How the FUCK is he not in prison?????? WTF is happening????

How the FUCK is he not in prison?????? WTF is happening????

Attached: 1563723283721.jpg (550x369, 29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

esquire.com/news-politics/a23471864/devin-nunes-family-farm-iowa-california/
gellerreport.com/2019/07/ilham-omar-explains-brother-marriage.html/
ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/182486.P.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Un fucking BELIEVABLE this guy is still in office like really? Really??

What laws do you believe he has broken?..
Maybe it's because you are brainwashed by msm to believe he's the bad guy..

the justice department opinion currently is, that you cannot indict a sitting president.

My 401k is great after he MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

Attached: Screenshot_20190418-194340_YouTube.jpg (2960x1440, 853K)

Libtard faggot. You faggots have a mental health condition. Your too busy jacking off to video games and believing that AOC cunt.

He's doing a great job. You only dislike him because the smirking high school dropout comedian on TV told you to. He's going to win re-election with 40 states and 400 electoral votes. Then he's going to give one-way helicopter rides to every fucking communist Antifa in the country, and it will be glorious.

Impeachment/imprisonment would be worse for the country at this point then letting him ride out this term.

Simple. The entire government is run by crooks. Pelosi and Schumer need him just as much as he needs McConnell and Graham.

You need evidence, kiddo. There is NONE. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FAGGOT

Czech'd & kek'd

He conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election. He's a fucking traitor, you moron.

Mueller said there was no connection though? It's written in the black and white of the SC's report that they came up empty-handed.

...

Oh shit /pol/ is here....

Attached: stand-back-shits-about-to-get-real.jpg (552x380, 36K)

Good boys don't go to prison

If the impeachment process is not begun in a timely manner, the message the Congress sends to everyone is that the Constitution is a mere veleity. Laws without enforceable consequences fail to be laws such that all subsequent unbalanced presidents will also go unchecked.
It's time all of these assholes get held to account.

Attached: biden-trump.jpg (722x1001, 111K)

what are the grounds for impeachment?

Someone's been asleep for three years.

Op , you are a little pussy.
There is no fucking evidence.
That aoc is a dumb bitch that loves deepthroating

Attached: 1563752838116.jpg (600x778, 76K)

i ask again, what are the grounds for impeachment?

>the message the Congress sends
Like the one they're sending where it's okay for illegal aliens to serve as members of Congress? Kek, begone traitor kike.

You'll be looking for the alternative-reality board.

i ask, yet again, what are the grounds for impeachment?

Must be no grounds for it then...

>>I HATE HIM RRREEEEE
>>MOMMY THEY WONT LISTEN TO ME
>>HES GONNA BAN TENDIES RREEEE

>illegal aliens to serve as members of Congress
None has been mentioned by name as yet.
On the other hand, there's a lot of hankie-pankie going on in Iowa these days.
esquire.com/news-politics/a23471864/devin-nunes-family-farm-iowa-california/
And who can forget the nation's beloved First Escort, who came in on a tourist visa and overstayed to work illegally in an illegal profession.

Attached: immigration lalo.png (800x934, 925K)

Imagine saying this while actively browsing Yea Forums

Ilhan Omar committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother to get citizenship

Mueller is about to testify before congress. Not about collusion, as the scope of his investigation already determined. This testimony will reach beyond that, and it will be revealing to say the least. Watch for it.

Omar was mentioned by name and by more than just Trump. Speaking of Nunes, how about that illegal FISA warrant Obama had placed on him as well? Where's the evidence of his so-called part in this muh Russia scandal?

Of all the important nations in the world the USA is by far the easiest country to move to.

Unless you are a raghead terrorist coming to germany that is.

You really have to stop listening to propaganda, son. That shit didn't work for Obama and it certainly won't work for Omar.

Attached: magatte 1531857060014.jpg (640x917, 100K)

>great job

Sure, like a quadriplegic giving a handjob

Obama killed off the lady who signed his birth certificate, how do you explain away a scuba diver in solid black drowning her on camera?

Lucky he still has his mouth.

