Give me one good reason why assault rifles should remain legal

Assault is a verb, not an adjective. KYS

I kno u white boyz like to shoot long black things...

so i got u a long black thing u can grip..

Attached: 4080466.jpg (300x400, 19K)

>more people in US than in both Australia and Canada combined

only the cops who are supposedly going around shooting all the black people should have guns

>gun crime goes down with ban
Are you actually retarded? Does is stop over all crime?

If you dont like freedom nobody is forcing you to stay here bud

Assault rifles ARE illegal, faggot. You're thinking of the made up "assault weapons" term, which is idiot-speak for "scary-looking rifle"

The possibility for a corrupt government which is becoming more and more prevalent with each passing day.

Assault is an action, not a thing. violence is a human action. There's nothing anyone can do to stop human nature. If the crazy's were not using guns, they would be using bombs, knives, cars or poison. There is no way to ban everything humans can use to kill each other.

I got a better statement let's see you try to take them really I dare you

>x is bad
>ban x
>criminals start using y
>ban y
>criminals start using z
>ban z
Rinse and repeat until literally anything is heavily regulated or banned.

Umm? Ant we already there dog

I agree with this user

To threaten the politicians to behave as is the reason, by design, from the people that set the country up. Im sorry you're not a fan of history, but fucking move if you don't like it.

look at all the gun loving incels in here

shut the fuck up pussy

Nah, when the US reached that point, it'll become the UK

>SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

What the fuck do guns have anything to do with not fucking chicks?
Are you fucking retarded?

it’s a human right

Attached: gun control fag 1.jpg (500x500, 86K)

If you’re talking about making them illegal in the United States then the 2nd Amendment says you can respectfully go fuck yourself.

Beyond that they’re no more powerful than many other rifles that no one has any sort of problem with. Most hunting rifles used for things like deer or elk are far more powerful than the puny little 5.56

Im not even american but i do believe if you look in your constitution it does say the right to bare arms yes, but it also says you have the right as a citizen to arm a d form a militia against your own government if you feel the freedom of your state is being threatened. So my friend. Get an assault rifle, learn how to use it and lock it away. In case that day ever comes

You dont need a gun because we have the police but the police are evil racist fascist that only harass non-Whites that also allow Antifa to throw quick drying cement at their political adversaries. You dont need to protect you, the State will protect you!

Attached: gun for slaves.png (500x759, 206K)

Why not just ban murder?

cuz this

Attached: gun law.jpg (500x500, 28K)

Thank you! Nobody seems to care that I can go buy a handgun chambered in 454 casull or buy 1oz deer slugs that could open a mans chest cavity like a pornstars gaping asshole.

"Lets ban the scary black guns!"

Bc they're fun as shit

Attached: 20181231_171007-min.jpg (4032x1952, 1.13M)

Or just make crime illegal? I’m sure criminals will understand.

That's a nice 1911

Switzerland would like a talk with you.

To fight the government you fucking nimrod!

Attached: 9430070928.jpg (2450x1344, 199K)

as of July 4, London fatal stabbings: 33
as of March 9 (4 months prior) NYC fatal shootings: 55

You're retarded.

Sauce on that magazine?

Attached: 1560731107738.jpg (250x289, 25K)

Bad shot.

You can kill more redhats with them.

>"Civilized" country with no guns
>Still get a lot of fatal incidents
>Niggers and stupid fucks have nothing to do with it
>"Cmon guyz, scarri lukin wepons kill, not pepl"
>ISHYGTY

Attached: 154856251977.png (584x622, 499K)

Cause only 4% of murders are from rifles

Playboy, either winter 2018 or spring 2019, can't remember.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Because fuck you it's my money.

and knife crime is higher

The second amendment does not specifically mention guns. Its says "arms" which refers to anything that can be used as a weapon. Anything.

The forefathers were being oppressed by a tyrannical English king. They knew what they were saying because they lived it.

In order to keep freedom the people need to defend themselves from government.

>refers to anything that can be used as a weapon.
So I can own an atomic bomb? Chemical weapons?

Well to stop gun violence. Like when all guns are banned in Chicago, New York and Baltimore. That worked great! Oh wait a minute....

Germany, firearms illegal = High gun violence
Switzerland, firearms legal = less gun violence

Attached: 1561096730716.gif (426x272, 430K)

I would trust the average redneck more to own nukes than any globalist government

Good idea.

Step 1: Ban guns.
Step 2: If the police see anyone with anything that looks like a gun, shoot to kill.

How can anything go wrong?

