Has anyone noticed that modern millenial and zoomer women have less suckable tits as women in the past...

yeah it does it like the way a watermelon grows. it's just like water filling out the shape. this is why braless feminazis have saggy boobs from no shaving

Yesssss... Their good... You pedo wannabe.

>Bras have no effect on the shape of womens' tits.
Why would a constraining garment that is worn for most of a woman's life and especially during breast growth years, have no effect ?

Chinese women used to bound their feet and they took the shape they wanted.
A lot of different cultures around the world did the same with children's heads, like pic.
Why do you think something that works on bones doesn't work on lumps of fat ?

Attached: déformation_toulousaine_»_MHNT.jpg (711x1024, 197K)

this is true, but then the argument still makes no sense cause the only thing that changed is the shape of bras, not wearing bras or not. don't be dumb

BUT IT DOESNT CHANGE THE GENETICS RETARD

GENETICS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BODY SHAPE, IT IS ALL ABOUT GOD

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE SHAPE NOT THE GENES RETARD 1!!

Attached: Hitchhiker-Luxemburg-1977.jpg (781x594, 174K)

>says “don’t be dumb”
>expects every reply he gets to be from the same person

I was just chiming in with my bra knowledge, you insufferable jackass. I’m not the person who said it was because of bras in the first place. I simply gave my input on a very debatable claim that bras don’t change the shape. Actual studies have suggested otherwise. If those studies are correct, then of course the shape of bras could effect the shape of tits.

Don’t be an arrogant little shit how bout that

ive not worn a bra for 5 years and my shape hasnt changed, if anything they've stayed the same (good thing). stop acting like women's bodies experts when you cant even find a clitoris. what HAS changed is aesthetics and demand in the porn industry.

its because literally anyone can do porn, but back then you had to devote your life to it. now anyone has a camera and fucks. you Yea Forums faggots are retarded as fuck.

all im saying is that people hired you with a near perfect complexion

You must have tiny tits

i have a small size C or a big size B, depends on the bra.. not necessarily small, not huge either. just a handful

Don’t your nips show through whatever you are wearing?

Bras are not worn as a way to change womens' bodies.They are worn to keep boobs from wobbling all over when a woman gets dressed. Some wear no bras and have saggy boobs. Some wear no bra and have perky hemispheric boobs. It's not the bra. It is the genetics that determine shape, size, etc. The only thing that might alter the shape is the women's exercise and eating habits.

yeah! but i always wear an undershirt with spaghetti straps or a tanktop. and in the beginning it felt really awkward, but now i dont even notice anymore

>you Yea Forums faggots are retarded as fuck.
^^^ This

best and only answer

post em

Post em. With or without a shirt

no. i dont want anything from you

You know the drill...
Tits or gtfo

I’m sure everyone else notices!

>millenial
>zoomer
>suckable tits
>vintage porn
>milkers
OP has autism.

Attached: image.jpg (884x1273, 238K)

probably, but no one has ever actually commented on it! and i've only noticed a handful of people stare over 5 years haha

You too.

Attached: 1552520448347-b.jpg (657x868, 142K)

when i want something yeah. i know the rules, fuck off

NO U

So if you have to walk fast or run do you let em bounce all over the place or do the boob hold thing?

In a way or an other you looking for something

It seems that a lot of summer fag don't even read them

>what HAS changed is demand in the porn industry.
When did men ever stop wanting to see prominent tits ?
As for you personal case, maybe it's because the shaping happens during the growth stage. Maybe it's because the bullet shape is not natural and required bullet bras to maintain, while yours do not. Maybe it's because you're just a faggot who used to crossdress.

What bras are worn for and what they actually do are two different things.
We know that bodies can be deformed easily. Why would breasts be magically safe from that?

Attached: 7e0457f16796db11be38cce73e8be5f9.jpg (1376x2000, 1.03M)

im just making conversation. nice try though

i dont do the boob hold thing because Streisand effect. trying to hide it will only draw attention lol, i just let them free

Its no different than when almost all older porn had women with great hairy vaginas. Its what the market demands. tiny titties and butterfly pussies are the order of the day so thats who gets photographed.

>Chinese women used to bound their feet and they took the shape they wanted.
To clarify; the shape high-society wanted at the time.

Good for you. I love seeing bouncing boobs under the clothes. Nice & hot here so it’s all over the place

morons

I’m still all about big ol titties.

i used to feel ugly about it but i feel sexy now, and i get a lot of tips at my work so lol. enjoy the view

Nips for tips. Everybody wins.

This.
WTF. You people are morons.

Bras of some form have been around for max 1000-2000 years. Genetic evolution in a populations, especially one as diverse as humans, takes 10,000-millions of years. More likely hundreds of thousands for such a sexually selective phenotypic trait, such as breast shape and size.

Faggot.

These "less suckable" tits you are talking about are actually just normal. These are the tits you would find on any average woman you would pick up at the bar. But you wouldn't know about this because you are either 13, a beta cuck, or both.

We see these normal tits more commonly in porn now due to recent societal shifts. Perhaps its because amateur, more realistic, "girl next door" type porn gained more popularity. The industry before was full of hot professional bimbos with huge, often fake, tits. This, along with the rise and domination of the internet, allowed literally ANY girl to be naked for the world to see. Thus, real or normal tits became much more common than gigantic, professional status tits.

