girl movies, mostly Dutch.

And they're ALL legal. Wouldn't be possible to make those anymore in our so-called progressive liberal society.

... be mad with me user-kun? I'm scared

So mad
Kek

Nope. I'm just going to piss and moan until you make it illegal for me. I'm a 64 year old women who survived Dresden, and you are not intimidating. BY MARGARET THATCHER'S PANTIES!

So the rise of the right wing anti liberals was just so they could start making legal pedophilia again ?

Sounds about right

Attached: E83966DD-9148-4ED0-9971-B975F31B4A36.jpg (750x394, 46K)

Two little faggots sitting in a tree
D I C K I N G

(You)

Wow

Now That’s What I Call Mad 19

There are states where 19 isn't old enough. PEDO ALERT PEDO ALERT! WE GOT A RE-ERM PEDO OVER HERE.

Article 13 claims its first victim

Thank God we have the First Amendment in the US. Maybe they will move their hosting here

(Also You)

There's a difference between romance and sex you (once again) dumb mutt. And I'm not anti loli, quite the opposite.

I explained this so simply that even an european child could understand, but american adults have trouble reading so they just get mad halfway through a post and make up the other half in their minds.

Let me repeat myself, more simply this time:

You americans have ''freedomz'', but were always prude as hell about any relationship other than 2 adults.

You might have freedoms, but there's no way romantic child-adult movies could have been made in America, ever. Meanwhile, there's dozens of them, all legal and many seen as classics, that have been made in conservative europe.

You are now my european friend who gave the old "nudge nudge wink wink say no more" to MAMBLA and the like.

you stepped into the conversation and took the side of someone I was arguing against with a strange turn. apparently you decided that since I was arguing for free speech, I also supported you child raping badger vaginas. I do not. stop raping kids you dumb fucking trash.

Funny.
Here in Europe we are of the opinion “thank fuck we have a sensible legal system and aren’t beholden to a piece of paper written by landed gentry 200 years ago”
There’s a simple test;
“Does your country allow degenerate pictures of children being molested?”

If the answer is “No” , you’re a decent country.

offensiveness is arbitrary and should not be governed by the law.
Also murder is a more serious crime than what is depicted in loli manga, should that also be banned along with any fictional depiction of an illegal act?

Attached: __chi_class_torpedo_cruiser_kantai_collection_drawn_by_kabeu_mariko__sample-a2f31a7720e3c6fb79b50d69 (850x850, 162K)

>offensiveness is arbitrary
See, I think that’s why it “should” be governed by law - so that we can all agree on what is offensive or not.
Otherwise, degenerate sexually deviant psychopaths , try to argue that it’s ‘moral’ to draw pictures of children being molested and making them available online.

Happy I could provide chuckles, user. YLYL threads these days are shit, so at least we can spread lulz for one another where possible.

Attached: iwaiybstvf411.jpg (960x915, 120K)

This entire debate is retarded to begin with. We can all just agree that art doesn't need to be banned under any circumstances, ever.

A hypocrite who faps to drawings of children calling me a child molester? How amazing. I was talking about perfectly legal movies you can buy off the internet or watch on youtube.

So please start masturbating to adult drawings before accusing someone else of being a child molester.

Attached: 1506274266-jeussou2.png (800x600, 519K)

Thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence

Derhurhur
"There's a simple test: Did your country lead to people fleeing from famine or oppressive church-run state, or is it presently a member of the EU?"

If the answer is "Yes", you're not a decent country.

Boris Johnson.

See, that's why your comments should be illegal - that way we can agree it's offensive.

Otherwise sociopathic Nazi wannabes will try to argue it's "moral" to dictate morality in accordance with the law.

>irrelevant and retarded
/pol is that way faggot >>>
You seem lost

/r/wooosh

Reddit is that way, faggot. you seem lost.

The law, quite literally, dictates what is acceptable behaviour.

Say, try gambling in a state in America where gambling is illegal.

>feels morally superior because he rapes children instead of fapping to drawings
I bow to your superior position

That remark is not a valid argument. Now, today, or ever. You failed to demonstrate it's validity, therefore forfeiting all rights to use it.

Go fuck yourself.

No , faggot.
The understood your “joke”
It was just irrelevant and retarded.

Like it’s author

ylyl thread?

Attached: 1536295139512.jpg (1080x1082, 233K)

"Acceptable" does not mean "moral". Nor does the law dictate what morality is.

For years it was illegal to be gay. I don't want to hear your shit, faggot.

