Until the Deal with North Korea is signed and the Iranian Conflict is completely disfused...

This is what I'm talking about. We need to maintain a National Front during this Crisis and both of you are doing what our enemies do.

Attached: 000-008.jpg (275x183, 8K)

Also this thread is at Page 5. This is unacceptable.

Unacceptable.

Attached: 000-010.jpg (615x410, 19K)

>Until the Deal with North Korea is signed
There was a deal. NK bailed, like they always do.

>and the Iranian Conflict is completely disfused,
It was already difused under Obama. Trump unilaterally reneged on the deal and has been hyping up confrontation.

>we really need to be looking at being under a Unified Front as a country,
Trump has undermined our relationships with our allies, splintering what was already a unified front

>There is just too much liberal divisiveness and this needs to be looked at.
Nothing you authoritarian Trumptards want more than to stifle criticism

Attached: 1237150255735.gif (263x185, 135K)

i'm australian, fuck the usa

triggered trumptard

A united front against maganiggers, yes. Almost all of them must die. Republicans are the biggest threat to america and need to be stopped before it's too late.

Fuck trump.

Attached: 000-024.jpg (728x452, 31K)

Attached: 000-005.jpg (400x408, 15K)

OK this is exactly what I'm talking about. I call on fellow supporters to put Homeland Security on their speed dial and keep an eye out for posts like this that are a potential danger to the work we've been doing.

Attached: 000-036.jpg (178x282, 11K)

You shouldn't admit our enemies tell the truth user. It might make people sympathetic to them.

Attached: 000-015.jpg (770x470, 23K)

And this thread is at Page 7.

Come on. People. We can do better than this. Better than this.

Attached: 000-014.jpg (293x172, 6K)

Problem, Donald?

Yes, why aren't we at Page 1? This is in an important topic.

Attached: 000-035.jpg (300x168, 7K)

WHY AREN'T WE AT PAGE 1??

Attached: 0156.jpg (282x179, 6K)

Sorry USA is the real enemy of the humanity and of the world

OK we're going to pretend this is Page 1.

We, the People of the United States, need to put on a Unified National Front where we stand behind this Presidency and self-police those who would cause dissidence and disharmony at a time we need to be taking on MAJOR world issues. That's what we're talking about here.

Attached: 000-041.jpg (277x182, 6K)

We've been rooting out traitors for a while now. Ketchup.

Attached: 000-029.jpg (275x183, 5K)

You know what would help us put up a united front?

Not shitting over the the bill of rights.

Finally. Page 1. Barely.

Attached: 000-045.jpg (294x171, 5K)

Attached: 000-040.jpg (685x385, 26K)

Please, in your own words, describe the rights you feel have been shat upon.

Attached: 3.jpg (700x420, 21K)

Why use my words when I can use the faggot calling for action who started this thread's words?
>I call on fellow supporters to put Homeland Security on their speed dial and keep an eye out for posts like this that are a potential danger to the work we've been doing.
He's talking about censorship.

>inb4 presdent raycyst
>inb4 sed meen thing
>inb4 gibs moar gibs

>Inb4 president racist
Given that this is proven by court record likely before you were born, I don't think you can inb4 it.

So you're concerned that OP has shat upon your rights? So, no actual complaints against the President, you merely feel oppressed by the contents of this thread?

the case you refer to was settled without admission of guilt. No obstruction, no collusion, no racism.

Attached: 000-033.jpg (250x201, 6K)

If Trump can't treat people crossing the border or refugees with dignity, then he doesn't give a a shit about anyone else, either.

I'm saying that the one spouting rhetoric about removing divisiveness is espousing a fundamentally divisive idea like censorship. I never mentioned oppression, nor the president. I just believe that the best way to remove divisiveness is not too suggest forcibly quashing an opposing opinion, but engaging it in open discussion until compromise is reached.

>compromise
>on human rights

lol

Attached: 000-012.jpg (332x190, 6K)

Additionally, that case needs to be looked at in context. In 1970's New York, black people were out of fucking control. Renting to them was toxic, all your white tenants would move out, and in 6 months you've gone from landlord to slumlord. Its easy to see the past through rose-colored glasses when the historical reality is too disturbing to reckon with.

