If humans had evolved to be gay, the anus would look and behave a lot more like the vagina than it does right now

You tell that to my ass.

Did you know guys can get wet?

Same reason god created a sinner when god hates sin, then punishes them for being sinners.

For the lulz.

that would be Pandora, not Eve. Anyways, whether one believes or not, if somene is going to invoke God as this or that, they at least need to be smart enough to know WTF theyre talking about.

God has a well-documented history of being a dick.

God didnt create sinners, He created perfect beings with free will, it was their fault that they chose to disobey, and therefore, God had no choice but to punish them

Eh, pandora ha the better story, anyway. A box that contains the evils connects her actions and the consequences directly. With eve it's more about an act of disobedience, which only happened because she was deceived by a talking snake. It's just dumb. I don't even think the people who say they believe it really believe it.

Gay people procreate all the time, they used to dabble in heterosexuality to get the job done, these days they just give a lesbian a jizz filled syringe on a Rosie O'Donnell cruise and wait a few months to a couple of years depending on who calls first dibs to get one of the babies she makes.

God hates sodomy, not homosexuality.

the story of the serpent tempting Eve, is, as im sure youre aware was Satan acting on his jealousy of man replacing him as favorite. its because she chose to do that and succumb to temptation that caused us to fall. God had no choice but to punish them because they disobeyed God.

But you aren't smart enough to understand that in the bible, god created the fall of man situation and all of its consequences.

Attached: fags00339309.jpg (285x200, 33K)

So you are saying having an orgasm via prostate stimulus is the next stage in human evolution?

A god with no choice isn't omnipotent, a being that can fault isn't perfect.

plus HIV/AIDS

no. He mightve created the tree and put it there, but Eve knew not to eat it, she Chose to eat it, she Chose to disobey God, no one put a gun to her head and made her do it. Its all about the choices we make. Had Eve said no, life would be drastically different for us. God did not make her so that she would sin, just so He could punish someone.

>implying god isn't omniscient and doesn't already know when we're going to sin before we even existed

>implying you're not a faggot

Attached: 3A2C06ED-C405-45D9-934B-6D524485AD23.jpg (259x194, 6K)

Attached: 38776A14-3B64-4DE5-9987-8985D32E0619.jpg (300x168, 7K)

Evolution takes more time than just the past hundred years or so, limp dick.

>that rare cross section of people who hate gays and also believe in evolution
>mfw

Attached: 1554033665892.png (440x440, 197K)

Too bad God didn't know Satan was going to do that.

they were perfect until they chose to go against Him.and His law. Just because His nature is a certain way, doesnt subtract from His omnipotence. He created everything, if His creation goes against His nature, He has no problem wiping them out and doing something else. Nature is under His will, not the other way around.

so god stopped being responsible for ALL CREATION after the fall? Someone skipped a few Sunday school sessions.

Attached: 1550305882590.gif (349x262, 497K)

because of free will, we can choose which path to go down, He just knows all possible choices we can make, but its still up to us to decide which choice to make. so in truth we can surprise Him if we have His Son helping us.

I'd say humans are bisexual if anything. Being 100% gay just doesn't make sense. The only argument that fags seem to make is that animals can also be gay so it's "natural", but what they don't realize is those animals are bisexual and not 100% gay or else they'd obviously go extinct.

but his Son died for all of mankind's sins, so no worries m8

Im sure He did, and im sure he could see the outcome of both choices, and maybe, He even knew which one was more likely to happen, but it was still up to Eve and Eve alone as to whether or not to do it.

careful, you're knocking on theodicy here.

even as far back as genesis, man is responsible for creation and what we do with it. but because we are born sinful, we are selfish and mean by our nature.

>Have infant son and daughter
>Tell them to stay in crib all day
>Instead they crawl around and explore everything new and exciting
>Kick m out of the house and eventually the them into the oven for all eternity
>That'll show m!

just because He died, doesnt mean we can do whatever we want without consequences. we are supposed to live a certain way and endeavor to not sin anymore. that means taking an active interest in how we treat those around us.

