You ever wish you had a traditional communist gf to overthrow capitalism with...

No rules active Yea Forums server, get the fuck in here already:
https:\\discord.io\KvmJ3kb

iybH

Attached: 1562152349.233.png (1247x1428, 863K)

>Girl
>Mao died 43 years ago
>Choose one

When you realize how capitalists stole your future and promote actual degeneracy, Lenin wouldn't stand for this shit

Attached: egel1qfo0tiy.jpg (1600x1334, 286K)

Many white women (who will often spell "white" and/or "women" incorrectly) claim to be compassionate citizens of the world while benefiting from the labor of poor foreigners as much or more than anyone else.

Chinese age pretty well. She looks pretty young. Amazing hair, pixie cut - she still looks like a gril.

Any1 got her nudez, plox??

You deserve to be tossed out of a helicopter you piece of shit.

Libertarians get the bullet bitch lol, you want us to be enslaved to the elite

Attached: 9f401009b9a4584515bd9abcb350a987-imagejpeg.jpg (1350x1005, 70K)

Rise up

Attached: ad4ccd158ca348d0892a94bcf9e39973_A.jpg (640x384, 40K)

Captalists fucked up and now their deaths are imminent bro lol

Attached: 3328da3aab434c57b75c221ed84d830b_A.jpg (622x472, 75K)

I actually really like this image. it easily shows how disgusting and wasteful modern life is today. and the irony of her wearing a Che shirt shoves it into lefties faces which is always funny.

All races in solidarity against capitalism, these fucking pieces of shits will regret ever promoting the destruction of our nation and people, immigrants and nonwhites aren't the enemy, capitalists are.
LOWKEY - MILLION MAN MARCH (FT. MAI KHALIL) OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO
m.youtube.com/watch?v=y547vgzCnC4

It’s not just white women, it’s about champagne socialists of all kinds, symbolically represented here by the Che T-shirt.

Attached: images (5).jpg (275x183, 25K)

gonna need to see that girl nude

The elite benefit more from socialism and a welfare state than they would from actual capitalism, you brainwashed fool

Fuck off

Attached: 2E0A5F67-D727-4D8C-9B6B-BAE5E46BA6C4.jpg (766x1024, 87K)

Oh you mean like in that fake revolutionary paper written by random shop keeper in Russia? The one who was hanged by the killed by the anarchists for writing something so stupid in their name?

I do. Feels good.

life is good if you're not born into a third world shithole

Fucking hell
>Nazis are terrible because they’re so violent and attach everyone they disagree with
>my side happily lynches people who write things we disagree with and I love retelling these stories because I can’t see the irony here or consciously recognise that I’ve been brainwashed by fascists to believe that my side are not fascists

Capitalists are turning us into the third world,wake up comrades.the only solution is the complete dissolution of capitalism, it's only a matter of time before more people wake up

Third world shithole here, actually life is fine, happy family, as long as every has food and job, life is great. Material goods aren’t so important like in the west. The only really bad thing about life here is when westerners interfere in our country, literally just fuck off and let us do our thing our own way please.

This. Even academic socialists/communists dont like American libs (Especially in Europe). They are "socialists" that dont even want to end capitalism, they just want to make it a little nicer and hide the problems that make them feel guilty so they can continue to enjoy the luck of being privileged.

Cool

I am American, only through ignorance have capitalists controlled us for so long, they've been dumbing Americans down so they don't wake up, our education system is a fucking joke unless you're rich

HAZE Ft. AKALA & BLACK THE RIPPER - PROBLEMS (OFFICIAL VIDEO)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Akps4K9WY3U

Capitalism created the most prosperous populations in the history of mankind. Not only is it the only moral solution, it’s really the only fair one. Cronyism, on the other hand, is what the actual problem is. You’ll understand things better when you’re older. Anyone who’s a communist past the age of 30 is either an incredibly lazy leech of a human being, or is actually mentally deficient.