>Without admission
It is a matter of court records that there was systematic, policy racism in that case. That is a fact. That it was settled by consent decree does not mean that investigation never occurred. It did. It is on record. It found what it found.

and it's not "Censorship." It's mutual cooperation to remove troublemaking liberal dissent at a time we have Deals cooking across the globe that need to be signed.

Attached: 000-044.jpg (1100x619, 79K)

>being racist was ok in that context

LOL

No. I did not mention human rights. Try again.

But idiots like you think human rights is "forcing an opinion"

>You've got no proof he was racist
>But even if you do it was okay then
Top notch.

false equivalency. And those that cross legally are treated with dignity. And the ones that we have to chase down like animals in the brush are detained and provided better living conditions and medical attention than they've had in years.

>Remove dissent
Literally censorship.

Nope. I never said that. Try again.

>dignity
>putting kids in cages
pick one trumpshit

Good. Maybe you should volunteer to get rounded up by ICE.

Attached: 000-019.jpg (1484x989, 261K)

>Those that cross legally are treated with dignity
Call me when this is true.

My point is some issues are not subject to compromise, and it sounds like you believe otherwise.

Meme faces are not an argument, censorship user. You will not take our right to free speech. Either engage us in discussion or suck it up.

Attached: 000-013.jpg (300x168, 7K)

>history should only be viewed from my ivory tower of morality

imagine being this self-righteously narcissistic

Human rights are not open to compromise. But disagreeing with the leader of your nation is not an argument about human rights. Back on topic please. Enough inventing arguments I've not made. I'm allergic to straw.

>He wasn't racist!
>He didn't admit to it even though the court had evidence he was
>And even if he was it was fine to be racist back then
>That's why he got in a legal battle over it
Apologists who won't admit someone has done any wrong are the worst.

You just got caught "justifying" Drumpf's racism in the 1970s user. At least admit it.

Attached: 0001-002.gif (480x480, 1.41M)

Suck it up it is.

Iran isn't the enemy. North Korea isn't the enemy.

The Trump Administration is the enemy. I would rather have China steamroll us than hand this country to the bunch of retarded shitkicker evangelicals who elected Trump.

Attached: 1558991071325.jpg (1570x1536, 396K)

they keep voting for him
they're not very smart

yes, putting kids in cages to prevent rampant sexual abuse. Would you rather the little brownies get diddled? I'm sure you would, liberals cream their gender-fluid undergarments for oppressed minorities.

your fap fantasies are extensive user

>There was a deal. NK bailed, like they always do.

As they should. Why would anyone make a deal with us after seeing how the Iran Nuclear Deal went?

Might as well hold onto the nukes if the U.S. will push for regime change regardless.

Attached: 1553973008319.jpg (1200x1200, 178K)

White supremacy needs to be fought at all costs. The victory will be the day whites have such a small voting block that politicians no longer cater to them and we can start putting them into camps.

Of course you'd rather have china rule us, since leftist policies are more or less in line with how china censors and controls it's people. Although I don't think you'd be happy with their treatment of blacks and mexicans.

Well, this fag who keeps spamming this thread is good at sucking things, so...

See this is exactly the kind of subversive bullshit trolling republicunts say to try and convince people anyone on the left actually thinks this way. Learn to spot a troll everyone.

Black people are treated just fine in China

retarded false flag

>The leftists want to censor us. That's why we should censor them
the thread.

It's interesting you Trump conservatives (not real conservatives) want unity, but only when you have the presidency. Hypocrite isn't a big enough word for you jack wagons.

youtube.com/watch?v=Few8kJ0zfnY

I think our best option is for Trump to resign. We can all agree in these tough times it is important that our leader is not an 70 year old senile grandpa, who can't do basic math

Attached: 24567gede.jpg (640x706, 63K)

he's right though
and you're going to get bred out

Attached: 7d0c36b578fc9071c21948ec4297c4fb.jpg (200x200, 5K)

I don't like either extreme, but I do not see the faction on the right calling for a ban or change in the first amendment. Social media companies actively censor the public based on their ideology. What they don't understand is this will eventually lead to government regulation because they have too much influence on politics.

only because you're offended by it

Agreed. Trump must resign now, so we can have Pence during fag pride month.
Could you imagine the anguished libtard screams? I can. It's music to my ears.

