So you're telling me incest can be considered "morally neutral"?

they left the comment section on

kek one of the most dishonest sounding speeches i've heard

He looks like a fucking gnome. He can never win, ever.

fuentes and metokur rekt him

>destroyed Jontron
>Jon still gets millions of views on whatever garbage he posts

In a Godless society, where children can decide to sterilize themselves and switch sexes, what's the reasoning for prohibiting pedophilia and incest? Our youngest are slaughtered by Abortion, so "youth" is no protection.

>Likes barely higher than dislikes because they froze it
>all those comments

Attached: 1559330473459.gif (160x160, 811K)

PragerU are ardent shills but at least they do support free speech.

>has destroyed Lauren Southern
Is this a meme? How do you destroy that goddess?

with bbc

Oof

>We are conservative
>Ok goyim let's spend more on Israel

Why does destiny have so many shills? How can you claim he's a good debater If mother fucking naked ape made him look like an incompetent and assblasted manlet

>Morals are subjective
you lost me there with that Jewish shit.
>LE THERE IS LITERALLY NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG THINGS I AM SO SMURT

I don't understand either. I'm a turbomanlet (5'2") and Destiny just looks so ... Small. Like he doesn't even lift.

Zoomer here no one watches these hacks besides balding 30 year old white men everyone I know my age K owe who Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro are stop talking about things you have no fixing clue of

yes let us descend into chaos like animals

he's never debated Spencer, surprisingly Spencer is a good speaker and would likely destroy him. I don't even like Spencer either I suspect he's a glow in the dark

>I'm a turbomanlet (5'2")
Oof, that's Asian woman height. How have you not ended it all yet?

reminder these are the kids they're converting
these pics are straight from the chapo reddit

Attached: chapo reddit pictures.jpg (1024x576, 118K)

Destiny aside, what do you wear for pants?I'm 5'7'' - 5'8'' but my legs are kind of stocky and I usually wear tight jeans but I don't like how they look.

>good night alt right
youtu.be/Cl986QBe7vU
OHNONONONO

>I hate them because they tend to destroy the outcomes coming from this country
wow, master intellectual there.

Attached: 1558731354571.jpg (640x630, 322K)

>Jewish
>spergs out completely
Pathetic.

>in tasmania they ate people, thats the same thing as not eating people, morals are subjective!

Best post ITT.

There is good in this world. And there is literally evil in this world. Never make the mistake of forgetting that, anons.

Attached: 0090.jpg (419x304, 22K)

link?

The same zoomer here the only lefties I know in my school are the weird gay kids and the pasty white nerds that no one likes basically anybody without a social life or athletic life and down right losers turn out to be socialist or leftist looming at all these breadtubers it's pretty clear they were part of the same clique that I just mentioned most of them downright admit they were fucking losers

What exactly is “immoral” about incest? Provided it happens between consenting adults

He's fucking rich that's why almost all e celebs have hot girlfriends look up admiral bulldog and sinned the fat fuck was the one that dumped her

she looks like a tranny, there are a lot better examples than that

>it's okay if McWalmart Exxon Dynamic-Amazon is treading on me

>what exactly is wrong with x? provided that x is entirely different than what it actually is

What is good and evil is based on public opinion though.

>is entirely different than what it actually is
Consent is the never what people refer to when talking about incest though

There is nothing wrong with 2 consenting adults just weird in my book considering there's so many fish in the sea why would you choose someone with an high chance of producing an abomination with

Destiny ass lickers getting btfo as per usual

>eceleb "intellectuals"

Attached: 985.png (621x702, 56K)

>Consent is the never what people refer to when

>What exactly is “immoral” about incest?
Nothing intrinsically. It's just that most cases of incest involve other immoral components such as power imbalance and reproduction (depending on your view on that). But it is not always immoral (two long lost gay twins), therefore you can say it's morally neutral. Don't understand how people don't understand this.

