Hey Yea Forums

>Google is part of a massive media machine used to control peoples minds
haha how is that even real just walk away from the screen nigga

Seriously. People need to unplug and walk away. If it's not Google controlling what we think, it'll be somebody else.

kek

Glownigger detected

K, think of this, how many times do you say "Google it" instead of "Look it up"/"Search it"

kinda strange huh

...acting like any of this is new. Jewgle glows in the dark, and has for a very, very long time.

their left-wing agenda have been exposed
bitchute.com/video/WyQ7ItI0GSgE/

Attached: googleexposed.jpg (882x630, 121K)

>glows in the dark
does that mean that we can see what they are doing or that they aren't hiding it?

>Google honestly needs to be stopped.
Yeah good luck with that

I like how you are making a pretty good anti-capitalist critique with such a distain for "left-wing agendas"

I'm all for capitalism to an extent, but when it comes to a monopoly like Google taking over the internet that's when it becomes a problem. That's why we have anti-trust laws so small businesses can grow too

You do understand that the search results on google aren't actually part of google... right?

too bad they went to right-wing news outlets.
amazon owns business insider
there are many google competitors that would love the story.
it's obviously fake.

Google has a tendency to alter organic search results for a more "favorable" result

Be quiet or they will designate you as a deceptive site

>how many times do you say "Google it"
Never. I actually never use that phrase. I always say "look it up"

>reality has a left-wing bias
>Google hates lying bullshit
>not beholden to any agenda
Is today opposite day?

>anti-capitalist critique
"The political defense of capitalism is that economic power is diffuse and cannot be aggregated in such a manner as to have undue influence over the democratic state. Both of these core claims for capitalism are demolished if monopoly, rather than competition, is the rule."

>search results on google aren't actually part of google
you for real Yea Forumsro?
kek

No, keep going. You had so fucking great start. We have anti-trust laws. Why didn't they stop Google? Who is responsible?

Try out Yandex. You get some pretty straight-dope results. It really sucks for searching for stuff in your town or for US-based movies or sports or the like.
>inb4 retarded af "russian bot collusion" shit

They are already a mega monopoly and influence democracy.

How are you realizing this like a decade too late?

Yeah, monopoly or oligopoly is the natural end state of capitalism. There is a game about that, it's called Monopoly

>it's obviously fake
Did you even hear and see teh documents last week? They even sent some rookie to questioning in front of Congress. They dun goofed.

> push their left-wing agendas

Dude, they just do whatever makes them money and right now that sells.

If fucking a child to death on camera would make them billions, they would be doing that. Google is a perfect example of capitalism.

They should be broken up into a ton of smaller companies but they suck so much dick in Congress that it will never happen.

>the natural end state of capitalism
wut

And that's the thing- Google has almost all of the top sites on the web right now. Aside from the search engine and youtube, they're the biggest ad provider, biggest mobile OS, and the biggest web browser. And they're using one position to influence another. Use a Microsoft browser on a Google website, and you'll get inundated with bogus security warnings telling you to switch to chrome. Even if it's not a google website, if it has google ads, the ads get replaced with fake errors telling the user they need chrome.

it was suppressed for me I guess.

>left wing agenda
OOOOHH how scary!!
>mfw this is what keeps conservatives up at night

Attached: gettyimages-1009938924.jpg (1842x1036, 58K)

Try searching for Jussie Smollett
It's happened before; go search for 8.chan

It was if you were using Google.

>When you're in favor of soviet-style propaganda and silencing of alternate viewpoints

Attached: Untitled.png (424x478, 21K)

Then why not dismantle them, when they are so oppressive. Why not disassemble the whole system and build new from the ground up so it can never happen again?

Need to pass the big tech regulation bill

If you dont like the company or product use a different search engine and use a different video streaming platform. Nobody said you have to use them

Like the NRA for the repubs?

>monopoly or oligopoly is the natural end state of capitalism
that's just commie critique.
it isn't part of the political system it's supposed to be respected and regulated by the political system.

Not enough

>disassemble the whole system
the fed is suppose to break it up into smaller competitive companies but the fed doesn't understand tech.

How can the NRA be a monopoly? They're an activist group that runs on donations/memberships. You're thinking more like the SPLC for the left.

I'm not sure this would do anything other than prevent Jewgle from slushing money around the entire corporation. I'm not sure I'd want a half dozen smaller protected companies.