If this were an American ad, you'd defend it as "JUST BEING A JOKE, WHAT, NOBODY CAN TELL JOKES ANYMORE? TRIGGERED SJWS LMAO"

Yeah I guess it's not great implying black people are unclean, but there's a pretty big difference between that and the kind of racism that exists in the United States

fuck my balls falseflag fag

Attached: 1559411555967.jpg (750x590, 50K)

So you're advocating hate and white supremacy? Glad to know, nazi.

This whole censoring of the right is bullshit. When algorithms can't tell the difference between nazi's and your politics, maybe you should start looking at the party you're supporting.

cnn.com/2015/12/08/asia/star-wars-china-racist-poster/index.html

You think that's the only example? Chinese people do NOT like blacks, all in all. Chinese think they are the superior race of earth.

The only anguished scream is when you get penetrated

Attached: nc33.jpg (500x303, 13K)

>search american inventors on google
>search american inventors on bing
>google doesn't have an agenda

No, except for the camps part I agree with him.
Your ideology needs to be bred out of society. Completely.

That's what they want you to do.

People find Trump entertaining. Pence is just another stick-up-ass evangelical.

Might as well have made Mike Huckabee cosplay as Hank Hill's dad if that's what people wanted.

Attached: 1557956879265.png (720x540, 523K)

>I do not see the faction on the right calling for censorship
So you didn't read the thread?

>Using Bing

I want Sarah Sanders Huckabee to sit on my face. Just to hear the schlupping sound.

I can tell you are one sick retard. You probably masturbate every time a child dies in one of the Trump concentration camps. But yes Pence and his attempt to purge science and journalism would finally unite all of america against the corrupt criminal republican party

I'm talking people in power with the ability to censor society, not random Yea Forums mongoloids.

Great counter argument.

Having you considered suicide, it would do your community well.

China has 56 ethnic groups.

Again, this is all just minor mildly offensive shit.

Something like the murders of Philando Castile or Eric Garner wouldn't happen in China

Or I'm advocating NOT putting anyone into camps because I'm NOT a totalitarian psychopath, and don't appreciate people making fake 'leftist' posts that suggest putting white people into camps for that reason.

Cunt.

i'm not even gonna fucking lie so do I user

maybe we can find unity after all

Attached: 1553596796072.jpg (408x310, 68K)

>I mean people in power
Ah, so nobody on either side? Since nobody is trying to change 1A.

>Trump has undermined our relationships with our allies, splintering what was already a unified front
With allies like those who the fuck needs enemies?

But yet here you are, thinking about masturbating to children, you sick fuck.
This is why the LGBTP group needs eradicated, since they decided to let the pedophiles in. THIS is why we need Mike "ol sparky" Pence as president. Trump is too lenient on allowing this degeneracy to exist.

youtu.be/VFOpotbAoSU

You masturbate to children being murdered, sick psycho. This is why everyone agrees Republicans are insane terrorists. Either you guys shoot up schools or murder innocent children who you stole out of their mothers arms. Republicans are all criminals. This is why america needs to unite against republican terrorism

>LGBTP
>they decided to let the pedophiles in

No the fuck they didn't. Even gays want pedophiles to die.

Stop taking paranoid /pol/ shitposts seriously.

Attached: 1559171025553.png (296x303, 174K)

Most republicans are pedophiles. So the right is projecting as always.

/someone else
I think it's actually /pol/ trying to divide the lgbt community.

And we want both groups dead. Win win.

>we
you and another another faggot with his hand on his cock isn't everyone

which is funny because /pol/ is by and large closeted homos

It's absolutely /pol/

The same thing with "clovergender" and "kindergender"

right wing shitposters make this stuff up for laughs, and then literal low iq retards think it's real

this is what happens when you don't expose yourself to people/arguements you disagree with

Attached: 1557776695985.jpg (344x245, 13K)

>right wing shitposters make this stuff up for laughs
>make this stuff up

Wtf are you on about? This shit would never fly America and you know it. The mental gymnastics needed to say "Yeah, this ad is kinda bad but its way worse here guys bc gotta maintain muh narrative" is astounding

It would be changed to be a white guy turning black and you know it

Yup. Pedosexuality is 100% a /pol/meme

> right wing shitposters = literal low iq retards

The President has actually been very patient with some of you despite the damage you are trying to cause to this country.
Soon enough you could be one of the first to get rounded up and put into a mandatory Patriot Program until you learn to appreciate this country.