Propaganda I'm not buying, fuck capitalism, we gonna put these devils heads on spikes

No rules active Yea Forums server, get the fuck in here already:
https:\\discord.io\KvmJ3kb

dLob

Attached: 1562157475.108.jpg (1280x725, 145K)

The modern world as we know it came from public funding and the military, that's where all the huge technological advancements have come from, not captalism, all capitalism did was privatize what was public

Only through lies and a huge welfare state has capitalism stayed afloat, progressives saved capitalism in reality under people like FDR LOL

>implying everything is just a big accident

>nearly, but missed the point
The Fed, and the welfare state, snd communism too, serve to take the wealth of peasants and funnel that wealth to billionaire corporation owners because all of those systems encourage price stability. When prices stability is guaranteed or helped by the state (by giving cash to unwaged people), corporations can charge whatever they like compared to prices they’d be able to charge in a purely capitalist society where only workers receive a wage and the unwaged rely on the charity of their friends and family; when cash is that hard to come by, people pay less for goods and services, meaning less billionaires because companies cannot charge rip off prices
to truly fuck the elite, fight for a purely capitalist society

Attached: 252671.jpg (1440x1416, 126K)

No it doesn't lmao I come from a communist country and personal property doesn't exist. Sure you can have tables, chairs, tshirts and whatever else that couldn't be shared...but beyond that everything belongs to the state. Your AM/FM radio, personal machine washers and other appliances and personal luxuries. Nothing is yours, but the close on your back and whatever piece of furniture you just happen to be currently occupying

My capitalist wife will blow your commie gf’s brains out when she comes to confiscate property.

>as it should be comrade
Sometimes I think Western lefties imagine that communism will have all the benefits of capitalism but they’ll be able to afford all the finest products.

>goal: avoid serving billionaire corporations over the people
>communism bad capitalism good

10/10 leap in logic

Yes, did you read and understand? What you believe about communism is incorrect, in telling you that you’ve been brainwashed into supporting the billionaires. It’s incredibly difficult for a brainwashed person to recognise that they’ve been brainwashed so I’m imagining that your first reaction to reading this is incredulity, because what I’m saying sounds ridiculous: you’re an intelligent person, you couldn’t be brainwashed, could you? After that, then you’ll feel anger, because you hate what I’m saying, so you’ll hate me, and you’ll want to do anything you can to make me stop saying this. After that? You’ll feel “oh well, fuck it, that guy I hate is gone now, everything is back to normal, what a crazy fool! Glad he’s gone so I can ignore the ridiculous things he was saying and get back to normality. Why would I listen to a crazy guy like him anyway haha”. And you’ll slip back into the safe, cosy, notions that you have been fooled into believing about communism.
These are textbook reactions, mate. You need to save yourself.

mises.org/library/anatomy-state

What you’re saying is 100x more applicable to capitalism though

Billionaires are the capitalist elite, and every decision made under capitalism serves to keep them there. They’ve brainwashed the public into thinking their choices matter, whether that voting or purchasing, and in both cases they really don’t.

If you want to talk about brainwashing, maybe think about the fact that you’ve presumably been raised since birth in a capitalist country and consumed media made by capitalists. You get pushed a capitalist worldview from day one. Lots of people never even hear about alternatives because capitalism, while “allowing” free speech, very clearly sets up alternative systems as boogeymen.

You’re still missing the key point: Price stability makes it easier to overcharge for goods and services.
Overcharging for goods and services allows corporations to suck in more and more cash from the paying public.
Price stability is a key tenet of socialism/welfare state. By giving unwaged people some cash to live on, that cash has been pulled from the genuine workers of the state in taxes and paid to unwaged people, who will then pay that taxpayer cash to overcharged prices to corporations. Making billionaires richer.

Its everyones GF

Bukkake time

Yea , a good looking GF that wants to smash Capitalism

(My name is Capitalsm btw)

>hide the problems that make them feel guilty so they can continue to enjoy the luck of being privileged.
So, Republicans in a nutshell?