They didn't have the knowledge to understand consequences or disobedience until after they ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil and there would be no us because death and birth weren't possible until after they were exiled.

that's not what I meant and you know it. God is omniscient and omnipotent, all of creation is because of him, right? Ergo...

Evolution is an ongoing process that is actively occurring with every single generation.

>active interest in how we treat those around us
a roundabout way of saying "not minding our own fucking business"

> we have free will
> our actions are predetermined by gods omniscience

Which one is it faggot

Attached: 33428411_1754344691278256_547897673596796928_n.jpg (714x960, 69K)

yeah god created humans so he could force them into doing things that they would naturally don't want to do. God gets off from all the suffering and debauchery.

That isn't how perfection works if you can be at fault, you were never perfect, just lucky up to the point of fault.

all He did was say dont touch this. not tell them to stay away from it.and keep them in an artificially small space. same way you tell your children not to touch, but allow them free reign to the rest of the house.

birth was, otherwise they couldve never gone forth and multiplied.

but why did he put it there? And with his omniscience, surely he knew they would eat it anyway. A more apt comparison would be if a parent left an unwrapped candy bar on the floor and said "don't eat that". 99% of kids are gonna eat that as any halfwit parent would know.

He didnt just destroy this creation and start over because when we were created He loved us. Would you just destroy something you love because it didnt obey you? if you would, please dont ever have kids.

you don't know shit about natural selection. Natural selection is not just about creating biological machines to procreate. In our society there is always a proportion of humans that don't procreate but they service other humans. We have a combination of survival strategies and they all compliment each other to some extend. At the end of the day individual does not matter as much but a collective to carry on genes to the next generation. Biological machines don't necessary have to have sex with opposite sex, pleasurable rewards from sex is independent of the sex type of other biological machine.

no it means not punching people because you hate what they say or belive or live. not calling people names to try and destroy them in some way. etc, etc.

He just sees all possible outcomes of our choices before we make them, which one we actually choose is determined by us, not Him.

still missing the point, but thanks for playing. work on your reading comprehension sport.

you think you're disagreeing with me but I'm on your side, just don't use the same logic as the right wingers.

have you ever thought hard abot the nature of spiritual vs material things? the fall also involved us losing our spiritual aspect and having only a material being.

again, He doesnt k ow for sure what we will choose, He knows all possible choices and what they lead too.

im tired yall, have fun with this thread.

Please... explain

but He loaded the situation like a parent leaving candy out.
Stupid really.

Everything can be argued as long as humans feel the need to justify their actions.

It also needs selective killing and reproduction to work and we don't have that anymore so yes evolution is done. Every fucking low life can have kids now and instead of dying of stupidity they're allowed to live and fuck.

I have, nothing special. It's all in the mind.

Yeah but you can just repent and accept him and ask forgiveness and your good, I'll wait until a year before i die easy peesey

>nobody is born gay
no shit fucking sherlock, bravo!

>implying the underclasses aren't well on their way to becoming morlocks

Attached: 1560505815547.png (500x500, 94K)

blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_359.cfm

How can he know all possible choices but not know which choice we are about to make? Even a regular person can deduce the probable outcome of something. Hell, if you want to take it further than that, AI is/will be able to predict actions with high accuracy. That's the whole point of omniscience. If god is not omniscient, then he is no god.

Attached: h9dh9hf32d3d.jpg (500x486, 44K)

Lmao

Then wouldn't their first act of disobedience have been failing to multiply in eden and staying in the garden instead of going forth?

He did destroy them, he flat out told them if he disobeyed they would die.

>implying gays can evolve

evolution is based on the idea that weak genes die
gay genes die by definition
what's your problem, faggot?

Nonsense if humans couldn't have a spiritual aspect, there would be no prophets and no bible.

No, they don't a gay just needs a jizz filled turkey baster, a lesbian on fertility drugs, and a Rosie O'Donnell cruise to prevent their genes from dying.

They can procreate but do so at a much lower rate than straights

Where does it say the serpent is Satan? Pretty sure that's just a fan theory. Isn't the story as-written just about a talking snake? And then the snake gets punished, too, by having to crawl on its belly.

