Ethnonationalism is a human right

That's not true, but if it was, it also describes all non-whites.

>Whites breeding is bad though and they have no culture.
Laughably false. The various white ethnic groups have a lot of culture, and deserve to prosper and reproduce like anyone else.
>To undo the wrongs of history the white race must be destroyed.
Do you plan on implementing this genocide against Turkey for the Ottoman Empire? Or how about Japan for the Rape of Nanking?

Turkey is white.
Also asians killing asians is different.

>greek empire
>roman empire
>byzantine empire
>holy roman empire
>french empire
>british empire
>spanish empire
>columbus
>american empire
So on and so forth

The only comparable peoples outside of europe are the mongols and the han chinese.
Han we all know are just as bad but mongols were much more welcoming of other peoples than any whiteoid even with their conquest.

Turkey isn't white since Turkey is not a European country. Most also cluster genetically with Arabs not Europeans.
>Also asians killing asians is different.
Why?

Attached: 1519891315438.jpg (1600x1538, 438K)

If you believe this then white people should all move back to Europe. Give back America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, etc.

Being white and being European aren't synonymous.
Middle Easterners are white. They're Caucasians.

So America isn't white then, and neither is Australia?

Nope.

All you are proving is white supremacy. But Amerindians, Asians, Africans, Arabs and even Indians committed and continue to commit, in some cases, terrible atrocities.

>If you believe this then white people should all move back to Europe. Give back America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, etc.
To whom?
All of those nations were built on undeveloped land. The reparations that the "native" populations of those areas (South Africa had no native population) would be immeasurable and unrepayable.
Also how is the rest of the world going to repay Whites for their heroic selflessness throughout the planet?
Countless whites have died onbehalf of nonwhites. You can't say the reverse is true.

>Middle Easterners are white
lol sand nigger detected

White means the aboriginal European peoples. All whites are caucasoid, not all caucasoids are white.
No, they are. See above. One could also say that white means European caucasoid. Another way of putting it, we are the ones that are supposed to feel white guilt.

Attached: whites.jpg (1050x1600, 300K)

This, but I also believe we should grant the remaining tribes complete sovereignty on their reservations.

Earth is homeland for humans. It's really as simple as that. I believe in freedom and the right to go and live where you choose.

If you couldn't tell I was playing devils advocate.
"White" is only loosely defined.
Caucasian isn't. And Caucasian is often considered a synonym of white.
Middle Easterners are Caucasians. I don't consider them white. Hell I don't consider most Mediterraneans or Slavs white.

The very notion of white "supremacy" is why whitoids are too covetous and violent to deserve an ethnostate.

That was in a bygone age. Also, notice how I say ethnonationalism is a human right, not empire.

>heroic selflessness

Whites literally annihilated entire native empires. Even ignoring that though, it's not native white territory. Move back to Europe. That's white native land and it's where whites should stay. If whites can't all fit or manage all their resources in their NATIVE land then that's their problem. Cull them if you want, but expansion isn't the solution. If it was nature before then return it to nature. But whites don't belong in the Americas, Africas, or non Euro islands.

Was this man white? Should he have felt white guilt?
>I don't consider most Mediterraneans or Slavs white.
They are, even though some Meds have slight Arab admixture, and some Slavs have slight mongoloid admixture.

Attached: white.jpg (500x348, 67K)

Whites are fundamentally incapable of respecting other ethnostates. They covet and destroy, hence all the empures.

You realize Amerindians were conquering land and killing other tribes all throughout their history right?

this mindset here is the reason, I believe, a majority of the world does not like Caucasians.

The white euro-christian has deluded themselves with such a superiority complex that they've been on a rampage for the last few centuries, spreading the benefits of their technology, culture, religion, and government to the world with such zeal that anyone who said 'no' and refused to conform was either killed or enslaved under the assumption that if they're not with me and my God they're agents of the devil or barbarians too stupid to know better.

They forced the world to conform at gun point and then wonder why people don't like them. I'm not saying it's bad to be white. It's okay to be white and our global culture may as well be white culture because of how dominant they've been in the past few centuries. So technically the white ethnic zone is virtually the entire globe.

I get calling Turks (i.e. Mongols) and Arabs/Jews (Semite) not European (since they obviously aren't).
But then what a about Central Asia i.e. Tajiks Iranians Afghans and the rest of central Caucasus? This is a rhetoric question since WW2 Europe classified all of them as Nordic Aryans.

You calling an ethnolinguistical group by a colour just proves how "educated " you are anyway. Racism and misogyny are perfectly fine as long as the person using them is educated. You clearly are not.

Not true at all. Had non-whites been as technologically advanced, they would have done the same thing. But whites are perfectly capable of respecting other ethnostates. There haven't been wars of conquest by white counties in years. Whites no longer have any taste for colonialism, something you can't say about the Chinese.

Mostly limited to a handfull of violent tribes, who were resisted and kept in check by coalitions of more reasonable tribes.
It certainly wasn't the universal drive to crush and break and smash that all whites down to the last suffer from

>shitty Indian caste system
>Mexico =/= Brown

Attached: 1530147245205.jpg (460x459, 85K)

Central Asians are non-European caucasoids. The term white isn't really about color, it's about race.

