In less than a week, I will be married to her and live a happy life together. How does that make you feel?

In less than a week, I will be married to her and live a happy life together. How does that make you feel?

Attached: IMG_7663.jpg (1366x2048, 557K)

Good 4 u, nice bitch, show her ass

I mean, good for you I guess, best wishes.

>OP

Attached: 1419279833403.jpg (500x633, 50K)

this exact post has been posted in the past. you can easily find it in the archives, like over a year ago. This is not his "wife", infact he doesnt even know this girl.

what is wrong withe some people? what makes you repeatedly post threads like this to anonymous people? it makes no sense

It’s shills.
They spam the board with new threads to knock old threads off the board. They do that when one of their argument threads gets derailed by someone or many people calling them out on their shit with opinions that they cannot logically fight against.
You notice it happening every now and then when one of the pro-trump/anti-trump/tranny/bbc/nigger/whatever, argument threads gets deep and suddenly instead of converting opinions with their propaganda, it’s the shills having to argue against people that won’t back down. So they nuke the thread by spamming this shit into the board.

Attached: 5451881331.jpg (2450x1344, 199K)

very interesting shit. i was thinking something similiar, but was afraid to say it.

Yea Forums is even worse than i thought. it seems like all social media is just here to control

Lmao.
Happy life together

I’m not afraid, I use my dumbass neighbors WiFi lol, they can’t track me haha
Yeah that’s an interesting point you made, in a way, the anonymity here makes it even easier for shills to “drive the conversation”.
I’ve noticed a lot of the “argument” threads use similar language and make similar points, even if they appear to be arguing for different sides. That’s part of why I think what I said above. Like, one thread will be shitting on trump and diary a massive debate which is generally just mudslinging unless strong spined anons enter to call out the bullshit, then the thread vanished soon after. Then, a while later, a pro-trump post will appear, which similarly, ends up mostly being mudslinging. But the thing is, if you analyse both OPs, even though they’re appearing to argue opposing points of view, they’re clearly written by the same person. Obviously proof is hard because who screenshots bullshit like that, but if you stick around long enough you will notice that pattern. Happens with all sorts of hot topics: “I love trannies”/“trannies are disgusting”; “bbc is best”/“niggers are scum”; “left wing rocks”/“right wing rocks”. Always the same shit, just designed to start arguments.
Sparking arguments by shilling both sides, is a known tactic of the JIDF, so I can only assume it’s them. Who the fuck else would actually bother?

explain OP.

Attached: Screenshot_20190628-101944_Samsung Internet.jpg (1080x2220, 612K)

I’ll miss her blow jobs

she gonna cheat alot, got them thot eyes

That bitch must be a hoe or something to marry 5 different guys over the last 6 months. At least it seems cuz I saw this thread with the exact same picture 5 times over the last 6 months.

what are they trying to do though? like whats their goal? just starting arguments, turning people against each other? I just dont understand.

Maybe 4 years ago I downloaded a HUGE collections of shill examples that someone collected from on here, I wish I could share it with you but its on an old HD. Its almost spooky the similarity in speech patterns, and how the same threads are posted again and again. There are some threads that look almost entirely generated by computers because they are the EXACT same as other threads. same exact replies and everything, almost mirror images of discussions that have happened in the past.

it almost seems like half of Yea Forums is shills.

your right about anonymity, to not be able to see accounts and some sort of karma system allows the robots to run rampant

Emma?

I dunno!
But “shills” of a certain tribe have been known throughout history to shill both sides in an effort to foment chaos, not apocalyptic future chaos, just political turmoil. Political turmoil results in a changing of the powers that be, which opens up opportunities for new people to snatch power.
Get enough of your guys into power, and you get to drive the future of the nation because the power-conversations involve you by default, because your guys are in power.
So at the root of it, it’s just propaganda. But it’s multilayered, so in a sense it goes unnoticed because regular people don’t have time to delve too deeply, they just see an argument about a hot topic, sperg out and contribute to that argument, and the distraction has worked because those people are riled up about the arguments instead of asking “Why the fuck are these same bullshit arguments popping up so frequently?”

IDGAF. Am I suppose to be jelly?

Attached: 1414678634872.jpg (960x540, 110K)

fucking wild dude. i dont know what to think. we are living in a very interesting time. I wonder how else technology and sociology can be used together to manipulate the masses,because im sure its already happening

you think its multiple groups? i heard you mention the jidf, what do you know about them?

you said this over 2 weeks ago

fucken troll

(Not op) looks like you found archive sites. Nothing interesting here move along

There might be other groups. They’re the only one I’ve ever heard of, though I’m hardly an expert. But over the years I’ve seen a ton of stuff specifically about them on various chans. They are like a call centre, rows and rows of people at computers making multiple accounts on any site with comments sections, shilling both sides, one account will be pretending to be a hard working mother that just likes things the way they used to be, or account will be pretending to be an SJW, one account will be pretending to be a hardcore trump fan, and so on.
Honestly, I don’t think it’s interesting. I think it’s horrible.
If you even just look at reddit, Twitter, Facebook, insta, and here. All of these bipartisan argument threads become so vitriolic. It’s horrible. These arguments pit fellow citizens against each other, driving a huge wedge between people who ultimately want the same thing: to live in a peaceful and prosperous country.
Nothing is gained by so many people angrily arguing with each other. It’s just a huge waste of time, a huge waste of effort. A huge waste of effort that those ordinary people could be using to better their lives, or improve their communities, but instead, those arguments are making enemies of neighbors for no net gain to the people who think they’re doing an admirable thing by arguing their viewpoint about topics that really just effect very few people. Yes, support the vulnerable in society, or yes, fight against over-supporting the vulnerable of you feel that they are taking advantage, but really, angrily arguing on these threads isn’t going to bring change. It’s just a waste of time.

In reality, what I’m describing is an effort to simply make people angry about topics that they don’t have time to fully research. If a typical person does not have time to fully research a topic, they can’t come to their own conclusions. They can’t form their own opinions.
But, what they can do is to seek out experts who can help them form an opinion.
But, the reality is, who the fuck has time to seek out experts in every one of these arguments? A climate expert (for climate change), a physics expert (for flat earth), an engineering expert (for renewable energy), a political expert (for that right/left debate), a sociology expert (for the whole “is immigrantion a good thing” debate), an economics expert (for the economy), a regulatory expert (for regulations), a foreign affairs expert (for wars and meddling in other countries debates), and so on. So many hot topics but who can find genuine experts in all of them to help you form an opinion?
Especially when they’re angry. Angry people want answers. They want solutions. And they want them now!
So, people turn to media. The left media. And the right media. And they let the media tell them how they should feel about those topics. And, with no other education on those topics, those angry people immediately accept the opinion given to them by their media as fact. It becomes their opinion. As if they researched the topic themselves. And so, with their new opinion, try target their anger at the other side in those online debates.
And the cycle continues.
It’s all a way to waste people’s time, and make them feel reliant on media to form opinions. And when people rely on media so much, they are vulnerable to propaganda. They’re vulnerable to being influenced to vote for certain politicians based on the media’s opinion of those politicians.
Which means all these guys have to do is control a relatively few media personalities, to control election results.
All from social media arguments!

Happy.

>married
>happy
kek