Ive noticed that everyone who I know that likes communism had these traits
1.Was raised without a father
2. A little bit under middle class and doesnt work
3. Has depression or a problem with drugs
4. Are whores or people who pretend to like ugly chicks so they can fuck
5. Watch Tons of Anime

If communism means everyone is like this it has already failed. It essentially shitty people trying to overthrow capitalism when it has been the best to them in their lifetime. (im 21)
Communism only works in small towns like during the puritan era where gossip would be good enough to stop bad behavior and even then they act out. If i thought for a second that communism could work then id be all for it. The truth is capitalism is the best type of society building ideology

No. I like eating food.
Communists and socialists have starved more people the death intentionally than anyone else ever. Killed a bunch of people with traditional means as well.
An all powerful state facilitates lack of liberty for citizens. Go figure.

NO, Republicans don’t even enter the conversation: their attitude is “Fuck communism/socialism/welfare and everything it stands for”. So there’s no hypocrisy there, Republicans have a ideology and are consistent, that can be respected, even if I disagree with it.
However western libs, want the fuzzy feels if communism/socialism, but they want the iPhones and BMWs and Corvettes and mansions granite countertops and new clothes purchase every month and avocado toast and a wide variety of food and all of the other trappings that come with capitalism. Under communism all of those trappings are extremely unlikely to exist because the state must produce everything it gives everybody as cheaply as possible, everybody must also receive an equal standard of goods, so that means everything we own under communism will be the cheapest thing possible. Choice will be rare, if not non-existent.

You make two great points here:
-First, communism only works in small towns. That’s so true, in a true capitalist society without a welfare state, community is extremely important. Because, the situation described in that old proverb was a fact of life: “Times of plenty, times of want”. Some times you just would not have food or cash because the government didn’t give handouts. But, no matter when you found yourself in a tune if want, one of your neighbors was bound to be in a time of plenty and could give you some helpful charity. And vice verse, when you had a lot, you’d share with your neighbors who needed help at that time. That way, communities grew to rely on each other. That’s literally how it was between the hunter gatherer dats and the Weimar Republic. That community spirit worked for humanity right up to the 20th century. Now that we all live in welfare republics, nobody ever goes through a real time if want, so communities have fallen apart. Communities are no longer crucial to a long life, communities are merely hobbies nowadays. Have you noticed that in your area too?
-Secondly: the failure at life thing. Yes. Unfortunately it’s true. Pretty much everyone I know is exactly as you described, some are very successful individuals from a financial perspective, but yes, they’re all damaged in some way and cling onto communism as part of their identity, probably to fill in the void inside them.

Not sure what communism you’re thinking about because billionaires don’t really have a place in their model. There are no billionaires if production is owned by the state because they would have no way to ‘profit’ in a communist system.

Ya but western libs don’t want real communism. What I said applies to welfare states/socialism mainly. Real communism wouldn’t have billionaires of course, apart from funding them via purchasing imports.

There are different approaches for sure. I lean socialist and I personally favour limiting CEO wages and distributing profits more evenly among workers. That would be a great first step. There are already a few successful businesses that do this, i.e. the highest paid employee is paid no more than 8x the lowest (which is still a big gap but far fairer than the standard we’ve come to expect in capitalist workplaces).

Ultimately, if that were made a political policy, it would be a huge step in addressing the billionaire problem.

Are you mixing up Marx and Campanella?

lost

Nazis don't just attack everyone they disagree with, they attack people based on characteristics those people have little to no control over.
We attack people based on whether or not they are in support of oppressive systems that we see as detrimental to society.
And the smart ones on our side only support that, if the violence serves the goal of abolishing the current system or stopping a worse system, like fascism, from emerging.
If not for moral, then for marketing reasons.
I'd almost only enact violence against non-fascists, and I mean actual fascists according to the academic definition, not just people with fascist tendencies like Trump, during a revolution. Most Socialists subscribe to some form of Utilitarianism, so a lot of us think that attacking people without any good coming from it as morally wrong.

