Imagine world, where animals are sentient and have human-like intelligence. They are the most loyal...

this thread made me realize that there are different degrees of beastiality

Animals do cheat. They don't give af about your monogamy. I've seen them have a go at their own mothers, followed by their brother in the same day.

We assume with gaining a sentience, they also change their behaviour mkay

>mkay
You're one step closer to using "kiddo" in an arargument internet tough guy

yeah theres definitely different degrees. for me a sentient animal giving me direct orders would only make it more hot

>human-like intelligence
>most loyal, perfect companions
They'd be more loyal if they had dog-like intelligence. As long as you feed a dog, they'll be loyal to you, but as long as you feed a human, they still might betray you regardless.

Attached: dogae.jpg (500x500, 115K)

Y'know user, perhaps you don't know but iamverysmart

what gender are you and the animal?

ok buddy retard

Animals don't have the required type of vocal chords to talk, no matter how smart they get, not even primates can say slightly complex words like "microphone"

im male but kind of fem and want a male animal to use me...

Could've fooled me

Attached: 1462756643312.jpg (323x241, 8K)

Imagine having your life flash before your eyes and your only legacy is posting bestiality on a message board to try and justify your perversion

Anyway, would that still be considered bestiality if animals could communicate on a human-level excluding speech?

>buddy

Attached: 1b0.jpg (680x499, 48K)

At least I'll die happy.

Unlike most of you depressed fucks.

id watch that
ideally it would be full trap beastiality but gay is hot too

yeah id want an animal to treat me just like a girl...

Personally i just want waifu sexbots to cure the incel epidemic while undermining feminism

Found out my ex who I was with for 5 years and almost married fucked a dog. She recorded it and showed it to the guy she was fucking at the time, who proceeded to tell everyone. She told him she didnt want people to know she was into it so she has done it a lot of times Im almost sure

kik me elvish_boy

I'd rather be depressed than a furry who gets off on bestiality

I've read some dumb shit on the internet but OP's sincerity really takes this thread over the top

i was actually daydreaming about something like this once.
basically a friend and i were tossing around ideas of how would you change the world if you could have some kind of super power or thing to help you. i came up with having an army of hyper intelligent androids like in nier automata. and my MO would be to pump out android skeletons with not exactly sentient AI but something that would be easy to suspend your disbelief with. starting off at a high price and eventually flooding the market with cheap android waifus everyone could purchase

You realize sexbots to stop men from treating women as sex objects would solve like half of the problems for feminism right

women literally ARE sex objects dude. why do you think they are so anal about sexdolls and sexbots? they hate competition and deep down they know if their vagina becomes irrelevant, they become irrelevant

t. 19 year old who's never had an adult relationship

t. white knight loser who cant stop simping for some sticky friction

You do realise that feminists say sex robots are sexist, right?
mirror.co.uk/tech/sex-robots-sexist-feminist-says-7373559

bro, you sound like an incel

can we not argue but instead discuss how having animals as sexual partners could be a huge plus for society?

>One time one self-proclaimed feminist said some dumb shit so they all have to agree with it

oh im sorry, i humbly apologize for insulting your gods.

Animals are sentient you fucking idiot. You mean sapient, fucking hell.

> doesn't even know what white knighting is
Incels are mind blowing

>OP is still monitoring this thread in hopes of getting attention for his shitty fapfic
Go back to fchan you fucking furry. We're talking about incels now.

youre vehemently defending a generization. id call that end tier white knighting

>vehemently
Not feeling particularly vehement about saying "not all women are clamoring to be objectified." It's not exactly a hot take. Anyway, white knighting is defending an actual woman in hopes of getting laid, not stating "I think women are people too" in a room full of men.

so youre just virtue signaling. in which case i hope you the best, have fun doing it while the women you're defending are busy taking cock from the men of the next society that decides to conquer yours and kill you off because you were so blinded by your morals that you couldn't accept the truth

I like getting Trentino

I mean attention. Plus it is really an interesting thought concept. But what should I expect from b

