Why the fuck would a person care at all about what other consenting adults do with one another if that person has...

Well why do you care if he cares cares about people who care about things that do 'ot involve/concern them when you are not involved with them?

Negative responsibility makes no sense in this context, though. If that's your true position, should people at all times be pumping out kids for the lottery of becoming a great person?

What might lead to more great people in the world is for those same women to choose not to disadvantage their potential offspring by bringing them into the world too early and without a stable household in which to become great. Like, they're probably still having kids at some point. Just, later. When they might have a better chance at not becoming a drug dealer when they grow up.

Not to mention, of course, the possibility of the women themselves becoming great if they didn't have that kid. And they could do it faster. We wouldn't have to wait twenty years for the same potential opportunity.

The logic cancels the both of us
It's ironic and self defeating
I personally don't but nice try at getting the upperhand