Why are people stupid enough to deny that this happened many times? Are they just trying to be edgy faggots?

Topkek
nbcnews.com/id/32581790/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moon-rock-museum-just-petrified-wood/

The greatest film set in movie history.

how come everyone likes to ignore the fact that the moon is smaller than earth and the sun is massive thus resulting in sunlight on the moon. how come theres never any "daytime" photos of the moon. always mysterious studio setting darkness. americans cant even fix the damn roads in this country let alone go to the moon and if they did how come they arent today??..hmmm..

It's not trolling man it actually didn't happen...
It makes more sense logically and economically
to fake it in an attempt to collapse the USSR and it worked.
Imo, faking it and juking the Russians is
the greater achievement.

if they landed in a crater it would be pitch black and the surface wouldnt be flat

theres no atmosphere on the moon so imagine how motherfucking sunny it is , more than the motherfuckest sunny day on earth

This. The USA and the Soviet Union were in a SPACE RACE where each nation raced to be the first in each achievement just so they could rub it in the other's face. The Soviets didn't have anything capable of landing men on the moon so they sent a robot; hoping to at least win the claim of first piece of technology landed on the moon but unfortunately, it crashed.

Then, there are the experiments the US left up there which are still running to this day. Did you know we bounce a laser beam off of mirror arrays left up there every day to measure the distance from the Earth to the Moon? This helps us determine the rate at which the moon is ever so slowly escaping Earth's gravitational pull.

The moon has extremely little atmosphere you plum. Sky colours vary on other planets due to light refraction through atmospheric content.
The moon is a vacuum. There is nothing to refract the light or provide any sort of colour or luminosity. So, yes. In the "daytime" on the moon the surface will be illuninated but no sky. Only space.

At this point its like saying you're a flat earther. It's mostly falseflaggers who want some attention though.

The Russians landed on the moon, Mars and Venus first.
Their rocketry was also genius. When Soviet scientists met NASA in the 90s and revealed their technology, their rocket systems in the 60 were better than us rocket systems in the 90s.

They didn't do too shabby. But you're right, nothing manned.

How? Paperclip sent most nazi engineers to America so I srsly doubt that

Of course, a bunch of basement dwellers that inhabit Yea Forums would still actually believe it was fake and defend that proposition tooth and nail. Of course.

I'm laughing so hard right now.

LOOK at the Russian rockets. They couldn't build booster engines on the scale of the Saturn V so their solution was to strap multiple smaller engines together.

Theres a whole documentary on it on Netflix called cosmodrome.
They didn't have a lot of money so they relied on ingenious engineering to launch rockets.
Long story short explained by me, a non rocket scientist, their systems could recycle the exhaust from the rocket combustion and reroute it back through the engine and reuse it. Hypothetically it was impossible, the rocket should of exploded the way they did it (and they did blow up a lot getting this right), and when they told the NASA scientists they didn't believe them at first.
This meant they needed a lot less fuel, making the ship a lot lighter and easier to get into space, which lead to further exponential fuel requirement reduction.

I'm still waiting on the solid definitive proof. I've seen none.

>Hears new thing
>Just laugh because you perceived a thing
>Doesn't look into it in case other user might know something you don't, meaning you could learn something new and interesting.
>Gambles on being an ass about it.

Don't be that guy, user. This isn't a good person to aspire to be.

letterboxd.com/film/cosmodrome/

If NASA put you in a spacesuit and blasted your ass off to the moon and let you jump around on the surface, you’re so stupid that you would probably say it was VR

You’re probably one of those faggots that thinks this universe is a computer simulation. That’s because you’re just a punk ass kid who can’t take his eyeballs of the iphone daddy keeps buying you

A lost soul stuck in the virtual world for the rest of time. Sad

Actually dickhead, I was old enough to sit in front of the TV and watch it. You obviously believe anything our govt or media tells you. I, on the other hand, rely on actual physical evidence which there is none. Not to mention our technological capabilities in 1969.