Have you played monopoly?
But seriously:
>competition is good for the market and the people (mostly).
>companies don't like competition because it forces to do shit other than scrape money
>therefore they eliminate competition
>when they reach monopoly (or oligopoly in some cases) they do everything in their power to stay like that
>weve got proper monopoly
If you don't agree with something I can explain further

>alternative viewpoints

Attached: The-Great-Replacement-Manifesto-F-300x187.jpg (300x187, 17K)

While their on the topic, has anyone noticed it is much harder to get through the captchas. I've got to go through at least 3 or 4 just to get one that offers the verify button

Yeah, Yea Forums is full of this theory, but it's never been true. Monopolies don't continue on as monopolies for very long. They get top heavy and competition is much leaner. Think how much everyone hated Walmart back in the 90s. Then Amazon came by and took them out at the knees. Now they're both too big to fail and are protected by the government.

How much better off would we be if GM was allowed to fail? The demand for cars wouldn't go down, so someone else would step in and make some newer, better cars. But the gov't stepped in and kept things shitty.

Monopoly is the natural end to corporate welfare and bailouts.

HEY YOU FUCKING NIGGER COME JOIN THE BEST DISCORD GROUP THAT DOESN'T POST GORE OR CP LIKE SHITTY /U/ COME JOIN US RIGHT NOW AT discord/gg/EjChZ8

Google and Microsoft need to are monopolies.
>Republican and Democrats used to hate them and break them up.
>Corporations now own this Earth.
Sad shit.

You know I've never thought about it like that and it makes sense

Just look up white American family and look at the photos. This should tell you how the cock sucking faggots at Google works.

Attached: 1561463275822.jpg (600x681, 74K)

>now type white couple.
My favorite result.

Attached: Capture.jpg (330x278, 14K)

>companies don't like competition because it forces to do shit other than scrape money
>therefore they eliminate competition
Actually Apple and Microsoft proved that competition is beneficial in more than just sales.

>Jussie Smollett
What was I supposed to notice there?

I don't really understand what you mean. I'm a yurofag, so I don't know much about NRA, but they seem to me like "right-wing, muh guns, muh freedom".
So i guess like that, but I don't really agree much with their politics.

>that's just commie critique.
>it isn't part of the political system it's supposed to be respected and regulated by the political system.
Political and economic systems are intertwined.
It's supposed to be regulated but as you can see it is not

>the fed is suppose to break it up into smaller competitive companies but the fed doesn't understand tech.
How is it being a tech company relevant. There are real fucking large oil companies, agro companies, food companies, textile companies , pharma companies and so on.

>I'm not sure this would do anything other than prevent Jewgle from slushing money around the entire corporation. I'm not sure I'd want a half dozen smaller protected companies.
I meant dismantling Google to the point of nonexistence.
But yes, small corporate structures are less damaging to the society

Nice Try Jewoogle, we know who's behind this post.

Legit, this is insane.

And how many of you will get stadia when it's released?

WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!?!? (O_O)

whats insane is white people being scared of a search result lmao 1rst world problems #sheltered

Do you know why they act like they are left-wing ?
So no one talks about how right-wing they are.
They are a monopoly, that bearly pays taxes, that bought every glimps of competition they had and that is why.

If you are against their policies i would suggest not getting fooled like a monkey by a card trick.

Eeeeeverybody talks about how left wing they are. Kek

>their politics
People say they are alt-right because they lobby for the 2nd amendment and the left doesn't like guns.
I think they were getting into other political issues lately idk.
They tend to support republicans but they do find the random democrat.

>intertwined
yes
>it is not
that is problem

>There are real fucking large
yes but they all have competition.
what is google's competition?
amazon? maybe?

Welcome to /U/ (On The Discord App)

Discord Link
https:\\discord.io\dkujHhf

A server with...
>Actual *E-Girls*
>Boipussy, Nudes, Yea Forums Memes, NSFW, VC, Megalinks, Voila, Dropbox, Kik swap, Nude swap, Porn swap, Snapchat, pornchat etc

Post what you want Mods don't give a shit. nuwd

Attached: 1562036780.901.jpg (890x800, 103K)

Try to even name a capitalist monopoly that hasn't had the government meddle. It simply doesn't exist.

Try "pregnant white woman"

Attached: 500_F_190206998_1HhPCCXJffx07cUEjlHYpaELV4HwWKIO.jpg (334x500, 62K)

>dismantling Google to the point of nonexistence
That doesn't just happen
>small corporate structures are less damaging to the society
Says who? Look at Standard Oil and how he grew even richer/bigger after it was split up.

How are you attributing some kind of "right wing" aspect to this? And how delusional are you to ignore them when they say "we are a left leaning company"?

Google is more trustworthy than any other company you've ever encountered.