> btfos the alt-right

Attached: yq4u1q4vxhe21.jpg (1536x2048, 408K)

Love these guys (and girls)

Attached: dc3s4vq-8b992c43-23ed-42ca-bfb0-282c6348b7b4.png (796x582, 666K)

Why do people watch Destiny after he got DESATROYED

youtu.be/v31UIhFrszo

why are the cum town people referred to as socialists? I thought they were just 30yr old boomers who grew up on Encyclopedia Dramatica and make jokes about saying nigger

getting dragged through the mud by an uncle tom is priceless

is that brie larson?

Spencer destroying Sargon is still the most based youtube moment of all time.
lil destiny can only dream of such a perfect moment.

this

Morals are based on religion, which gets its legitimacy from forming cohesive societies for centuries.

>where children can decide to sterilize themselves and switch sexes
That takes a lot of examination from doctors.

Jewish ethics is very different from subjectivism.

>Morals are based on religion
OHNONONO
LOOK AT THIS DOOOOOOOOOD

Attached: 1558192242959 (1).jpg (318x308, 35K)

but what decides what is "good" and "bad?

>he isn't a moral nihilist
pretty soi

Attached: 1559755137019.jpg (500x519, 27K)

?

I suppose purposely spawning a child with garbage genes could be considered immoral. I don't care about it when it's two decent looking people doing it but when one of the partner is an absolute uggo, those fuckers are just creating more goblins in the world.

>desTINY
>strong
yikes

The sheer amount of butthurt he creates among alt right shitheads is hilarious.

lol

Attached: h2irhkaaps231.png (1000x1000, 278K)

Outside of causing innocent people harm morality is absolutely subjective. You can't come up with a single logical reason consenting adult relatives having non-procreating sex is immoral, all you have is "muh feels".

Attached: destinydivided.png (1280x720, 1.1M)

Sex is disgusting and STDs can cross.

>Sex is disgusting
Have sex incel virgin freak

>Sex is disgusting
feels
>STDs can cross
Both parties willfully accept this risk when they consent to sex. It does not affect anyone else.

>Sex is disgusting
Yikes.

it effects other people they choose to sleep with and can be judged as such

youtube.com/watch?v=J-IEYEJ0o3g
have sex

have sex.

the skin can tear, the flesh will bleed, sex is for procreation and abortions do nothing but kill the future

Wow he destroyed a bunch of youtube video essay writers, he’s truly matched wits with the greatest minds of our time and triumphed

>the only argument the right has on him is that he's short
>he's actually taller than the alt right figure head Joe Rogan

Yes, if it's consensual.

God

enjoy aids

based retard

I guess by not giving a shit.

Trump

>sex is for procreation
lol

>those squats
Jesus how fucking embarrassing. Thats only about 75lbs. He should be shoulder pressing that, not squatting such light weight

wrong

It literally comes from out own survival instincts as a species.
Then it trickles down into our modern culture, where it is so far removed from its original practical intent that there can be argument over it.

For example murder is morally bad.
We decide this as a species because for survival we need to stay alive, we need our partners to stay alive and our children to stay alive.
In order to best achieve this, we decide not to murder anyone else so they don't murder us or our family either.

But you can get to a theoretical level where it's utilitarianism versus deontology.
Utilitarianism says the outcome matters where as deontology says the action proceeding the outcome matters.
Under utilitarianism you can justify killing people to save people, under deontology you do not.
Both of those still agree killing is bad, they're just interpreting that rule in different ways.

In that sense, there is objective good and bad in this world, completely rooted in our own humanity.
Any discussions to be had is when those fundamental rules of our species become complicated with extra considerations.

>has destroyed Sargon, NakedApe, Metokour
naeh

> blah blah blah there is objective good and bad in this world
Wrong, there is no such thing as objective morality. There is nothing objectively wrong with murder, rape and torture.

>Provided it happens between consenting adults
Because of the power dynamic between close relatives it can't be truly consensual. There being some kind of grooming going on is way too likely because otherwise those people wouldn't get over the natural avoidance people have to incest.

t. Ahmed al-Saladin Emir Takbirallah Allahu Snackbar Muhammad al-Somali

>it effects other people they choose to sleep with
Who also accept this risk when they consent to sex. You might as well be calling sports immoral because people can get hurt; people willfully engaging in activities that carry an element of risk make an elective decision to accept that risk. Your argument is stupid and holds no water whatsoever under the slightest analysis, pull your head out of your ass.