Attached: 1553462907438.jpg (4000x2700, 1.51M)

>Whites no longer have any taste for colonialism
American and French colonialism are alive and well, and America has literally never respected foreign ethnostates in its entire history: mexico, cuba, hawaii, guam, vietnam, afghanistan, iraq, etc etc etc

This is what Americans learn in school? My family has been living in this Austrian land since at least 1500 years and I'd rather give it to a gay Arab and Jew couple who have adopted a gay nigger for free than have you pay for it.

If this seriously is what your education is I will bet the ugliest shitskin whether from Mongolia or Nigeria will have more success in intellectual affluent territory (like Austria) than you.

Btw for affluent people (goto Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Austria or Switzerland) America is literally the same as North Korea socioeconomically. But how can a proletarian know right.

You realize that's a red herring, right? Conflict among native tribes is irrelevant to the fact that whites don't belong. Whites can go back to fighting each other in Europe and natives can fight in America, etc. No people are without a history of violence, but if you believe in ethnonationalism then you believe they should mainly be fighting at their borders, not halfway around the world.

Crack open a book and read about a lot of these events.
Things didn't happen as the narrative has been told they happened.
You need to learn what a day in the life was for a European settler, and a native inhabitant.
You need to understand their relations and the intricacies of the time.
When you look for yourself, the illusion of the brutal dominant white imperialists conquering the globe vanishes.
The closest thing to that was the Spaniards in South America. The story of the United States and Canada is absolutely nothing close to that. And the Stories of South Africa and Rhodesia are ones of great compassion. Read about the Zulu and the Boer.

Wrong. There were entire empires built on the most savage cruelties. The same in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. No one is innocent.
>It certainly wasn't the universal drive to crush and break and smash that all whites down to the last suffer from
Now you're just being hyperbolic.

Because whites are evil. And this is coming from a jew.

It's too late. What's done is done. The land is conquered and claimed according to those tribes very own principles, and too much time has passed. Besides much of the land was unowned and unclaimed when we got here.

So you define belonging to a social group by visible phenotypic traits? Are you retarded?
What is a person from Iran then according to your logic? Their country name literally means Aryan and (assuming you are German (i.e. Anglo Saxon or anything related) ) you are spreading their genetic pool (R1). Why do you do this? Or are you not spreading their genetic pool and in realty are just a Semite/Mongol/Afrixano???

>German
>Anglo Saxon
You just made a breddy big oopsie dagumi.

Anglos are Germanic, Germans aren't Anglo.

>American and French colonialism are alive and well, and America has literally never respected foreign ethnostates in its entire history: mexico, cuba, hawaii, guam, vietnam, afghanistan, iraq, etc etc etc
Mexico attacked the U.S. We haven't done anything to Cuba except not trade with them. Hawaii and Guam should be granted independence if they wish it. Vietnam was against communism, not for conquest. Afghanistan was against the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Iraq was because neonconservative radicals took control of the White House and declared war for Israeli interests.

What exactly do you have a problem with?

Right at least you prove to the world the pictures you post are just American autism. See pic related official Nazi studentsbook. What to expect off of braindead Americans.

Attached: Meyers_b11_s0476a.jpg (1500x1187, 541K)

Look, you either believe people belong within their native borders or you don't. If you think "what's done is done" then you are okay with multiculturalism because that is the current state of things. If you believe non natives of Europe and America need to move back to their homeland then that means white Americans and Europeans need to move back to Europe from whatever land they are living in. Otherwise what you are arguing has nothing to do with ethnonationalism.

Like I said before, all whites are caucasoid, not all caucasoids are white.
>White people is a racial classification specifier, used mostly and often exclusively for people of European descent.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people

Israel will always make america it's bitch because christians are inherently stupid. Jews are much smarter.

The Mexican American war began when Mexico attacked the United States.

After the Texas Revolution, the white Texans joined the Union. Mexico, despite having lost the revolutionary war in Texas, didn't recognize Texas as a free state, and considered the US admitting it into the Union as the US annexing Texas from Mexico.
It's pretty stupid, but the LOSER wrote the text books in this case. Not the winner.

With you beyond retarded Americans using White like some sort of religious meaning.

There is no white person on this planet. White is a colour. A Hindu man can be whiter than a British it is just a phenotypical trait.

What Americans mean when they say white is Indo European but if they would use that term they would also include the for ever hated Iranians and Afghans. That is the sole reason braindead people like you are washed into making this white thing genuine. Nazis in Northern Germany gave Iranians and Afghans an Ariernachweis (non ironically look it up, acknowledging one being of an pure Aryan family) while South Germany and Austria labelled them as Meditarannmian Aryans.

America stole 100% of it's land from natives. It is a nation of thieves.

>Ethnonationalism is a human right.

If you knew a little bit about German history, you'd know that Germans aren't an ethnicity.

Attached: Heiliges Römisches Reich 1648.png (1256x1024, 1.28M)

>using a phenotypical trait as racial classification
>linking a Wikipedia article
>Hello my parents are Soviet/German Jewish migrants I am white

Look at the lesser-than crying about its inferiority. Just be glad your masters allow you to continue existing, boy. You only have cause for gratitude. Now beg for some more white charity.

For one thing, there is no single group of "natives". There were tons of groups of natives.
For another European settlers bought most all the land. The idea of the wise nomatic natives of North America is false.
Do some research please.

Also Mexico was "stolen". And "Mexicans" aren't the natives. Mexicans have no "muh people" argument for any inch of land.

