Why are trannies such a disgusting ugly subhumans?
Why are trannies such a disgusting ugly subhumans?
Oh no you di'int
When you're mentally damaged, refuse to seek mental help, and instead undergo a process to make yourself an embodiment of that mental illness, it will look like a mental illness in physical form.
...
They are mentally ill and their appearance matches the fact
While most are ugly af.....there are a couple I wouldnt think twice. Would smash and feel ok about it.
MORE
CHILDREN
FOR
MOLOCH
No way that's a dude
>Fuck off
Jane Marie, I bust a nut to her all the fucking time. Would gladly be a faggot for her dont even care ain't even mad
its part of living in Kali yuga. absolutely disgusting, demonic freaks roaming the land causing strife and chaos wherever they go. I cant wait for Kalki to return and purge this land of all degeneracy and restore the earth the usher in the new golden age
>Her
Exactly
>t. pagan
>Ignorant
en.wikipedia.org
>hindu is pagan
>non-Christian religions are valid
Google her faggot fuck off
>Christian religions are valid
"hey wanna see my fedora collection?"
no religion is valid because they are all man made.
lmao ok edgelord
I don't think being ugly really makes you a subhuman. There a plenty of cis men and women who are insanely ugly, but that doesnt really make them less of a person.
there aren't any laws against hating anyone. Where did you come up with this stuff?
have fun repeating existence here. suck on that edge.
"This bible is hollow it's my secret butt plug holder."
Why are you such a bigot?
Couldn't even brush his hair how much you wanna bet his day was Goin to Starbucks then Goin back to his dungeon
>"i hate trannies" in public space
>banned, deplatformed, criminal record
>"i hate straight white males" in public place
>murmurs and applause
John 10:27-29
That doesnt really happen. You're taking memes for truth. I you said the first thing in public about half of all people would agree with you. If you said the former then most people would disagree. The whole white guilt thing is from a really small group of people and sane people know not to take it seriously. You're lettting the internet totally skew your view of the world.
also criminal record? lmao thats really stupid and I think you know it
Laws making it ILlegal to hate them. Read it closer.
>en.wikipedia.org
t. tranny faggot
sorry there is absolutely no justification for your degenerate disgusting demonic existence you fucking freak. kill yourself ASAP im sure kalki wont be as forgiving in his punishment for you.
Those dont exist either
>christcucks are anything but jewish slaves
Witnessed.
But many laws now protect gender identity
If you read that literally it is quite ominous, seeing as sheep are oblivious to their inevitable slaughter.
If you wouldn't make love to that beautiful woman you are a subhuman cis gender bigot who should be beaten to death.
Then you're a faggot.
based
>feeling cute
That doesn't make it illegal to hate someone. You're blowing it out of proportion.
Former means first. I think you meant latter.
There not some are hotter as a female and some just look hotter as a guy. Depends alot on the way the body is shaped and how effeminate the persons face is. Pic is me, I look better shaved and somewhat masculine.
So let me get this straight, you think twitter(a private company) shouldn't be allowed to censor what's on the website that they own? Also she doesn't have a criminal record like you stated. People raise frivolous law suits all of the time. Doesn't mean it's gonna go through. I can sue someone for having a haircut I dont like but it wont happen.
yeah I'm a weetard
show dick
Not the same user, but nothing in that article describes the law.
Because men arent women
Personal opinion if shared publicly is subject to social justice.
i.e.
job loss
shunning
unemployment
Which lead to depression and degeneracy.
Which lead to incarceration.
so ipso facto it IS illegal to hate someone that the public doesn't approve you to hate.
you're not helping.
its already been settled in the supreme court. If a baker in colorado is forced by law to bake a cake for a gay wedding, then twitter should be forced to allow free speech on their platform.
fuck off you fucking freak
When you control the public space, it should be treated as the public space. If they want to ban free expression by claiming they are a private company then they should be broken up over anti-trust laws.
The more they try and censor and dictate who votes for whom, the government will have greater incentive to regulate them as a public utility.
Should a power or gas company get to turn your service off because of your political leanings?
>so ipso facto it IS illegal to hate someone that the public doesn't approve you to hate.