It's all made up anyway and has all the fingerprints of an origin story written by a culture that had almost no scientific knowledge. Not trying to say there really was a talking snake, just saying that the talking snake is canon and the snake being Satan is fan fiction.

prostate

How many months does it take a gay pregnant women to have a baby? Because that would be a much easier way of telling whether someone is gay. Only works for gay women, though.

Wait, you say God doesn't know what choice we will make until we make it? Pretty sure that's not canon, dude.

>God is omniscient.
>Omniscience means, "the state of knowing everything"
>What choice you will make is part of everything
>Therefore God knows it

God's existence necessarily precludes free will.

Oh, canon doesn't matter to most religious people. I asked my friend what his response would be if God asked him to kill his son. He said,

>"I don't think God would do something like that."

They don't read their own book.

Okay, but if your capacity for reasoning is low enough not to see that, then it's not a very convincing argument. Kind of a chess-with-a-pidgeon situation.

evolution creates personality and preference divergence within species to offset the risk that potential threats could make an otherwise homogeneous population. Nature atomically doesn't put all the eggs in one basket.

That sounds about right. I've had many conversations with people where they listen to an argument, stare blankly for a few seconds, and then say something to the effect of,

>"Whatever. I know it's real."

it has been shown in animals that being gay is product of overpopulation. so i bieleve that you wouldnt be born gay but if you lived in a time with too many people subconsciously you would have a chance of it.

Every twin that I know has either a gay or lesbian twin. Seriously. How the fuck is that a coincidence? I am positive that every set of twins has one of them that is bi or "hasn't discovered" that they are gay.

Explain homosexuality in Greece then.

The real answer is that we're a thinking animal, and a neurotic one at that. One of our neuroses is deviant sexual behavior. The more time we have to think, the more neuroses develop, and the more we normalize them in society.

Is humans had evolved to be straight the asshole and pussy/ dick wouldn’t be so close together and the asshole wouldn’t fit a dick so well

Attached: ip0bxkbr5u501.png (1080x1076, 213K)

But it doesn't. It hurts a lot, and your body rejects it immediately. Faggots just keep doing it until their natural reflexes are suppressed.

Wait, how do you know it hurts?

> why would you destroy something you loved just because it disobeyed?
What's the point of he'll then?

Hell I meant. Stupid spell check.

Tell the guy fucking you to use lube user. Then it doesn’t hurt

>It hurts a lot
it does?

by which logic, straight people are only attracted to the vgina, not the person its attached to?

And lesbianism is completely fine since that's two vaginas?

I think you (a) havent really thought this through much, and (b) are a little fixated on anuses, OP.

To punish the rebellious angels

Evolution works trough reproduction so your claim is retarded to begin with but lets ignore that for a second.

Not every trait in every organism has to be advantageous and the result of evolution trough that advantage. There are also traits that are side effects of other traits. If the negative (or neutral really) side effect does not outweigh the main trait then there appears to be evolutionary pressure for the negative trait while in fact it is for the net positive combination of both.

We all put a finger in there one time to see what's doing. Stop pretending.

Nah the blood lubes it up eventually anyway

The "point" is to rule simple people by fear. Before religion there was mysticism, explanations for observed phenomena based on intuition, crude reasoning and storytelling. The first time a human used mysticism to solve a problem like, "you have food and I want it," by saying something like, "the bright light in the sky said you should give me your food or it will kill you," was the birth of religion.

Hell is how you scare people who have figured out that God never strikes anyone down dead on the spot for breaking his rules. So it's like, wait, does that mean he's not real? Uh, no, uh... he'll punish you later. Oh, it's hard to care, then. Well, he'll super punish you forever.

> by saying something like, "the bright light in the sky said you should give me your food or it will kill you," was the birth of religion.

More likely, the birth of religion was a lightning, and thunder, or a flood, something like that, which was perceived as an impossibly powerful being. That'd have rapidly been anthropomorphised into a human-ish creature (because its what out brains are wired to do.), and later on someone would've used that as a tool, by saying "(ug) wants you to give your food - you can hear him in the distance" or something.

You dipshits. Humans don't evolve to be gay. Homosexuality is a non-reproductive behavior. It's what sorts them out of the gene pool. Their genes don't survive. Heterosexual genes do. This is the exact essence of evolution.