This is our land now. The people that might lay claim to it are dead and gone, and even if we could give it back to some current tribe, there is a question of who really has just claim to it. Most tribes took their land from the dead hands of other tribes. It's ours. End of story. Current non-whites are trying to stake claim to our territory, and it is up to us white natives to stop them or suffer the fate of the Amerindians or Australian Aboriginals.

US invaded Afghanistan despite U.S. knowing that everyone was Arab and Pakistan hid that guy. And now 20 years later world's biggest military power (combined with all ts allies) is too embarrassed to admit defeat against 2000 year old bushmen.

Mexicans are natives interbred with spaniards. They have more of a claim.

No, white means the aboriginal European people. That's it. It's not about color.

You're too hung up on the term white as a color.

>there were not one United tribe but 3000 so stealing the land is fine
>Europeans brought the settlers, me, whose entire family history has happened in Europe except the last 2-4 generations, is unrelated
>But Mexico was also stolen by other European neighbours

Like are American really this brainwashed or are you just glow in the dark psyops???

Jews are not white they are special. They are the chosen of god to dominate the goyim.

Yes, the German ethnicity exists. So, do the German people. Just because there might exists sub-ethnicities within a greater ethnicity, that doesn't mean the greater ethnicity doesn't exist.

Natives stole their land from other natives.

You should take a look at the "white" American genetic make up if you think only Mexicans are bred with Natives.
Just admit it, Mexicans are browner, so therefore you think they're "natives".

It really has no bearing on whether white Americans deserve an ethnostate or not.

this. and it will happen again

The ones I posted are the genuine documents.

I'm talking the initial settlement. They were spanish + native. Spain was evil as well. All whites are the evil scourge of the earth.

The problem is that it proves how easy brainwashed and uneducated you idiots are.

I am studying ethnolinguistics in Switzerland and government always says use the term Iranian over Aryan etc. What happens? People go out read science literature which is agreed upon worldwide (In U.S., Europe, Russia and Iran) and then decides hm this is retarded so let's use the scientifically correct terminology which is Aryan.

This is also why you only see German speaking countries call Iranians Aryans and only in scientific literature. You Americans will eat anything a Jew serves you even if it's your mother's own cadaver.

>Yes, the German ethnicity exists.

Ok, define it.

I'm waiting...

Attached: 1347221025258.png (274x242, 5K)

>The people who might lay claim to it are dead and gone

Most of the native tribes are still around but even then a significant portion of the country would go to Mexico which, and this might be a shocker to you, is still an active country with a large native population.

This won't be replied to because racists don't do logical consistency.

Attached: 8FA1D099-744B-486A-A66B-C623C103CC30.jpg (1284x1258, 417K)

Mighty white teutons with huge cocks

>there were not one United tribe but 3000 so stealing the land is fine
The vast majority of it wasn't "stolen" it was traded for.

>Europeans brought the settlers, me, whose entire family history has happened in Europe except the last 2-4 generations, is unrelated
Are you really this naive? Since the modern European colonization of the Americas there have been 21 generations. My family has full American ancestry traced 10 generations deep. This is literally the lands of my forefathers. (I'm also part feather nigger and could be a card carrying reservation whooloo if I wanted to)

youtube.com/watch?v=K84c7NlZzno

Attached: america.jpg (1280x720, 170K)

Ah yes. The Spaniards brought the Aztecs and Mayans and shit.
I forgot all about that. Stupid English and French not Bringing the Cherokee and Sioux.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germans

Like how retarded can you be to fall for such bad psychological manipulation about the white shit? This is psyops done for 11 year olds. If you are any over 12 and fall for the white propaganda you should stay inside your US and have fun there. affluent first world certainly doesn't want you whether it's Vienna Frankfurt or Genf

We bought most of the Mexican territory from them, and we won it fair and square. The remaining native tribes are tiny in number and have their own reservations. They should be granted autonomy.

You do know that the indos that make up the Mestizo blood are not the same indians that occupied the south western US right?
I can't believe I have to tell you this shit. In the US at least we dedicate tons of classroom time to native histories.

If you mean the indigenous population of Europe (because aboriginal is a different thing American education) those are the old Iranian/Indian people. This is confirmed by scientific literature go outside your comfort zone and look it up.

This is why so many random words in any modern European language as some old Iranian root. Hell entire concepts of modern European thoughts are based on simple Iranian words (Paradise and Magic themselves are entirely Iranian concepts). Or the Roman worship of Iranian goddesses.

You Americans have the problem that not only are you uneducated utility you also refuse to go out of your comfort zone and try to look at different possibilities.

Most Iranians cluster differently from Europeans.

Attached: 1525421608269.png (960x959, 486K)

You do know that American Indians fucking hate Mexicans right?

If you mean the indigenous population of Europe (because aboriginal is a different thing American education) those are the old Iranian/Indian people. This is confirmed by scientific literature go outside your comfort zone and look it up.
But much like the mongoloids that came to the Americas, those peoples diverged genetically after having settled in Europe for thousands of years.
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aboriginal

Forgot to green text.

>wasn't stolen it was traded for
that's why 90% of population had to be killed makes sense. And yes I got that number from vanderbilt but an American learning education even I'd its American education .. Impossible right??

>My family has full American ancestry traced 10 generations deep
Ok "American" ancestry so you are a Mongoloid person?Because native Americans are Mongoloids. What you mean is you ha e 10 gens deep European generations which I won't argue with. Fucking idiot seriously I'd you are genuinely this retarded holyhell how dumb did the US become in the last decade. If you are LEA psyops then congratulations.

