Do you think all the people in the world can coexist at some point?

Do you think all the people in the world can coexist at some point?

Attached: sikakikkeli.jpg.gif.png.jpg (415x236, 91K)

Maybe if we kill the jews and muslims, it's worth a try

Love on the planet.

probably not

Attached: DHDS-92V0AELjx4.jpg (1200x900, 180K)

Kill everyone and then it can happen I guess

it is impossible for a bunch of reasons which i will list:
politics
race
nationality
gender
age
people just like to fucking fight
jews
yeah all the jews
id blame them

look at me i'm fitting in by hating jews even tho i have no idea why

Fuck off rabbi

For one, Islam requires extermination of all non-believers. So by default, the answer is no. Also, Jews created Islam. So you do the math.

>Jews created

this is also why Mohammed cant be depicted. Because he looked like Jerry Seinfeld fucked Jar Jar Binks and had the baby.

Jews aren't the problem you idiots. We all do the same shit they do. And their women are super fuckable try it. But more important no we're going to continue to be savage assholes. The end is near be enlightened love your brothers sisters and everyone else too. When the end comes you won't have to stare it down knowing you were a jerk to everyone.

possibly if greed and religion were to disappear..

but muh white genocide

Kek good one user

Fuck if you try to love everyone maybe you'll have someone by your side when your little piece of the end arrives

The world would be a great place if we all agreed to let white people run the show.

Only under some kind of extreme circumstance. Worldwide lobotomies, Skynet, Independence Day, etc.

No. There are multiple ideologies in play that revolve around world domination. Billions of people who don't have any interest in co-existing.

Everyone has a proper homeland, but I think races can coexist if we respect each other's boundaries.

shut up, meg

I'm all about getting along but, kekekekekekek

sorry. i tried not posting i really did.

Attached: Are_you_.jpg (640x960, 261K)

It is possible for some time only. Then they have to reduce themselves in wars. The reasons are mainly politics and religion. Most of people have their intelligence bellow average so they can be easily manipulated into crap.

Not if they can't get along. Everyone thinks their religion or beliefs are the "chosen one" and if they can't get around that we will continue to fuck each other over. News Flash: We're all going to the same place. We just take different paths to get there.

Some things just are, user. Static being de-scrambled by ourselves under many absolutes.

Thanks for posting. Nice pic.

I think that we would all be able to co exist of there was like a actual evil alien race thing the we needed to group together to fight or something.

Attached: predatorarmwrestling.jpg (408x245, 42K)

lol fuck no
Too much ego. Everyone thinks their brand of mediocrity is worth being heard Some take it further and demand others listen and follow the morons into battle, and sometimes we do. Can't wait for this biological dead end to run its course.

?

No. The Rothchilds make sure of it.

Depends on the context?
Racially maybe but we would either have to be completely separate or the minority would have to properly assimilate and accept the fact that they cant never enjoy the same rights, freedoms and privileges of said ethnic group that established the nation.
Theologically speaking i dont think so in any way shape or form, religions are globalist by nature and will spread to all corners of the earth so conflict will always arise.
Finally on a classist basis absolutely not you would sooner see black Catholics and white muslims lock arms and sing kumbaya, the poor will always loathe the rich and the rich will always look down on the poor

Look this guy watched a youtube video of a guy who read a book once. He knows everything now. The most fucking lukewarm nothing of an explanation.
Why the fuck didn't Europeans properly assimilate to Native American customs? Why the fuck can Buddhism be a globalist theology that doesn't call for a bloodbath on every fucking turn? How can Bill Gates spend his vast fortune curing African children without looking down on them?
Why don't you just shut the fuck up.

Nice word salad schizo do you even have a point to make

Can only lead you to the water, can't make you drink, retard. If you actually feel like pulling your head out of your ass, I am going to need to see some genuine intent first before I do anything else.

I just ignore the peasants. Their dog n pony show of apathetic gloom is just that, a show.

Only in death.

NO it will NEVER happen we should have stayed apart like the creator intended then everyone would have been happy and had a perfect life, until us stupid humans decided to go visit neighbours and lets stick our dicks in strange things and we invited everyone over for dinner....that was the beginning of the end.....