Price stability induced by the welfare state is the real issue I’m describing. Freezing CEO pay won’t change anything. Anyway, pay can be hidden in stock grants or in loans, or in investments in a startup that the CEO happens to own, or any number of things, the company could buy the CEO’s original copy of last Thursday’s New York times that he valued at $50millilon! Without the constantly fluctuating prices inherent with real capitalism, extra money will always be moved from wage-earners/taxpayers to the billionaire/company-owner class, via the welfare given out to the unwaged population.
If that welfare was removed. Prices would have to fluctuate according to the spending power of ONLY the waged population. This would result in far cheaper goods and services as suddenly each waged person must save for their own retirement as well as pay got their living expenses, and help out as many of their friends/family as they can who happen to be unwaged during this pay period. Cash will become a premium commodity, people won’t spend cash as freely as they currently do, companies will have to provide genuine value for every dollar they earn, billionaires will be few and far between.

Don’t try to talk yourself out of it with excuses. You are the one who excitedly described somebody being lynched for saying something the group disagreed with. That’s nazi/fascist behaviour from both you and the group.
Get help. You need either therapy or to hang yourself. Normal people do not excitedly describe another person being lynched by a group simply because he said something the group disapproves of. Normal people condemn such actions. Get help please.

>communist girl

>enjoying capitalism in her picture

this is how retarded people who use the word communist are

Hurr durr communists should live in a cave because they don’t like how things are.

You can’t just not consume. That’s not a freedom we’re granted in capitalism.

1. Was actually raised by my father, my mother being the one that earned money. My father still worked though.
2. Probably grew up in the lower echelons of the upper class, though I'm not working right now. I go to University.
3. Depression, sure. A lot of people suffer from that right now though. I do drugs, but not too often.
4. I've had Sex with 5 people in my life, every one of them would be considered good looking by society. I'm look pretty good too btw.
5. I read some Manga, but you probably shouldn't consider me a weeb. I like a very limited amount of the media coming from Japan, but categorically implying that there is something wrong with liking a form of media seems stupid to me.
Capitalism certainly has some huge upsides, but don't forget the influence of technological development to the increase in standard of living. It's not about capitalism having no upsides, it's about keeping all or most of those upsides while addressing it's detrimental parts at good as possible. If you think that there are no methods of dealing with crime in socialist societies, I recommend getting into the literature.

Yes you can. We live in a free world, you could easily leave your capitalist nightmare and travel to a communist country to live in the kind of society you desire.

You’re not considering changes to the economic system that could be made alongside the implementation of welfare.

It’s true that welfare alone won’t solve the issues of capitalism, but no socialist is saying it will. As long as those with money can turn it into power, inequality will grow.

In a realized socialist society, goods could be produced cheaper because a) the enormous wealth of billionaires would now go towards common goals, like infrastructure etc., and b) there would be no incentive to drive prices up artificially, as profits no longer would go to individuals. Corporate greed would be eliminated.

It’s up to you how you feel about it - but to me this is a core benefit of socialism.

>No true Scotsman because I happen to be a Scotsman who goes against your extremely common observations

I don't know what you're referring to, my only other comments in this thread were and
I don't get enjoyment out of seeing people suffer. If by "saying something you disagree with", you're referring to someone promoting mass deportation, genocide or structural oppression, I'd be morally fine with enacting an appropriate amount of political violence against them to stop them. What form that would take depends on the situation. Doesn't mean that I'd emotionally enjoy it though.
I'd shoot someone breaking into my house, but I wouldn't enjoy doing that at all, it's similar to that.

Not the other user, but in no way are your observations common. There are neckbeard lefties just like there are neckbeards in every walk of life, but the reason you got No-True-Scotsmanned was because your premise was a straw man.

The enormous wealth of the billionaires would evaporate in less than a year. Where do you think wealth and welfare currently comes from?
Welfare is an ongoing current account, topped up each week by taxes on wages.
Billionaire’s fortunes are not a bottomless pit of wealth. Once that money is spent it’ll be gone forever. So any responsibile state will just not spend that money unless they have a critical piece of infrastructure to buy. You and me, we will never see that cash.