>Fuck this guy explicitly stated the truth that glorious US lost to some time traveling mud house living bushmen what do
>hurr no relevancy hurr

It actually has very much meaning since it proofs that a true ethnolinguistixal group will always be superior to a mix. America is a mix of Semites Europeans Mongols and Negroids. There is no pure European in America. Contrary those bushmen propagated amplified the same genetic pools for thousands of years meaning it was subject to heavy natural selection.

Winter.

Had we wanted to, we could have exterminated the Afghans with ease and take all their land. That was not our goal. And ultimately, the Afghan war was sidetracked for the Israeli controlled war with Iraq.

>that's why 90% of population had to be killed makes sense.
I bet you also screech 6 million too right?
The vast majority of native deaths in the US and Canada were by disease.
I know this might shock you, but the majority of natives actually dissolved their tribes and joined American society.
There were a few stubborn tribes, and of those even fewer were stubborn and warring.

This is wrong and proves you post propaganda (intentionally or not). Iranians carry at 60-80% median some kind of R1 which spread into the Area of Ukraine tens of thousands of years ago and then into Western and Northern Asia. Tajiks Iranians and Afghan native population will have a remarkable similarity genetically to Eastern and Northern Europeans due to human migration pathways. This is a fact you don't like which is why Americans use the term White over Indo European since the latter includes Tajiks Iranians and Afhans.

That's not Jewish civilization.

Hahahahahahaha it’s funny cos it’s true!!

Winters already c9me and gone you dumb fuck. Learn2GoT

You wish. Breaks your fragile little nazi mind doesn’t it hahahahahahahahaha

Holy shit we had this exct paper couple of weeks in class.
Now after my excitement is gone I have to ask: Do you even understand what this picture wants to say? I highly doubt it ft you think this image says that Aryans (i.e. Iranians Tajiks Afghans Pakis and Indians),an European ethnicity, are genetically more distant from Europeans than for example Turks, a Mongol ethnicity.

The other guy here had it pretty right many to us obviously European things thoughts and words are actually just Aryan things describing a more specific concept i.e. Magic in Europe stems from the Magis of the Aryan religion which basically are priests or the Roman goddess of Mithra which itself is the Aryan goddess Mithra

so these
and this (pic related) are wrong? They're arent' as genetically similar as you think. And I'm fine with using Indo-European, Aryan, or white. Doesn't really matter to me. But white is the common usage, and pretty much everyone know who were are talking about when we say it. It's the native European people. No one thinks Iranians, Tajiks, or Afghans should feel white guilt or that they have white privilege.

Attached: 1558641248521.jpg (4000x4000, 1020K)

Not that guy, but African, Middle Eastern, and European civilization in 1000bc was all effectively the same thing, and it was Mediterranean civilization.

There is also extensive evidence of civilizations in Europe (Yes Europe, Europe, and even up to Iceland) way back in 3000bc that rivaled the Mayans.

Have you been to Saudi Arabia ? The quinitsential middle east? They're literally nigger colored. The only people that think middle easterners are white are sand niggers larping as whites.

Then by that logic, a white man renting a house has less right to that land than the Arab landlord who owns it outright.
Cool news and completely irrelevant to the fact that this is not white native land.

You and mongoloids have a lot in common, you're both retarded

You do not have a right to other people, you dumb subhuman nigger.

Right so if "you" (especially you personally) could you would exterminate the Afghans. But you don't because let's waste billions of dollars every year so we can "sidetrack" someone who is so far ahead that it doesn't make any sense geopolitically since Afghanistan is surrounded entirely by blood enemies of US but ok.

Like most people at least say yes we lost to those ugly Bushmen with their 5000 year old weapons. But you in 2019 still say "we" and say that "you" could ha e won. If you are genuinely serious I am deeply sorry not for you but for your parents/kids/relatices/friends

People care about the dumbest shit.

>Cool news and completely irrelevant to the fact that this is not white native land.
You were just advocating for handing the entirety of North America to Mexico as "the rightful owner".

>a white man renting a house has less right to that land than the Arab landlord who owns it outright.
You should really let that one bounce around in your head again and try to come up with something less nonsensical next time.

Most Iranians today do not cluster with Europeans. End of story. There are some Iranians (Iranian Nordids in this picture) that might, but perhaps these analyses did not capture it. Remember, populations change over time.

Attached: nonwhitecaucasoids.png (1408x1138, 812K)

Comparing the local brawls of native people over territory with the influx of millions of technologically far superior people from a different continent within basically a century is a idiotic.

Also you can tell by the comment section what type of inbred watches those videos.

Attached: 1551627210991.png (916x619, 981K)

>Right so if "you" (especially you personally) could you would exterminate the Afghans
No. And the rest of your post is nonsense.

Attached: 18D55FE6-97C3-4BED-82EA-758A0435110C.jpg (763x809, 71K)

The blacks and muslims moving to the US bought their homes fair and square and the Turks won the Anatolian Plateu fairly from the Byzantines.

That's the point. We should all separate into our own respective ethnic groups for our own good.

>Talks about R1
>Has to post the version for retards
You do know there is a version about the y nuclear chromsomes which is the only relevant one since its the male one. Goto a university anywhere on the world or write their ethno department an email asking then about how R1 diversified and what it means for the relation between Aryans and Northern/Eastern Europeans.