Our God damn sworn enemies the Soviet union had a satellite orbiting the moon and and even they confirmed it. Why would they do that?

>I watched it on TV
>So I know for a fact it isn't real.

I'm sure you were a well educated PhD gentleman back then with all the capacity to understand modern rocketry and the achievements of mankind in physics and mathematics.

Sure kid.

How many other trolls were there back then?

>Are they just trying to be edgy faggots?
Pretty much yes

Attached: uFzWGba.png (500x400, 239K)

Go to any observatory on appointment and they will be happy to show you the Tranquility Base coordinates and landing site with everything we left behind.

- 0.6875 - 23.4333

...dumb motherfuckers like you as why I wish a second coming would actually happen

Last faggot who came at buzz Aldrin with this bullshit got punched in the face. youtu.be/G_YM9cCtwz4

The Russians have very, very good rocket tech.

And got thier tech up to speed first. They were achieving LEO while America was still working out how to stop thier engines from blowing up. This is undeniable

They need to send up a moon satellite with a live video feed to show faggots the US flag still sitting up there

did they confirm it? wouldn't you be better of talking about china's recent trip to the moon and their statement that they were going to make sure the US went there?

Eh the flag is likely all white now thanks to the sun

Get yourself a digital microscope and enter these coordinates and you will see for yourself the landing spot and the flag.

Fucking idiot

if you have a connection to look at the moon with an observatory telescope you can see the landing pad
>tfw you're years of space race denialism is literally caused by not looking up

Attached: ....jpg (1280x720, 71K)

The Indians have a lunar observatory. They would jump at the chance to debunk the US landings... but they haven't. Because the landing sites and rovers left behind are still very visable

You mean a telescope, right

Which probably ended up costing them way more than to "just build it bigger lol"

technology and style of ruskies remind me goblins and their engineering in warcraft

pretty much just take 1 cosmonaut , a huge firework and some ductape , should work

No, I said mircroscope! That is the scam, that you need a telescope to see it. No you need a microscope to see the real lunar landing.

>tfw you're no true michael bolton fan

Attached: 1544916847640.jpg (1084x610, 56K)

>does work

As a ancient user said: As Above, so nellow.

EGH! WRONG!

there could be a bunch of reasons they would keep shut but nothing prevents the US from sending unmanned rockets to the moon which the soviets would see, doesn't mean you went there :^)

Because they really think that 400.000 people involved in everything around the Apollo Project were able to shut their trap and that the Russians approved a hoax by the US instead of calling it out. Not counting the numerous eye witnesses who saw the astronauts boarding the rocket, the takeoff and followed the ascent plus astronomers who took it from there until arrival at the moon.

It didnt.

read

or

you know what ruskies do with twins ? send one into space and show other that he came back

is this true? can you actually look up and see some shit on the moon that was left behind? where are these bomb ass telescopes

Attached: shocked pepe.jpg (236x236, 9K)

Hawaii

yeah, you can see stuff left by a robot

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2008_season) and go to 104

hawaii, but you can find many places with an observatory that isn't in the pacific ocean

and the footprints of a robot? where is this footprint making robot anyway?

>a robot
In 1970?

Attached: robot.jpg (310x474, 17K)

see pic in OP's post

at this point you're making a deepstate point, which at this level is inconsistent with deep state timeline literature.

like a thing with 4 wheels and an arm

this is one of the side effects of the internet, while it's great venue for people with similar ideas to find each other it's also a venue for people with similar ideas to find each other. These people then form insular online communities that give them identity and the illusion of consensus. That's why conspiracy theories in general have taken off in the last 10 years.