Attached: 000-030.jpg (960x640, 52K)

There are racist and colorist people everywhere.

There's a difference between "haha get it he's black" and over a century of systematic racism.

China didn't enslave black people. China didn't have Jim Crow. China didn't have the pushback against the Civil Rights movement. China doesn't have an ongoing problem with police murdering unarmed black people.

But you're gonna deny that these are problems and call me a fag. I don't know why I even bothered responding.

Attached: 1558987352904.png (480x615, 468K)

the president's an old ass homo i bet he doesn't even play fortnite or listen to drake LMAO

Dude. I've told you before. There's no rehabilitating these faggots. They need to be rounded up and shot. Every single one of them.
Or do you just not learn?

Hard to unify with the traitors in the white house who care more about Russian and Saudia Arabian interests than Americans. If you want to unify, then unify against the tRUmp crimefamily.

Attached: catch22.jpg (960x942, 117K)

Attached: 000-046.jpg (294x171, 6K)

Attached: 000-005.jpg (408x408, 15K)

Attached: treason.jpg (576x402, 76K)

>Censorship
No. Fuck off. Not even a 100% republican Supreme Court would let that slide.

Because you're a good person trying to make sure other people see the truth in spite of the guy your arguing against, user, and blindly hoping one day he'll see it too.

This would be done by Executive Order, and if the population complies, Temporary. Once we make the necessary strides in the Deal with North Korea and the Iranian Conflict, along with other Domestic Issues, we can then go back to the former system. But liberals are really leaving this Presidency no choice. The divisive hurtful comments have actually made this Presidency's job more difficult to do, and a good deal more expensive in terms of taxpayer dollars.

Attached: 000-004.jpg (275x183, 5K)

Hurting libtard feelings is not treason. It's already been proven time and time again that there was no collusion, and no obstruction. Get over yourself, snowflake.

>I cover for the President's crimes

Attached: -faggot-.jpg (224x225, 6K)

>the President's crimes

Attached: 000-021.jpg (810x455, 27K)

"crimes"
Innocent until proven guilty. I know you faggots want guilt by public opinion, but that's not how it works in this country.
Stay mad, soyboy.

Trump is a criminal who devalues his worth, forges his tax returns and has ties to Russian mobsters. These are facts, user.
By choosing to ignore them, you cover for him.

>you faggots want guilt by public opinion
like Benghazi?

China never had enough black people or rich people to enslave like America did. They integrate everyone and enslave their own under government law. Have you seen integration camps? Holy fuck dude, you wouldn't be sticking up for China rn

>Trump is a criminal

Attached: 000-006.jpg (300x168, 5K)

Oh, I wasn't aware that he'd been tried in a court of law and found guilty. Oh. Right. He hasn't.
>B-But Hillary!

Nope, the SC, house and senate would overturn it in seconds because it sets far too dangerous a precedent.

You can't executive order blanket censorship even temporarily. It would take less than a day for it to be overturned. It's so blatantly, unarguably unconstitutional it's actually funny you keep this trolling up.

Yeah, but lesser of 2 evils, yadayada..

Attached: you.jpg (232x217, 9K)

Attached: 2197981786.jpg (1612x1270, 156K)

You know, at this point, I'm pretty well convinced you're a leftard trying to make Republicans look bad by posting this bullshit over and over. Fuck off, soyboy.

Just pointing out your hypocrisy trumpshit

>Not being found guilty means we can safely give up on trying him for any crimes and call him am innocent man without question.
Yes OJ.

No they wouldn't. You cannot defy a direct Presidential Order.

Attached: 000-035_rotation.jpg (288x168, 6K)

North Korea is a stage state they don't have weapons of mass destruction kim just has a real expensive hobby shooting tube rockets into the sky your media outlets are just one big circle jerk when it comes to real news.

You learn speaky English, you come back and post, savvy-savvy?

>republicans need help from the left to look bad

Attached: di_05812.jpg (500x393, 48K)

you could go to Prison for posting this in time of War

Attached: 4.jpg (624x422, 17K)

So, seeing as we were at war during Obama's entire presidency, why weren't all of the right wingers locked up for everything they said against him?
Oh. Right. It's unconstitutional.

Attached: 1.jpg (625x417, 43K)

Not an argument, faggot.

