Well what is it Yea Forums ?

Well what is it Yea Forums ?

Attached: A27EA961-65F9-498B-9A67-B77C9948A1D6.jpg (936x489, 29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

symbolab.com/solver/equation-calculator/\frac{6}{2\left(1+2\right)}
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

1

the answer is 1, as stated above

your mom is a faggot

nice dubs also :^)

TRUMP2020 MUTHERFUCER!!

It is 9

9

Attached: 1550208862435.jpg (600x600, 75K)

half the number of genders

Its 9, and all you 1 faggots need to go back to middle school

Correct. I had my 14 year old check my work.

Attached: 1549955678657 (1).jpg (1100x917, 135K)

Doesn't make the first statement false tho

*3
How do you know to multiply it? It's not shown.

Yeah i don't understand Chinese, but I'm glad i was right

No.

If another species developed another set of numbers and rules, they would get the same results. By logic, by math.

You are simply wrong.

5(5)
Means 5 * (5)
Thats just a math rule

Doesn't make the second statement false either

Congratulations, you stumbled into the concept of a standard. They are pretty useful aren't they?

You just proved me right with your own words idiot.

>1+3=3

Attached: +_1c168516c94f0860b93afed43431d6d7.jpg (121x120, 4K)

9

How so?

Kek, love how this started with a math question and became more of a philosophical one. You right doe.

I've done a mighty big dumb...
And took this long for anyone to notice

6/2(1+2)
6/(2+4)
6/6=9

Attached: 4adollefijntjes215.jpg (600x450, 51K)

Its 1, following the order of operations it is 1
6 divided by 2(3)(which is also 6 is 1

type-o isnt as bad as not actually getting the correct answer which is one

Attached: 011.jpg (300x400, 11K)

I meant to write 1+2=3

Attached: Tobey-No-forehead-Maguire-130254.jpg (1000x1245, 232K)

Anything IN the parentheses you do first, yes. Once its all been done, you then do the problem from the beginning. Since division and multiplication are all that's left and they're both done in the order they're in, you would divide and then multiply. Its 9, you fucking troglodyte.

no the order is this
6/2=3
1+2=3
3*3=9

Ya'll idiots saying 1 probably use the standard instead of scientific calculator on windows

Attached: 250px-Windows_10_Calculator.png (250x375, 25K)

Na m8 you gotta distribute

2(1+2)=2+4

Then you do the rest

i liked this more than i should've
multi props to you m8

Attached: 9_propfan2.jpg (400x381, 35K)

This is preschool. When operations are confusing just go left to right. 9.

so 54?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-19-00-21-35-137_com.android.chrome.jpg (1001x1300, 313K)

Thats the same result man.
Doesn't matter

Addition and subtraction is at level 4.

Multiplication and division at 3

Wrong. The order is actually:

First, parenthesis: (1+2) = 3
You get 6/2*3

Then, left to right:
3*3 = 9

Check lvl 1 first

It's dead ass the same result, so doesn't matter

7

Thats incrementation you idiot
++ isn't the same as +

Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally
Parenthesis exponents multiplication division addition subtraction.

>/thread

Important adult math:
Income-bills=???

And what do you think about these:
()

... still waiting for an answer

What you said was wrong. Your result was right. Might as well say that you got lucky.

Are most of you idiots? Simple order of operation: for this equation, everything in () first, then work left to right...

6/2(1+2) = 6/2(3)= 3(3)=9

Thats a function call. I'm not sure if this is meant only for programming but either way we've all been saying you sort whatever is inside () first

It 9

Then post a valid question.

OP seems to think math is some sort of non-scientific philosophic thing

Google says i'm right

Attached: 123.jpg (1587x818, 74K)

No it doesn't, it gets you 7

You first form a denominator when in fraction, the part after the divide sign is the denominator. You solve the denominator first, then move on to solve the fraction.
Even niggers should be tell that the answer is 1. Also, good job 9 fags, you're a disgrace to humanity.

Do I realy have to do this?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-19-00-35-44-016_com.android.chrome.jpg (868x960, 103K)

If there's anybody I trust, its fucking Jewgle

Open your calculator on windows right.
Set it to standard
Type in 1+2*2
It'll be 6

Now set it to scientific
1+2*2
It'll be 5.

Standard is baby left to right.
Scientific is s c i e n t i f i c
Using factoral order

No you don't, and you're making a fool of yourself. Shhh, its okay. Go back to your corner, little one.

Ambiguous syntax. Division does not exist. Only fractions.

You just returned 0...
Is there something I'm missing here

There are things that are just the way the are. As proven.
That's what my math teacher always said in school, when we questioned her.
She was not able to prove, but she was right.

No matter what any calculator u tough claims... the OP equation will be 9

Yep, you have missed the cout (consol out)

I agree with you. Because 9 is correct (using scientific factoral order no less)

it's 1

Attached: foto_no_exif.jpg (3024x4032, 1.48M)

6/2(1+2)=9
BODMAS
brackets first, 1+2=3, becomes 6/2x3
No orders, move on to division. 6/2=3, becomes 3x3
3x3=9

lol its a viral math problem user

From the Wikipedia: The ISO 80000-2 standard for mathematical notation recommends only the solidus or fraction bar for division, or the colon for ratios; it says that the obelus "should not be used" for division.