Attached: lip service.jpg (620x367, 46K)

gellerreport.com/2019/07/ilham-omar-explains-brother-marriage.html/

When will you find her Kenyan birth certificate?

Kenyan? She was born in Somalia, SHE admits this

100% of the blame belongs to the Democrats. They lost to a meme. That’s how shit their candidates were.

See!? This is Trumptard nation. This, right here.

Money, bro.
And he's also been pretty good at doing shit that is not quite but sort of illegal or simply "letting" his cronies do shit that is not quite but sort of illegal for what appears to be his entire adult life, and likely before as well

Why are conservatives so afraid of AOC?
because I mean holy shit is she making you people nervous.

Attached: EE845B75-0486-4F3F-AF91-EABBA93534BF.jpg (600x600, 37K)

Attached: E6ED2728-5C14-4772-8097-067C6730421E.png (589x588, 694K)

because he didn't do anything wrong

>nervous

"dumbfounded " and "want to fuck" are more accurate

This. And also why they'll lose again. People would rather a meme than a bunch of unfunny, perpetually offended assholes running their country. Between Trump and Yea Forums (/pol/) they've been getting their asses handed to them. People are sick of their shit

Why are you faggots, nignogs, spic liberals still dreaming of this. It will never happen! You have a better chance of actually doing something amazing with your life, but no... you want to be a whiny little bitch, virtue signal on my Yea Forums and probably on social media on someone that doesnt give a fuck about you, nor affects your daily life. You liberals and a good chunk of republicans are fucking retarded. People like you is why the US is turning into a shithole, not because of trump.

Great argument. You seem like a pretty smart person.

It's a slow process. It's starting on the 24th when Mueller testifies. Republicans are squirming and are plaining to derail the testimony. It's probably not going to work.

>"no, user. We're n-not afraid of h-her. Really. She's just dumb!"

>People like you is why the US is turning into a shithole, not because of trump.
>People like you is why
Do the world a favor, and cull yourself from the gene pool.

Attached: ourpresident.gif (220x165, 256K)

>"I don't agree with you so that makes you the problem. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

actually there is more evidence that the demtards conspired with russia than anyone else. Why isnt killary in prison?

Attached: 1562291214667.jpg (217x232, 10K)

He has money, dipshit. Prison is for plebes like you. Any other stupid questions?

These are the grounds for impeachment the demtards have determined. IF THE GLOVE DONT FIT BRING FEELINGS IN AND IMPEACH!!!

I thought he was millions in debt?

Shut up, libtard. Kill yourself.

Attached: trumpmiddlefinger.jpg (574x575, 30K)

This is actually very accurate. VERY VERY VERY few people with money actually go to prison no matter the charge even rape and murder.

>arguing politics on /b

Good job retard

Attached: C0DEAC5A-9E3E-471E-8C17-D940DD790C8A.jpg (653x477, 59K)

Muller did say that he Obstructed Justice several times. There is also tax evasion, the Emolument violation, and pulling a con on 48% of the US population should be illegal.

>this goes unanswered just as I knew it would
FFS if you libshits were even remotely serious about prosecuting corruption in Washington, you'd be making damn sure your own people's closets were spotless before throwing pointed fingers around lmao. If only people on both sides of the aisle would police their own first. Trump has all but been cleared of any charges, meanwhile skeletons keep flopping out of dem candidate's pockets like goddamn spaghetti. What does kek mean by this?

Those are fines tops. Obama was guilty of the same and paid his fines but that got memory-holed like the rest.

How do you explain Trump's Bone Spurs.

Attached: 823D37E6-4B7D-4202-92B4-B080396C1121.jpg (588x806, 434K)

He can afford to have anyone killed he wants killed. Debt is irrelevant. It's access to cash that matters. You gonna prosecute or sentence this guy knowing that there's a very, very strong chance you die if he doesn't like the outcome?

The reason it goes unanswered is because no one actually believes your bullshit. Trump hasn't been cleared of anything because he hasn't been charged with anything, and Republicans are trying their hardest to make sure Trump won't be charged. They're complicit with him.

He didn't want to go to nam like a great many people didn't back then. It's not as if there was any honor in nam, it's an embarrassment on our history, same as the gulf war, war of terror and Japan bombings.