Try "pregnant black woman" there are no men in the pics lol

Hoping Trump has them, Facebook, and many more broken up. Next either they are a publisher or not. Since Trump cant block people on Twitter then Twitter has no right to block anyone.
Its time for lawsuits. Time to being down the bigboys.

>pregnant black woman
Oh fuck, you're right.

>Standard Oil
competition were able to sell them patents and then they suppressed the competing tech.
oil itself is just now getting a competitive resource alternative.
the gov failed to enforce anti-trust here too.
when oil is a thing of the past we will all find out exactly how much was suppressed.

I can't think of one.

>pregnant black woman
kek

Time to bring down google

What? There was no competition. Standard Oil was massive, the gov't forced them to break it up, it only got bigger and mode more money than he ever could've done with just the one.

Type "black father" and it's all kinds of black dads with their kids. "white father" goes back to mixed couples and family pics again. Fags.

>Monopolies don't continue on as monopolies for very long.
>Now they're both too big to fail and are protected by the government.
Not saying that. Monopoly can easily become a dipoly or oligopoly. But this doesn't mean we get the sweet dream of capitalism of thoisand small businesses everywhere without the govment.
Corporations use the state as a tool i can't really blame them for that, they are acting in their best interest. The system works as it is supposed to work.

>Actually Apple and Microsoft proved that competition is beneficial in more than just sales.
I am interested, what is the beneficial thing they did.
They didn't really innovate, most of the tech they work with comes from the public sector research.
They spy, they steal data, they buy other smaller companies, they exploit cheap labor. There is a lot of of things that aren't beneficial, that are the result of this system of global capitalism

You can also see it in the autofills. Try "trump is" and you get a whole list, try "hillary is" and it's always blank. But yeah, they're not lefty.

reddit.com/r/IsItBullshit/comments/6h3edo/isitbullshit_oil_companies_traditionally_bought/

This I guess is what I was talking about.

also

There was no alternative to oil, so no matter how many companies there were, you were going to get the same product, oil, there was no apple to their windows.

Capitalism and Government are opposites. The only thing that allows capitalism to flourish is the lack of government.

Demonitizing youtubers such Joe Rogan just for giving everyone an equal platform to speak. Big Tech is the new Big Oil.

Big oil actually gave you something and didn't care who they sold it to. They are the opposite of big oil.

I know and you're right nothing but a bunch of soy faggots

>beneficial thing they did
Read their histories instead of making inflammatory statements that you can not backup.
I don''t think the countries that produced those products are complaining.

I'm going to fucking reddit.
I don't know what your point is anymore.

>public sector research
Do you just make this shit up as you go?

>gunz
Well I'm a leftist and i like guns. Both as a machine and as a political tool. As Marx said:
> The whole proletariat must be armed
Guns were very useful for example during the Civil rights movement. It's pretty hard to find a leftist who doesn't like guns.
What I think you mean is
>liberals don't like guns
Yep, they are whoring for the status quo
>alt-right
Basically the freicorps of our time, when the economical shit hits the fan just right, like it did in 1928, we gonna see something

>big corporations
Yeah, Google seems to be pretty much a good example of a monopoly, in other sectors it might be bit different, but still you get few big corporations and consumer suffers as a result.
There are other structures other then classic corporate, that proved themselves bretty good.

>That doesn't just happen
Grab a molotov and your mosin, comrade, we can do this
>Says who? Look at Standard Oil and how he grew even richer/bigger after it was split up.
Within that context I guess I take it back, but usually the argument goes the standard pro-capitalist way "more businesses means more competition and more competition gooood" or some shit like that

>Capitalism and Government are opposites. The only thing that allows capitalism to flourish is the lack of government.
Are you an ancap, you sure sound like one.
I don't know if you define capitalism as just "freedom" as most ancaps , but I go with "the private ownership of the means of production".
It is pretty well known, that capitalism relies on a government

>other structures
such as?

>Grab a molotov and your mosin
I have both. Standing by.

>Are you an ancap
I don't know what I am. Too many labels. I guess partially.
>pretty well known
>capitalism relies on a government
I keep reading this on Yea Forums, but I don't believe it. The greatest (purest) form of capitalism in the US was the West before the Feds and the banks moved in. No gov't and the capitalist economy prospered.

>the private ownership
Forgot to add...
Yes, I agree with this, but there's something between capitalism and socialism, and it's corporatism. It's still considered capitalism, but when you make deals for the government to push your service to schools in trade for spying and recording citizens' data, that's not capitalism and there's something wrong.