>The law, quite literally, dictates what is acceptable behaviour.
that law dictates what is legally acceptable, not generally or morally acceptable
few have problems with teens drinking responsibly, and most do, and most remember doing so fondly, but it remains illegal nonetheless, and likely will remain so

In response to a “thin end of the wedge” argument, it is utterly relevant.

You need to demonstrate why your “thin end of the wedge” argument is relevant

The real question is why hasn't Yea Forums stopped all the loli threads yet.

They are no longer acceptable in 2019.

eight-ch is that way. You seem to be lost.

Fuck you Yea Forums, I'll mention whatever I want, thanks.

This remark is a thinly veiled attempt to be relevant. It is not, in fact, relevant.

QED.

This isn't a courtroom dumbfuck. You are not a judge, and that statemeant is a coverup for your lack of an argument.

you're no longer acceptable in 2019

And homosexuality was seen as “Immoral” precisely because of its illegality.

So. You prove my point further . Public morality is dictated by law

Read my post again you fucking mentally challenged ameritard. I don't fuck kids, how many times do I have to repeat it before you understand you dumb negroid?

You're the one calling me a child molester based on fuck all while fapping himself to drawing of kids. Following your logic I could accuse you of watching the real thing based on no evidence too.

I'm just done arguing with you, you're just as dumb as the rest of your country.

Not the guy you're responding to, but what's Reddit like? I've personally never been a member, the site structure is too weird.

Is it like The Yea Forums?

saying QED in a conversation is stupid shit some college freshman would think means anything

QED

You're advocating child sex tapes. I don't really care about the intricacies of your position.

Homosexuality is between two consenting adults, people banned it out of personnal bias because they found it disgusting. Kids are young and fragile, they can't consent to sex.

Verily.

Attached: 1563222788280.jpg (960x758, 127K)

You think making a thin end of the wedge argument is a valid argument.

It is not .
Especially legally, which is functionally the only place that counts

QED QED

It was originally argued that homosexuals couldn't consent because they were mentally ill.

That argument doesn't really hold water against history, sorry. But for what it's worth, I agree children can't consent and that we shouldn't fuck kids IRL. That's not the problem at hand.

>Kids are young

This sleuth... nothing passes over his head.

And in that world every form of media is G rated and we all die from boredom

see

>I was talking about perfectly legal movies you can buy off the internet or watch on youtube.

btw you can also find their IMDB pages too.

Do you even read before replying to someone? DAMN you're thick.

just like any other forum from the mid 00's, but more people. mods are inattentive or power tripping blowhards. whole parts of it exist to annoy other parts. if you have a niche interest and ignore the politics/popular forums, it's a fine place to chat. switch names on the regular if the lack of anonymity bothers you

It used to be illegal to be gay. Find a better standard to judge your morality on or shut the fuck up.

Okay good, just had to know

Attached: 1532782196233.jpg (603x483, 232K)

Attached: 1520998182285.jpg (680x680, 66K)

>let me fuck children
No, it’s morally wrong and nothing you degenerate Ameritards do to try and convince us morally upstanding Europeans will convince us otherwise

you know I'm thicc, bitch

all they had to do was delete all the loli content? it was easy because all loli content was tagged anyway? why did they have to delete everything else?

Attached: 1557952631708.jpg (625x564, 70K)

Yeah and unlike CP nobody is being hurt by making loli drawing.

Degenerates like you belong on a cross.

Attached: Vulpus of anger.jpg (503x359, 44K)

Attached: 4gmk.jpg (210x154, 11K)

>unproven claim backed up by zero evidence
The cope you faggots go to just to excuse your degeneracy.

Go to any respectable member of society and asks if it’s acceptable to masturbate to drawings of children being molested.
Do you think they would answer yes or no?

If it's not valid in court then why is loli legal in the US? Because banning it encroaches upon the 1st Amendment and could jeopardize its integrity. This constitutes a thin end of the wedge argument..So tell me what your point is

The pedos cries like this when they shut down their CP sites back in the day too.

Good.
Means we’re doing something right

ask them if it's okay to masturbate to shit porn, or rape porn, or little old lady porn, or to fap at all. you know what they'll say? get the fuck out I'm calling the police
because people shouldn't discuss what we like to fap to in polite company
you just do it in secret in your home, chat about it anonymously, and then never mention it in life

>banning pictures of children being molested is against the 1st Amendment
And is why Europe has resisted enforcement of a “constitution”.

we should shut down soccer and american football too. it keeps people from being pressured into a dangerous and injury prone profession for just money. and those fags will cry forever about it
>these are valid and not completely specious reasons to do a thing

Right .

