Should we really condemn lolicons? I mean not every lolicon is a pedophile, who will resort to abusing real minors to satiate their desires, right?
Should we really condemn lolicons? I mean not every lolicon is a pedophile...
Most people start like that but then that’s not enough and they eventually evolve into real pedos looking for real cp.
generally not all pedophiles will act out, just as non-pedos will actually do rape kiddos, as well as adults
condemnation like that is really just patting yourself on the shoulder for being better by... not raping people, i guess
but this is normie-Yea Forums now, welcome all those retards throwing a fit and how you have to submit to their rulefagging because anyone else not being normal is hurting their feelings
We should condemn closeted pedos like you who confuse drawings with reality.
So long as people don't offend, I don't see why we should condemn them. It's a fetish. Sure; it's girls with underdeveloped bodies, but it's completely unrealistic in comparison to actual kids.
I work around kids every day. I can hardly stand 90% of them, much less find them attractive.
i mean how much of a faggot you have to be not to love that delicious lolielf.
Abusing children is a criminal act.
Sharing actual pornographic material of children is also a criminal act, because creating demand and shit.
Fantasizing about sexual relations with children makes you a scumbag, but it's not a criminal act.
Creating fiction of sexualizing fictional children makes you a scumbag, but is not a criminal act.
This should be really straight forward, but for some reason, it isn't to many people.
Murdering people is a criminal act
Hiring people to kill people is also a criminal act, because creating demand and shit.
Fantasizing about raping and killing people makes you a scumbag, but it's not a criminal act.
Creating fiction of raping, torturing and murdering fictional people makes you a scumbag, but is not a criminal act.
Yeah, what's your point? The funny thing is that everyone gets this with murder. You can watch the bloodiest movie available, and nobody will think you're a murderer, based on watching the movie alone.
logic tends not to be straightforward to many people is what life taught me.
Exactly nobody will think that way because its fiction. How come you label people who draw fictional loli as pedophiles?
On a 10 point scale, how drunk are you right now?
Im trying to understand your logic how murder rape torture in movies and cartoons,fiction is normal but when it comes to drawings of lolis you freak out.
>Exactly nobody will think that way because its fiction
people watch movies like that for the thrill, not because they enjoy being the person that does the killing.
with loli, they enjoy being the person that does the fucking. its a different train of thought
Who freaked out when? user, I've met 10 year olds with a higher level of reading comprehension than you.
>not every lolicon is a pedophile
nice b8 m8
The average Society freaks out.
>I work around kids every day. I can hardly stand 90% of them, much less find them attractive.
which means he wants to fuck the remaining 10%
You were addressing me directly, not society.
Again, how drunk are you?
Westerners are too emotional to consider it an option
kek
Because you call loli drawers scumbags, you are part of that hypocrite society. God damn how stupid are you?
> not every lolicon is a pedophile
yes, yes they are. they enjoy pictures of little kids getting fucked.
treat them like pedophiles; you know, people that take advantage of childrens naivety to get their rocks off.
How is it hypocritical? I think they're scumbags, but it's not a criminal act. That's pretty straight forward and exactly what I wrote.
It's the 10%'s fault for being so fuckable.
>not everyone who watches action movies are murderers
yes, yes they are. they enjoy movies of people getting murdered and shot up.
Treat them like murderers, they get ideas from these movies and games and act on it.
>imagine still attempting this stupid ass argument
Do you think that people who watch movies like saw or movies that include narcotics are scumbags?
Earlier you asked about people creating content, now you're asking about people consuming content. Who is the hypocrite here?
I do think that people who create content that promotes violent and degenerate behavior are scumbags, yes.
The people consuming it usually aren't scumbags, they're just mindless consumerist whores.
>imagine being this hypocritical
listverse.com
you tell me whats more dangerous.
screenrant.com
oh but loli drawings are more dangerous than the kids who stabbed their friend to please slenderman right?