>why assault rifles should remain legal
Because the US populace has not just a need but a duty to resist any and all forms of tyranny that should usurp their liberty, be it a foreign standing Army, or their own government...

Fortunately, in our 240-ish years of history, we've not yet had to resort to this extreme measure, but this extreme measure MUST remain, to ensure the Freedom of the American people.

The problem isn't "assault rifles" in the least; fewer than 30 people on annual average across the nation are murdered with these particular types of firearm, where handguns and blunt and sharp objects VASTLY outweigh the dreaded "assault rifle" in terms of annual average homicides committed via these methods....

So why ban "assault rifles", when homicide with blades, baseball bats, pipes, etc. are all far more commonly used as murder weapons?

And in the case of crazies trying to make the news, let's not forget that Timothy McVeigh killed over 160 with the flick of a Bic; not a single shot fired.... If you ban swords, murderers will choose daggers. If you ban daggers, they will choose knives. If you ban knives, they will choose clubs....

If you want to decrease violent crime, then you must remove the motivation behind violent crime.... Simply disabling one of many methods isn't going to accomplish shit.

Thus, gun control is NOT about safety; it is about CONTROL.

Attached: 1521198377765.png (1000x656, 1.27M)

AR
Automatic Rifle

not assault rifle.

>Thus, gun control is NOT about safety; it is about CONTROL.
This.
America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a crime problem and a faggot infestation problem.

ArmaLite Rifle, design #15

>The government should fear it's citizens
... at least its illiterate citizens. It's the ignorant retards that worry me the most.

Attached: 1547395680569.jpg (1024x1023, 89K)

no ar means armalite fucking retard

yeah, those machine gun wielding faggots are a huge problem.

Attached: 1528639442161.jpg (1936x1936, 402K)

also this

Attached: 1528639273750.jpg (507x392, 44K)

AR

ArmaLite Rifle

Because they don't cause any crime.

>gun crime down
>every other crime skyrockets

Syrian shithole immigration is up in those countries, too. Fuck you, commie bitch.

Well user, from this and above post it looks like we have a serious nigger problem.

Attached: 3102DE1D-86E3-407D-925D-1EDAFF3B8E03.jpg (474x474, 39K)

yeah sure then noone has any right to self defense and you get put in jail for defending your home kys and your whole family faggot

It's only because of poverty and white oppression and the Man and social injustice endemic to a heteronormative patriarchical society that doesn't respect the nigger's need to kill, rob, and rape indiscriminately. And steal copyrighted music for "samples," to hide a complete lack of creativity beyond the field of malingering.

They look pretty cool

Is that milf beer?

Give me a reason why a liberal is on fucking Yea Forums lol

Liberal cuck

easier shootings

And the pussification of society continues....

The founding fathers put it in the constitution even though they had no idea of automatic guns reading journals from the founding fathers you can tell they would of loved them

Tumblr must be down

Op is dead

Lol yep fucking cuck is bothering the real men

Share Blue pays them to shit up this website.

>what is per capita

You're retarded.

Like legit or metaphorical

I meant he hasn’t responded to anything lol

Oh lol I thought you were talking about murder

There is no 1911 in that pic....

People are the fucking problem, I have yet to see any gun shoot someone without some asshat involved

DELET THIS.

Attached: 1478555971189.png (766x793, 896K)

No lol

Its summertime

Because you touch yourself at night

It is. Hands down my favorite beer. I'm an hour or so away from where it's brewed. When they ship it out my town is sold out in about 6 hours. Luckily they hold a bunch back to release at the brewery throughout the year.

Why is a right-wing delusional idiot on Yea Forums

Lol atleast I don’t try to destroy America

What's the silver handgun on the upper right hand corner?

That's not how you spell niggers.

I dare you to try and take my guns you commie faggot

Does it taste like milf?

Provided you're asking this question from the United States, the simple answer would be the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution.

Also, your photo is silly as it shows 2 assault rifles.

P.S. I'm not a gun owner. I don't think I'm responsible enough to own any. However I do enjoy the notion that home invaders are given pause in the country as they have to consider the potential of getting shot if they choose to break into someone's home.

UK has less than half the intentional deaths per capita compared to America.

This is a website for right wing people go to tumbler faggot if you want to be cuddled otherwise grow some balls

Stg 44

Attached: 982432F9-B6FE-458E-B5AA-982E1ECEB715.jpg (720x480, 18K)

Assault rifles are a made up categorization for normal rifles that certain uneducated (on the subject) groups of people have decided are scary.

They can take my guns from my cold dead heads brother!

Crime is higher in countries with firearm bans

Wow, who would've thought.