Tbf, i find incest gross, but kind find an argument to call It wrong as long as they are not having babies

Literally who destroys a bunch of literally who.

not an argument

What if the siblings were seperated at birth?

destiny is pretty great aside from his hard left views like killing conservatives can be morally right
he doesn't support abortion and shows people to be the pseuds they are so he's fine by me
>tfw there are people that genuinely think he advocates for incest because he uses the incest logic game to humiliate people

>Because of the power dynamic between close relatives
What about twins? Where's the power dynamic there?

>alt right figure head Joe Rogan
cringe

>"fucking someone much younger than you is immoral and the same as fucking a kid"
>ends up fucking a 19 year old and flies her to his country to live with him
wew lad
Maybe he should leave his cucking open relationship GF and go back to his son

Tell me this isn't kino.

Attached: loss.webm (1280x720, 2.9M)

Probably okay.
As long as no kids of course.
Utter retard.

This is embarrassing.

ITT a bunch of retards who call anyone who disagrees with them "cletus" defend actual literal incest. Incredible.

Yeah but Rogan is a fucking tank. He might be a manlet but he is as wide as he is tall

Muslims follow their "objective" morality more closely than Christians these days so that's a retarded retort you have there.

imagine actually slagging someone off for fucking a hot 10/10 pure swede
also his son lives with him 4 days a week I think

Attached: J9ckmNz.jpg (1024x1820, 180K)

>actual literal incest
Purest form of love as long as you don't spawn babies.

there would be 0 politics and they would discuss their shroom trips

Incest is in fact morally neutral, if not morally righteous.

get back to sister fucking cletus

>like killing conservatives can be morally right
I don't support that in general, but I can see why it could be defensible to attack (not necessarily kill) groups like fascists or other authoritarians.

why would someone do this to themselves?

Attached: 1500230171880.jpg (449x546, 31K)

I think its great that he does, but the hypocrisy is just too hard too ignore.
Thats the problem when you are only talking about hypothetical situations. Do I believe he was sincere when he thought he would never date someone much younger than him? Yeah I do, but the problem is he never had the chance to begin with until now.

>Utter retard.
Not an argument.

Jontron's a fucking retard who thinks unsourced /pol/ images are fact.

>doesn't like incest
pleb

You didn't have one to argue with.

When did he destroy Fuentes?

What's it like to be such a predictable background noise shitposter that you may as well be a bot?

He got btfo by Alt Hype.

>Who also accept this risk
what evidence do you have to support people wouldn't change their minds?

The white supremacist and history denier who acts like a respectable academic?

well it's hypocritical sure but it's not like he's fucking a 16 year old at 30, she's 19
and yeah it's hard to be morally consistent but once again, she's a 10/10 prime swedish model so despite him not having a chance before he got wealthy and famous and despite him literally stealing her from her "open" relationship, it's pretty hard to slag him off for doing so

Psychologically damaging and physically impossible to get proper offspring. Human Biology itself rejects incest. That should be enough.

Mass repliers ruin threads. Kill yourself.

What history did he deny?

>socratic method
People there to "win" debates are hated by socrates, plato, etc. Destiny is a sophist.

yeah but its okay because he has a website where he has half assedly stringed together what appears to be a valid reason for why whites are superior

No, the liberal sodomite.

Alt right figure Joe Rogan? What the fuck?

>copying an always sunny bit
>not even doing it well, throwing in some dumb memeshit
pathetic

t. does not know any muslims and only learns about them through the internet

No they do not fag

The established fact of what happened in the Congo in the 1880s-1900s? The fact that segregation was a very repressive system that nobody in their right mind would want to bring back?

talking about combat sports is alt right

They're members of the DSA and they practically share an apartment and are best friends with the Chapo guys, Adam does a lot of crossovers between podcasts in fact.