Loli is degenrate. But acting like its a big crime while there are worse things around and that the argument is bs makes you a hypocrite
the only people who believe these bullshit mental gymnastics are people who are trying to justify this behavior. it didnt work years ago, doesnt work now. you're a fucking creep dude.
little children should rightfully be afraid of you
I can draw a line between reality and fiction. Unlike mentally ill people like you.
im mentally ill but you like pictures of little girls.
read to know my angle on this.
no one needs to understand anything past you're a fucking weirdo man
no amount of explaining is ever going to save you from that
>REEEEE I DONT NEED TO UNDERSTAND YOU REEEEEEE WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT REEEEEEEEEEE
got more constructive arguments?
I don't think loli should be ILLEGAL, but I absolutely support condemning lolicons. The last thing we need is for that shit to be seen as normal.
/thread
>How come you label people who draw fictional loli as pedophiles?
...because they are? Pedophile just means you're sexually attracted to children. It doesn't mean you're a child abuser.
>oh but loli drawings are more dangerous than the kids who stabbed their friend to please slenderman right?
i never claimed such.
>acting like its a big crime while there are worse things around and that the argument is bs makes you a hypocrite
and i never claimed it was a big crime.
anything else you want to accuse me of while you're at it? i mean, i know you're jsut dying to have an online argument and all...
alright so can we post loli to flush the normies out
Think we're done here boys. Stop acting like the children who get posted and move onto some other shitty thread.
SO if we go by that logic, people who draw comics where murder occurs and drug trade occurs are criminals ? Because pedophiles draw children and murderers draw murders. Or is it that murder is less taboo than loli and therefor more acceptable?
Did you ever, in your entire life, see a school from the inside?
I worked at schools for 2 years. Elementary schools at that.
I would never fuck a woman under the age of 11!!
And never saw a kid with demon horns and wings like
Wow, that makes it so much sadder. Now you don't even have an excuse for your stupidity.
yeah, no, people definitely like the catharsis of murder.
if you dont like loli please go back to your adultshit threads
>calling people names because he cant handle the fact that drawings is not same as reality
Its a wonder you havent shoot up a school yet with that brain of yours.
>we should regulatively fuck over people who are hurting no one because theres a chance the end up hurting someone, the thread
why not, maybe, just maybe, fuck over paedophiles and paedophiles only?
The difference between violent movies and lolicon is that the drive to destroy your fellow man is far more innate and unadmittedly acceptable than paedophilia. Everyone gets the urge to kill a bitch when they get pushed so far.
Finding children attractive is an error. Your wiring, be it genetic or influenced by life, is damaged. And a dangerous one at that. I say that as a total lolicon.
No, I'm calling you names because you don't understand the definition of a word, or the meaning of very simple sentences.
Condemn does not mean convict. Open a dictionary every once in a while.
You are the one who has a problem understanding the difference between fiction and reality. Confronted with other scenarios your brain go`s on meltdown because it`s programmed not to think differently.
No, in fact I have in an earlier post clearly differentiated between fiction and reality. It's just that you're so far up your own ass that you don't even bother reading the arguments, you just default into opposition of what you think other people say, and pretend everyone who challenges anything you say is automatically wrong.
Let me put you in a way even your retarded self can understand you
> Kronk not like drawings of lolis that are created with pencils and software not even based on reality!
>kronk love to see movie with real people where they get shot up, mugged tortured and drugged! Kronk love the idea that these platforms give people ideas to follow up on!Me kronk! Me think drawing 10.000 times more dangerous than violent games and movies Kronk smart!
Did you ever, in your entire life, try to use your brain?
but what if she consented
Same goes for gay people.
If you're sexually attracted to children you are a pedophile, the word doesn't require you to actually abuse children. Actively seeking out media that sexualizes chlidren makes you a pedophile.
A murderer is a person who actually murdered someone. Seeking out media that contains murder doesn't make you a murderer, because consuming media depicting murder is different from committing murder.
You should be careful with calling other people stupid when you don't even know the most basic concepts of language.
user, "using your brain" doesn't mean anything. The act of farting involves the brain.
ur a pedophile once u start thinkin about kids like that, not when u start
raping, thanks
Not all lolicons are pedophiles. Some are hebephiles, ephebephiles or nepiophiles.
It's better to use the umbrella term minor attracted person.
Seems you really use your brain, but have a seveere problem to read between the lines. Yes yes, I know, you only fake that to show off. Sure.