Oh come on. It's just a giant conspiracy involving a few thousand people a NASA, the Navy, the Air Force, the president, all the major media networks, our arch-rivals the Soviet space agency, radar installations around the world, astronomers around the world, and any amateur with a decent consumer grade telescope. Why is that so hard to see?

that's awesome. what do deniers say about this evidence?

they call the myth busters "Jews" and then just keep on denying

Because when you are lied to time after time it is both easy and logical to assume they have lied once more.

Attached: taken by NTID student Yesenia Ballesteros.jpg (2157x2044, 391K)

Why are there so many intersecting shadows in that picture? Are there multiple suns on the moon??

You're on Yea Forums. 90% of the userbase has legitimate mental development issues.

they usually shut up when they find out you can actually look at the proof themselves

left 10% for yourself I see

read
or

It won't be long till regular cameras will be able to see shit we left behind. Nikon P900.

Attached: DSCN8735.jpg (1620x1080, 751K)

What a gift, it helped me so much

Sorry, but the Russians never successfully put anything into space with this type of engine ever. The program was scrapped after the US beat them to landing on the moon.

The engines were a great idea, but extremely dangerous and never really used successfully until the US got their hands on them many many years later. user's comment stands.

We have a society of men that think they're women...so yeah

if you're being sarcastic read
if not then good show

No wind on moon flags blowing lol

looks like a picture, not a video. How is the flag blowing? Due to the wrinkles? Surely you aren't that stupid.........

what he said

Provide evidence it didn't. Because all you people wanna claim it didn't happen you must provide evidence. There's plenty to show they did. I bet you people believe in flat earth too

You seriously that dumb you must be an Americanfag

Yes. But you can also fire a laser at a relay point left behind. They use it to measure the moon moving away from earth.

no he's right wrinkles are on your clothes right now, doesn't mean there's wind in your room

>flags blowing

No movement at all other then when it was allowed to unfurl and those are wrinkles in the previously packed material. Flag was spring loaded.

sooo, your stance is that they faked the landing, in a studio, and turned a fan on to blow the flag around because they forgot it wouldn't be windy on the moon.

Yeah, I'm the dumb one. Just when I think people on the internet can't get any more stupid, you show up and completely prove me wrong. lol

You can buy one at best but and the landing sites latitude and longitudes are public information.
Easily searched and found online.

LOL spring loaded next you will be telling us your Donald fart I mean trump what a set of goonies

Ha, you and your science mean NOTHING to the New American. We are legion!

youtu.be/K9AdBuN05CE

Nice try sherlock Holmes

This is my favourite. "There's no wind on the moon so that means it's fake because the flags blowing."
"Very simple explanation that, though real, a 4 year old could have thought of."

This is confirmation bias at it's best folks. Investing so hard in believing in something, that as soon as you perceive evidence you don't take the half second of thinking it takes to realise maybe there's a simple solution that, even if ultimately you're right about the moon landings being fake, the evidence you're using probably isn't the best argument...

You're my favourite kind of troll. You make me Chuckle. No sarcasm.
You're probably working comic magic in the area 51 raid group, aren't you?

To all you anons who think we faked the Moon landing, please explain why we would fake it 6 times?

I said they never used that type of engine successfully. I never commented on dropping garbage onto Venus from orbit.

The first N-1 rocket was assembled beginning in early 1967 and stood 35 stories tall. Tensions were high in February 1969 as the Russians geared up for the first unmanned launch. The N-1 took off from the launch pad and things were looking good. About a minute into the flight, some metallic debris got into one of the engines and the rocket exploded.

Over the next few months, the team made improvements and scheduled another launch for early July 1969, just a few weeks before the Apollo 11 mission. The N-1 took off and promptly crashed down on the launchpad with incredible force. Although the success of Apollo 11 effectively ended the space race, Mishin and Kuznetsov persevered. Improvements were made on the NK-33 including the addition of filters to keep debris out of the engines. Test launches continued until the Kremlin canceled the program and ordered the destruction of all N-1 rockets in an effort to keep a lid on the technology.