I’d rather work towards a better society than admit it’s fucked beyond repair and peace out but it’s a hard choice sometimes

THIS IS A SHILL THREAD BECAUSE THE ELECTIONS ARE COMING UP

Haha ok. I was actually taking the kids out of how the Scotsman guy was trying to argue against the other guy’s extremely common observations, except he didn’t come across as an exception that disproves the observational hypothesis, like he was trying to, he actually confirmed that some of them apply to him: “depressed..and drugs”.
So he is actually one of the many who confirm to those observations.

You will never make a difference, don’t be so delusional it arrogant. If you’re on here, you’re obviously not politically in any way that might grant you any power, so that hope that you may contribute to a brighter future is just delusional self masturbation. I offered you a way to make a difference that is within your grasp: simply emigrate to a communist nation. But you just have excuses.

Election isn’t till 2021, nothing happening next year so you can chill dude

It’s not about buying things with the billionaires’ money, it’s about realising that we have enough resources to self-sustain everybody. Because our resources are controlled by the people with the money, it looks like there’s not enough. You know Jeff Bezos makes $22m a day on just investments / other passive means of accumulation.

We have all we need for welfare and we can sustain it. It’s just in the wrong pockets.

In short, the ‘bottomless pit’ of money isn’t what we’re after.

I don't care about her political ideology, I just want a qt racist girl.

Zeig Heil Belsen Belsen Auschwitz Auschwitz Zeig Heil Achtung Shnell Schnell Actung Belsen belsen Schnell Auschwitz Zeig Heil Belsen Belsen Deutchland Zeig Heil Belsen Belsen Auschwitz Auschwitz Zeig Heil Achtung Shnell Schnell Actung Belsen belsen Schnell Auschwitz Zeig Heil Belsen Belsen

Welcome to /U/ (Discord Application on PC or Phone)

Rules on discord? What is this fucking reddit?
Get in here you faggots, the water is fine.

We got it all, filled with
>e-girls >faggots >Shitposts >VC >Hentai >Rates >Niggers >Fascists >Normiefags >Ass >Titties

and it's all NSFW only, post whatever you want, maybe even break the rules
Who fucking cares, we sure dont.

s9nrATH (Discord)12

Attached: 71c6by852XL.jpg (1556x2400, 240K)

You're a leftist but like a girl with a rifle? You're fucked up, yo.

I've never accused you of applying a no true Scotsman fallacy though. That would be absurd. For it to be that fallacy, you'd have to have answered with "Well, no TRUE communist is like that".
I could have called you out for the whole thing you being an ad hom, but let's not kid ourselves into thinking that we will have an academically useful discussion here. So why would I point something like that out?
Anyway, though I believe you that this is a common experience for you, I believe that you are not aware what a bad set of data you get by evaluating probably a maximum of a few hundred people, most of which you most likely know via the internet.

“If you don’t like it, leave.”

Right Wing Politics Stock Response #215

Haha
>we are not after the bottomless pit of money
>did you know that Jeff bezos makes 22million per day off his investments
The implication of the second line is that you want to continue to earn that 22million per day, yes? That is a bottomless pit of money you door. And I won’t work because everybody else in the chain that is involved in that 22million per day will likewise be affected by the sudden societal change to communism. Right down to the end customers, I.e. you and me, the regular public. We won’t have the cash to buy products because we’ll receve whatever the state gives us. Because that is how communism works. That 22million Per day vanished, it’s gone, because there is no bottomless pit of money to fuel it.
You guys are unbelievable.

Are you actually this stupid?
He listed five very common things.
1. Like 1/4 of people are raised by their father, if not more since 1995.
2. Being Working or lower middle class is also common as fuck.
3. roughly 7% of all adults in the USA have had a major depressive Episode in their life. It's your guess as to how much that increases with people using the internet regularly enough to be on Yea Forums
4. Depends on what you'd consider a whore, but left leaning people tend to be more sexually liberal in my opinion, I'll give you that.
I do drugs every few months, I have no problem with them according to any medical definition.
5. How many people on the internet are into anime?

Somebody’s planning a eurotrip?

Go for any black chick, they all hate whitey

The leftists have always been mentally ill, so that’s not surprising

You misunderstood my post, i write a joke. Not serious, only half serious. Satire.