Yes i know what pedophiles are. I`m also not defending them. They are degenerate and danger to society. But when you talk about children you keep referring to fictional drawings. What if the author would place a text balloon next to the picture saying " i am a 1000 year old vampire!"Would that be more acceptable?
What? Are you now pretending that, despite that what you've said is objectively wrong, you really meant to say something completely different between the lines?
That's not even remotely how that works, user.
hebephile isnt even accepted as a real mental disorder , just pedophilia. its very simple sometimes. lol
>>If you're sexually attracted to children
>>you are a pedophile, the word doesn't
>>require you to actually abuse children.
>>Actively seeking out media that
>>sexualizes chlidren makes you a
>>pedophile.
You know that this is entirely wrong? You are a pedophile if >only< girls are sexually & romatically atteacting to you, before they hit puberty.
Can you please stop embarrassing lolicons with this faggotry. You're attracted to children, that's why you like loli. Deal with it.
blub
That is actually exactly ho it works.
KYS
Since when is that illegal???
Shut up kid, grown ups are talking here. Know your place.
seriously, hes a little fucked up
How offensiv!
If that were even remotely true there would be a LOT more cases of pedophilia in the world. Considering how many people read loli manga and watch loli hentai, this actually happens incredibly rarely.
its just socially retarded and something to keep to yourself
Since society became a thing
if a loli said it its ok
>Yes i know what pedophiles are. I`m also not defending them. They are degenerate and danger to society. But when you talk about children you keep referring to fictional drawings.
So you don't know what pedophiles are.
>You know that this is entirely wrong? You are a pedophile if >only< girls are sexually & romatically atteacting to you, before they hit puberty.
What the fuck? So a girl liking you makes you a pedophile now? You people are seriously brain damaged.
No, and I don't know what else to tell you.
Sure.
Pedophilia is not classified as a mental disorder unless acted upon (which doesn't include consuming lolicon) or it causes distress. It is likely that it will eventually be classified as a sexual orientation, indeed it very nearly was in the most recent DSM.
The topic of hebephilia however is still being debated in academic circles. Some choose to use it, others view it as pointless.
Actually no. Only acting on it is.
>just as non-pedos will actually do rape kiddos
Nope, those are pedos. You cannot fuck a kid and not be a pedophile, as you can't fuck when you're not aroused, and to be aroused by children is pedophilic.
This is literally 1+1=2 shit, absolutely basic logic and rhetoric.
>Only acting on it is
Please fuck off back to Brazzers.
looooool bruh im outa here now we start with the its a sexual orientation argument i have GOT to GO peace out and remember to keep that shit to yourself in the real world
For gays, the danger isn't immediately relevant. It's only a problem in one or two generations, if they embrace it. Their personality traits are valuable to humanity, valuable to the gene pool. The quantity of incredible fag inventors and scientists, and their unconventionality can't be ignored.
Nonces however, the data isn't there, so I do wonder. But the urge to procreate with the infertile is some form of genetic suicide.
>>What the fuck? So a girl liking you
>>makes you a pedophile now? You
>>people are seriously brain damaged
Wait, you REALLY don't get it?? I thought you where trolling. Sorry.
This.
Yes, I really don't get that statement:
>You are a pedophile if >only< girls are sexually & romatically atteacting to you
Feel free to explain it to me.
>Wait, you REALLY don't get it?? I thought you where trolling. Sorry.
Nigga this is literally you.
This is not how beeing a pedo works. If you are still atteacted to girls of legal age, you are by definition not a pedo. Go look it up...
You stupid or what?
I don't think you are right.
Pedophilia is not a fucking mental disorder. It's a paraphilia that is developed upon repeated exposure to specific stimuli.
That's literally all that it is, a fetish, albeit a very degenerate one at that.
>You stupid or what?
If anything, I should be asking you that question.
I fear you are wrong.
This is actually a fact. Some people here should really read a bit more.
I fear you are even more wrong.
if someone has sex with anyone over 18 then they are obviously NOT a minor attracted person because they couldn't possibly get aroused by someone under 18, even if they jerk it to loli porn sometimes
Pedophilia, BY DEFINITION, is the abnormal sexual attraction to individuals under the legal age of consent or who have a very youthful appearance.