Sorry to crush your world but clearly you have succumbed to the brain washing. People in affluent world make fun of American education if you aren't in Ivy league. And it is clearly justified. As thus I will also leave this thread. Maybe you will understand how closely those Aryans are related to you when you shut off all your brainwash implemented prejudices and autism and actually go read some whitepapers.

It's a colonialism effort to force one culture to adopt the mannerisms or standards of another. Forcing the West to adopt the people and cultures of the nations that we ruined might seem like Karma to some, but just looks like injustice to the people living there. Pushback is reasonable. The colonized didn't just accept their colonization. They fought and lost, or they weighed the pros and cons of the relationship. We've spent the last 20 years weighing the pros and cons, and found the pros obvious in their absence. It's our turn to fight.

That said, if you see something beautiful or wise or charming or delicious in another culture, by all means adopt it. Try to make it a part of your life, or make it your own. But don't ever, ever, ever, force anyone else to adopt those things, or berate them for not sharing your tastes.

I can't stand Mexican food, but I don't call people that enjoy it nasty names. But I have been called nasty names for not liking Mexican food. Because God Forbid I have a different palette from the socially inclusive.

>He started a topic I am not familiar with but I am American so what do?
>Hurr here is a picture again showing phenotypic traits and equating then with race now shutup.

Read into Human migration and study linguistics in relationship with ethnicity then come back. Whether you like it or not Iranians and Tajiks are (assuming you are from somewhere Europe) heavily related to you.

And I don't talk about Arabs there are obviously mixed lot of Semitic genetics, populations changes that's why the US gets uglier and dummer per generation (and all of you besides Indians and East Asians are at fault). I am talking about the Aryans.

>The blacks and muslims moving to the US bought their homes fair and square
Only because we allowed it. Blacks are the only non-white group that has any claim to American territory since they were brought as slaves. It is not in our best interest to allow Muslims in our country, and they have no just claim.
>the Turks won the Anatolian Plateau fairly from the Byzantines.
Okay. But does Turkey have the right to an immigration policy or is it just the Americans that have to let everyone in because of our (long) past crimes. Good luck telling the Turks they shouldn't remain Turkish because of the Ottoman Empire. They would laugh in your dumbass face.

Okay, I agree. But most of the modern Iranians are not. Don't know about Tajiks though. We're talking thousands of years here.

>Fucj he called me out and I lost the argument and we lost war against retarded ugly bushmen what do
>hyrr you are a retard hurrrrr

That's the point. They were exactly the same, just with different technology. In some ways they were much more cruel and savage. Read some first hand accounts.

Attached: 51fqmcJ6DGL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (220x338, 49K)

You really think the U.S. couldn't beat Afghanistan in a war with full committed resources and no rules of engagement?

Your point was that you bought land fairly from the natives and the Arabs and blacks bought land fairly from you (at least recent immigrants). Thus their right to stay is as enshrined as is yours.

But ultimately, the U.S. government controls all the land.

I'm not advocating giving it to Mexico; I'm advocating whites leaving and letting the Mexicans and native Indians fight amongst themselves over it. They each have a better claim than the whites.

And you should remember that as far as the founders were concerned, if you didn't own property then you didn't get a vote.

A lot of people in this thread don't think whites deserve to have countries of their own. Very telling.

Attached: DnD5Jk6XoAAmkpj.jpg large.jpg (1200x1200, 178K)

How does anyone look at this and go like yep, Arabs are white. The US census system was based on levantine immigrants or white Arabs. Levantine are white (a very tiny proportion of all arabs) gulf and north African Arabs are brown as fuck even black and sahel Arabs are black.

Attached: images - 2019-06-08T140638.543.jpg (739x415, 65K)

Whites deserve Europe. They should leave Canada, the US, Australia etc if they truly believe that blacks, Asians etc should leave white countries.

I'm the person who talked about buying the land originally, not the guy you're talking to.
For one thing, a transaction of land between nations is different than a transaction of land between inhabitants.
If we were to implement the ethno state policy, I would make nonwhites second class citizens, not mass deport and genocide them.
They would become guests in the nation, and their current properties would be grandfathered, but they would not be allowed to purchase new properties. They would be getting nothing taken from them, and they would be incentivized to go home, but not forced. And the multiculturalism issue would clear itself up through either dilution or emigration over the course of a few generations while having a minimal impact.

>They should leave Canada, the US, Australia etc if they truly believe that blacks, Asians etc should leave white countries.
We already went through this nonsense. Plus, it's not even feasible. Repatriating Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, etc. out of white countries is.

Even then, the Levantine Arabs cluster differently from most Europeans.

Exactly! Calling Arabs white is retarded. Levantines may be Caucasian but over 90% of Arabs are brown or black.

An excellent strategy. Definitely, no serious person is advocating genocide of any kind. Anyone that does is probably a Fed.

Attached: E99300AE-EB1F-4E1B-BCBD-15FE94B97A59.jpg (735x417, 71K)

Are y'all gonna be very American and mistake ethnicity for race?

Just cause it isn't feasible doesn't mean it isn't right. Repatriating millions of blacks, Asians etc isn't exactly feasible either. Their original countries wouldn't even take them back. Why shouldn't they secceede and form their own country within the US? If you truly believe that white people deserve purely white countries and the non whites should go back then also leave all countries that aren't Europe, regardless of feasibility.

The problem with non-european whites "returning" to Europe is that there is no European nation for them.
These countries were founded not on a whim, but out of fundamental differences in politics.
America is by far and away the most square peg in a round hole for a European return.
America dwarfs the rest of the non-european anglosphere in number.
There isn't enough land in Europe to even house us, let alone give us autonomy.