So, if you feel so strongly about it, and are so opposed to the ban, go protest - sign petitions - write letters to your local representative .....
They all need a good laugh

where will i find my dickgirls now?

because you like being slaves

Imagine living in a country where fucking pic related is considered a crime.

The thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence

You’re slaves to a piece of paper written by landed gentry 200 years ago.

ITT a person that is proud of learning a useless phrase that perpetuates their ignorance

>ban something embarrassing
>"well why don't you go admit to and fight for it"
>kek
I hope they goosestep your faggot face

ITT retards repeatedly argue a “thin end of the wedge” despite being told repeatedly that it is not a valid legal defence.

FTFY

just ignore them. they're shitposting because they don't have a valid argument

We are slaves because we are free? That's an oxymoron

First, I'm not who you're responding to, but I'm going to point out that you are terrible at argumentative reasoning.

Second, you are using terms without depicting or outlining them. Respectable member of society? Define it concretely enough to continue your point.

Third, even after you define it, why does that person's OPINION on what someone does behind a closed door (yes, we're making the assumption here that the masturbation is in private, not public exposure or any other thing) matter?

Fourth, if you found the majority of "respectable members of society" (who fit into whatever definition you conjure up) said it was not acceptable to masturbate to drawings of something like furries, would you advocate for the banning of it?

Fifth, the user you're replying to said something very simple, which is that nobody is being hurt by making loli drawings, and he's correct. Your flared up emotional passive-aggressive greentext response shows that you're not logically situated or capable or having an actual discussion on the matter.

/d/ickgirls is the board for you

I hope you get lynched for being into kiddie porn, degenerate

I am also free.
Most of the world is free.

“American Brand Freedom” is full of additives, capitalism, and is bad for your health.

Tl;dr

Kek

despite being told repeatedly that it is not a valid legal "defence" by someone who is not a lawyer or legal expert in the United States. And someone that can't spell defense.

We tried but we only had a fucking 12 hour notice

*draws 15 year old character being horrifically murdered, blood and guts splattered everywhere*
No one bats an eye.
*draws a stick figure, adds an erect stick penis, then says it's 15 years old.
"THAT'S ILLEGAL YOU PEDO! GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL! I HOPE YOU DIE IN A FIRE!

lol, who needs common sense anyway?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-26-19-46-17.jpg (720x716, 155K)

>yfw you speak and write in “English for Dummies”
It’s called “English”

Attached: 80741FC5-0BA2-40F9-B326-B2FC69044B51.jpg (640x780, 191K)

The thin end of the wedge is not a legal defence

If I was that other guy , I would kill my self out of sheer embarrassment

Attached: FCC84AF6-B491-4627-8B6D-08C571F01A93.jpg (640x1055, 366K)

Irrelevant reply.

I don't think everything is lost... right?

tbh i hate you all. Goodnight

That would require the ability for self reflection and introspection, Ameritards are incapable of these things.

The definition of an....

is yours.

Just because you britface spell it that way doesn't make it correct. Go sit on De Fence while I prepare my defense against your fagotry.

Reading is difficult.

Reasoning and logic are also difficult.

It's much easier to approach something with generic retorts like "kek", "lol," "u mad bro", or other nonsense, even though it contributes nothing to the actual discussion or issue.

People tend to do this in order to sate their ego, which craves some form of victory yet cannot find it when confronted with an argument to which they cannot articulate a counterpoint.

Where what is considered a crime? Wearing a bikini? Where is that illegal?

nationalism is illegal in yuropoor you are cucked

>any felony that can be committed sitting quietly in a room alone with nothing but pencil and paper is a fucking joke.
So you’re ok with white collar crime?

OK, it's all gone, but is there anything that can be done? Is anyone planning to make a new site?

>Here in Europe we are of the opinion “thank fuck we have a sensible legal system to oppress and imprison us over everything and anything"

> misrepresents the argument yet again

I never asked to fuck children.

I'm a faggot and I blow horses.

FTFY

Hey. White collar criminal here. Typically takes more than a pencil and paper, and has actual victims.

Drawing a picture of some loli vagoo on the other hand has no victims.

Let's take a long step back and talk about the invalidity of victimless crimes.

>pleading the moral high ground
that's not what i'm doing retard, i'm just being realistic. no matter how you look at it in an ethical sense, men getting hard over young girls is something that has always and will always exist. grown, mature adults who have self control and are honest with themselves and with each other can realize and accept this without trying to place needless restrictions on what people do. to try and bury a generation's worth of artwork that reflects this aspect of the human condition is to deny its existence and reject reality and won't have any positive effect in the slightest. at best it will just leave people frustrated.