The top is obviously shopped. It's well known Trump can't read.

Obstruction of justice, a fine. WTF are you smoking. If any of us obstructed justice we would end up in jail.

There's videos all over jewtube, go have a look-see, cuck. Obama is gonna burn with the rest.

Totally agree.

Here's your sign to start making politicians accountable, huh? How about glowniggers? Congressniggers? None SHOULD get away with it but ALL do get away with it. Condemning Trump just because he's abrasive, is just stupid.

This thread is the absolute proof that Yea Forums is full of degenerate communists. Sage Heil you motherfuckers.

You can voice your opinions and feelings all you want, but this fact still stands: Obama wasn't charged with a crime for it. And it's either because there isn't sufficient evidence for it or it's a lie. My bet is on it's a lie. And you're just peddling it.

You want real facts and crime-worthy activities, read the Mueller report.

I honestly believe we would all be better off if we replaced every single politician with an actual downy retard. Fucking shits a joke

>Emolument violation

Behind the news aren't you? ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/182486.P.pdf

No proof of that. Russia does have a right to try and meddle, because the outcome effects the entire world, not just our country. Hacking, illegal, yea, but other than that, they can contribute to a campaign

I think there message is "crying will get you nowhere"

also no proof russia hacked the dnc

He wasn't charged with a crime because he literally killed off the one person that could have spoken otherwise. Explain the diver killing an old lady. There's nothing in the Mueller report to suggest Trump is still under investigation, it has concluded with nothing to show for it but wasted tax dollars.

Washington is considering a separate “emoluments” lawsuit brought by congressional Democrats, who this week began issuing dozens of subpoenas for financial records from the president’s private entities.

So yeah that was only one case, dismissed because they lacked standing. That's not a problem with the case brought by Congress. So yeah who's not up to date on these things.

Because being butthurt doesn't make reality

Attached: 56A943F4-7141-4A12-8DC9-305C028D06C3.jpg (640x616, 35K)

To be fair, that's only to his emolument case for his Washington hotel. And it's just that the court ruled that D.C. and Maryland lacked standing to bring it up, not that what Trump is doing is wrong or not.

>NONE
Objectively incorrect.

The fuck they do. They have zero rights in the US.

>Mueller said there was no connection
Really? I don't remember any conclusions to that effect in the report or otherwise. You'll have to tell me what page it's on (or which interview he said it in, link please) so I can check again, but I'm pretty sure you're bullshitting.

>He wasn't charged with a crime because he literally killed off the one person that could have spoken otherwise.
Your tin-foil hat might be on a little too tight, user. Again, we can discourse in reality where the current president is a complete asshole (and provable), or you can continue to ramble out your incoherent fantasies to other anons on this thread. Just thought I'd let you know.

Time to lay your hand on the table or fold, faggot. So far there's been no proof even provided to the media. If it was there, it would be on every airwave between Seattle and DC. Stay salty.

Ur so out of touch. Its cringe

Why do you all respond to the Trump spammer? What is the point? He's OBVIOUSLY a paid rep from the DNC/DSA. He's not suddenly going to have a revelation, he's being paid to do this. If you just want to troll him, not responding would be the best approach. If his threads just sink, he has to go back to the underpass, to live with the illegals he loves so very much.

Well, Trump is calling Omar anti-Semitic, although this is a recent thing and hasn't been going on for 2 years. And there is evidence out there of Trump sexually assaulting multiple women and peeking at underage girls with Epstein. So yeah, this pic is somewhat accurate.

Attached: 54212955_10156980077926212_1751873136623616000_n.jpg (480x384, 33K)

Unless the SC is still in effect (It isn't), the investigation has concluded with nothing of substance to prosecute. Cope.

Also RM never said that there was no conspiracy between DT's campaign and Russia. Just that he was unable to find significant evdience of it.

>shhh user, it's in the past. No need to pay attention to obvious fuckery
FTFY. Being an asshole isn't illegal regardless of your employment. Just thought I'd let you know.