Throttle back there Turbo. You know you're wrong, but you keep plugging away instead of admitting it.
It's okay you like crayon eater, no one knows who you actually are. You're right, it was fans in a studio making the flag wave. lol

Prove it

Yes spring loaded the horizontal arm folds down next to the main shaft of the flag pole. It extends out and hold the flags (There were 4) perpendicular to the ground. Otherwise they would have just hung against the flag pole much as is seen next to thousand of podiums on Earth.

Pic related

The Apollo 11 flag is believed to have degraded too much to be detected from Earth but the other 3's (Shadows) are still visible with Telescopes of sufficient power.

Attached: apollo11_flag01.jpg (480x321, 34K)

try that one again

Obviously, its because the moon's only out at night. I can't believe how little common sense people have.

Not my fault ur a sad bastard toughen up kid

You got it squirt. I'll work on being tough like you and you can work on being a big boy like the rest of us. Good luck!

That's your answer to my question?
Why would we fake it 6 times? Prove it.

You're a fucking retard.

kek

youtube.com/watch?v=_H20GUvUfl4

Look at that fucker waving........

settle down you two

>artificial light hadn't been invented in 1969

...

No u. It doesnt work that way. The ball is in your court.

I know people who were in Mission Control and they talk NASA and the lunar mission at the drop of a hat, and have been all over the press with the anniversary. At this point, anyone who thinks there was a secret conspiracy is beyond repair.

>Why are people stupid enough to deny that this happened many times?
Probably because of the Kubrik connection, and the Space Race, combined with jewi.... er, "soviet" infiltration and subversion of US institutions. Also the accounts of several astronauts regarding what they saw, which matches up with what's being pushed now (the normalization of "aylmaos" that are actually interdenominational demons or some shit". Do you know about the stories from astronauts about how they arrived to an occupied moon with shit like Imperial Star Destroyers waiting for them on the moon? Kubrik tried telling people about his involvement in faking the original moon landing that was broadcast on live tv through imagery in his movies and was probably killed off for exposing that and the elites and their devil worship and sex/drug orgies.

I personally don't invest in any of the stories. Maybe we did go to the moon? Does it really matter though? We're not supposed to be able to get through the radiation belt just outside of our atmosphere, via NASA scientists. So what does that tell you? There are so many conflicting stories and opinions from a whole bunch of people involved.

The Space Race shit in and of itself is a huge deterrent for belief from a large swath of people. We were trying to beat the Russians to the moon and broadcast some shit on tv that looked fake as fuck and created more questions than it gave answers.

Don't buy into groupthink. It's a weird subject and we'll never have real answers to these questions.

The moon isn't only out at night you mook. You can see it in the daytime quite often too.
Also the user you're replying to means why is it night on the moon when photos are taken, and it's because he doesn't understand atmosphere and light refraction.

You typed a lot of stupid bullshit.

Lol, the N-1

>on Netflix
Netflix is a propaganda machine created by the grandson of Edward Bernays

What a well thought out reply with many fantastic and thought provoking points

Cool stuff user

Basically everything here you've listed as evidence against is very quickly debunked with Google. You heard things and didn't check essentially..

>Kubrick
People extrapolated what they thought were clues in the movie the shining. There was a movie called a beautiful mind about a brilliant schizophrenic who could find all kinds of whacky evidence for fake things in newspapers. Remember these people exist and are a source of a lot of conspiracy shit. They're creative and convincing.

>unable to get through the van Allen belt
We can. Radiation isn't instantly deadly or even harmful. It comes down to time and exposure. You can walk through some radiated parts of Chernobyl and be just fine provided you don't stay too long or go back often. You can also drink alcohol which will reduce absorption and increase your exposure thresholds.