Your so goddamned stupid with your illogical reasoning and your intellectual pretentiousness, fucking cunts like you who just spit out the propaganda unthinking...useful idiots. just as predicted.
Different person, but there is more to the argument than just allowing a privately owned company to engage in corporate censorship. YouTube, Facebook, and other social media platforms have been having the same issue, and it's this:
If you state specific guidelines and rules, and then engage in a business relationship with people who agree to those rules, you can't arbitrarily hamstring their ability to make money based on your personal political views. When YouTube says they're a platform that you can base your business on, and then they violate the contract THEY wrote, it's definitely legally actionable.
TL;DR
The rules need to be made 100% clear, and followed to the letter by all parties, which is not what the platforms are currently doing.
And your entire existence is devoted to a 16 year old website devoted to porn and stupid chink cartoons
Yeah ok so?
They aren’t. Also, you don’t have to pay so much attention to them. Why waste your time looking at people you hate?
They certainly should be able to censor at their own discretion, if that's what is stated in their ToS.
But it's not. Currently, their ToS and Community Guidelines are much more specific than that, and they continue to arbitrarily subvert them to support the speech that they like. That's the real issue. If YouTube/Twitter/Facebook want to be exclusively "progressive" liberal platforms, that's their business. They need to make that clear, however, since they're monetizing the users of that platform. It's a business contract they drafted, and they refuse to obey it. That's certainly grounds for some kind government regulation, though it should obviously be minimal.
>Your so goddamned stupid
>illogical reasoning
>intellectual pretentiousness
>>So let me get this straight, you think twitter(a private company) shouldn't be allowed to censor what's on the website that they own?
Look asshole I get it you think you are fucking special, so let me explain it like you were a fucking three year old. Everyone of those companies built a platform and invited EVERYONE to join in order to blow up their user base numbers so they could increase the valuation of the companies for thier Intial Public Offering, and once they had done that, they started banning people they didn't agree with. If they had made that clear from the outset they NEVER would have gotten as big as they did. It's textbook fraud you pseudo-intellectual idiot.
I'm not watching that shit nigger...
the court sided with Masterpiece Cakeshop...
Some of em can fool you sometimes, but damn some are gross. I was at Origins this weekend, and Columbus pride parade was there at the same time, so the dudes in skirts were all over. They don't even shave! Disgusting fucking faggots.
the title will suffice.
>Alanis Morissette
Listen, I tend to agree with you on the social media thing, but you are an absolute faggot for even knowing one of her songs.
The idiocy of the leftist. You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about you fucking idiot.
I'm not that user, but he was obviously arguing in defense of conservatives on those platforms.
You are retarded
oh shit... mandella effect. how the fuck did i end up on this timeline all of a sudden?
this..i may have been wrong about the final ruling of the supreme court. (somehow switched timelines i guess, because im positive it was different) but that being said FUCK TRANNY FREAKS. i
>Alanis Morissette
>one of her songs
I didn't know her name faggot.
Media made the cakeshop out as the bad guys.
Thus they lost in the eyes of public opinion.
Not your fault.
The media is very good at subliminal brainwashing.
The court felt that it wasn't their place to dictate the success or failure of a private business.
So in other words, you masturbate with your tears while listening to her music.
Gotcha.
The risk of the decision to ban certain opinions is that their following will leave the platform.
They obviously didn't lose enough users to worry about banning certain people so it was a public relations decision.
>So in other words
I grew up in the '90s
"topped the chart, on April 1, 1996 staying there for six weeks"
and I had a radio and a TV.
It was harder to be a close-minded, sheltered, fedora faggot back then.
I guess I'm lucky, I was only two years old in '96. And most of the music I listened to for the first 12 years of my life was '60s psychedelic rock that my dad played.
The chin and cheekbones give it away. She's had a lot of work done, plastic surgery on top of her transition, but there's no hiding that Bogdanoff bone structure.
LOOK CLOSER LENNY
Yeah also look at the shoulder area, and how big it is compared to the top of her arm, she's lost muscle mass but the bone structure is still a mans
I'd still slip her my manly bone structure
hahahakillme
She looks like she’s probably(?) in the middle of transitioning, you basement-dwelling shitgoblin.