There is the Mueller Report, which contains a actual evidence of some dozen instances of obstruction of justice.
>"But there was no crime to obstruct!" Cry the retards
He cannot be exonerated of a crime he may have covered up, which is why obstruction has NEVER required a guilty verdict on another crime to be valid. The mere fact of obstruction invalidates any conclusions that may be drawn by trying tampered evidence.

So again, objectively incorrect. There is evidence of wrongdoing. If Congress ignores this it too is complicit in obstruction of, or at the very least the abject contempt of, justice.

The world may never know...

Attached: 15E6D023-0A4C-47CE-BBD6-98FEE8E3E43B.jpg (480x360, 17K)

It isn't the Special Counsel's decision to prosecute. Go read the mandate. You claimed Mueller said there was no connection and I await your evidence of this claim, as I have never once seen him say those or similar words by speech or in writing.

Don't think I'm going to let you wiggle out by pretending you've won the argument by ignoring me.

>Mueller said there was no connection
Proof. Go, bullshitter, show the world what you are.

Making shitskins cry isn't illegal. Yet.

How does one ‘jack off to video games’?
I generally need both hands for a controller.
This fuckin’ guy...

That's why you people keep bringing her up constantly and used to assume she was running for president in 2020 before realizing ahe can't run in 2020, kek.

You don't have to be exonerated of a crime, you have to be proven guilty of it. Until then, everyone is innocent. US criminal justice, 101. It seems that way though because corporate (kike) media tries to convict people in the public of whatever it wishes and the public thinks it has to be disproven, but it does not. Modern MSM, not even once.

Attached: All Souls.jpg (480x480, 77K)

That’s one small racist af post for man, one giant step backwards for mankind.

op is glowing and you guys can't see shit lurk moar

He alternatively can't be convicted of a crime of which there is no evidence of. What evidence was presented, has shown the DNC used falsified reports through Britain, Australia and Israel to introduce a bogus slew of claims to our FISC, one of which was openly admitted as false by the one who gave it to them. That is your "investigation" in its entirety, a plot to subvert our election process. A glorified #metoo.

It's not that they came up empty handed. It's that the DoJ policy is to hand cases against the PotUS to the Congress to persue. The minute that orange crook is our of office hell be indicted.

It's right there in the report. No substantial evidence of the DJT campaign having dealings with Russians.

Been investing all my life, Trump has made me a lot of $

That was done, so why isn't congress pursuing? Seems they know something The People don't?

Yes, you do have to prove guilt, and the subject also has to not actively interfere in the process of investigation illegally. Trump failed in this and has thus most likely broken the law, there is a preponderance of evidence to this effect. So again, there should be a trial to determine if there is enough evidence to convict, because ignoring evidence of wrongdoing as the prosecutor is, guess which crime?

MORE obstruction.

So as I said, Congress failing to bring the Mueller Report to trial would be obstruction.

lmfao are you really saying russia has the right to fund any party or candidate? GTFO fucking commie.

True, but he can potentially be convicted of obstruction even if there is no evidence of the crime he obstructed the investigation of because if found guilty of obstruction it can be determined that the lack of evidence could be a direct result of obstruction efforts.

Image how many people committed suicide when he canceled obama care because people couldn't get the help they needed after that. He may have not actually killed anyone but I do believe he caused a few thousand people to die.

No, you said that Mueller said there was no connection. That is not a conclusive 'no connection' statement, especially considering the wealth of circumstantial evidence. Trials have been brought with less.

Page numbers or links brainlet. I await your evidence that Mueller has said there is no connection. Not 'I interpret this to mean there is no connection', you said that Mueller said something he obviously hasn't, and you are reaching. He in fact, in an ACTUAL statement, declared that the report DOES NOT EXONERATE TRUMP.

He's had two dismissed. One more to go.

This. Sage. Fuck off, /pol/

Guess we'll find out this week during the hearing.

Sorry buddy, Seth Rich leaked. No collusion. But you already know that don't you.

>voicing a public opinion in your defense is obstruction
WEW LAD

Feel free to interpret or rather, misinterpret it however you wish. There still needs to be sufficient evidence, which there is not of course. Keep the delusion going through 2020 so we can beat you again please.