Wow how kind of you user please refute my points properly and explain how everyone can coexist instead of spouting verbal garbage making no coherent point at all

as soon as religion is gone

Yes, but only if there’s like less than 1000 of them

no

You're either a moron or you're willfully ignorant. Either way, no thanks. If you genuinely can't connect the dots from the posts, shutting the fuck up is the correct play for you. If you're pretending to be retarded, it's still the same play.

>of THEM

Attached: 647152C1-50A6-4A68-931B-8F324FE83E81.jpg (196x257, 4K)

No

Yes if they are all white....after all whites are the supreme race, beautiful, high IQ, chosen and have perfect DNA

>Why the fuck didn't Europeans properly assimilate
OPs question is clearly talking about the present and future so bringing up the past is wholly irrelevant
>Buddhism be a globalist theology that doesn't call for a bloodbath
While buddhism may not be globalist in nature it certainly has spilled its fair share of blood and you Cleary know nothing about them if you thing they are truly all peaceful and nonviolent
>How can Bill Gates spend his vast fortune curing African children without looking down on them
Curing Africans of what? You must know him personally if you know his feelings of children
Kill yourself you fucking retard

Ok schizo

wow I haven't seen that image in 15 years

>at some point?
>OPs question is clearly talking about the present
Clearly.
>certainly has spilled its fair share of blood
Buddhism rejects violence at it's core, unlike the other religious. If I go around fucking grand mother in the name of you "user: No.802793389" does that make you a grand motherfucker?
>Curing Africans of what?
Malaria, you troglodyte fuck.
>You must know him personally if you know his feelings of children
Right, unless I am sucking the marrow out of his dick I can't possibly have an opinion on his actions. Explains why you have an opinion on me gargling my semen so effortlessly.

>underage

>retard

>projection

>delusion

>seething

>fuming

>dunning-krugering

>projection

>no u-ing

>he did it himself
stop embarrassing yourself. Show 1 evidence for god, or go catch aids

That you and I exist to have this discourse at all is evidence of God and his creation

non sequitur

Not an argument

no, yours isnt and what i wrote is pointng out why

>no u again
Our advanced form of life existing at all is mathematically impossible based on theories of evolution and the great accident of the Big Bang. Only through intelligent design do we humans come into existence.

Only when everyone turn black/mulatto an transsexual.

Seriously though the answer is no. People will always have different point of view/ideas etc.
It is impossible to bring all the humanity to the same point of consciousness.

its not "no, u", stop projecting. Life is quite possible and even if it wasnt, it still doesnt prove your god.
Evolution and big bang r not accidents.
Theres no evidence only through inteligent design can human exist, while theres loads of evidence we exist due to evolutionary processes

No.

>life is quite possible
Life can't start from non-life; abiogenesis has no evidence to support it whatsoever, only hypotheses based on equally hypothetical events and factors.
>evolution and big bang are not accidents
So in other words, there was design to them?
>theres loads of evidence we exist due to evolutionary processes
DNA, irreducible complexity and the fossil record suggest otherwise

>Life can't start from non-life
yes it can, it clearly have and we did it in lab too.
false dichotomy. They were necessity
dna, fossil record suggests exactly what i said, retard. And irreducible complexity doesnt exist

>name 1 evidence for god
>went for "we exist, therefore god", instead of starting with the bogus claim dna proves intelligent design, which is equally not supported

only if all religions and all traditional values and instincts are erased

thankfully, humanity is getting closer to this

the best way to do this would be to mix all races and cultures by enforcing open border policy in all western countries while ruining countries that oppose these ideas

replace racial and cultural identity with internet meme culture

>name-calling and claims without evidence
Amino acids aren't life, they didn't create life from non-life.
>They were necessity
Could you explain that
>irreducible complexity doesnt exist
Just because an argument is awkward to explain doesn't mean you get to dismiss it out of hand, especially when the counter-arguments are based on computer simulations based on hypothetical (IE non-proven) processes
Where did the information in DNA come from?

theres no name-calling, nigger. Also u r the 1 who has to show evidence, not me.
Amino-acids r building blocks of life and i didnt mention them either.
There was no other way. It had to have happened like that.
Theres no argument there.

from chemistry

Lets sum up: u provided no peer-reviewed paper for anything u said, u made logical jumps, deflected, strawmanned, shifted the burden of proof, and imagined some1 called u names
Strong case uve got there

penis

Assuming makes a ass out of u and me, Mr.Goldenshekilberginblatstein

Attached: 1560644337199.jpg (556x291, 36K)

This

Attached: 1560638807972.png (640x478, 431K)

As soon as there are "space niggers" from other planets, people will start to think on a global level and therefore be more accepting and tolerant towards other people on earth.