HAHA
>I don’t like this so I want the rest of society to change according to my fantasy
>left wing politics since Marx

leftists very often conform to many of those aspects, what’s the problem? ate you shocked that they are common things? Leftists make up a sizeable portion of society, don’t they? How do you even begin expect their common aspects to be uncommon?

I--big govt-------------------------------small govt--I
Dems, reps, socialists, communists (socialists), fascists are all on the same end of the scale. When the result is the same, does the rhetoric really matter?
Drop the partisan bull and follow the currency. Currency rules all, and it comes from one private bank. I wonder why regardless of "which party" is "in power" we always get more of the same.
I'm sure it's all coincidence.

Doesn’t that describe the American Revolution too? Or the French? Or any change ever?

YES ending the fed would be useful. It’s not mandatory, capitalism alone without a welfare state would be fine. But ending the fed would be the cherry on top.
No political candidate will ever do that ever again after Ron Paul lost out

You’ve ignored the point about resources, not money. The money is made from ownership and control of resources. If WE owned the resources, we would control and maintain our own economy.

We would decide everything for ourselves, by vote: what to produce, where, and where the profits are invested.

We don’t have to abandon our current freedoms and make everything state-appointed. The important thing (especially in the present day) is removing inequality. Our businesses would still run as usual, except decisions made would be in the interests of the community. A socialist workplace would never, for example, hire cheap foreign labour and put its workers out of the job. It would go against its own self-interest.

Socialism is taking power from those who value their greed over the common good.

Nope.
How long have you been pining for a communist utopia?
Both the American and French Revolutions were short term affairs that quickly turned violent. Not comparable.

Yea, I'll pass on the buzz cut pink haired ham beasts.

Capitalism and Communism are two sides to the same Jewish coin. Reject the false dichotomy, choose the 3rd position.

Attached: 1505456517641.png (2550x3300, 305K)

I totally love your hope that this is just about power. But here in the real world that is not the case.
The point I was trying to get you to understand is that the $22million per day represents a certain amount of value, but not an intrinsic amount of value, it’s a notional value that is only and entirely propped up by our current system. If that system changes, that $22million is no longer worth the same as $22million is worth today.

FYI That dollar sign one is not right wing politics, it’s welfare state politics.
What is your third way, anyway?

Except they both stem from the ideas of Enlightenment philosophers as early as the mid-1600s, and they in turn took cues from ‘socialist’ ideas put forward earlier by religious groups.

Conversations about equality and criticisms of unequal systems are always ongoing. To act like the ‘good’ revolutions were in some way different to the ‘utopian’ socialists of today is to be no different from those who opposed the revolutions of the past that brought the democratic ideas everybody now can’t imagine being without.

The founding fathers were ‘utopian’ too. Stop using it as a crutch to undermine critics and address what they’re saying. Conversations are more productive that way

probably socialism aka he's a watered down commie who has """anti-degeneracy""" opinions

OK, yes, you are exactly like the founding fathers. Good job pal. Totally not delusional at all. Self importantly comparing their movement to the French and American revolutions. Definitely not a symptom of any mental illness either. I honestly don’t know why the meme of mentally ill leftists ever started spreading!

Once you see through their bullshit, nothing they say can be taken seriously. To use their own terminology: “it’s very liberating!”

I don’t care if you believe socialism is anything like those revolutions. My point (which you’ve ignored like pretty much every point I’ve made) is that criticising something as ‘utopian’ means nothing unless you’re prepared to listen in good faith to their ideas and discuss them.

If you’re willing to dismiss anything as ‘utopian’, a lot of valid ideas will go ignored. Maybe you have thoroughly investigated actual socialist theory (not the demonized socialism that shows up in a lot of capitalist media) but I’ve seen no evidence of that in this discussion.