>Read their histories instead of making inflammatory statements that you can not backup.
>I don''t think the countries that produced those products are complaining.
1. "to be beneficial" is a subjective thing, that is why I am asking
2. Inflamatory statements:
Yep i can back up my statements tell me which one to back up. You can also consult these wiki articles, these practices are usually considered unethical:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coltan_mining_and_ethics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_suicides
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
3. Can you tell me what were the beneficial things they done?
>I don''t think the countries that produced those products are complaining.
Countries maybe not. Workers and consumers sure as hell are

>Do you just make this shit up as you go?
No, my friend, tell me what technology Apple invented, tell me
Corporations are good at packaging stuff into things they sell, but the underlying technologies come from da big evil govment

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coltan_mining_and_ethics
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_suicides
Communist China

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
Lazy consumers that don't want to learn how their products function.
Mac and Microsoft cannot be expected to support products from the 80's.
Though with enough money I'm sure they would.
>Countries maybe not. Workers and consumers sure as hell are
COMMUNIST CHINA
A failure of the state is a failure of the community.
It's literally in the name.

>such as?
Depends on what you want them to do.
If you want a strong economic growth of a nation you can lookup for example the soviet union
>from a feudal rural shithole to a fucking global superpower in 30 years , sign me the fuck up
But if you want a genuine society that is good to live in maybe you might be interested in worker coops and anarchic governments, that is how I got into this mess. Some examples, look em up:
>Revolutionary catalonia
>Black army during Russian civil war
>paris commune
>rojava
>titoism
And quite a few more
For the worker coops you can lookup prof Richard wolff

That black couple/white couple is the same on Bing too.

>I don't know what I am. Too many labels.
labels are overwhelming, but sometimes useful

>govt and capitalism
Usually it boils down market failiures, aka "when market doesn't do good"
And government is there to flextape over these failures to fix them (in theory).
Getting rid of government would open these holes and it wouldn't be good.
I realize an example would help: >Company is dumping toxic chemicals into the water, its cheap.
>maximum you can do without government is orginize a boycott, but those aren't really effective.
>But the government can step in and use it's power to make them not do that
>wild west
I don't really know jack shit about wild west besides westerns, but they don’t seem to be free market capitalist freedomzones but rather small isolated communities, i will look it up.

Usually, when someone talks about corporatism it seems to me like a cheap way to push the bad things capitalism does away from it. I never heard it well defined

1st step is to use a different browser & search engine

I was calling out your "public sector" comment. The public sector makes nothing. The public sector didn't invent the transistor, the LCD screen, the TV, the mouse. The private sector made that. Apple made it smaller or cheaper. MS wrote software for the average user. Some shit was stolen, other stuff was created. It's not like all cars built today are merely ripoffs of Benz's design and there's no innovation.
So what did the government invent, tell me.

>Bing
>google jr.

Google nneds to be broken up. And Facebook and Twitter nned to be nationalized and taken over by the government. They have become utilities at this point. They government had to do it in the early does to private phone and electric companies for public service.

No all someone has to do is share the money they make from data mining their userbase with the users, then you can literally watch everyone flock to it and away from faceberg and shitter. Imagine a social media platform that pays you for content and using it. Multi-million dollar idea here btw.

Fucking hell, how can someone be this fucking dense?
Were did you get this genious argumentation strategy? From a fucking 1950s anti-communist propaganda?
You didn't read any of it.
>planned obsolescence
im an EE, I can tell you it's real thing that gets taught in unis. Its pretty easy to make a TV that lasts more than 40 years, I live in a postCOMMUNIST state and there are still well functioning soviet devices. Modern smartphones life cycle is bout 1-2 years at best.
Also this directly goes aginst your dumb claim:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronics_right_to_repair
Read those articles from the fucking top to the fucking bottom, lazy fuck.
I can't argue with someone this dumb

Attached: Screenshot_20190222-120331~2.png (1080x1081, 624K)

>feudal rural shithole to a fucking global superpower in 30 years
They weren't feudal pre 1917.
They progressed at the same rate as the rest of the world.
Attributing any of it to government type is autistic.

>>Revolutionary catalonia
>>Black army during Russian civil war
>>paris commune
>>rojava
>>titoism

>good to live

>underlying technologies come from da big evil govment
Transistors came from the Bell corporation.
they are the underlying tech that made computers possible.

Attached: 5029754410.jpg (1016x1476, 82K)

This thread
>>>/reddit/

I agree with you. It's the horrible evil of m00t that is behind all of it.

Attached: 4ec52974eab8ea002b000009-750.jpg (409x599, 27K)

>They dun goofed.