Blood is a terrible lube

But what if it's NOT hairy OR covered in shit?

This is just two pictures of one guy. He was very surprised to find out he was twins with himself.

conversely, having about 10% of your males being non-breeding, unconnected to the gene pool is also highly beneficial to the evolution of the species as a whole, by becoming available for support networking within the pack/tribe. It serves as a buffer to the loss of other adults, for example by adopting, and similar reasons.

Okay, but your dad is gay, and just got with your mom to blend in. Him being gay doesn't make him infertile, so he was still able to conceive you by thinking about your mom's brother while fucking her. So gay people have no trouble passing on their genes.

what the fuck am i reading.jpg

if your talking out ancient greece then it was overpopulated as hell during the 7th and 8th century.

if your talking about modern greece then that they have internet so they can see how populated the world is even if there country isnt.

>The real answer is that we're a thinking animal, and a neurotic one at that. One of our neuroses is deviant sexual behavior. The more time we have to think, the more neuroses develop, and the more we normalize them in society.

what kind of pseudo science is that? we are not intrinsically neurotic to the point that we cant evolve out of it. being neurotic is something our brain created, and unless it gave us an advantage then it wouldnt still be here. and deviant sexual behaviour is just a product of some people deciding that what is deviant and what isnt. in some religions having multiple wifes is deviant in some its normal.

He's saying there is evolution of the individual and in parallel there is evolution of the species. There are things which are not advantageous to the individual but which are advantageous to the species and therefore are selected for in a larger, more general way.

That is the most likely scenario

Fucking reality getting in the way again.

sorry. do you need it distilled down to words of two syllables or less?

We are a pack animal. Having a small number of of the pack non-reproducing is good for the pack as a whole, by reducing the overall load on the child-rearing percentage (especially in pre-industrial society where infant mortality is through the roof). While it does not confer any advantage to that 10% whose genetics are not passed on, it does confer advantages to the pack as a whole.

With what? Poop lube?

How are you defining overpopulation then? Because you seem to just use whatever definition fits your argument at the time. Ancient Greece outgrew its ability to support itself in some ways, but it certainly didn't have the population density of some large cities today. And the world population wasn't anything close to what it is now, so that doesn't apply to them.

So let's be more specific. Do you mean more people than your resources can provide for? Do you mean heavy population density? Or do you mean sheer number of people?

Also, having multiple wives is still heterosexual. It still falls in line with our biology. One man can impregnate multiple women. A woman can't become pregnant by multiple men. So polygamy is entirely normal from an evolutionary perspective. Homosexuality is antithetical.

True. Just pointing out that OP had all of the pieces to an elaborate puzzle, but instead he tried to glue them together to make an action figure.

Both, of course.

There is a mucous membrane in your anus. My tunnel gets extra slippery when I'm aroused.

>Would you just destroy something you love because it didnt obey you? if you would, please dont ever have kids.
Would you punish something you love with eternal damnation and hellfire? If you would, please dont ever have kids.

>my tunnel prepares for the abuse it's about to undergo

ftfy

>mfw I know the abuse my tunnel is about to undergo

Attached: 1385364169918.jpg (265x402, 60K)

>mfw I'm about to dish out the abuse

Attached: 220px-Brian_Brushwood.jpg (220x330, 13K)

>A woman can't become pregnant by multiple men.

It's rare, anyway.

>mfw fapping to watching it all

Attached: 1560573196115.jpg (458x393, 53K)

True, I forgot about that whole twins from different fathers thing. And I also misspoke another way. They totally can become pregnant from multiple men. Just not usually at the same time. lol

But it's ok to punch Nazis right?

Lel

>Knew which one was more likely to happen
So good at guessing, but NOT omniscient?

No, he was disagreeing with a specific statement

Namely, that
>taking an interest in how we treat those around us
really means
>meddling in the lives of others

That's what he was disagreeing with.

This, and many more double standards will all become available to you, if you just vote democrat!

This and many other incorrect opinions about the vast majority of democrat voters can be yours for the low price of believing /pol/.

Fair enough, Antifa are certainly leftists, but they're more extreme left than Democrats currently are.