1: if you wanna try to take my guns away then you can try
2: most gun violence is hand guns
3: it’s part of the constitution

Attached: 2601F8FD-0BC7-4764-9C44-0FAD7144E61E.jpg (300x222, 18K)

ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-4.xls

Attached: fbimurderbyweaponsstats.png (941x603, 48K)

You can’t mow down a whole crowd with a knife, Einstein.

(See Las Vegas massacre)

Yeah lol these liberal don’t realize that if we don’t have guns they will have illegal guns

Nobody is forcing you to remain stupid, bud

The legal definition for an Assault Rifle is a firearm with a selector switch.
In order to purchase a firearm with a selector switch you would need to get a tax stamp, so they're pretty much already legal. Any no one has been killed by an Assault Rifle in a 'Mass Shooting' in the US in forever.

Possibility? We’re at the 1-yard line, about to score

Guy in Vegas could have just chucked grenades into the crowd. Would that have been better? You could make your own hand grenade with crap from bass pro or walmart no probs.

You are the retard most gun violence is done by hand guns and more deaths are done by knifes

The right to bear (not “bare” dumb fuck) arms was a concept written into the constitution for single shot muzzle loaded rifles. Dumb. Fuck.

Doesn’t matter if you read the journals of the founding fathers you know they would have agreeed with automatic guns

Actually, neither of those is an Assault Rifle by legal definition.

Based upon 18th century concepts

So...vote Trump out.

They would have wrote that for automatic if they could foresee it

No it was for anything, people were allowed to own cannons and at that time there were a few guns that were multi round shots

But guess what? Countries with those bans have higher acid attack rates and knife attack rates.

It's almost like criminals will do whatever they can, regardless, and gun bans just make black markets. But don't worry, I'm sure if we ban guns, people will hand over guns, hand over fist, because that just makes sense!

You mean like, muskets?

Attached: 1525831554750.gif (400x300, 977K)

No, it was written into the constitution for ANY armament. At the time, there was no standing army. Private citizens owned warships, canons, repeating firearms, the most advanced military equipment that money could buy. The government rented it to attack or defend.

Well they couldn’t foresee it but if they could they would have wrote it in there

Right? You can own an Abrams tank and an F-16 by law!!!!!!

AR means American Retard

Compare the mass damage that can be done with explosives to that which can be done with propellant. Modern firearms are far less dangerous than 18th century weaponry.

Exactly dude just like the alcohol prohibition if a gun prohibition is done then there will be a black market

Ruger MK 4 I think, definitely a ruger rimfire 22. might be an older model though.

There were repeating weapons in the 1800s.

Because the large majority of the population of firearms don't commit crimes. They shouldn't be senselessly grouped together because of the actions of a few.

Now exchange the word firearms for latinos or blacks and you have Liberal rhetoric.

>They would have wrote that for automatic if they could foresee it
They did, what they said just happen to be even more generalized because they wanted the citizens to be able to wield/own the same shit the government's military had.

Attached: 98706554645645779.jpg (612x592, 79K)

They would love for every citizen to have tanks and fighter jets parked in their driveway, too. Why stop at automatic rifles?

Everyone is gonna call you a retard, so I will too.

"... shall not be infringed."
/thread

1718.

Attached: 1498409494829.jpg (766x601, 78K)

the one in the picture you put as legal actually isnt,its the military's version of the ar 15.why are the anti gun crowd also the ones who know the least about the guns they want banned?

You should be allowed to. If the manufacturer of an F16 can sell it to Turkey and Russia then you should be allowed to buy it as a US citizen.

High quality encryption is far more dangerous in the hands of a US citizen than an F16.

Oh fuck, oh god, oh fuck

Attached: 20190706_102622.png (706x486, 379K)

What countries are those?

>shall not be infringed

>except when trump does it,then we act like its no big deal

Every gun hugger in this thread is boning up, and polishing their guns as we speak. And by boning up I mean going from inverted raisin to 1cm hard-on.

Look that’s not practical, not because of regulations but because of the money aspect. If some one could get enough money to own a tank or a fighter jet then yes they should have one

Japan and that's about it

You need a full mag to kill an elk?

this is why im glad all the places with the strictest gun control in the country also have the most shootings.keep it up,a future with less of you commies in it is a better future

Germany has lower gun violence than switzerland you moron

To get all the niggers off my lawn

Yes user, they wanted every citizen to have the right to own exactly what the government has, just in case they needed to defend themselves against such things.
You're framing it as if they wanted everyone and their brother to own these things without being properly trained.
They spoke about that shit too, obviously they wanted the average citizen to be highly trained with the arms they owned.