>For example murder is morally bad.
Except when we murder people we """"objectively"""" consider a threat to our survival. The fact that killing a person is sometimes considered just and sometimes not suggests its not objective in its morality (at least from a societal point of view). If you say survival instincts are at play when we deem murder to be morally bad you mistake not murdering any person with murdering a person from inside your genepool / ethnic group. In the stone age, where survival instincts - as opposed to sociability - were probably a lot more dominant in controlling behavior and murder (between and within tribes) probably a lot higher.

"christian" country (Ireland)
>pro abortion
>pro divorce
>pro alcohol
>casual sex
"muslim" country (any country in the middle east)
>literally throwing gays off buildings
>chucking rocks at women who have been raped until a nice shot caves their head in
hmmmmmmmm
oh wait hang on, because shitskins rape and drink in western countries that means all muslims in general don't follow an objective morality aka sharia law in this context, interesting

how do none of them know how to take a fucking selfie

you aren't supposed to push your chin into the camera at point blank range unless you want your head to look like 90% jaw

>The established fact of what happened in the Congo in the 1880s-1900s?
Don't think he really denied that Leopold II had his fun. It's just that he points that colonized nations got better than they were before colonized. That's why he attacked that poo in loo historian about British rule in India with statistics to back it up.
>The fact that segregation was a very repressive system that nobody in their right mind would want to bring back?
His point was that some blacks did better and that some want it back now. Not a burger, but if I was I would probably want it back too. And besides, this part is not even about history.

Pretty sure Alt Hype points out that East Asians have higher IQ on average.

Trut. Me produkt of incest and me smart. Inkest not so battt

Destiny should go on Joe Rogan.

All humans are the result of incest. You have multiple ancestors that engaged and reproduced with incest.

Not sure if bait or retarded

Who are any of these eceleb onions faggots and why should I care?

Attached: AE49CEA8-A931-4F75-9B49-FBC467BC7D9F.jpg (625x598, 88K)

We already live like animals

Why do leftists love pedos so much?

Attached: another leftist pedo.jpg (1102x580, 125K)

should you only care about "real" celebs like the one who act in your shit marvel films?
how is destiny, someone who argues and educates people about intellectual things worse than CIA man in your pic?

I've never heard his argument for it, but it isn't hard to argue for consumption not being illegal since it doesn't really hurt anyone.

Destiny wasn't in any noteworthy films is a start and finish of your question.

How about the movies and television shows he is in?

Ever heard of supply and demand? Think about what you just said you nonce

"noteworthy" films
so because someone has acted in a hollywood blockbuster that is the intellectual equivalent of power rangers then destiny isn't..... what exactly?
this meme is the product of two things
when aging in favour of AOC laws he brought up that another thing that could prevent kids being molested/raped was giving people with those tendencies state purchased CP (bought with permission from the victims) which why not exactly viable would be morally justifiable if it actually did stop kids from being raped. Of course it brings with it all sorts of problems but if it stops a major harm being comitted then it's somewhat OK to do but this got spun into DESTINY WANTS TO LEGALISE CP

Also a 15 year old sent him a pic of her in a bikini and he said that he finds jailbait hot but would never fuck them (he posted the pic in skype though as an example of hot jailbait)
Also people keep reporting him for having CP because of this meme so the FBI have investigated him numerous times but found nothing which is pretty telling

The best part of these threads is when you have no fucking clue who any of these people are. They all look creepy.

Anonymous consumption has nothing to do with producers. Solicitation to produce, conspiracy to produce, these are crimes.

If someone pirates Fallout 4 and doesn't tell any1 about it, they aren't supporting Bethesda.

If someone pirates Fallout 4 and tells people about it, they are still supporting Bethesda through advertisement.

>creepy.
Post tits and timestamp or sharpie in the pooper.

I think the biggest piece of shit move Destiny has done is abandoning his son. It's probably the only thing you need to know about him is that he hates his own fucking kid. Awful human being.