/pol/ is always right. Faggot

Underrated post

Relax and look different.
Gays are just a statistical error (no). For the whole history of humanity, gays were 3-7%, depending on the historical period and region.

Alt-right doesn't count faggot.

>Pulling beliefs and arguments from evolution.
>The shoddy nature's duct tape who's literal best and most effective tool is mistakes that on rare occasion work.
>Acting like your interpretation of it isn't an opinion.
>Using "nature" as an argument from a magic box that sends data across the planet at light speed.

Guys. Just mind your own lives ffs. You have no stake in this. I've never met someone who hates things other people do this much who wasn't themselves very miserable and in dire need of a social life and activities.

This.

I came to Yea Forums in 2007 a Social Justice Fag and the more Yea Forums talked the more I realized they were right all a long.

Attached: 1556522972144.jpg (899x1599, 142K)

Alt-right doesn't exist

>rare
>mfw

Attached: 1481186113037.jpg (413x395, 25K)

Depends what you're talking about. Being gay is one thing. Forcing it to be taught as a normal thing in public schools is another. If people are going to cram pro-gay propaganda into kids heads on the government's dime, it's up to someone to retort.

Everything about the gay lobby is bullshit.

No one gives a shit about being gay, and they throw that shit in your face in every fucking corner of everywhere you look and if you don't like it you're a homophobe.

Dub dubs of truth

Attached: download (4).jfif.jpg (244x207, 6K)

You can't make someone gay the same way you can't make someone not gay and gay people exist.
Youre literally teaching kids about the world around them."the earth is round, America was founded in 1778, some people put their dicks in assholes of other people with dicks and that's just a thing people do"

You're acting like they have live demonstrations from the village people and tell kids if they're gay their parents will love them more.

Being gay is a mental illness.

Just like people who develop a shit eating fetish

True. But it's not the meme right you should be worrying about. It's the unironically genocide-or-enslave-everyone-thats-not-white crowd that should concern you. You huge fucking faggot

Dub dubs of deception

The village people thing isn't far off in some circles. Perhaps not in public school.

But elementary school children don't need to hear about that shit in any way. For decades, they did just fine without hearing about sex at all, but now they need to know about what a tiny minority of the population does differently with their dicks?

Attached: repititious numericals.jfif.jpg (225x225, 5K)

Pride was yesterday a literal 5 walk from my house. The media: "prides today".
Butthurt pol fags non fucking stop day in day out: "fags exist! The world's ending, hurr shoving it in our face!!"

No one is advertising homos more than you. No one. I have several gay friends and I hear less about homosexuality from them in a lifetime than I hear on Yea Forums in a day from people like you.

Nah but being this stupid is a real mental handicap tho

The US has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the western world because of lack of sexual education and abstinence only education...the kids aren't/weren't fine without it.
It's part of life.
They were teaching us about sex in elementary schools in the 90s as kids. We were fine then, too.

You're literally talking about a fucking parade of thong wearing faggots on rainbow floats going down main street, but people who vocally disagree are promoting it more?

>being this retarded

Attached: HarmfulHandyHogget-poster.jpg (546x324, 24K)

I'm literally talking about I stayed home and heard nothing because it's my choice whether or not I want to be exposed to it. And since I don't focus on it I barely hear about it. I don't care either way.
And so the only times I hear or see anything gay is on Yea Forums when bored ass people like you wanna cry about it. Turn off the internet or change your Facebook feed around. No more "gay propoganda".

>being taught sex ed in elementary in the '90s
Where did you go to school? I was in elementary in the '90s and I didn't hear a word about it until freshman year of high school.

And the solution to poor sex education isn't doing it through public schools at a younger age. It's more responsible parenting. America is an extremely puritan society, and we have a hard time letting go of that, especially when it comes to our kids. Parents need to teach their kids responsibility early on. My parents did, but a staggering amount of my friends had to find out from other kids.

>being on Facebook

Please go back. Yea Forums is not the place for you.

Canada. Sexual education has always been a thing for kids in any other we start country. The US is incredibly weird about sex. It's as baffling as how you teach creationism in school and how evolution is "just a theory".