This is because it is confusing to use "÷" instead of a fraction line. In this example, when the denominator has not been well defined, the fraction ends whenever it can end (i.e. at the next digit if there's no composite close by).

Also mind your manners, we don't know each other.

You missed the cout and also the part where he used modulus instead of divide because he has a bad problem with his brain

are you dumb?

not once!

Attached: math.jpg (800x526, 106K)

How the fuck do you get a 6 in line 2?

you have to be 18+ to post here. go back to school

i say 9 and the python program i made agrees with me

Ignore him. He'll either flunk or already has. Leave it to the big boys.

he divides 6 with everything after

pemdas nigga
6/2(1+2)
6/2*3
6/6
1

Finally someone with 9 brain cells

I cannot believe you are this stupid in math. It’s not the calculator, it’s the equation!!

Your equation 1+2*2=

If you use a simple calculator, you cannot enter the equation correctly: the calculator will output 1+2=3 and then 3*2=6. Bit that’s not the correct equation! The correct answer is 1+2*2=5 always!!

1

3

I hope the NASA will not hire any of you.
I hope that for all mankind

nevermind im a dumbfuck its 9

Honestly if I saw that written out I'd interpret the slightly kooky formatting, with the 6 kind of marooned in its own like that, as intended to signify that the author wanted the precedence conventions to be overridden. Ie an answer of 1.

9

symbolab.com/solver/equation-calculator/\frac{6}{2\left(1+2\right)}

Attached: math.jpg (828x484, 35K)

You'll make a great designer someday.

Not a great mathematician though.

No, 1 will be the answer if the equation was written 6/(2(1+2))

Nah. The precedence conventions aren't an inescapable law of science, they're just a convention to, if needed, avoid ambiguity. By using a child's 'divided by' sign but then an algebraic way to denote multiplication, the author is clearly doing something a bit odd, not exactly deliberately introducing ambiguity but, y'know, I think here you have to look at everything in the round and go with your instincts in terms of what the author intended.

i suppose the answer is 9, but it's intentionally vague so you end up with arguments

going with PEMDAS, 6/2 * (1+2)
3 * 3 = 9

you could make a case for 1 but only if you did 6 / [2(1+1)] = 1

WTF.
THERE SIMPLY IS NO ARGUMENT
MATH IS NO SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION MAN.
IT IS EITHER PROVEN OR NOT

Get rekt
This whole thread is stupid tbh

So according to your logic, the obelius (÷) sign should not be used for division given in the same paragraph of ISO 8000-2. So you're saying that the part after ÷ should be completely ignored or solved separately because the sign would separate the statement . Now you cannot assume that you can divide according to your own will and change the order of division. If you assume its a division sign, you should solve the denominator. If you think ÷ should not be used to solve the problem then the problem starts after the sign
Tldr
If ÷ is divide the answer is 1
If according to ISO 8000-2, ÷ is invalid then
2(1+2)=6
Either way 9 fags are wrong. You cannot even apply your own logic all the way through.

Wow you're dumb. I'll condense this:

"/" divides by the next element. If it's "/6" you divide by 6, if it's "/(1+2)" you divide by 3, if it's "3/xy" you divide by x. Easy, isn't it?

Attached: 9.png (586x677, 26K)

the fuck is this shit

"÷" is indeed divide, even though the symbol is discouraged.

The denominator is vague, so it ends at the next figure.

The answer is 9. But like I said, "÷" is vague, so if you want the answer to be a 1, then go with it. No math teacher will say that you're wrong (mainly because no math teacher will ever use the "÷" symbol).

Math teacher? Go to any university in the world with this, they will laugh at you. And right they are. WTF

It would be like me saying:
1+1 = 2
No but wait
What if the + is not really a plus???

>wow you're dumb hurr durr
>If /6, then divide by 6, if /(1+2) the divide by 3
Now /xy. Let me explain
For example 6/xy=? Lets assume x=3,y=2
6/3.2 (more like 3*2, but whatever)
You - (6/3).2 =2*2=4
Me - 6/(3.2) =6/6 =1
The denominator has to be solved first, in order to solve the fraction. Why don't you understand, my troglodyte. Apart from that, the other user atleast tried to save face by using the ISO 80000-2 which clearly states ÷ should not be used for division. If he wants to follow the ISO standards then the problem should start after ÷ sign, therefore making the problem 2(1+2)=6 since ÷ is an invalid sign and separates the problem statement . Atleast he tried to use wrong logic, you're just wrong

Right, the denominator has to be solved first. The denominator is 3 in your case. Only the symbol right after the "/" is out in the denominator, as already explained. The rest stays on top.

The state of pornfags: 1+1 = 5, because you know, there is a theory