Nah, gypsies, kikes and samic people dont deserve shit.

yes

That sounds a lot like watered down apartheid. Can the blacks in South Africa do it to whites ?

The same problem applies to blacks returning to Africa. There's no real nation for them as Africans are very different by culture and even genetics to African Americans. Asians wouldn't exactly be taken back either.

Judens need to go back to hell.
All problems will be gone.

Blacks didn't found South Africa.
The Boers went to an uninhabited, considered uninhabitable land in Africa and turned it into a thriving nation economically more robust than the majority of European countries.
They fought wars for African leaders and invited Africans into their nation.
Blacks have zero claim to South Africa.

If whites were to all return to Europa, they would need to be made whole again. And not just "I had a home give me my home's value". They would need to be repaid for the infrastructure their people built. It would literally be impossible for the reparations to be made. It would be like giving a cracked out nigger a loan for 1 billion dollars and asking him to pay it back within the year.

>Repatriating millions of blacks, Asians etc isn't exactly feasible either. Their original countries wouldn't even take them back.
They came easily enough. And their countries should want them back because as we are constantly told, having more immigration is always a good thing for your economy.
>Why shouldn't they secceede and form their own country within the US?
That's part of the reason why Mexicans are so eager to come here and why the Mexican government encourages it. They want their former territory back. But no, they belong in Mexico. And other Central Americans belong in Central America with their own families, culture, and nations.
>If you truly believe that white people deserve purely white countries and the non whites should go back then also leave all countries that aren't Europe, regardless of feasibility.
No, it's completely unreasonable, unfeasible, and the territory is ours now.

The 2nd and further generations of those populations is so small in the west right now.
This is just an argument for jumping on it NOW.
Keep in mind the US is populated by an estimated 10-15% illegal South American population.

>The same problem applies to blacks returning to Africa. There's no real nation for them as Africans are very different by culture and even genetics to African Americans.
I think they should be encouraged to move to any West African country that will take them, but I also think a black ethnostate should be created somewhere in the South for them.
>Asians wouldn't exactly be taken back either.
Yes, they would. Many are highly-skilled and have a decent income.

Good point.

True

The blacks had some civilization and had ownership concepts before the boers came to South Africa. They developed it sure but they don't have any right to it if immigrants don't have a right to America.

It is literally impossible for Afghanistan to lose. It's as impossible for them to lose as it is for them to win.
Those bushmen do not care about their lifes. They just jump at you until you leave them alone which makes winning impossible. The Brits realized this hundreds of years ago which is why they divided Afghanistan and told them to fuck off (which both Brits and Afghans then did becAuse neither could win)

Just deal with it some places are Unconquerable even if you are God in person. The Greeks, Mongols, Chinese Soviets and British all tried and failed miserably.

Worst thing for Americans dropping Atomic weapons on Afghanistan will make Iran Pakistan and India drop atomic on the US

So your argument boils down to boohoo get the non whites out because of xyz reasons but we won't apply those same reasons to white civilizations. Immigrants are here to stay and if you want them out then fight a war.

When we speak of white nationalism, we are talking about ethnonationalism for the various white ethnicities. Most ethnic groups have a racial component to them.

Apples and oranges. And I hope it doesn't come down to war. Non-whites would lose badly.

We could do it easily if the goal was to wipe out the native population and take the territory.

You do know there was conquering in more than just America, Canada, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand right?
The dust has settled. Leave it as it lies.
You're trying to claim a Nigerian in Germany is the same as the entirety of 21 generations of white Canadians.

This is what I like about geopolitics. There is this irrelevant isolated shithole of a country called Afghanistan and on the other hand is this giant US with its world allies. Situations like this makes it so easy to.See who is shittakking.

This is illogical. It was just stated that since forever exactly what you are describing has not been possible. How do you win by killing people that want to be shot???
People like you are the most retarded. Not even a single clue of what the ire talking about a shittu middle class American and then calls the US army "we" and gets insecure about his countries (Not yours) military being unable to do anything against middle aged busgmen.

This is one of the American things that always makes your downfall. Your sense of superiority and exceptionalism. The British realized fast it's impossible to conquer/extinguish/burn/whatever that place and just agreed with the Afghans to everyone fucj off. behind their line. Clearly Americans don't have their brains from Brits Germans or Jews although this is what nearly all claim heritage from

Attached: if-you-kill-your-enemies-they-win-justin-trudeau-genius-1687191.png (500x295, 243K)

Not the guy you are arguing with but that doesn't make any sense.If you kill a people entirely (e.g. atomic weapon) obviously it cannot defend itself anymore because it doesn't exist yes this is true.

On the other end how the fuck do you think this would happen?As soon as somewhere something starts others wouldn't get into alarm mode? Are you trolling? Brits tried for more than 200 years. Literally every single invader in human history has failed at these bushmen since thousands of years. This is called asymmetric warfare and it is impossible to win especially if your opponent is as mentally insane.

There are 50 million of those Afghans scattered throughout the world elaborate how you want to.kill.Even 10. an Atomic bomb would kill.Maybe 1 and then Iran Pakistan Russia and India would all together fire atomic bombs to the US

Modern technology. Also, the Brits and Soviets were not necessarily employing the kind of tactics you need to in order to counter a guerilla war. You either have to be absolutely ruthless and massacre civilians, or you have to somehow win the over the populace and not kill any civilians. Half measures will get you beat every time.