I’ve explained the money situation. You’re still clinging to the power idealism, without understanding that money has to come from somewhere. Productive people don’t work for free. And they don’t work for food. They educate themselves until they can demand an earning potential that makes them happy.
That $22milliob per day doesn’t represent intrinsic value. Nor does it represent intrinsic power. It’s a symptom of the capitalist system we currently live in. The day after we switch to communism, that $22million of value vanishes, As does the power associated with it.
That’s just how money works. It’s not ideal but it is what it is. You’re clutching at raindrops if you think that $22million will be there for us to use after we switch to communism.

> Socialist Theory
> Demonized Socialism

That's like saying "study the finer points of dog shit instead of listing to the media saying it's stinks" ...it IS nothing but dog shit either way.

If you study real fucking history, it is clear beyond all doubt that socialism does not, can not, and never will work as a system.
Capitalism is by no means perfect, but no system is. Capitalism is by far the best thing for a sustainable, thriving society.

Capitalism is far from sustainable.

It encourages and causes inequality, creating an unstable population that turns on itself and sometimes the establishment.

It encourages self-interest and capital over all else, as evidenced by the fact that billionaires are doing nothing about climate change. Environmental instability would be actually conquerable if the actual majority had a real say in their workplace.

It creates global instability through exploiting poorer nations for labour in the name of profit, and in turn taking opportunities for labour from the working class in wealthier nations. I could go on.

Every system has to tackle instability but capitalism has never proved itself able to do this.

Capitalism actually is perfect. Without a welfare safety net, people under capitalism are very strongly urged to build long lasting community relationships, independent of the state, with a diverse skill set so that if one member (or family) is currently out I work, their community can chip in to help them out. “Times of plenty, times of want”. With a system like that, cash becomes a precious resource that cannot and will not be squandered. Saving for your future retirement becomes mandatory and very important, as opposed to an optional endeavour like it is nowadays. Self sufficiency is encouraged but always within the context that your community, as described above, needs your input too, you need to develop skills that’ll contribute to your community as well as to your life.
Under the current welfare state system, all of the above is gone. Nobody needs to do any of that anymore because the state looks after them. No community is needed, so communities become optional. Skills are no longer needed, because the welfare state gives you money, so skills become optional. Everything is optional, and people being people, optional things are dropped if they’re a lot of effort. The whole of western society has been ruined by the welfare state (which is a form of light socialism, real communism would be way worse because innovation and standards would drop to bottom of he barrel levels).

You absolute moron. None of that means anything in the real world beyond platitudes.
Money and productivity, that is the main driver of society. The billionaires are a symptomatic of how bad the welfare state is. If we got rid of welfare and reverted to regular capitalism, those billionaires would not be able to horde so much wealth because cash would not be spent by unwaged people who did not earn that cash, earners would also need to save for their own retirement, meaning even less cash is wasted on frivolities every month, which means less cash donated to billionaire corporation owners.
Capitalism is how we moved from being hunter gatherers 10,000 years ago, right up to the very first welfare state in the Weimar Republic. Capitalism looked after us as a species from cavemen right up to and past the industrial revolution right up to manned flight, and allowed societies to thrive over a 100 century period. I’m just 100 years, socialism in the form of the welfare state has saddled us with massive debts, too many wars to count, broken communities.

A Race-Historic dialectical paradigm with National Socialist economics and politics and communitarian social policy.

Attached: 1505761109020.jpg (604x552, 92K)

The idea that capitalism encourages innovation more than other systems is untrue. By always pursuing the highest profit, it restricts what is produced by equating an ‘unprofitable’ idea with a ‘bad’ idea.

Think of any eco-product that has tons of benefits but is never widely adopted because the less responsible product is cheaper (and so can yield higher profits.)

I know somebody will say ‘communists only produce the lowest quality goods’ but why would that be the case if the people were in control? Surely they’d want high quality goods, and variety. So surely they’d vote to produce these things for themselves.

The billionaires are a symptom of capitalism alone. If we destroyed welfare, the poor would get poorer, and guess what, the rich would continue to get richer from the middle class and foreign markets.

nazbol gang rise up

Attached: 1561490722189.png (750x955, 899K)

A gf is similar to a piece of furniture you currently occupy and, thus, won't be property of the State.