You people are so fucking braindead, it's a miracle how you even managed to figure out how a computer works.
Do you have a criminal record? I have a feeling that, if so, it's very long and interesting.
>You people are so fucking braindead
It's more a case of trying to excuse abnormal behavior through mental gymnastics.
You act as if every pedophile is caught, the majority are not I'm sure just every type of crime. Especially when you consider just people who just look for cp.
So regardless if your statement is true of not you lack the knowledge to make that claim.
Why do you think it matters if I have a criminal record or not?
>Trying to excuse abnormal behavior
More like abhorrent behavior.
>Pedophilia is not a fucking mental disorder
I disagree, if you have a sexual allure towards prepubescent children incapable of reproduction then you're definitely fucked.
Let's not start splitting hair.
I think it matters because then it would explain why you have such degenerate sexual fetishes.
How so, amigo?
Well, it's true, is it not?
Source is yourself I presume?
I simply agreed with the general point of the post I replied to, using the word that the author of that post used.
I don't see how a drunk and disorderly assault charge would have anything to do with any of my sexual fetishes
You lacked the knowledge to make your original claim you idiot.
Okay?
Not the guy you're talking to, but it actually matters since your personal bar for undesired behavior has been lowered.
What about a charge for disorderly conduct?
Hmm?
>illness
I have never been arrested or charged with anything. But asking if I had a criminal record just feels like you fishing for another hook to bait
lolis are not real children, there is no crime
got a wholesome one for any western art fans
>pedophilia is bad
I don't think anyone in the entire thread said it was a crime. It still makes you a pedophile though.
trips of oppai loli justice!
good. no crime = no condemnation
/thread
I'll take them!
...
Fine
You still have shit taste in girls tho.
you don't know what kind of girls I like
except this is completely wrong, "pedophilia" was accepted human sexuality for all of human history except the last ~200 years
You're confusing condemnation with conviction. Dictionaries exist for a reason, user.
Why condemn someone for something thats not criminal?
no reason to condemn someone who has done nothing illegal. Unless it affects other people, like wanting to legalize abortion
No it wasn't. Pedophilia applies to pre-pubescent children. Sexual attraction is by definition unnatural behavior, since sexual attraction is supposed to lead to offspring, which is something that children can not provide.
It was never considered normal and it was never considered accepted on a significant scale. Exceptions will always exist, of course.
you've never heard of nurturing, have you?
I could write down a long list of examples when it's okay to condemn people for legal behavior, but you contradicted yourself in your own post, so that's probably pointless.
Has there been done any research whether or not the prevalence of drawn/fictional CP leads to an increase in actual child rape?
Women can start ovulation as early as 8, and on average they will by 12. In a natural "wild" environment, that is when women would start having children.
Not in this context, no. Feel free to explain.
that is correct
Why does fantasizing about and creating hentai of children make you a scumbag?
Judging by the images you are posting, I think it's pretty obvious you want to fuck a 13 y/o.
getting there first is a completely viable reproduction strategy.
you talk a lot of shit for someone who likes pictures of naked little girls.
continue trying to normalize it, it raises your visibility.
attraction to younger mates before they can procreate isn't irrational because they will eventually become viable mates
It doesn't. It makes you a fucking criminal.
what makes you think they're 13?
I suggest you read my post a couple more times and try to actually understand the point.
ITT people trying their best to make pedophilia acceptable.
HALT CRIMINAL SCUM!
So why should it be a crime if it doesn't even make you a scumbag?
That you have no point?
True, but that's not even remotely what I've said.
I wasn't talking about rationale, I was talking about natural behavior, which often doesn't follow rational principles. I also wasn't talking about attraction, I was specifically talking about sexual attraction.
Making use of mental gymnastics to completely misrepresent a point isn't helpful.
nice to know it's working?
Nigga, I literally just said...
You know what, forget it. Keep jacking off to your shitty Loli or whatever, because arguing with you is clearly not gonna fix that problem.
Just don't come running to us when the FBI raids your house on account of your 200TB hard-drive full of hentai.
pedophilia being not acceptable is a completely modern notion.
its not working, you just become a little more pathetic with each picture you contribute and everyone knows it.