Why ? Non whites would fight with the same guns and weapons. It would be a civil war after all.

You forget Russia and also European sanctions on the US

>modern technology
So you prove you have no clue how modern war works. 2000 years ago those Afghans themselves defeated Alexander.

Now the entire World is at their door. What do? Right ask the rest of the world to supply you.

Americans always imagine everything so easy and everyone being under the authority but in reality those superhero Americans cannot conquer those savage bushmen with 2000 year old caves. That's why I explicitly did not say Afghans win. The Afghans will never win but it's as impossible for th US to win against them. They are there currently because of the Opium money which contrary farmers will readily grow because Talibans prohibited Opium and it only grew valuable again when Americans came.

Conquering that place is impossible however you put it it doesn't matter.Go talk to some expert on asymmetric warfare and central Asia. Dead serious.

Military and right-wing militias. Also, most of the guns in the U.S. are in the hands of whites.

Not for whites. You couldn't stay in your homelands to begin with and invaded other people's countries, destroyed their races and annihilated their cultures. So now you deserve no pity.

Attached: 07.gif (691x389, 1.99M)

The stormfag hypocrite shows his true face. He demands that non-whites leave supposed white countries, yet when it comes to whites leaving the countries they stole by genociding other races, he totally rejects it.

The white is a natural hypocrite and doesn't deserve a single inch of land to call his homeland.

Care to be more specific? If you're talking about the Amerindians, no whites are alive today that did those things.

Facts! White people had no problem taking over other countries and destroying their natives. Now they're gonna cry just cause there's non whites moving to their countries ? Fuck them!

Read the thread. Already, demolished this faggotry.
Also, watch

The whites alive today didn't build most of the monuments and structures you guys take credit for. The blacks of today had no role to play in the lack of ancient Africa's achievements. Yet white supremacists love to bring up the achievements of ancestors. If you can claim the achievements of your ancestors then also own up to their rapey genocidal ways.

Does Morocco, Turkey, or Japan have a right to decide who comes into their country?

You have it backwards. Non-whites want whites to feel guilt for the bad things their ancestors did, so that means we can be proud of the good things they did.

Attached: 1539203497700.png (599x502, 285K)

You don't punish the son for the great, great grandfather's crimes.

Cumskin faggot, you show flagrant and obvious hypocrisy and self-interest in the favor of your group alone. You have no ideology other than advancing your own group at the expense of non-whites.

So, I will as well advocate only for policies that harm whites and benefit non-whites. White countries should be forced to take in unlimited amounts of immigration, and whites should be banned from isolating themselves from non-whites and forced to race-mix. I will keep voting left until the end of time so your pitiful race dies out.

And yet their descendants benefit from their ancestors' crimes and take pride in them all the same. Stormfag, you cannot claim credit for the past achievements of your race if you will also not owe up to their past crimes.

Europeans did the ww2, we know how smart you guys are

Cause they are racist

>Destroy their races and annihilated their cultures.
Their races are still here, otherwise we wouldn’t have crime in our cities.
And what culture?

I want ethnostates for everyone. But if you want to bring harm to my people, I would happily kill you.

Attached: 1556947111362.jpg (699x1024, 137K)

>if you will also not owe up to their past crimes.
I admit they were crimes. All those responsible are dead now though.

I will make sure to find a white woman and race-mix with her just to spite cumskin pieces of shit like you.

Whites don't deserve ethno-states, they deserve to be in hell. Eat shit cumskin.

Which are you, spic or nigger?

Native Americans and Aboriginals have almost stopped existing. In Latin America, they have been completely wiped out and replaced by a mixed race. So much for the fabled purity that white tards go on about.

Aside from that, whites invaded and imposed their culture and way of life on every people on the globe. There is no country on Earth today that has not had its way of life forcibly altered by whites and had white morals and values imposed on it.

>types through computer made by white people.
To undo the wrongs of history.
>race must be destroyed
Make more wrongs in history.

Kek this logic kills me every time.

Did you know that white people have been enslaved too?

Did you know the chinese have been enslaved too?

Do you ever think about how japan was nuked?

Do you ever wonder why some races never get over being oppressed while others seem to get over it?

Because you cant change the past.
All we can do is change how we treat each-other.

>There is no country on Earth today that has not had its way of life forcibly altered by whites and had white morals and values imposed on it.
Wrong.

No its not. Are we done here?

Are the Japanese racist because they want Japan to stay Japanese?

Attached: 1542079948116.jpg (482x960, 84K)

Why do you support genocide?

Um wrong, Native Americans are the fastest growing population where i live.

>Completely wiped out and replaced by a mixed race

Pick one.

Also ever notice how genocides affected Latin Americans less that slavery of less than 5% of the population in Africa has affected Africa.

Romans took Scandinavian slaves and it doesn't seem to have affected them at all whats up with that?

THIS TREAD IS RETARDED.
Send the blacks to Africa, whites to Europe, rip china to shreds, split japan in half, cut Jerusalem in half, take the legs and arms of south Americans and them to Europe leaving behind literal blooded stumps and random body parts....

THIS IS FUCKING RETARDED

what you would have left is a broken world.
Torn apart families and ethnowars to supply the huge influx of of people or total loss of man power.

YOU ARE FUCKING RETARDED.

MIX RACE PEOPLE EXIST.