Fuck you all, I'm never coming back here again. Also, here's my ex's big suckable tits.

Attached: IMG_2063.jpg (1600x1600, 465K)

Its because pretty much every single woman in porn has plastic surgery on their tits.

It has nothing to do with bras holy fuck..

it might actually have to do with how early girls start to menstruate, and that seems to be affected by all sorts of estrogen-emulating chemicals, soy, and then there's the affect of those chemicals on the actual formation of the mammaries.

This guy is right. And I'm also leaving, this became fag/fat'r'us and the only (presumable) woman present won't show tits. This shit is dead.

Which they were part of. Women generally deserve at least half the blame for the things they're socially forced to do. The enforcer is often the mother, mother-in-law, or female peers.

Attached: covers.jpg (1000x750, 183K)

Here, enjoy my big suckable dick.

You literally don't know what a zoomer is then

and my point with this was, more estrogen-analog chemicals in a girl's diet might actually affect nipple formation

Oh, I can find your clitoris

Or perhaps the standards of what is magazine and porn friendly has changed?
You strike me as one who doesn't see many actual tits irl.
Most of them aren't porny.

They're all fake chest extension modules

But who the fuck is talking about genetic evolution you dumb fuck ? not me.

Attached: 0LO4Hew.jpg (667x1000, 66K)

big nipples was the fashion back then, not it's not.

t. 43y/o

im hurling. dont touch me with your ballsweat covered hands

>Seems
Are you getting data from pictures on the internet?
Because photographers are very selective and will respond to the trends of the time.. boobs don't change.

>braless feminazis have saggy boobs from no shaving
kækked

What....What the fuck did i just read...

hope you still enjoy them when she has to tuck them into her waistband so they dont get caught in the car door.

wtf wat

>hurling
a true gentleman's sport, milady.

not even a (you)?

i meant puking

She’s 40 & I’m still enjoying them

that'll be fun too

post 'em

there are 18-19 zoomers ya know :/

.. true,
Gen Z starting years are around 2000.

>the shaping happens during the growth stage.
Oh you virgin retard you.

Attached: 1535045940231.jpg (258x245, 12K)

the happening grows during the stage shaping, you regin vertard.

>I think it's because of bras. Their shape evolved, and breasts followed.

This guy claimed that as bras "evolved" or changed, then naked breasts followed.

idunno
I need something to drink
water
I need water
imma git me sum waturh

form follows function, the body becomes it's function.

this is why feet will eventually become shoe-shaped.

.. I am very intelligent.

I’m old. I’m not taking pics of my wife’s tits

Yeah, and why did you add genes into it ?

Attached: les-activistes-feministes-ukrainiennes-du-femen-manifestant-contre-le-defile-versace-(collection-aut (940x620, 59K)

Ha that’s awesome

Attached: 1507910243688.jpg (417x517, 15K)

Where did c cup go?

Attached: 9.jpg (690x578, 173K)

still here

Attached: 1556276073176.jpg (497x497, 26K)

Actually, this is not true at all. Bras do have a significant effect

I'm old too, who the shit cares.

Attached: 1560284445387.png (307x300, 100K)

You been playing with those fabulous tits?

thnx brahirrim

>Zoomer 'women' are all still technically underage

yeah, I paint them green and run down the street flapping them around acreaming HUEHUEHUE WUTERMELUN HUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

no. also im going to bed, goodnight!

no, no they're not. The oldest cohort of zoomers were born 2000, which makes them 19 years old now.

sleep tight

Attached: 564878_10big~2.jpg (768x1054, 116K)

Attached: 239146~2.jpg (838x523, 87K)

I think all y'all fuckers need to explain where the goddamn sauce is

This is my dream come true..

Attached: 63495160_168330350861495_1313262454567282921_n.jpg (1127x1409, 160K)

in the fridge you fudgepacker

> Youn & Sexy Models links

models4u.website/

Sorry. No way that's true. The torpedo tits porn during the 50s only lasted as long as the torpedo tits bras were in style.

The amount of truely stupendous stupidity in this thread is fascinating.
What are the sources of iinformation as to the shape of breasts in the past?
A: Art, in the form of painting and photography primarily and sculpture a long third, and physically in the shape of corsets and bras.
So what is art based on? Generally ideals and personal taste.
What were corsets based on? Ideals, particularly in the Victorian and Edwardian era.
There is not a jot of evidence, at all, that there has been anything in the way of evolution of the female form over the last few hundred years. Indeed that is far too short a time for evolution to have any effect. And as for those how reckon that pointy shaped bras result in pointy shaped tits should put a pointy shaped hat on and see if their heads 'evolve' into what they truely are.
Grow up the lot of you.

>put a pointy shaped hat on and see if their heads 'evolve'
See pic in

Nah you wrong ...

Bras hold chicks tits better and keep from gravity pulling them down, most girls take them shits off immediately when they get home tho, the ones that wear them all night keep their shape better

It's because chicks today are fatter and everyone has rounded implants. Back in the day day they were looking for skinny chicks with big tits. Those are hard to find, and now you can just slap some silicone on them. Girls with torpedo tits tend to have more breast tissue/ bigger mammary glands which get drowned in fat when they turn into ham beasts. It's implants and fatties.

Attached: 0067689415.jpg (1514x1624, 189K)