>when aging in favour of AOC laws he brought up that another thing that could prevent kids being molested/raped was giving people with those tendencies state purchased CP (bought with permission from the victims) which why not exactly viable would be morally justifiable if it actually did stop kids from being raped. Of course it brings with it all sorts of problems but if it stops a major harm being comitted then it's somewhat OK to do but this got spun into DESTINY WANTS TO LEGALISE CP

This is absolute brainlet tier shit. This guy is meant to be smart? I guess we better start showing repeat violent offenders snuff films (with the permission of the murder victims family of course) because that will definitely sate their urges rather than encourage them.

>CP (bought with permission from the victims)
Sounds valid to me.
>Also a 15 year old sent him a pic of her in a bikini and he said that he finds jailbait hot but would never fuck them
Perfectly reasonable. They are biologically fit, and premarital sex is immoral, so even if he has other reasons for abstaining, the result is still good.

>it isn't hard to argue for molestation of children not being illegal since it "doesn't really hurt anyone"
Try to argue that shit in real life faggot, lets see how someone beats the life out of you. Besides it's been scientifically proven to be harmful, debate is not possible when it is already a fact.

Wow someone is butthurt that their little boy internet celeb is not actually famous like a real celebrity.

Attached: 1456682011699.jpg (447x428, 77K)

Or if someone downloads Fallout 4 from a website with a download counter, and leaves a comment thanking the uploader, they have incentivized the distribution, so that is bad.

You don't have to love your offspring

>this is brainlet tier shit
uhm sweety he didn't just whip this idea out of thin air, it was a study done in Japan and Norway that showed positive results which isn't surprising because, guess what, watching porn makes your sexual urges diminish and has made sexual crimes go down globally
I'd show you the source but I aint googling that shit, you can if you want though

dude ur epic

>>it isn't hard to argue for molestation of children not being illegal since it "doesn't really hurt anyone"
False equivalency to what I said. Molestation is proven to hurt people. Viewing pixels doesn't do anything to anyone.

I've had this debate irl, and because I'm not a woman my peers don't have a juvenile emotional reaction like you are experiencing.

not an argument
tell me why an "eceleb" who has intellectual discussions and comments about the current state of politics isn't worth your attention whereas an "actual" celebrity is, say chris evans
why is an eceleb like destiny "worse" than chris evans? because he plays video games while talking instead of uhhhh dressing up as a comic book superhero and saying quips? I don't think you have a leg to stand on here

>I guess we better start showing repeat violent offenders
Why do you have to make fallacious statements to get your point across?

what if there was a study that proved without a doubt that showing violent offenders snuff films stopped them from offending, would you be in favour of it then?

What's fallacious about it?
Replace it with 'those at risk of extreme violence to others' and its still as ridiculous.

>study done in Japan
discarded
twitter.com/vocativ/status/1136279255900274688

Among your incel 30 yearolds? Sure.

>muh video games
I am not debating you, I am mocking you.

Show me the study you are referring to.

You are operating with the same mindset of an SJW who says "all men with penises are latent rapists"

>discarded
>doesn't post a study or peer reviewed paper, instead posts a fucking twitter video about perverts in Japan
L E L

You're a fucking retard that can't follow a line of logic. If the pedophiles aren't at risk of being rapists why the fuck do you have to show them child porn?

wow no riposte huh
shocking
I don't see how that video discredits the study btw

>Among your incel 30 yearolds? Sure.
I'm not much older than 20, my peers are zoomers.

Why are you incapable of engaging in honest dialogue? Is it because you know you have no ground to stand on?

I'm astounded this Uncle Ruckus caricature has a platform.

>dude child porn is fucked up
>you're just like those SJWs(me)
lmao imagine trying this hard to "win"

>what is culture and environment of the country that did a study about sexuality is
yeah okay

there isn't one but you can search the aforementioned CP stopping child rape study if you want because that's what we were discussing until you went off on a tangent

You didn't even post the study you fucking faggot.

The whole theory reeks of Destiny creating a backwards, complex hypothetical to show off his 'intelligence' and 'reason' rather than actually solve anything. This is one of the greatest signs of a midwit.

>still has literally no evidence
yikes big guy, might want to stop posting

>pedophilia is legal
>someone has to supply said pedophilia
>more people supply pedophilia, more children molested and raped
And what happens then? Kek.