The van allen belt isn't so full of radiation as you think. you can definitely fly through it with protection from a shuttle for 8 days with optimum flight path avoiding hot spots. It would become a huge problem if you were going to Mars, and even bigger if you're doing interstellar travel. But not the moon.
>We'll never have real answers
But we do. We went. Other anons have mentioned even. There is a telescope in Hawaii that can see what we left on the moon, you can go there.
You can fire a laser at ordinance left on the moon and have it bounce back, which they left there to calculate the moon moving away from earth (brother in law has done it). Or you can just understand conspiracies are extremely difficult to keep. There are mathematical algorithms for calculating how long before a conspiracy totally breaks based on how many people know. Time decreases exponentially with each person in the know.
Hundreds od thousands of people were involved with the moon landing and millions of experts today know and have the evidence we went.
It should have broke in a few hours. It's been on for decades.

No you can't
No telescope on earth is that powerful not even the Hubble space telescope

I really wish I was so stupid I could comfortably call anything that disagrees with me a propoganda machine.
I'd be so reaffirmed every day in my unlimited cosmic knowledge of everything in spite of no education.

there are 2.5 million lunar rocks storaged in multiple facilities arround the globe

Attached: meteoritelab.png (980x735, 1.24M)

Attached: 584641main_apollo17-left-670.jpg (620x298, 57K)

It's all that bullshit post deserved.

you wanted to say something stupid and you actually made it - hubble is not able to see from that close

>lunar
Stellar not Lunar.

We collect meteor rocks from all over Earths surface. But Lunar rocks were limited to manned lunar / space missions and are not in the thousands of pounds much less millions.

but but but buuuu
that fucks my whole edgy conspiracy theory shtick all to hell!

This times a 1000

but is no wind!

Attached: Tom2.jpg (300x424, 31K)

Stuid idiot just doesnt know where to find all the evidence. Its all over the place for you to look see and touch. Like anothern person replied to your autistic dumb ass. Spend some serious money on a real telescope and look at the moon yourself

>some dumb guy said dumb thing on the internet! oh boy i sure can't wait to rip on 'murica for this!
Seriously the extent of your hatred for America is just as irrational as it is embarrassing.

2.5 million lunar rocks. 12 men have walked on the moon. That means that each astronaut lifted 208,333 rocks into their lander. Are you sure these are rocks?

They are just a bunch of people who don't understand human nature or the special effects capability of the 1960s

Attached: _55193708_nasa.jpg (1024x574, 122K)

It would have been more expensive for kubrick to film it in a studio rather than just go to the moon, here are the facts
youtu.be/dWBYAxhH3u4

We did not fake the moon landing.

Sincerely,
NASA

Also, the russians would find out pretty fast about the faked filming, why haven't they say anything? They would have been whistleblowing that shit harder tham the americans tried with chernobyl hbo series

"Around the globe"? You cant even prove the world is round. Protip you can't.

Attached: smile2.gif (322x179, 1.9M)

Because it was so easy to fake, and people still believe it happened. That's how powerful the media is, and that's why we need to fire key people at CNN and NBC for starters. Then we need to abolish NPR and PBS.

Attached: angry-emoji-1[1].jpg (800x800, 29K)

The Moon was manufactured and installed.

Attached: moonface.jpg (1529x747, 469K)

>that's why we need to fire
who is "we" ?

Because if we cut down every achievement the USA has, it makes it easier to say it's a mediocre country at best and makes it more ripe for replacing its constitutional republic with a socialist dictatorship with no freedom of religion and where the people are subjects of the government.

The ending of that video was so therapeutic to watch.

they not only believe in flat earth, they also believe OP isnt a faggot

Why is the College of Winterhold in today's Bing image?

Attached: bingbong.jpg (1485x597, 195K)

Literally every moon hoax believer is massively ignorant about space. I don't mean they lack a phD in astrophysics... I mean that they're ignorant on basic facts you'd find in the space section of a fucking CHILDREN'S encyclopedia. Yet they're too arrogant and stupid to think this doesn't matter.

Attached: Sasha Grey.jpg (2816x2112, 482K)

explain