Exactly.
Plus, look up some fucking old canons. They're retarded. You could blow up literally an entire building with a single shot. That shit is perfectly legal to own right now but got forbid you have a full auto .17. You might shoot your eye out!

Exactly dude people like you are helping to keep America great you and are great leader

What's the CETME like? I'm on the fence of buying a kit and getting a local machine shop to build the receiver.

You can. In reality own any weapon. It's just the hoops you have to jump through. Even in England there's a dude who owns a bunch of militarized tanks and charges people to have fun. It's legal.

maybe if its .223, lol. who hunts elk with a varmint round?

Because they piss you off

The magazine itself isn't even tracked or regulated. That's the point. Why regulate the magazine size when it's just a spring and a piece of sheet metal with no serial number on it and they don't track the sale? It's unenforceable legislation just to get votes.

I don't know why you Americans are triggered when I say assault rifle instead of automatic rifle. If it contains "assault" in it, that doesn't mean I'll use it for massive rampage.
Fucking retards

america is not great,never has been.never will be,time to take your cheaply made chinese hat off.especially since you brag about american made products but wear clothing made in china and technology built by foreign parts

There were Court cases back in the early 1800's where the local governments tried to ban cannons and lost because it was the citizens right to own/use them.

Attached: 1497304629028.jpg (500x596, 48K)

this is what you look like when you say assault rifle.

Attached: 1562383075918.webm (1066x600, 1.13M)

Attached: 1561875429347m.jpg (548x1024, 121K)

Grow up.

yeah,and now we have a president who stacked the supreme court with bible thumpers who only care about baby killing.since i guess crapping on the 2nd ammendment is okay by them

Hey that’s just capitalism some people are on the bottom but they can work there way up

says the trumptard,how many sports players are going to offend you next week?

Made up? Lol, you know nothing about history or the weapons industry, do you?
I bet a rocketlauncher is also a made up term, right? Lets just call everything by the word "gun" then.

>work

funny,in a country that would rather elect socialist democrats to their goverment.nobody in america wants to work to begin with,its a country full of stupid and lazy people

>muh fully semi auto assault rifle clips

Attached: 1561692264996m.jpg (1024x668, 126K)

We're doing better than most other countries including China and most of Europe right now.

A bump stock isn't a gun, isn't an armament and it doesn't obstruct your right to bear arms in the slightest.
Although I didn't agree with the ban, I certainly prefer Trumps SC picks over the ones Hillary refused to name before the 2016 election.

americans already proved they dont care enough about their 2nd ammendment.give them a scary black democrat,they'll defend it.give em a republican and they'll flush it down the toilet just like the left wants

I don't watch sports, they couldn't offend me if they spent twenty years trying.

what about silencers though? im sorry trumptard,but if you want to act like a democrat.ill treat you like one,now get the fuck out.my guns are more important then your feelings

Kinda like how all the places that ban murder never have murders.. oh wait. You dumb fuck

>i didnt agree with the ban

>thinks im only using that example

>doesnt matter if you disagree with it because you still voted for trump and will vote for him again

THEY CHOOSE NOT TO STAND FOR THE FLAG A DISGRACE TO AMERICAN PRIDE

2nd amendment isn't about hunting dumbass.

Alright, he doesn't know how to handle a rifle. Big deal

Attached: 1561491639225.webm (1280x720, 1.68M)

sure you dont kid,you snowflakes cant go a week without cryin bout some sports player who said mean things about orange man.you've even gone after the sports that arent popular in america

I can name many American innovators that came from nothing, that then became billionaires.

Interesting, user. What's the legal definition?

Attached: 1561495426556.png (1140x1546, 292K)

>what about silencers though?
Are they banned?
In the 42 states that permit civilian ownership of the products, individuals must submit an application to the ATF, pass a background check, and pay a $200 tax stamp.

Well sorta. Not that user btw but rocket launcher means rpg right? Rocket propelled grenade? So its not exactly accurate even if everyone knows what you mean when using such terms.

It wasn’t what they said about American pride it’s because they were so self absorbed about being black that they stoped caring about the flag and refused to stand for it the flag stands for the American pride and just because your black is no excuse

>billionaires

and as we can see with donald trump,money cant buy everything.like a decent education

there's no reason for an american to stay in america if they have enough money to move to a foreign country

This is very ironic considering you sit on here all day, everyday whining about politics.

im fucking craaacking up. did they really show this? its like some shitty sex toy demonstration

im sorry kid,but you dont understand what freedom means.your feelings arent more important

this is why i hope trump loses in 2020,you idiots have ruined the republican party.your no different then democrats

Bump stocks are useless, just wasting bullets

Might need that much to defend your home.

i dont know,lets ask your trump guy and his supporters.because you already gave em an inch.they'll do it the democrats way and keep chipping away at it

>assault rifles
Kek'd

You're not a Republican, you already admitted last week that you loved Bush.
You're clearly an Establishment shill.