By and large, yes. You'll still have the occassional loon, but if you provide enough outlets, almost all people could chill.

>i didnt mention them either
You said "we did it in lab", presumably the Miller–Urey experiment which did not in fact create any life, just the components that make up life.
>There was no other way. It had to have happened like that
That's hardly an empirical approach, which is what science is supposed to be, isn't it. Big Bang is impossible given the laws of thermodynamics; evolution is impossible given the laws of probability. The only way either could be possible is if there were an intelligence of infinite power that created both the laws and the events leading to our and everything's existence
>Theres no argument there
Non sequitur :from chemistry
Could you demonstrate that, or even explain it?
>no peer-reviewed paper
As opposed to your own proffered sources? Peer-reviewed is meaningless anyway when the contents are all hypotheticals, without empirical evidence
>u made logical jumps
Like the one where you claimed that people in the world can coexist if religion was gone?
>deflected
I've been answering every "point" with a relevant response
>strawmanned
I don't think you know what this means
>shifted the burden of proof
Humankind has believed in creation a lot longer than evolution, the burden of proof is actually on the latter.
>imagined some1 called u names
>retard
>nigger

Anyway, been a fascinating exchange but I have to work tomorrow, goodnight and God bless.

we're lookin at all facets of man in this thread lads

Sauce on the pic?

>presumably
u dont understand laws of thermodynamics. Your own specific existence is almost impossible and yet u exist. This is a sniper fallacy - u r painting a bullseye around the probability of our existence. Show peer-reviewed study stating universe and evolution is impossible.
Thats not non sequitur
DNA is a chemical compound
Shifting the burden of proof
tu quoque fallacy, deflection
no, uve been making up points to answer to. U admitted u jumped to aminoacids, which we also found on a comet
I do. U dont, as evident how u use "non sequitur"
and creation was never proved. Also we r not talking bout others, we r talking bout u
No, uve got school tomorrow. Well think for u, since u r incapable of doing that.

The opposite is true. When people realize that all the organizations they hate are run by Jews, they turn into Jew-haters pretty quickly. Then they quickly alienate people and end up in a fringe conspiracy group. Not because they want to be there, but because those are the only people that accept them.

It's the opposite of trying to fit in.

No, there will eventually be a war that will rage until only one culture exists and I think it's very close at hand.

>It's the opposite of drinking the Kool-Aid
FTFY

You would have to genocide 60-90% of the world's population.

>genocide 60-90% of the world's population
>continue to move forward in an endless power struggle
I know what Spock would do.

Attached: 016.jpg (353x480, 25K)

Did people actually watch this retarded TV series irl? I thought it was just a dumb meme.

Maybe not, but I certainly hope so. I'm tired of living in a world where people categorise themselves by race.

A possible solution would be
>Interbreed until there are no discernable races anymore
>Treat countries like states, wherein some are very different from others, but where you were born matters little.
>Stop using racial slurs. If you don't want black people to act so "niggerly", then stop calling them "niggers".

Attached: Frensman.jpg (235x250, 7K)

Nah, nobody watched 60s Star Trek, just a meme.

Nope. If we were robots, that'd be great

Good, I thought I was going crazy for a second.

It has nothing to do with race, it's culture that differentiates us and cultures compete for dominance. You could transpose every race, but keep their cultures the same and nothing would change. You think if a sub-Saharan African was instantly changed into a right British gentleman, that he would suddenly say, "Pop pop, cherrio, off to find some tea"?

Newsflash: we are coexisting. It's not peaceful or fun or pleasant but we are coexisting.

No. I refuse to coexist with :
-Muslims and Catholics who put religion over logic and modern social norms
-Furries
-Feminists
-Anything LGBT except for gays, i dont have anything against vanilla gays
-Vegans
-Hippies or whatever closely resembles that

> I refuse to coexist
So... you'll kill yourself?

no, because fortunately the listed degeneracy has not reached my country (yet)

The best option for you then is to just kys. Seriously, either you accept people for what they are or you'll feel this disgust the rest of your life, these people won't dissappear just because you don't want them to exist.

Kek, which country would be that?

I'd venture a guess.

Attached: obscure_reference.jpg (600x697, 58K)