Can't wait to see Op get friend zoned by every animal from the farm

Friendzoned by a cow goddamnit

You sure do like buzzwords, huh. I'm not signaling anything to anyone, I'm stating to you that I disagree with what you're saying. You seem to be under the impression that everything is performative and nothing is genuine, which must make dealing with the world around you pretty difficult.

actually you were insulting me m8, im just laying down the truth

whoever thinks having sex with animals is wrong just needs to try it seriously

Make Chobits real dammit

That's basically our worls, minus the
> ...and have human-like intelligence

>and have human-like intelligence
your just too lonely to find a human companion fucking nigger

Attached: 1539903522630.png (403x484, 228K)

It's not racist to have sexual preferences dumb fuck. If he said burn the furries. That would be racist. They can fuck or not fuck what they want.

These days it kinda is tho

thats optional for me. even if an animal isnt at human level its immoral to deny it sex. every animal is built for sex so and since you're taking care of it you should take cares of it sexually.

A women being humped by her dogo is actually sexy.

Not that I would touch her if I knew it, but I can well imagine that it would give every orgy the special twist if a it's centered around a sexy bitch having her way with toys and animals.

Attached: 1559671625523.jpg (600x907, 48K)

>where animals are sentient
they already are
they all are
some are even sapient
because humans are animals
and were sapient

wait there is a literal anime with that premise?

DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT! DOGS CAN GIVE CONSENT!

ID GIVE MY CONSENT TO DOGS!

I love this.
I love how people over the internet argue like this.
"Yeah zoophile enjoy your beastiality"
"This motherfuckers a furry"
And you gotta appreciate how they join the thread and start an argument that is not needed.
Instead of looking at it and being on their merry way they gotta come make a big scene
What are you accomplishing here?

you high?

i dont know about OP but I just want to talk to someone about how hot it would be to get fucked by a dog

Gonna be 100% honest. Yes.

Good boy

ha! how did i guess.
anyway, chill bud, thats just the way Yea Forums works. we will call eachother names for liking different fetishes but when shit hits the fan we are there for eachother

I would sell any given one of you to the feds for a shiny nickel.

well id make you watch me rape your mom while i force her to suck your dick, so win win

Attached: 1534376224118.png (256x241, 73K)

Comfy wholesomeness

fpbp

The problem with this is that unless there's a way to cross breed with them then human beings would cease to exist because they'd be fucking animals instead of breeding with other human beings therefore making sure to continue our existence.

most autistic thing I've have read all day. seriously.

>the normies can't entertain a hypothetical that requires them to critically think

I could then see why a new religion of "Humanism" in that world would be a thing. They would want to ensure that humans continue to exist.

Now if only a small percentage of people are doing the whole animal fucking then, then yeah sure that's fine.

>thinks sexual reproduction with organisms outside species is natural
>critical thinking

>appeal to nature

nature is a valid authority. unlike you retard

Personally speaking I've never been into bestiality and even if they had human-like intelligence I wouldn't be into it... MAYBE if they were closer to anthropomorphic humanoid I'd be willing to do it but if it's just a straight animal that just happens to be able to talk / think, I'd pass.

on what grounds is nature a valid authority

all of life on earth for all time including your entire genetic and evolutionary timeline. where NONE of your ancestors fucked dogs except for the ones who died without reproducing.

untenable argument, you do not have the exact records of every single ancestor, you can fuck dogs and reproduce too

so basically go ahead fucker. you're just selecting yourself to be removed from the gene pool which would've happened a lot faster if the state just killed you. which it should.

you dont need exact records you fucking degenerate. give me a single example of animals cross breeding in the natural world and itll disapprove the appeal to nature

You're making yourself seem dumb dude... Sex doesn't always have to be about sexual reproduction. That's what they are saying. Hell humans are alive right now that have sex but can't reproduce.

You're probably the sort of person that says something like homosexuality is against nature...

cats and dogs do it pretty regularly
horses try to mount humans on the reg and sometimes other things
ostriches love and have sex with human, other birds mostly just love because incompatible genitals
dolphins will literally fuck anything, but orcas are pretty regular

you never gave an example of cross species breeding in nature and failed to prove it's natural.

>cat and dog hybrids exist
>horse human hybrids exist
>ostrich human hybrids exist
>bird hybrids with "stationary genital" animals exist
>dolphin human hybrids exist
no.