Without those guns, those asshats won't be able to mass stab. Common sense measures like background checks, registration, and ending the gunshow loophole would reduce much of the bloodshed.

Donald trump is amazing leader and is wits will take this country into great new era

>i dont know
If you don't even know, why are you talking about them?
How are you this dumb, user?

its an unconstitutional tax, and bull shit i have to pay it. much like commiefornias new ammunition background check.

Attached: 1549355176821.png (750x3200, 204K)

you're useless.if you want to be an anti gun snowflake,we'll treat you like an anti gun snowflake.republicans support gun rights,not cheer on the nra's destruction and act like gun control is no big deal because a republican passed it

Believe it or not, all white males don't watch sports, or even a tv. Sorry you are so encased in your own world.

Trump didn’t take anyone’s guns away, but yes I know...orange man baaad.

and you are? people who hate bush arent republicans

i have a right to waste bullets.

That sounds like Bruce Dickenson, lead singer of iron maiden.

>its an unconstitutional tax, and bull shit i have to pay it. much like commiefornias new ammunition background check.
I'm not disagreeing with you.
Other user seems to think silencer regulations are solely Trumps doing.
All I did was refute his argument that he admitted to knowing nothing about.

neither did obama,but i guess you actually cared about gun rights back then.now your bone spurs guy got elected and all you care about is immigrants.well,good thing you lost the midterms and i hope 2020,because republicans need to get a clue and get rid of the trump supporting trash in their party

Then waste your bullets, but why would you?

>people who hate bush arent republicans
LOL

Attached: 1543641027160.jpg (232x330, 19K)

checked, but he trashed the hearing protection act and banned bump stocks. im not sure how involved he is in the russian embargo, but i want some slav shit and cant have it because its fucking import banned.

>unconstitutional

its already been proven that republicans dont care about the constitution anymore.they'd rather care about the scary immigrants and stacking the supreme court with bible thumpers like that kavanaugh guy

You saying bump stocks are objectively good?

look at him grinning lol what the fuck. its like the libtard is self aware he's a psycho murderer

yeah,you'll be laughing in 2020.when orange man isnt re elected.because you dont quite understand what republicans actually support.you just think all that should get thrown into the trash because you dont want mexicans and muslims in america

>neither did obama
Tell everyone here what law Obama tried to get passed regarding guns, user.

Attached: 58475675675675.jpg (1023x745, 78K)

>3 years of straight liberal tears
>durr why cry about sports man?

Attached: 28902F59-61F0-410E-AB3F-2D51950A8753.png (645x729, 75K)

im saying that the 2nd ammendment is the only gun control we need.retard,either support gun rights or get the fuck out of the republican party.plain and simple

>Being this retarded

Attached: EA4599B5-A565-46A6-8925-AD92B494BCA9.jpg (540x388, 27K)

Back in my day sissies didn't cry about guns and people still smoked in restaurants. This generation is completely pussified

he tried to pass laws for 8 years.meanwhile,what did trump do? he sat his fatass in the white house and shit on the 2nd ammendment with 0 outrage from the same people who threw tantrums whenever obama even mentioned gun control

The "republicans" you agree with support endless wars the Patriot Act.

Amendments to the constitution made 2 centuries ago have very little bearing on today's modern world. We at least need a way to track guns in this country (I understand serial numbers, I'm saying better systems of registration and record-keeping).

liberal tears? you mean,trump supporter tears

although,i find no reason to call trump supporters republicans

>he tried to pass laws for 8 years.
WHICH LAW DID HE TRY TO PASS, user.
TYPE IT OUT SO EVERYONE CAN GO LOOK IT UP.

we wouldn't have bumpstocks if the ATF would stop caring about me 3 holing my lowers. have you seen an sig brace? tell me gun control works.

yeah well feminists say men cant decide on their bodies because they know nothing about them. so fairs fair whore

>wars the
wars and the*

>endless wars

oh right,i forgot.the crowd who trys to make you believe they are republicans but finds nothing wrong with a draft dodger getting a military parade is gonna talk about wars and the military

I literally don't know anyone who watches sports and I'm as white as they come.