Attached: 1.jpg (342x147, 8K)

Actually if it is filled unconstitutional by the other branches of government yes you can. It's called checks and balances. The president is not the dictator of the nation.

>The president is not the dictator of the nation.
You libs are giving him no other choice

Attached: 3.jpg (270x186, 6K)

You're not even conservative. You're just larping. Go jerk it to the furry porn thread and you'll feel better.

Attached: 4.jpg (275x183, 7K)

>Choice
It isn't a choice he can make. The us Constitution exists, the government can nope literally any EO the president signs if they declare it unconstitutional and the SC agrees. And I'm afraid censorship and internment camps for political opinions is pretty cut and dry in terms of whether it is unconstitutional.

So fuck off with your censorship suggestions. It will never happen. Your dream will remain a dream.

Attached: 9.jpg (275x183, 4K)

FDR did it. All the President has to do is sign an Executive Order. And it's not fascism if the Patriot Programs (not CAMPS) will be teaching traditional American values to those who need it.

Attached: 7.jpg (310x163, 6K)

>Memeface
Thanks for admitting defeat :)

You're biting b8. Be smarter than that. Sage

No, FDR did not sign an EO to put people who disagreed with his policy into camps. The SC, house and senate will shit all over that EO in moments. You are literally talking about censorship. It is undeniably, irredeemably unconstitutional. It will be declared invalid before he signs it if he (as usual) announces his intent.

I don't want to unify with any of you 325,000,000 fucking faggots

You call unite with these balls

Attached: 1552338675664.jpg (500x350, 42K)

Attached: 9.jpg (800x481, 36K)

they fell in luv

Attached: Donald-Trump-Kim-Jong-Un-hair-swap.jpg (640x358, 24K)

Attached: 7.jpg (600x400, 18K)

This thread is at Page 7 again.
This is your fault.

Attached: 1.jpg (1160x629, 168K)

And it doesn't take an Executive Order to get on board with supporting this President. All you have to do is report anyone who's damaging this administration's goals and achievements. Remember, our enemies do this.

Attached: 2.jpg (403x219, 21K)

fuck off, soyboy.

Attached: 6.jpg (640x360, 36K)

cuck. cuck cuck cuck.
Sounds like chicken in here.

Attached: 5.jpg (298x169, 5K)

It would take an executive order to create the camps you described in as 'mandatory patriot programs' and 'round up' people into them. And it would last a day at most before it was shot down as unconstitutional. It would be incarceration based on speech, and free speech is protected by the Constitution.

Stop arguing with the President. Can't you see he doesn't like that.

Attached: 3.jpg (300x168, 6K)

Yes, but the ban would only be TEMPORARY. Once the major Deals in North Korea, Iran and Saudi Arabia are confirmed, the restriction would be LIFTED. That would be the stipulation for the Presidential Order.

Attached: 000-016.jpg (960x628, 46K)

OK why is this at Page 8 now? This is BS.

Attached: 1.jpg (960x640, 55K)

>Temporary
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Nope. Even temporary it is unconstitutional.

It's not my job to make him like the Constitution. If he dislikes the Constitution he is free to take it up with literally the entirety of the rest of government.

Attached: 3.jpg (960x640, 61K)

That's CONGRESS. This is a PRESIDENTIAL ORDER we're talking about. Presidential.

Attached: 13.jpg (318x159, 6K)

OK you did it. This thread is at Page 9 and this is INEXCUSABLE. INEXCUSABLE.

Attached: 000-004.jpg (272x183, 5K)

>Article Two of the United States Constitutiongives the president broad executive and enforcement authority to use their discretion to determine how to enforce the law or to otherwise manage the resources and staff of the executive branch. The ability to make such orders is also based on express or impliedActs of Congressthat delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation).
If Congress are not allowed to do it conditionally, neither can the president. He is the executive of the powers of Congress. EOs only have the force of law because of the Constitution and are bound under it. He cannot make laws Congress cannot constitutionally make, EOs only direct the powers of Congress and bypass the need for a vote.

OK then we'll let the Supreme Court will decide that.

Attached: 145.jpg (1160x773, 99K)

Perfect. Let's. No SC is ever going to want to be seen to rule against the Constitution. :)

Attached: cvn.jpg (750x563, 46K)