GET THE FUCK OVER IT.

Send them*
Bloodied*

Forcing people together is what causes conflict in the first place. Many of the happiest places on Earth are racially and ethnically homogeneous.

Attached: 1556757458415.jpg (996x1024, 160K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_ranked_by_ethnic_and_cultural_diversity_level

Correlation doesn't equal causation.

Attached: ecrays491t131.jpg.jpg (640x954, 108K)

central and south american is full of pluriethnic states.

And if you think India is monoethnic you're just retarded.

Do those places need more diversity? What are you a colonialist?

>this conflict
So let me get this strait the world was paradise before international flights?
Or was it before Boats?
When is this golden era in your mind?
Humanity has been in conflict for as long as it has existed.
Fuck your reductionist bullshit.

Sub-ethnicites can exist within the greater national ethnicity.

never trust statistics, you didn't forge yourself

-winston churchill

Not conflict as in war, conflict in terms of ethnic and racial strife. Better for people to live in their own separate ethnostates. Most countries are like that anyway except for white countries because we are having racial diversity forced upon us.

Do you think Freddie Mercury's ethnicity is one of the subethnicity that can exist within India "national ethnicity" ?

By that count, Mexican are a subethnicity of white.

Colonize earth.
With humans.
I'm the boogie man.

was for
>what are you a colonialist?
colonist actually. Just like most humans in history.

chances are you are too.
Reality is a bitch... but them are the facts.
Even if you're native there is a good chance you're in what was precolonial another tribes land.

Yeah that's called colonialism.

>Do you think Freddie Mercury's ethnicity is one of the subethnicity that can exist within India "national ethnicity" ?
If they can't, they should be allowed self-determination.
>By that count, Mexican are a subethnicity of white.
Most Mexicans are mestizo and their culture is mixed Spanish/Amerindian.

Attached: 1557787357417.png (693x1457, 754K)

No.

>quote people in an nod to power when you've lost the argument.

OH so Papua New Guinea isn't the most isolated genetic group geneticist and historians are lairs I
>ONLY BELIEVE WHAT I FEEL LIKE BELIEVING.

Attached: F126434B-BA53-41AA-A2D7-647E8FA78420.jpg (496x488, 80K)

Fukn kek

Kek

>There’s a river in Papua. On north side the tribes boys become men in a rite that involves receiving semen anally by the male elders of the tribe. On the south side, the boys become men in a rite that involves them ingesting semen orally. The tribes hate each other and consider each other’s rites an abomination.
Papua’s fucked.

BEACAU FUCK WH*TE "PEOPLE"

Attached: 1557534302830.gif (244x407, 1.47M)

Nice, so which side of the river you are born on determines how you are sodomized into manhood.

BASED AND REDPILLED

FUCK CRACKERS

Attached: bree-daniels-blacked-interracial-flat-doggystyle-fuck.gif (700x391, 770K)

All regions that didn't have an ice age... except Europe.
So, what's your point?

I agree there is a constant doctrine to guilt white people for damn near everything and it constantly used to push us into destructive immigration.

Ethnic redistribution Is not only a moral nightmare it would also mean a huge loss of valuable human resources.

I believe the source of this "conflict" is not ethnic but cultural.

Trying to simplify it to race or ethnicity is shit.
huge numbers of non whites live in north america with no meaningful cultural conflict.
Because they don't see them self's as living in some foreign state, they are at home.

Truth hurts hey?

Read it, and then tell me again there isn't a problem. Just because the MSM doesn't cover it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Attached: 1043154399.jpg (1000x1500, 436K)

Ethnonationalism Said it should be a paradise though....
I thought all the conflict came from mixing though.
If yall wana be racist BE racists.
at least its honest.
This shits so full of holes it cant even produce facts about it self.

Words have meaning.

>Ethnonationalism Said it should be a paradise though....
Strawman. They don't have to worry about Africans or Central Americans taking over their country do they?

Diversity has failed. Race is the fundamental divider.

Attached: 1542256390329.jpg (960x600, 69K)

Words are like bullets

Nah

Attached: 1556229469545.jpg (1024x707, 339K)

I'm good. There is a problem its just not based on genetics.

MSM does cover it all the time.
They are hella biased but they talk about it every damn day.

I get that you want to enlighten me and all but I've spent enough time traveling and living abroad that I know what I need to know.

While I do believe our culture is at war, we've been winning for 500 years.

Not going to read some manifesto about what some dude thinks my identity is or is'nt.
I have my own life I'm not wasting it on this bullshit.

Every race is racist.
People are greedy and cowardly.
The progress of the last 300 years is almost entirely the work of 3 men(all of witch where white or mixed white.)

Culture is downstream of race.

Colonialism is the policy of a polity seeking to extend or retain its authority over other people or territories, generally with the aim of developing or exploiting them to the benefit of the colonizing country and of helping the colonies modernize in terms defined by the colonizers, especially in economics, religion and health.

SUB AS IN MINORITYS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE MAJORITY.

like how the Irish are a sub-ethnic group of the english

like how the ainu are a sub-ethnic group of the japanese

like how the blackfoot are an subethnic group of the Algonquian

Whats wrong they didn't teach history in your gender studies classes?

>*farting noises*
cough black republicans cough.
White liberals Cough
>Thinking Singapore is a single ethnic group.

Blue eyed blonde haired people who speak English and praise Jesus In America are evidence that you're wrong.

you reductionist fuck.