>If the pedophiles aren't at risk of being rapists why the fuck do you have to show them child porn?
I never made the claim we HAVE to show anyone anything, you buffoon. I'm making the argument that viewing pixels is not a crime, because it hurts no one.
No one is denying that the existence of such media is fucked up. You are being disingenuous.

A proper man should.

I don't need to post the fucking study if your counter to it is actually just posting a fucking twitter video you brain dead moron

Post them. Post either one. Show me that you put a single ounce of critical thought towards the paper and didn't believe it simply because Destiny Spaketh it To Be So.

>>someone has to supply said pedophilia
I deny this assertion. The existing pool or self recorded content would be enough until we learn how to fix pedophiles.
>>more people supply pedophilia, more children molested and raped
Rape and production of such media is still a crime, because these are evil acts that hurt people.

He's an economic retard. When talking about international trade he would refer to comparative advantage... like, wut kek. The world is a bit more complex than English cloth and Portuguese wine and evaluating opportunity cost between the two goods. It just so happens that 100% of the people he debates don't know that comparative advantage is a bullshit trade theory anyways.

Attached: Verve-Passport-Photos.jpg (2381x2381, 1.81M)

You're a retard who didn't even post a study in the first place. I am not obligated to disprove a negative.

for

Attached: 1470190525843[1].jpg (1598x2541, 257K)

So then my analogy applies completely you fucking retard.

Post a source showing that this would actually work. Go on.

But you did, and the way you "disproved" it showed that you're a literal sub 80 IQ neanderthal

It doesn't.

Nice counter-argument fucking retard. Snuff films are just pixels on a screen.

>producing is illegal
>consumption is legal
How about we just fix them like you say instead of indulging in their mental illness?

>still no source
okay sweetie, stop replying

A source showing what would work? Do you think anti rape and anti-CP production laws do not work? They are in place right now.

The only thing I am advocating is not punishing people sitting in their mom's basement looking at pixels on a computer monitor, because that action hurts no one.

What about letting a dog fuck you in the ear?

Attached: rogan.webm (608x1080, 1.36M)

Yes, snuff films are pixels on a screen. Do you have a point beyond that?
Not initiating violent force against someone for no reason is not "indulging"

My opinion on this:

Actually, there is nothing wrong with incest from a moral perspective.

I mean, think about it, all "morality" is, is a bunch of social rules, some of them are idiotic.

BUT most people are disgusted by it, because
when having children with your close relatives they probably will be retards.
You actually can "smell" how related you are w someone, there is this thing called VMO (vomeronasal organ) inside your mouth, which "smells" the other person's immune system.

If you both have the same immune system (same MHC - major histocompatibility complex) you are equally disgusted by each other..

tl;dr Incest is OK from a moral perspective, but dangerous for reproduction. That's why most of us are disgusted by the thought of having sex w close relative

>okay sweetie, stop replying
Why would I post it when you've already showed that you're incapable of engaging with it?
But nice try trying to deflect away from you already "discarding" it :^)

>when having children with your close relatives they probably will be retards.
This isn't true.

Attached: 1558713477286.gif (500x349, 906K)

You claimed my analogy was flawed like five posts ago, and have yet to provide a single concrete reason why its any different. You're a retard.

Hey dude, can you post a source?

>You claimed my analogy was flawed like five posts ago
No, I said it is fallacious, because it is. Offenders that have actually commit crimes are not comparable to non-offending pedophiles.

I amended it to those at risk of committing crimes and you still claimed it was wrong. So how?

Oh you're back, well could you answer why you said that you discarded the study before even seeing it? You "discarded" it by linking to a twitter video, that doesn't seem like a good counter to it.

Yeah, ok, you are right.

THe other posibility is they will be prone to a lot of genetic diseases (probability of having same genes for e.g. cystic fibrosis is high)

AND most importantly: will have same immune system as yours --> will be prone to infection from same viruses/bacteria --> we don't want that (you can look up The Red Queen effect, in each generation parasites and us are competing for who is the best and can beat the other)

>those at risk of committing crimes
And this is no different than saying "Men are at risk of committing crime because they have penises" you low IQ SJW nigger.