I would fucking love that discussion
Well maybe not, but it would still have some highlights
there was a fairly recent Danish study that essentially found no intrinsic link between the consumption of fictional materials, such as loli/shota, and the commission of actual crimes, heralding the same conclusion as just about any other kind of pornography and sex crime study.
If you google around I think you'll find what you're looking for. If violent movies and video games don't contribute to gruesome murders or school shootings, then I have little reason to suspect simulated pornography would contribute to rape or child sexual abuse.
Fascinating. I knew about a few of these but this is incredible.
I guess us human failures have something to give to the world in verbal intelligence anyway. Most of them are authors. Maybe that just comes with living a lie.
Scumbags may be total degenerates, but at least they're not going out of their way to do anything illegal
A criminal is someone who says:
"Laws, what are those? There's nothing wrong with wanting to anally penetrate a person who is biologically unfit for sexual intercourse."
being a dreg of society is a notion older than the hills though.
[citation needed]
rofl
shame me more please
So you have no basis for a claim, while I have a basis you call spurious?
Pretty sure that means mine has a basis in reality then...
this joke's punchline is better when delivered verbally, but, "What's the bets part of twenty four-year-olds?"
>Attracted to and fucking children
>Not a pedophile
Holy shit your brain is broken nigger.
Who's to say all the lolis in this thread are not post-puberty?
>and fucking
lets see some evidence
Yea Forums is a white hat hacking station now. Nobody is even talking about fucking children
>Except for the express purpose of procreation, like the Mormons do
Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a
---------------------------------------
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, there are drawings that in this very thread that look like literal toddlers.
I know you want to feel good about your degenerate behavior, but come on.
I'm I to loli but I'm not attracted to my daughter just like I'd rather watch hentai than porn
examples of post puberty lolis:
I'd say most in the thread are plausibly post-puberty. So, what you are actually saying is you are against toddlercon?
stop shamefagging
Not the one you asked. But. I'd fill it up..
user, there's 68 pictures in this thread at this point. Cherry-picking 6 doesn't refute my point.
I know you want to feel good about your degenerate behavior, but come on.
famous panel from Gantz
What the fuck is shamefagging you twit use real words
other user, but why do you presume that everyone here feels good about their socially awkward loli posts on Yea Forums
The majority align with the examples I picked. Do you need me to go through all 68?
>the "when that's not enough.." meme
Are you talking out of your ass or is there any substance to this statement?
I hear people say this for a lot of things yet when I actually look into the facts surrounding them, the reality usually contradicts any invocation of a slippery slope logical progression. Something about this seems based on anecdote and assumption rather than inquiry of facts.
Like there's a difference between a fat fuck eating hamburgers when he's hungry and getting even fatter, and a fucking weeaboo beating it to loli hentai moving onto actual CSA materials.
>remember user, pretty soon those McDonald's hamburgers won't be enough to satisfy you and you'll be too fat to really care, so you'll move on to even greasier shit
>remember user, pretty soon that fetish porn won't be enough and you'll wind up dead in your closet with a belt around your neck and your hand on your cock
>remember user, pretty soon that marijuana won't be enough and you'll go from a gravity bong with your friends watching bad movies on weekends munching on chips to a crack pipe behind a dumpster with no life prospects or hope for recovery
Like can people not fucking think??
my bad
Was ment for
I'm new to Yea Forums
I said that he WANTS to feel good about himself and therefore tries to justify his degenerate behavior. If he actually felt good about it, he wouldn't jump through all those mental hoops.
>the majority
Even if that were true, it still doesn't refute what I said.
I know you want to feel good about your degenerate behavior, but come on.
so it is only the toddlers that bug you, good to know
I forgot to split the hair thin enough
No, but that's what I used to make a specific point.
I know you want to feel good about your degenerate behavior, but come on.
toddlercon feels more like a troll fetish than anything else. When I see it it just makes me laugh because of how absurd it is. But maybe that's just me, there are people who get off to injecting feces into their cocks and jerking it out so who knows.