And that's kind of exactly my point. So we agree more than you realise.
And I don't know about you but I don't trust every parent to teach their kids sexuality properly. I trust their older brothers less.
That's why we have carefully designed curriculums that are age appropriate. And that is why we aren't so Puritan. Hiding things from kids turns things into a phobia.

We don't teach creationism in school. Not public school, anyway. Church funded schools do, but what else would you expect?

I believe you.
Still weird that flies. I think we have a few schools like that ourselves. But I went to Catholic school and we still had sex education. It's mandatory.
The Baptist and born again schools I've heard are problematic for this but theyre very rare.

Right, and I'm all for teaching people about sex at an appropriate age. But years before they'll ever hit puberty? MAYBE the super early-blooming women might, but not a vast majority of kids. I also don't think its the state's business to push morals on them. That's the parents duty, whether they're good at it or not.

The media advertised it to the general public, you'd have to come to pol specifically to hear the other opinion. It isn't mainstream, and opposition isn't common in public either, cut your bullshit.
>"No one is advertising homos more than you"
>corporate twitter full of rainbows for the month
>people getting mad at the straight parade cause it somehow impedes their "gay rights"
>the vox cuban
> every time a person who isn't straight is in a piece of media, they sell it to you just for that
/pol doesn't have the power to shove their propaganda into the mainstream, all those big ass companies do.
I repeat, quit your bullshit.

Attached: Screenshot_20190609-015348(1).jpg (1737x1440, 805K)

>Baptist and born again

Welcome to the southern half of the US. It's called the Bible Belt. Don't get me wrong, I'm an atheist, so it's bizarre to me as well. But we're a country who values individual freedoms, so it is what it is.

Uh guys?....
You ARE God though...

It's like saying homosexuality is unnatural. Guess what, we are not separate from nature. We ARE nature. If we do it, it is natural.

They don't really teach morals.
It's more "when a man meets a woman" shit until you're like 10, the they start on sexual organs, functions, how babies are made. I think it was like grade 8 they started talking to us like adults about sex.
The risks were strong emphasized. Pregnancy, stis, potential emotional consequences. But they were very much "if you aren't ready or unsure, don't do it. You need to make informed decisions about these things and use contraception" and what not.
I also remember the textbooks had a lot of "go home and talk to your parents about your families individual values".
Fuck they even assigned homework involving asking your parents what your family believes.

That's why they held so many rallys? So they could drum up enough members to actually start existing?

Well, your mouth behaves a lot like an anus with all the shit coming out of it, yet no one complains.

Attached: 1560314614479.png (691x602, 473K)

You just described the Alt-right. They are a living meme.

We also value individual freedoms and right to worship.
You and I could spend weeks trying to figure out why it's different and not even scratch the surface, but I think it's education. We're taught critical thinking really early on.

And sometimes I always wonder how much has to do with the fact the US gained independence right before the French revolution, so they missed out on the close cultural proximity with the european enlightenment era of the 1800s.

Don't get me wrong, I am well aware of the vast innovation and scientific progress of the US. But the new enlightenment was an international fad that I'm sure missed the more remote area of the US.

We all live in concentrated population pockets here. It's not hard to spread ideas wide.

I wouldn't be opposed to a system like that. I think most people would support it, in fact.

The problem is when we get headlines like "school hands out condoms to 5th graders"

The backlash is so intense, it sets us back ages in progress.

>He doesn't know about the Gay Uncle hypothesis

Attached: OhBoyHereWeGo2.jpg (429x519, 32K)

>Prides today. There will be traffic closures in these areas.

That's what the media advertised.
Then the next day we just heard about the gays who were attacked by alt-right fags. So once again, we got news. We were informed a thing was happening, and how it affects us.

Then we'd have heard nothing more if not for you fags.

I dunno, the anus behaves a lot like the vagina as it is.

You'd understand this but I love referencing when Oregon got self serve gas stations a few years ago. The outrage was intense.
"They're forcing me to work for free" "people are going to set their cars on fire !!"
"There'll be explosions everywhere!"

For one week I could show this type of American how silly they sound. It's such a a strange phenomenon, how opinions and uninformed doomsday predictions have such power there.