>THe other posibility is they will be prone to a lot of genetic diseases
This isn't true.

You automatically win this internet fight if you post the source, happy?

But I just want to know your thought process behind "discarding" the study? Did you really think that posting that video "discarded" anything? You can't possibly be that retarded right?

Holy fuck you're a retard
The premise I was arguing against was
>We should let pedo scum watch state sanctioned child porn to stop them raping children
That pedophiles are at risk of raping children was in the fucking premise, retard.

Right, you are talking out of your ass apparently and don't have source, I don't have an entire day to indulge with some retard.

Post the fucking source faggot. I'm starting to think you REALLY DID just take Destiny at face value because your favourite internet manlet aid it in a youtub video. Now that is fucking EMBARASSING.

>That pedophiles are at risk of raping children was in the fucking premise, retard.
Pedophiles are no more at risk of raping children than you or I are at risk of raping developed females.

I don't care if someone else put forward the idea that pedophiles are inherently more likely to rape, you accepted it and it remains untrue.

Hmm... so you can't even defend your thought process? Yikes big guy, maybe doing this kind of thing online isn't for you since you don't seem equipped to do it :/

Guy lies to win arguments, not very respectable

His debate on guns on BLACKED Alaska's channel with the guy that used to work at Infowars was very illustrative of desTINY's "debate" tactics.

Yea Forums..
Home....

also you should just post your fucking source.

Attached: Home.jpg (748x602, 81K)

That's COMPLETELY wrong.
Pedophiles are more at risk of raping children because ANY real life sexual fulfilment of a pedophile's desires with a child is rape, which is not true between adult men and women. If you disagree with me, you're just proving that pedophiles like yourself are at risk of abusing children.

But why would I? It would be like giving a book about quantum mechanics to a baby, they wouldn't be able to engage with what's actually written it in.

>Pedophiles are more at risk of raping children
False.
>y-you're a pedo
I'll take this to mean you are done pretending to debate. I'll be chalking this up as my win, you may have the last word, sweetie.

Attached: 1509245859466[1].png (492x403, 17K)

destiny is what stupid people think is a smart person.

>Dude I'm not a pedo
>Posts previously saved picture for when you have to defend your pedophilic desires
LMAO
99% of the time men act on their desires towards women, its not rape. 100% of the times adults actually act on their desire towards children, it is rape. Its simple maths that being a pedophile makes you more at risk of rape, unless you're claiming that pedophiles are superhumanly good at cntrolling their desires.

Embarassing. Just don't even post after this point, you're NOT saving fave.

>unless you're claiming that pedophiles are superhumanly good at cntrolling their desires.
Vast majority of pedophiles are celibate or have sex with developed women.

>Embarassing
Why won't you just answer me? :( Why did you think that posting a twitter video "discarded" a study you had never even seen? That's all I want to know :^)

That may be the case, but simple mathematics show they're still more at risk of rape. Funny that you call me an SJW yet want to ignore facts that hurt your feelings.
I'm not even him you fucking retard. Did you see how many replies you got? There's at least five anons asking for the source and you're claiming you won't show it because of a post from half an hour ago made by a guy that might have got bored and left the thread. Like I said, embarassing.

Simple mathematics show there are more cases of rape of developed females than there are rapes of children. Pedophiles are LESS likely than regular men to rape, because most of them are intelligent enough to know it isn't worth it and that is it morally wrong.

>I'm not even him you fucking retard.
Then why the fuck would you jump in?
>you won't show
So? You think after all this time making fun of the other guy I'm going to post the source to you? LEL

Oh hohohoho, you just revealed yourself as a brainlet. Google 'overrepresentation'.

Because I wanted the mythical source all you Destiny fanboys were referring to.
>So? You think after all this time making fun of the other guy I'm going to post the source to you? LEL
No, I think after all this time you don't have or even know what the fuck the source is because you're an idiot that took a fucking youtube video as gospel.