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. You don't know anything about sexuality and pedophilia. You're unironically talking about evolving into a pedo just because you do a certain thing. That's not how it works. People who love loli are closet pedos and pedos in denial. Not acting on it by watching CP or abusing children doesn't make them less pedo.
Also, I think culture and religious values are the reason why sexualized children are "wrong". The actual question is not "are lolicons pedophiles?" but "Why shouldn't pedos be allowed to watch loli?"
i love this panel
i only screw women under 20 as a rule, havent gone wrong yet
this has turned into a pedo thread
forgot to contribute...
>Should we really condemn lolicons?
Yes
>I mean not every lolicon is a pedophile
Wrong.
I think that toddlercon is a manufactured fetish. Most of it I find really gross, but I do gather a few just for troll posting material
But there are some people who really genuinely do seem to enjoy it
>now that's deep cover
I think pic related is hot af and I've never wanted to fuck kids in my life.
you got it wrong. It goes "whats the best part about fucking twentyfour year olds?".
implying normies cant be pedophiles lmao
Why aren't you honest to yourself? Isn't that the worst a man can do?
after her dying twice, I gave her so many head pats...
It's the eyes that keep me flaccid
do people actually like this body type? I regularly babysit a girl who looks like this (yes I've seen her naked) and I don't see the appeal
>ITT thought police
I don't really get it either. Kinda like how I've changed enough diapers that toddlercon is total meh to me. And there's people who like diaper porn stuff with non-lolis
>fucking freaks
I am, though. You're talking to a man who likes petite girls. You just can't wrap your head around it because it contradicts what you think you know about life.
>You just can't wrap your head around it because it contradicts what you think you know about life.
That's literally you. You don't even wanna think about the possibility that you're a pedo because pedos are being viewed as the scum of earth. Keep being dishonest.
bro
>can't tell difference between real and cartoon
>2019
Can't believe people still use the cartoon argument. What does the cartoon try to represent? A real life girl! By your logic CP is just pixels.
But I'm not a pedo. These are things that you just know about yourself, that you can observe in the way you conduct yourself privately and the way you look at others.
Are you implying that just because someone likes adult women under a certain height/weight that they're automatically into children? That's pretty closed-minded of you, and would probably piss a few people off since you essentially called them all pedos.
can we leave illegal things like CP out of this thread?
Same here. Fucking babies, why can't they change themselves?
All semantics aside the main difference between cp and loli is that a child has to be abused to produce cp and no child has to be involved to create loli
>cartoon
>ink and paint
>B-but it's a real girl
Seek help.
Hahahaha so you think the only difference between adults and children is height/weight? Again, you're perfectly describing yourself because THAT'S pretty close-minded. So midgets and children are apparently the same, I guess? Come on, you're not that stupid
Sylvie is best girl.
>piss a few people off since you essentially called them all pedos.
>piss people off.
Are you implaying being a pedo is a bad thing?
>being this retarded
One is a materialization of a sexual interest, a form of expression which represents a candid desire and exists within the realm of fiction. The other is the end result of actual child sexual abuse.
bro, again
Did I ever say these are real girls? It's about what your brain processes "ink and paint" as. Spoiler alert: you don't think of ink and paint when you see these pictures
Not really true. Lots of girls and boys make vids (or cam) of themselves for attention.
source: I did it when I was younger and saw a lot of others doing it as well
This has been an ongoing drama for like a decade now. Wikipedia moderators openly admit they don't intend to correct their pedophilia pages to accurately reflect what is written in the sources they cite.
"Brain" "Think"
>Very Thoughtcrimey
You see ink and paint, an inanimate and unliving drawing, and you imagine real-life children.
Seek help.
[citation needed]
Fair enough but doing shit like that still negatively impacts your own mental health. Not that there's anything we could do about it
>One is a materialization of a sexual interest, a form of expression which represents a candid desire and exists within the realm of fiction
Again, the way lolicon girls look like are based on underage girls. ALWAYS. And additionaly to that, there is the typical anime artstyle in most of these pics (big eyes, certain headshape). But this artstyls is to express more cuteness. And some artists don't even use this artstyle and head to more realistic drawings that are solely based on REAL CHILDREN.