Sure, many countries value those freedoms, but America is the only one to have it enshrined in our founding documents. France has it spelled out in their declaration of rights, but that came as a result of revolution, it wasn't their founding principal.

And that's not jingoism or American exceptionalism. That's actually true. No other countries were founded on the freedom of speech as a protected human right.

And dense populations have benefits, sure. They also come with a lot of their own problems. Especially in multi-cultural societies. There's a reason crime rates are insanely higher in cities.

kek

Oregonians are a bit dopey. My buddy's grandma lives up there. She's a certified "white witch" and chiropractor. She also practices several other forms of quackery.

And yes, she's high 24/7.

Although, as a Californian, so am I.

>mfw

Attached: 1556951856110.jpg (500x597, 43K)

Yeah population density is well associated with crimes.
And the new french republic was indeed founded on free speech. They helped America win the revolution. And they had a huge boner for the US freedom fighters.
Their declaration of rights is a word for word translation of the american one.

Their huge emphasis (like the states) though was separation of church and state. That religion has zero business deciding policy. Practice all you want but stay out of our government and schools. Any suppression of religion passed that is cultural. People are kind of sick of religion.

It caught on better, there.

I would interpret crime rates being higher in cities being purely a function of opportunity to cause crime being tied to density. You don't need to bring "multi-cultural societies" into this.

Attached: 1478969558441.jpg (1000x1000, 699K)

>it caught on better there

Yeah, that's why I always take time to remind people when they say

>We're a Christian country founded on Christian values by Christians
I correct them
>We're a secular country, founded partially on Judeo-Christian values, by Christians

That's one reason I actually like Ben Shapiro. You will never hear him argue for lawmaking based on religious values. And he's as Jewy as they get.

I disagree. And to be clear, I'm not making an argument against multi-culturalism. I think the benefits outweigh the pitfalls.

But when you bring disparate cultures into close proximity, they will clash. Sometimes it will be peacefully, sometimes it will be violently. Every major wave of immigrants faced really severe bigotry upon arrival, and infighting among different European cultures happened constantly during Americas early years. It's not a racial thing. It's cultural.

There's several European countries that have free speech as part of their foundations. Take Belgium, for example. The country was founded on the basis of a number of principles (free speech included) that became an immediate part of its constitution. Your premise is completely wrong.

Indeed. Also I don't know the correlation in multiculturalism and crime much. Just the density. And I do mean I don't know.
But I did grow up in a very multicultural place (white minority) and race wasn't really a thing. We had copycat gangs (crips and bloods) but it wasn't confined to any race. Pretty equal distribution.

It was a beautiful testament to how people can come together and put aside their racial differences and work together to be total dickmunchers.
Jamaicans were the weird ones, though. They love that race card a lot. Like we had black people from all origins and it was really consistent, if there was talk of whitey and reparation gibs, it was a Jamaican. I don't know why.

But a dear Jamaican friend explained to me that Jamaicans actually are even considered in the black world to be very strange in their attitudes and world views. Self victimizers.

The Belgian constitution also states that their freedom of speech is punishable by law. Hence people being put in prison for denying the Holocaust.

There's nothing comparable in the American constitution. My premise stands.

>Jamaicans
Jim Carrey told a similar story early in his career. I don't think he talks about it much now though. I think I still have that clip from the old Stern show where he talked about it.

I was also raised in a fairly multicultural area. A very slight majority white. Perhaps not even a majority, possibly just a plurality. We also didn't care much about race. I think a lot of people lived that way, and that's why growing up into the world we've inherited now, we're a bit confused by the constant accusations of racism. Hell, now we even have "implicit racism" and "unconscious bias". In other words, it doesn't matter what you say or do. I will tell you what is in your heart based on my personal experiences.

Attached: 1527779772072.jpg (700x692, 89K)

Yup. Now race is on my mind always. I find myself treating black people better in a bad, pandery, almost patronizing way because I feel I'm on eggshells. It was never like this before the idiots got on fb.

>what is prostate stimulation.jpg

Not sure if that's an argument that gay sex is natural as much as it is an argument evolution does weird things and "naturalism" is the worst argument for how people should behave.