So what's your thought anons?

>So what's your thought anons?
Irrelevant now when GoT is finished

waiting for soles

it's gonna be glorious

Attached: Maisie legs.jpg (740x1023, 335K)

What a slob. She looks terrible.

dark phoenix

0/10 face. A straight fucking troll has more sex appeal.

I don't think you know what a 0/10 is, i'd say she's a 5/10 realistically but she has the cute factor

Delusional.

I'm kind of disappointed. Not bad, but not great either.

Pretty got / fappable. Bonus points to the fact she surely knew she'd be exposing herself to paparazzi and wanted this.

i'd say she is a 7/10. Always had a sexy white trash look about her. Nothing special though.

now we wait

Attached: maisie.jpg (542x1078, 39K)

Maisie's body is so much more fit and toned.

I mean tits are fine, nice nips.

Alright I guess

Attached: maisie1.jpg (480x1078, 30K)

How do we know it's real? Remember the Anna Kornikova shots, and it turned out not to be her

Looks like there might be a few good sole shots in this set.

look at that cute little ass

Attached: 1553182419560.gif (367x265, 565K)

Sure, gotta wait for her to sue the magazine.

Posted in actual tabloid magazine, they'd risk big money lawsuit if fake.

Wash your hands for typing that filth

>believing this isn't CG

why would it be? she was over 18 and didn't really show anything aside from her ass crack

Because loads of "nude scenes" the last ten years have turned out to have CG nipples or the entire tit being CG.

Why CG nothing?

Plus just like Emilia when she didn't want to do it, then they made her.

check

She looks 30+, ew.

You have been visited by the Laura of not great, not terrible threads.

This thread is currently reading 36 replies (not great, not terrible).

Attached: Laura.jpg (1278x637, 108K)

Attached: vzG4G.gif (364x363, 253K)

Attached: 116600515_0e5be357-90c3-4669-8216-4.jpg (1125x1512, 586K)