That wasn't the question. Don't act like a liberal cunt

George Washington didn't actually say that:
Here's what he said "A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a Uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies.

The proper establishment of the Troops which may be deemed indispensible, will be entitled to mature consideration. In the arrangements which may be made respecting it, it will be of importance to conciliate the comfortable support of the Officers and Soldiers with a due regard to economy."

Get fucked soy cucks

Attached: if-the-second-amendment-only-applies-to-this-then-the-first-amendment-only-appli.jpg (400x516, 26K)

Nice assumptions, wrong across the board btw.
>bone spurs
Kek, rent free.

>dont act like a liberal cunt

huh? the ones acting like liberal cunts are trump and his supporters,i dont support any type of gun control.and yes,accessories you can put on guns matter also

Can you stay on topic?
Is that possible for you, user?

But no actual guns were taken or made illegal...

>hurr durr,rent free

coming from the rednecks who still bring up obama and hillary.show us on the doll where the mean sports player hurt your feelings

Attached: download.png (225x225, 6K)

They are gun

There’s 3 years worth of archived threads and news stories that disagree with you friendo.

maybe i would if i found their to be a point in arguing with ignorant liberals.but i dont,maybe when we finally kick you out of the party in 2020 you and trump can make your own party.where you can believe immigration and other bullshit is more important then real things republicans care about

July 4, 1776:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

No you stop trusting the government, kids are more competent then the fucking government

they use the registration for confiscation. this has happened in california. and if the laws passed in the past have no use for the present then why cant i own a sbr without a tax stamp, why do magazine limits still exist, why cant i use armor piercing ammunition? those laws infringe on my rights, still, and they want to make more laws. they're pushing towards an outright ban. some states ban a gun by name. or because "its got the shoulder thing, that goes up."

I wanna be a soy cuck! How do?

You're not a Republican, stop pretending and grow up.

>Came from nothing
Name a single one of them that didn't get a family loan or other handout that isn't available to the majority of the population.

>friendo

hey dipshit,im not your "friendo".

>news stories

yeah,you mean like the covington kid,colin kaepernick,nike,that female soccer player

plenty of those stories out there to prove how trump supporters are no better then democrats.and im glad you retards are gonna learn it the hard way because losing house majority apparently wasnt enough for that lump of shit you call a brain to realize it

Bend over bitch

Because banning guns doesn't work. Thugs don't just go "guess I won't have guns".

its funny how all these trump defenders are telling me to grow up.this coming from the crowd who cant go a week without throwing tantrums over the news media or sports players

But it is a made up term. "Assualt rifles" are just semi-automatic rifles that politicians think are scary looking because they resemble the military's m16 and m4. I bet you think the "ar" in ar-15 stands for assault rifle too. Do some goddamn real research on a subject before you try to infringe on people's rights.

Assault rifles are not legal now.

You think the people committing these crimes are buying legal guns? Most are stolen and bought on the street. Passing laws to stop criminals does not work

I never mentioned Obama, you did. Also never mentioned Clinton...

Attached: thisisbait.png (625x626, 66K)

it was an opportunity to make procurement of accessories easier and cheaper. it was also an outright ban on accessories. it also limited my accessibility to other firearms.

All categorizations are 'made up' in a sense, but assault rifle actually does have a military meaning. It's just that civilian rifles like the AR-15 are not actually assault rifles.

Accessories matter but I asked if you think bump stocks are generally needed for people

Shut the fuck us about the sports shit we get it you dislike us standing for American pride now move on to some other issue

Thomas Jefferson was also a slave holder, and was sitting his ass in France outside the larger conflict. He also said in 1787 "tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots". Everyone in the real shit thought he was a cunt for saying it then, and he's still a cunt for saying it now.

trust me,you will though.you cant have an argument with an ignorant trump supporter without them bringing up

1.the news media

2.barack obama

3.hillary clinton

im sorry that id rather support freedom instead of your president and his feelings.maybe if you acted like a republican id treat you like one,but you act just as liberal as your stupid president

>accessories matter

apparently not to you,anti gun piece of shit.maybe we should ban you instead of guns

Funny coming from someone who cries about bone spurs and orange man bad.

also everything with a bump stock attached to it was made an illegal firearm. and every bump stock you owned could send you to jail, get you a felony, or cost you more money.

Not him, but many people who are committing crimes are buying legal guns, yes.
>Passing laws to stop criminals does not work
You heard it hear folks, guess we should just not bother passing laws against theft and murder.

But murder is higher... So... Moot point.

Because the government pulls the "think of the kids!" card to further limit your rights and you applaud.

From what can you conclude I am against weapons?