And now they oepn up a checkbook to make a "donation" which magically end sup in some congressmens pockets and then suddenly its no big deal and they ungoofed.

Jesus fucking christ i thought it was a joke.... Then i did it and its not.

>planned obsolescence
Consumers have a responsibility before they make a purchase to understand the device and the companies policies.
Laziness in not reading the policies and not working to understand the device is on the consumer.
If you don't agree with the company's practices, don't buy the device.
Also
There are ways around it in tech.
I'm not defending these companies.
My first point was that competition is beneficial to the companies.
I don't have money so I jerry-rig, tinker, upkeep, maintain, torrent, and hack.
If companies didn't want me to do this they'd be more open and make their shit to a higher standard.
Governments do the same thing as these companies (even communist/socialist ones) in that they just the cheapest option, the only difference is that Governments don't give a fuck about what you have to say about it and they'll take your money anyway.

Welcome to /U/ (On The Discord App)

Discord Link
https:\\discord.io\dkujHhf

A server with...
>Actual *E-Girls*
>Boipussy, Nudes, Yea Forums Memes, NSFW, VC, Megalinks, Voila, Dropbox, Kik swap, Nude swap, Porn swap, Snapchat, pornchat etc

Post what you want Mods don't give a shit. oBQS

Attached: 1562045042.0259998.jpg (1506x1500, 217K)

Then, go to White American Inventors.
m00t and his band of jews are trying to rewrite history.

Attached: 1562017333947.gif (480x267, 444K)

this.
what is the youtube alternative?
when are creaters moving?
literally nothing is keeping them at youtube anymore.
It wouldn't take much to take on youtube.
Just pay your fucking creators.

How do we get that started?

Maybe if you got off Yea Forums and hit the books, you could compete.

Attached: b-tard.jpg (500x595, 84K)

Hello m00t.

Death to Democracy
Human rights are a crime which must be reported

Attached: image.jpg (800x449, 88K)

Money is speech.

Buy a catchy .com and start advertising on youtube.
lol
Perfect the kids network and highly scrutinize it making parents trust the site.
Once those kids grow up they won't use their parents youtube but their own platform.
Cater to creators and promote good content instead of
youtube.com/watch?v=PmlRbfSavbI
garbage.
Maybe direct and support specific content and promote discussion.

>Foxconn suicides
>Of the 230k-450k workers, 24 commit suicide
>Suicide rate in the US in 2014 was 13/100k people
>Even at the most conservative number for worker count, still ~10.43/100k people
>Suicide rate better than that of the US
>Implying that their lives are worse than American citizens' lives based on suicides

There's a reason workers line up to get jobs as Foxconn factories.

>Break up Google
>Not in favor of soviet-style propaganda

See constant facebook posts during feb about inventions by black people.

the one that sticks out the most was the gas mask. so i wanted to loko into it more.

The "gas mask" that the nigger invented was nothign more then a bag on your head with a fucking hose going to the ground... have fun with mustard gas you fucking tard.

Everything and i mean damn near EVERYTHING that black people have "invented" has been nothing more then something a white man looked at and said "your retarded but im gonna make something good out of this fuster cluck you call an invention"

don't use fb.
pretty simple.

>I was calling out your "public sector" comment. The public sector makes nothing.
In the US public sector technically doesn't exist (maybe the post office), but some companies are really close to the government. Problem is how you define "public" That said I didn't say that public sector makes nothing. It makes and it does R&D.
>transistor
AT&T, they patented it. Sure a private sector invention
>the LCD screen
The wikipedia article is very long and im too lazy, but there are some "patented", so sure, private sector
>the TV
Dunno, some "patented", probably private
>the mouse
This one seems to be invented by someone from royal navy, so I would say public.
The problem isn't that "lazy business do no research". But that it actively hampers advances by using patents and similar stuff.
>So what did the government invent, tell me.
Lookup NASA, DARPA and other US agencies.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_research_and_development_agencies
Or the soviet design bureaus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OKB

> (You)
>>feudal rural shithole to a fucking global superpower in 30 years
>They weren't feudal pre 1917.
Don't know what you mean, yeah de jure it was a constitutional monarchy doesn't change that it was a fucking hellhole.
>They progressed at the same rate as the rest of the world.
No, i dont think so, even though it had two world wars and a civil war fought on its territory, it really became a global power
>Attributing any of it to government type is autistic.
Maybe, but a lot of people say that about capitalism
>good to live
As a society, not as the situation from which they were formed from, of course

The new police AI app can read your criminal thoughts if you do that search.