You guess we'll find out what the report already says?

He did more than voice a public opinion. Evidence is in the report.

Attached: 823C544A-A4F5-48DB-BDF7-16EA9C8CEC6E.jpg (497x427, 29K)

>Feel free to ... misinterpret
Feel free to pretend the report which explicitly did not exonerate the president did. Feel free to never back up your claims.

I know man. I always hear people complaining about him but don't ever hear reasons. I am not pro or con. I really don't know why people are so upset, besides the regular anti-authority nonsense.

A dozen cases of obstruction being ignored because the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel said you can't indict a sitting president for felony charges is a fair reason to dislike someone. He is literally acting above the law and his fan club find this perfectly acceptable.

Impeachment is a political not a legal procedure. The Mueller report specifically laid out at least 30 contacts of the Trump campaign with Russians offering to help - he out and explicitly told them to intervene on his behalf and they did within hours. He fired everyone involved in investigating him, he has stone walled every Congressional oversight, tampered with witnesses, dangled pardons in return for the silence of those who he directed to commit crimes. This doesnt even touch on his money laundering and tax evasion, emoluments clause violations, sexual assault charges. If the Dems had balls, there wouldnt even be any questions left on impeachment.

He is a small, petty corrupt and incompetent man who doesnt give a damn about the country or it's people other than how they can serve his ego. He is a narcissist driven by a thirst for power - and being President is not enough - he is aiming for dictator. Think there is a single person he wouldnt throw under the bus in a second if it served his purpose?

We read the report, which showed "attempts" to use twitter to influence officials working the case, which is reaching badly. That's literally all.

Cope.

>This testimony will reach beyond that, and it will be revealing to say the least. Watch for it.

And not a soul will care except for a few leftist pukes screaming at the sky.

People care more about attack the other political party then punishing those who break the law.

Lucky for us the Dems are a bunch of pussies.

>That's literally all
Apart from his efforts (not on twitter) to forestall the Flynn investigation, his efforts (not on twitter) to fire Mueller, his attempts (not on twitter) to curtail Mueller and his investigation, public statements made at the announcement of Manafort cooperating, records of his orders (in writing, not on twitter) to McGahn to deny trying to fire Mueller...
I am getting tired of writing now and those are only the ones with the near unassailable evidence. There are cases of strong evidence with few criticisms in e.g. his attempts to influence testimony, and efforts to have Sessions intercede and take charge of the investigation.

You clearly did not read the thing at all and are only repeating whatever your news source of choice tells you.

Cope yourself. I didn't interpret anything, you ignored explicit statements in order to reach a conclusion by way of interpretation. You have thus far failed at every turn to back up your factually incorrect claim that Mueller said there is no connection.

Fucking tribalists I swear...

Somebody hasn't been listening.. his campaign slogan was "Make America great again.". Sounds like he cares about this country to me.

I’d rather put the homo pedophiles dressing up little boys as girls and posing with them almost naked in prison than put out great American hero President in prison. And put those violent pieces of shit that hit people, destroy property, and cry like bitches in prison

People think they're being objective because the media regurgitates the same points over and over again, whether true or not. Even Fox is guilty of it, Hannity and the rest of them aren't on the side of the people, they're on the side of capitalism. Fucking retards ITT I swear.

Attached: rtx372tl.jpg (961x641, 64K)

Attached: aiportraits_1563777750.jpg (512x512, 41K)

>amounts to not being allowed a public opinion
Way to curb free speech and deny the right of defense in a single post.
>this is what leftists actually want
>silence all voices who disagree
Law dictates he can have a public opinion, shill.

What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without proof.

Attached: 1563484333038.jpg (680x839, 70K)

Attached: trump-eating-pizza-640x413.jpg (640x413, 69K)

You a Rooskie, son? Cuz, even I know better than to believe Russia has a right to meddle in our elections. Or contribute to a campaign. Back to /pol with ya.

>.
I think you posted the wrong pic dude. That there is the original pedophile...he bought the teen USA pagent and had teens from Europe shipped to his "Epstein" infested motels in Florida claiming to offer them modeling contracts. Ooh, wonder where is that vid of him leeching on his own daughter.