Why don’t we just ban you

>here
fml

Fuck you faggot

>american pride

your right,instead of exercising your right to protest.you'd rather celebrate your american pride by electing a draft dodger president and on top of that,give him a military pride

your a disgrace to america,just like your president.there's a reason even your own party didnt want to vote for you in the midterms,or are you to out of touch with reality to realize you didnt win the midterms

yep,if your against bump stocks.you are anti gun.they arent gonna stop with bump stocks,and its still a violation of the 2nd ammendment.maybe if you trump supporting retards actually understood the constitutition your opinion would matter

Because you obviously don't know what your talking about, and if you have no idea what your talking about why should anyone give a fuck what your saying. It'd be like a doctor telling people to stop drinking water cause pools drown people fucking retard, there is a difference.

Tens of thousands dodged the draft kid, cry harder.

>cry harder

except those people arent commander in chief of the military and recently got a military parade

Would you argue in favour of private citizens being able to make a nuclear dirty bomb? I'm just curious where you draw the line, if you do at all.

and in terms of

>cry harder

im not the one still crying about obama,hillary or the news media.that would be you snowflakes,its time for republicans to clean the trash out of their party.starting with trump and his supporters

Because a government must always fear its population.

Military service isn’t a prerequisite for being president, and the parade wasn’t for Trump.

So cry harder kid.

>if your against bump stocks.you are anti gun
What kind of reasoning is that?
>its still a violation of the 2nd ammendment
How do you figure? "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." How does banning bump stocks infringe on your right to keep and bear Arms?

Bans and taxes on firearm accessories and ammunition types are not unconstitutional as has been upheld by the supreme court. They are not arms, so they have no constitutional protections. They never have had. The president could write an EO tomorrow banning 100 round drum magazines and silencers and if it went to the SC they would have to overturn a ruling that has been upheld more than a dozen times before (you probably haven't heard of Sunnyvale v NRA) in a complete reversal of established understanding of the Constitution and essentially invent an imaginary sentence in the second amendment.

>where you draw the line

im more concerned about the fact we dont have anybody to actually defend the 2nd ammendment.lets work on that first

democrats wanted gun control with obama
republicans want gun control with trump

Shut the fuck up snow flake if you honestly think Donald trump isn’t good for this country then your iQ is lower than 2

I never mentioned any of those, cry harder kid.

We’re having here the same problem
we had when alcohol was outlawed
No matter how illegal guns become
there will always be a market for
guns or anything the law prohibits.
I think the solution to this would be for making mandatory that every
property owner has a gun. This
also solves the problem homelessness because it gives them the incentive to work and get land

im done arguing with people who dont even understand the 2nd ammendment to begin with,thanks for proving why i consider most americans stupid

They shouldn't.
>Constitution of 1776 not 2019
Doubt the founding fathers where thinking "in 243 years when we have semi automatic assault rifles this shit will be clutch"

Second amendment wasn’t for hunting it was for defending against the government if things get too out of hand

how is donald trump good for this country? he's a draft dodger,who got a military parade.he's suppose to represent the political party that's pro gun,yet he passes gun control while the pro gun people find nothing wrong with it

if you ask me,he needs to fuck off and go back to the democrat party.where he's been most of his life

Do you consider a citizen's right to create a nuclear dirty bomb as protected under the second amendment?

Hard to say no one's defending it if you won't define what it does and does not protect.

If you can afford a nuclear bomb then you should have one

The little blurb in the Bill of Rights about "The right of the people shall not be infringed".

And yes. It is the right of the "people" that shall not be infringed on not the "right of the well regulated milita".

pretty sure the founding fathers wrote the constitution with the belief that 2019 years later.you libtards wouldnt change it because your feelings are more important

Not an argument.

>its funny how all these trump defenders are telling me to grow up.
Nope, just me.
I know you like to equate one persons views/words with everyone but I take sole responsibility for telling you to grow up.
Now grow up, user.

All i see is failure to assimilate and a single mom at the end of that

What are you even on about, retard?

>2019 years later
Yep, 'merica is thousands of years old.

Read this chart.

Attached: homicides_committed_firearms_england_wales-450x353.jpg (450x353, 31K)

>hard to say no one's defending it

another trump supporter with his head up his ass.go figure when you call everything fake news,try living in reality instead of trump's fantasy land for once.there's no point in arguing with people to stupid to understand the 2nd ammendment

Because banning them wont fix anything but hurt a booming market

I didn't say a nuclear bomb. I said a nuclear dirty bomb. Read up about the kid in Scouts who was going after his atomic energy badge (used to be a thing, most kids just did a report). He actually gathered enough materials from radium watches and smoke detectors to get the damn thing to work, however briefly. All you do is put a bunch of explosives under that...