I felt bad so I'll put it to you simply.
There are 100 blue aliens and 5 green aliens. 30 out of the 100 blue aliens are rapists, and 4 out of the 5 green aliens are rapists.
Who's more likely to be a rapist, a blue alien or a green alien?

>Oh hohohoho, you just revealed yourself as a brainlet
Oh the ironing.

>because you're an idiot that took a fucking youtube video as gospel.
Really what gave you that idea? Was it when I completely didn't engage with the CP argument at all?

>4 out of the 5 green aliens are rapists.
Not true.

Here I explained it in simple terms. Your grade school teacher really sould have explained this stuff to you.

LIterally puporting to have seen evidence that it would work is the exact opposite of 'not engaging'.

You are operating off of false axioms.

>LIterally puporting to have seen evidence that it would work is the exact opposite of 'not engaging'.
I did? Where?

In reference to someone criticising
>>when aging in favour of AOC laws he brought up that another thing that could prevent kids being molested/raped was giving people with those tendencies state purchased CP (bought with permission from the victims) which why not exactly viable would be morally justifiable if it actually did stop kids from being raped. Of course it brings with it all sorts of problems but if it stops a major harm being comitted then it's somewhat OK to do but this got spun into DESTINY WANTS TO LEGALISE CP
you wrote:
>uhm sweety he didn't just whip this idea out of thin air, it was a study done in Japan and Norway that showed positive results which isn't surprising because, guess what, watching porn makes your sexual urges diminish and has made sexual crimes go down globally

You can give up now, you're just embarassing yourself.

lmao dude, nice one. But as you said earlier:
>I'm not even him you fucking retard
Nice one :^)
This is where I jump in:

After some quick and dirty googling (and please, correct me if I'm wrong):
>Around 5% of population are pedophiles
>Around 5% of children are raped
while
>Just under half of population is straight men
>Around 20% of women are raped
Pretty clear from this that pedos rape children more than straight men rape women.There's just no way around it.

>I was just pretending to be retarded
or are you going for the more complex
>I'm just pretending to be retarded now because I can't defend my argument, but I'm still totally right.
Either way, you're still embarassing yourself.

>because I can't defend my argument
But it wasn't my argument? Hmm... seems like you're trying really hard to push this position on to me that I never stated or defended
>Either way, you're still embarassing yourself.
Not the one who can't read famalam :^)

So you continually stated that you won't post the source because of that random dudes reply, but....
it turns out you're not the guy that ever even claimed to have the source, but someone else entirely?
Why did you write ten posts all about how you won't post your source if you never claimed to even have a source? Do you have schizophrenia?

>>Around 5% of population are pedophiles
Don't accept this statistic.
>>Around 5% of children are raped
Don't accept this statistic, especially considering the false definition of what a child is by the law, and not all genuine child rapists are pedophiles.

>Why did you write ten posts all about how you won't post your source if you never claimed to even have a source?
I stated it pretty clearly my duder, the guy posted a twitter video as a way to "discard" the source he hadn't even seen, I was just wondering if he was actually able to comprehend why that was a retarded thing to do.

Those are what the statistics said dude. If you have superior sources, post them to correct me, but just saying,
"I don't accept this statistic" is fucking retarded.
You should seriousy think long and hard before you call someone an SJW, because you're literally using the exact same coping mechanism.

>Those are what the statistics said dude
Link them then.

Animas don't live in chaos at all retard. They live in a very strict world. One of knowing what can kill you at any second, survival of the fittest, and very easy to recognize patterns of living.

So as far as you know, the source doesn't exist?
Cool, then I was right that Destiny's theory was just midwit bullshit.

Any day now, Herschel.

>Cool, then I was right that Destiny's theory was just midwit bullshit.
Okay? Good for you I guess?

Cool, glad we agree.

Lol, the Nazis would've fucking hung you by the neck.

Doesn't bother me, really.
People can do what they want. I don't have time to be grossed out by strangers.

So you can cite these stats but can't link them? Interesting.

Attached: 1455196981317[1].jpg (574x395, 96K)