Attached: 1560056516664.jpg (441x480, 38K)

They ain't got nothing on him.

Attached: 1550910300952.png (1200x1200, 372K)

LOCK HER UP

>AOC
>making ANYONE besides a Democrat nervous

Wish I was out of touch with reality as you. Nigger, AOC and her retarded window-licker squad is the best thing to happen to the Republicans since Trump took office. That bitch is literally too stupid to realize shes the best Republican double agent working in a blue office.

Attached: niggers.gif (320x240, 159K)

This

I aint arguing with the likes of you who get taken in by a bumpersticker slogan. If he is still running on that slogan after 4 years in office, he has objectively failed to Make America Great Again.

No. The president is not allowed to defend his attempts to obstruct justice with 'muh free speech'. Use of authority to order people to do illegal things is not protected free speech.

The President has the right to his own opinion. But he also is subject to the courts deciding he is exerting undue command influence. And if he orders somebody to do something illegal, that is definitely a crime.

That's what HASN'T been proven. You've been goaded once again to believe Trump has done such, while no evidence of it has been shown thus far. Way to be mad for no reason, if evidence had been presented I'd be mad for being duped. The society we live in cannot condemn others of guilt without that, fuck being a bunch of blind tribals.

I was wondering about that myself!

Attached: crime-stoppers-most-wanted-sex-offender-extraordinaire-wanted-lock-71-28528323.png (500x461, 100K)

> The society we live in cannot condemn others of guilt without [evidence]

Remember "LOCK HER UP!"
Remember the chants.
I agree with you but Donald doesn't.

-7/10 bait.

You fucking toddlers.

>I don’t agree with trump that makes him the problem reeeeeeeeeeeeee

Let’s see what Jan 17th holds

Derp....July 17
Go head...flame me....

July 24th faggot. The 17th was 5 days ago

There are decades of circumstantial evidence suggesting Clinton should have been thoroughly investigated for years and instead that family got shoved under the rug until this administration. That if nothing else, has been an objective good, I just wish they would do it with all of Congress as well regardless of which side of the aisle.

Attached: TRUMPFOREVER_COPE HARDER FAGGOTASS.png (1011x669, 1.39M)

Why the fuck would you have a trial to determine if there is enough evidence? Shouldn’t you already have done that homework before the trial starts?

I live in the past

Muller listed 11 instances that Congress should investigate as possible obstruction of justice on Trumps direct orders but he himself declined to investigate because his scope was limited to any possible connection between Russia and the Trump campaign (which he found evidence of but no direct quid pro quo that would constitute a felony.) In this instance a congressional hearing would equate to an ongoing investigation, not a trial, but Congress would lack the authority neccessary to conduct that investigation without first committing to an impeachment.
It's a catch 22 the founding fathers didn't think we'd ever be dumb enough to be caught in.

>trial
It's not a trial, it's no more than a hearing where Mueller will (hopefully) testify under-oath as to the findings of the Special Counsel. There are already numerous falsehoods in the counsel's findings, including the use of people's in the SC who have a known conflict of interest and leftist bias. Yes Andrew Weissman, I'm looking at you. You were fired for good reason.

Attached: TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT 2024.png (637x722, 869K)

>I said something negative to you so that means I think trump is the problem, REEEEEEEEEE

Google steered from 2.6 million up to 10 million votes toward Hillary. That is the worst election meddling in US history. I don't see a Democrat taking a fall for what a US company did, why should Trump take the fall for what a foreign government did?

Hi user. I just wanted to say that I love how you said "REEEEEEEEE". That is SOOOO CUTE!!!!! AWWWWW!!!!!! Here's a hug for making me smile -----> *hugs* Please reply with a hug!

REEEEEEE!!!

Attached: bt5nMZN.jpg (604x516, 30K)

>why should trump take the fall for what a foreign government did

Please name anything that Trump has done, that is an impeachable offence. And no evading like you did with the other guy, because if all you do is evade, I conclude that you don't know why he should be impeached.