> 'merica

cringe,im suprised your educated enough to count that high

He defined 2nd amendment for you. What is unclear?

>draft_dodger

In each case he had legitimate reasons like he was sick or family crisis.

yet people think banning bump stocks is going to fix something.we should of just elected hillary if we wanted an anti gun democrat again as president

Reminder that breaking away from Great Britain and founding a democratic republic was a radically liberal act.

his feet hurt.that isnt a legitimate reason

you trump supporters are as intelligent as a bag of rocks

Looks like my gram pops desk. Roloflex included.

What is the contraption in the lower right, above the knife and to the left of the pistol? Im thinking its a cammera. if so thats the coolest thing in that pic followed by the big hand plane and the corgie.

And put more $$ into the pockets of organized crime because the cost on the black market would skyrocket.

>2019 years later
Wat? Also they didnt write it thinking anything about liberals considering liberals wherent around in 1776 unless you consider the fact that we where fighting against tyranny of a King in England making us the liberators or liberals. Get educated you unsung faggot.

Russia,Ukraine,Mexico,Brazil, basically any slavic, asian or south american country.
Londons crime rate is worse than New yorks. Plus what is the over 2million violent crimes stopped with a firearm without needing to discharge a roundb

If he doesn't need it, why should he have it?

28th amendment when?
>not in our lifetime

It’s a camera

You don’t need Yea Forums, so take it away from you.
This place causes more harm to people on a daily basis than nuclear weapons in all of history combined

Kek

*roloflex*
Unless it’s a Pentax knockoff

>Second amendment wasn’t for hunting it was for defending against the government if things get too out of hand
Why would they get out of hand? You want a free-for-all country?

B killed 200'000 japanese in one day? And another 250,000 over the course of 10 years? Wow, I love this place.

>2019 years later

Attached: 1515993862565.jpg (355x417, 40K)

Lol you think that.
But you are wrong it was usually more serious
Your logic is like Swiss cheese

I said harm. Not death. Wow. I love illerates

Not him, but the US was literally founded by people who thought the government had gotten out of hand.

See

>harm
>not death
I love illiterate people

I can't kill people with Yea Forums, it's fun and stupid. Bombs? Not fun for anyone really

Holy shit. How many buzzwords can you fit into a paragraph? Kill yourself.

Um yes it’s fun bombs are very fun snowflake faggot cunt whore dumbass faggot

Just think. If Hillary had won we would have a 5-4 left wing agenda pushing SCOTUS with more justices like Ginsberg who sleep through arguments because they know how they will vote regardless of what the constitution says.

>hillary wins
>stacked SCOTUS
>IL, NY, NJ or CA pass a gun ban and confiscation bill
>lol but you can still own muskets because thats what the founding fathers had in mind!
>naturally goes to court
>no matter which side wins it goes up to the SCOTUS
>agending pushing court wipes its ass with the constitution and upholds the ban
>next time there is a dem supermajority it goes national because SCOTUS gave it the green light.

THAT is how close we came to loosing our rights. Trump sucks balls but he is FAR better then hillary.

The founding fathers knew there would be change. That’s why the bucking constitution is editable.

Ignore that tag on the end. Fat fingered

Assault rifle, battle rifle, both are just categories of military rifles.

But if the founding fathers were alive today they would want automatic guns

I mean not like you can influence the government, it's always going to be shit

But you hurt feefees daily

Totally makes sense. Right to bare arms should include patriot missles and nukes to huh? Freedom of speech written or spoken cannot be more volatile than it being written or spoken, but you slap a 30 round mag in a semi automatic and you can kill many more people than a 9 mil with 12 rounds.
In other words the two arent comparable and retards like you have no point. I can ignore what any one faggot says, but i cant ignore a bullet screaming through my skull.

Agreeed

You're not wrong, but the justices that push right wing agenda are no better. They can and do vote based on their own beliefs instead of what the constitution says.

If you think something designed to kill people is fun, you're a bit unaware of the life

Can’t wait for RBG to die and trump picks her replacement.

It’s a tool. The use of it is in the decision of the user. Ban knives then

Precisely. To protect accessories you'd need a 28th. They aren't protected. So the tax is not unconstitutional.

The end. No ifs ands or buts.

You need to stop, you’re giving people fuel to make us seem retarded. God damnit, don’t ever voice your opinion when you know absolutely nothing.

God damnit.

Knives are used for bread, not created with intend to kill people