>doing shit like that still negatively impacts your own mental health
well I am ITT :^)
ill ruin it for you
he wasnt a lolicon, he was only helping her because she reminded him of his dead daughter, which is why he chose to stick with her and help her survive the ayy lmao invasion
you see a BlackedRAW video and imagine real-life people. So what?
bro. Everyone else besides the two of them got chopped up in a chipper shredder. I love my Gantz
I've not seen whatever the fuck that is. You're projecting hard enough to be a PowerPoint presentation.
Sounds mentally sound to me
I didn't judge you.
>"nuh uh you're the one that's projecting faggot"
we've reached levels of autism that shouldn't even be possible
Did I say I liked midgets? Where did I fucking mention that I prefer physically deformed dwarf people? You're drawing unreasonable conclusions from my words, possibly to make me look like an idiot and discredit my position.
I said I liked petite adults. The only reason why I'm in this thread is because a lot of the hentai I happen to enjoy spills over into the loli category. Call that reaching, look at it however you want. But if you pulled your head out of the safe, impenetrable barrier that is your colon then maybe you'd be able to appreciate things a little better.
If you can't imagine anything but ink and paint in pictures you lack essential brain functions to be a normal human being. Are you autistic or something?
if you've seen my PPTs you would never say that
My point is who cares what you think? I don't mean you personally, I mean, in general. If you deny someone even their thoughts, then I just don't know
Hi kiddiefuckers
Having a good day?
>it looks like this therefore it is this
bro meat product companies must love you. I could serve you a mystery meat hamburger made out of ground up foreskins, earlobes, and scrotums from various mammals, call it beef and you'll never know the difference.
I'm not that guy. I think you've gotten responses mixed up.
no, clearly you did not
Guess what, children often have way more petite attributes than adults. Thaz's why you end up in loli threads. That was my whole fucking point. If you're into petite, you're probaply into children anyway
define a pedophile
en.wikipedia.org
it's an absolute train wreck. they literally say they're not going to acknowledge neither the DSM-V or the ICD-11 and give the most moronic excuses. it's basically just a massive "fuck you"
Relatively
k, so I'm gonna assume that you meant no disrespect to my PowerPoint skills
If you look at ink and paint and can't imagine anything except for real kids, then I suggest it's your own thoughts that you need to be policing. Because it certainly sounds like you have some deep issues you need to come to grips with.
And you would?
Since the last few decades, you mean. "Society" didn't have nearly the inflammatory reaction before recently, and 100% of all cases weren't considered abusive or exploitive just because some could be. We can see the societal effects as people seem to be becoming more and more uncomfortable with their own sexuality and reject their own development. When you get caught doing some hanky or panky when you're little, I don't think treating it like you did something wrong and that it's bad is helping anyone.
children so either 3d or 2d. deal with the fact you are sexually attracted to children. deal with it and stop trying to pretend you're not.
That's the thing though, when it comes to pornography, all it needs is to look like something. That's also how makeup works. Fake meat is different, you don't only look at it, you also eat it.
forgot to add this
mods
it's like every man has to fuck every woman. Not everything is sex
lol
Destroyed
yeh sure
look up the defenition twat
fake and gay
>dagger darkstar
oof
the section "Definition Errors in the Second Paragraph" talks about the second paragraph, this section is what i think u r talking about so they r talking aobut the 2nd paragarph not the little amount of txt i ed. neither the 1st or 2nd claims are referring to the text i ed.
only with you?
for you
>Dagger Darkstar
Ouch, those edges.
my biggest source of unconscious bias is confirmation bias. Which is fine
loli diapers pls
did you read the thread?
that's totally how behavior works lol
We cannot blame things for that what people are doing with them. We cannot ban knives because of people who are using them to killing themselves. Because people will find another way to killing themselves. If you ban lolis pedophiles who were fapping to them will start fap to kids in parks or another shit. The thing isnt a problem, people are problem. Thinking in that way everyone should be in safety belts.
>loli Sagiri.
>pubes
Fucking disgusting.
or the criminal justice system for that matter
no
this is not how you massage lolis
there is nothing cuter than a little loli in a cute squishy warm freshly wet diaper
I don't know the character, but I love me some wispy pubes for pure masturbation fantasy purposes