Oh btw impeachment needs a 3/4 majority in the senate.

I’m not even your user shithead

Technically Google is a CCP listening device now, so it falls under foreign in nature.

>frog

Attached: 1540882379776.jpg (1487x1980, 262K)

To post here you don't have to be retarded

>Hasn't been proven.
There is evidence though, evidence that you continue to ignore because you refuse to read the trial and are regurgitating points from your news outlet of choice. I listed acts of obstruction, all of which are NOT protected free speech, and you tried to use free speech to defend them. You hilariously said
>fuck being a bunch of blind tribals
Even as you obviously and unabashedly reach for any law you can to defend your tribesman.

>pulling a con on 48% of the US population should be illegal.
Being the less terrible candidate is a con?

Doesn't matter since I never said anything about trump yet assumptions like a nigger.

Where is the conspiracy?

When is the impeachment?

Attached: 1563064347215.jpg (992x1024, 120K)

Assuming those are punishable under the law (they aren't outside of fines), you still have to prove intent, you silly nigger.

>Circumstantial
And there is actual, in writing, non-circumstantial evidence of Trump attempting to use his power to obstruct justice.

I didn't defend Hillary, not once, I said 'let them investigate and take it to trial then', because the truth will out. I say the same to you now, if there is or isn't collusion, it is not for the investigation to decide, nor the court of public opinion. It is for a trial. There is more evidence, and less of it circumstantial, that Trump committed acts of obstruction which could taint the result of any trial into interference in the US elections, which means it should be taken to trial and it's veracity and validity tested in an actual, judicial setting, not in the fucking news.

Never ever ;)

Well, luckily there is a process to deal with that situation... It's called impeachment.

Attached: 1496958024506.png (500x382, 109K)

Can't stump the trump.

>the truth will out
Not when you're attempting to crucify the only guy to see it through without getting bribed off.

Where is this said evidence?

July 24th, and I agree. Faggots arguing it should not be taken any further are missing the point of the justice system. If they find, as the report finds, that there is evidence of obstruction then it should go on, and anyone saying otherwise doesn't want justice, they just want their team to 'win'. Similarly if they find that there is NO evidence of obstruction, then it should be dropped, and anyone who thinks that a trial should be brought on no evidence is similarly not interested in justice, only 'winning'. The issue is that they CANNOT find there is no evidence, because even the redacted report has all but unassailable evidence of obstruction.

bbbbut I thought you have the House now...?

Attached: kktor.jpg (918x672, 109K)

>The issue is that they CANNOT find there is no evidence
Want to bet? We're entering uncharted territory with the amount of double think Trump supporters are pullling. I wouldn't be surprised if Fox News just doesn't admit Mueller ever testified to anything ever.

In. The. Mueller. Report.

Deep orange = "strong evidence" listed in the report, light is "evidence suggests" or similar with evidence in the report, light blue is "evidence COULD suggest" or similar with evidence in the report and darker blue is "evidence does not show" or similar with negative evidence in the report.

As you can see the "this absolutely fucking happened and we can demonstrate it" vastly outnumbers the "this didn't happen and we can prove it".

>Numerous falsehoods
There are also numerous justified findings with documented evidence not reliant on third parties. Including that Trump actively tried to curtail the investigation on multiple occasions.

Attached: pasted image 0.png (1008x734, 117K)

>muh report is redacted but I, a dumb peasant, know for certain there's "unassailable evidence" of obstruction because reasons
FTFY

>>Hasn't been proven.
>There is evidence though
Evidence =/= proof... last time I checked it was "innocent until proven guilty" in this country. and yes, I know you don't need proof for impeachment, but if congress feels there is enough to justify that then bring it.

Where is the conspiracy?

When is the impeachment?

Attached: 1553731796006.jpg (611x494, 40K)

>muh twatter rants
>muh remarks on TV
Cry moar. This investigation has been a shitshow of nothingburgers from the get go.

>Assuming these are punishable under the law
Obstruction of a federal investigation is a federal crime and fines are NOT the typical punishment.

And yes, you have to prove intent. There is evidence of intent in the Mueller Report.

Why are you trying so hard to convince us this investigation should stop? It hasn't cost the taxpayer (it earned in seizures more than it spent) and it has demonstrated that Russia did, in actual fact, interfere in the election, along with uncovering numerous other crimes in the process. But the second the evidence shows that your guy did some wrong you reach for any legal precedent you can to try and stop this ever reaching a conclusion.

> "this didn't happen and we can prove it".
That's not how the law works...

> "this absolutely fucking happened and we can demonstrate it"
Ok great, when is the impeachment?

Attached: 1553488937435.jpg (500x370, 29K)

You know that not all of it is redacted, right?

Another person who wants to try and tell people what the report does and doesn't say without reading it.

The attempt to fire Mueller before he completed his investigation is obstruction of justice. Just like every other scandal in American history it's the cover up that's going to ruin him.

Fines for obstructing federal investigations are the typical punishment if you're a politician, look no further than Clinton and GWB.

b u l l s h i t

Attached: tmzzzzz.png (768x846, 481K)

j u i c y

b u r g e r

Attached: ass burgers.png (593x370, 308K)

Yes, but innocent ≠ free of suspicion and suspicion and evidence is all that should be needed to get to judiciary, otherwise the justice system is self-defeating.

Stop spouting buzzword sentences like "where is the conspiracy?" You need to go read the report if you want to be taken seriously in this kind of discussion.

>clearly says in post "unassailable evidence" is in the redacted portion of the report
Sure, kid.

Possibly after Wednesday, we shall have to wait and see.

Attached: 00-dnc-leaks-010816.jpg (1000x960, 427K)

He never fired him though, therefore no obstruction.

>That's not how the law works
It's how that report is written. In three separate places did Mueller state "evidence does not support the conclusion that..." followed by the negative evidence demonstrating that it is in fact not the case. This is called a refutation, and can come in the form of alibis, antithetical motive demonstrations and such.

Really, you think I said that the unassailable evidence is in the redacted portion? Please show me where I said that because I sure as hell don't remember writing it you disingenuous fuckstain.

Obstruction was not found.

He tried. Obstruction charges can be brought against attempts as easily as successful action.

>meanwhile faggot OPs will keep making fat nothingburger threads claiming they'll get drumpfy this time
>only to be let down yet again after many others

So he didn't succeed? Then there was no obstruction.

Because 'Hurting your feelings' isn't an arrestable offense

Attached: you.jpg (603x261, 25K)

>suspicion and evidence is all that should be needed to get to judiciary
First touchdown doesn't win the game. Just "getting to judiciary" isn't enough. You can start impeachment with that, but at some point you need to have proof, otherwise what's the point?

And stop beating the same "go read the report" drum, you silly libs read a single report and now you think you're all special investigators lol.

Attached: fife.jpg (680x350, 34K)

Trump for President 2020!

Attached: 2ywj16.jpg (525x500, 76K)

can't indict a sitting president or some silly shit. he's gonna be fucked come 2020 if he hasn't stroked out by them

Attached: Mueller_61305478.jpg (649x698, 46K)

Attached: DpEUDxnXgAEirhT.jpg (707x693, 99K)

the real version

Attached: 1551571601091.jpg (600x778, 118K)

but that never happend

Ivan

Attached: putin1551064835121.png (640x640, 417K)

Attached: trump-manson.webm (854x480, 1.44M)

Attached: 1563629378148.png (600x778, 1.78M)

What msm is not telling you

Attached: IMG_20190722_105351.jpg (600x429, 54K)

So you can't read?

Not getting to judiciary is tantamount to not reaching the field. You do not need 'proof', evidence proves, you need evidence. If you haven't read the report, you cannot say what isn't in it.

>How the FUCK is he not in prison?????? WTF is happening????


He didn't do anything ILLEGAL, you ignorant fukkking FAGGOT!

This!!!!

LOVE 777

He's statistically the best president you've ever had. You should look into the facts instead of sponging up what the liberal media tells you.
I'm not even American but this shit is hilarious to me

Because we don't throw people in jail just because we disagree with their politics.

hehe cok

Shit bait, good job user.