Also think about the fact that we have humans have advanced science to the point that we can breed without the need of two individuals actually having sex.

Who knows maybe in that bizarro world where animals have human like intelligence they could conceivably have interspecies reproduction. Or maybe the couple could just adopt a human baby. Or get a donor sperm / egg. And raise it.

oh ok you want cross-species breeding
horses and donkeys
lions and tigers

after this you're obviously going to make the argument that they're either not differentiating enough in species
or the argument that those species are infertile (they are most of the time)

then again this whole argument of yours falls on the premise that I was talking about reproduction and not just sex, and that I've already stated this by the fact you can have sex with dogs and still reproduce, producing many more lovable zoophile offspring.

I like how you ignore the argument I actually posted about sex not having to be about sexual reproduction... Good try deflecting there guy.

The point is that humans as well as other species in the world try to have sex with other species... I get the point that you're trying to make that it's not viable for the continuation of the species which is what I originally stated in the post about Humanism as a way to preserve the human race.

yfw you realize OP was making a metaphor and wants it to be legal to fuck kids.

Fucking animals is deviant.

homo sapiens and neanderthals and that one other that i don't recall the name of

>plus for society
It certainly would not be. You disgust me.

your posting style disgusts me and is not a plus for society either

Oh and let's not forget the part about humans themselves having characteristics where sexual reproduction can't happen. Like in homosexual relationships (and yes there are gay animals in the world), people born or becoming infertile, etc. Humans have advanced to the point where we don't necessarily have to worry about sexual reproduction... A gay / infertile couple can adopt or use a donor. Same sort of thing can happen for the animal / human couple.

The problem is the coupling with humans is that if the majority of humans couple with them and don't care about reproducing then humanity as a race can cease to exist. The same thing can be said about those particular animals as well.

I am not obligated to do anything with my animals besides feed them, give them attention, and provide medical care. You would have to possess a small member to fit it inside an animal anyway.

We should do our best to not allow science to manufacture such abominations

>human-like intelligence
>most loyal, perfect companions

The only reason animals show any kind of loyalty to humans is because they *don't* have the intelligence to relieve that many of them are being used. They think "I do stuff, humans give me food and shelter." Once they have intelligence, they wouldn't need humans for shit. Matter of fact, since they're already more powerful than humans, the human-animal dynamic would flip 360 right quick.

But...I don't think you're talking about animals, are you?

Fuck.... realize*

And they never should exist.

1/10 got me to reply

Attached: 1433616135459.png (2500x1645, 148K)

Animals are sentient anyways

I do not carry out abominable actions, or suggest doing so online, like you do.

Your very post is an abominable action because you accuse me of something I haven't done.

You should not even suggest it. Do not fuck animals, and do not encourage it. It is an abomination

>the human-animal dynamic would flip 360 right quick.
Him going to make me take the knot without me having a say in it sounds pretty hot tbh.

>Once they have intelligence, they wouldn't need humans for shit
Except opposable thumbs lol gotem

You can be intelligent and be good natured or loyal honestly.

Are you fucking gay or what?

Yet again you accuse me of something I haven't done, you subhuman.

You suggested that people having animal sexual partners would be a plus to society. That is repugnant and evil.
About fifteen percent

>You suggested that people having animal sexual partners would be a plus to society.
No, I didn't.

Damn right lol finally a smart comment

My ex was super into that and I found it hot as fuck. I think dudes fucking animals is abuse, but women? I dunno. It's the ultimate submission I guess. She never did it in front of me, but I would get diamonds thinking about it.

Somebody did, look back at the chain of replies.

Really fucking disappointed in the lack of beast content in here.

Who the fuck cares what somebody did? Stop accusing me of what they did. Or is your brain so underdeveloped that you associate everyone as the same person?

>nice dubs

My ex was into that. Used to get me diamonds knowing she was fucking her family dog whenever I was out of town. She never let me watch though :(

I replied to that person, you replied to me. Apparently I was not even speaking to you to begin with.

Yeah imagine posting on a public imageboard and expecting you're only holding 1 to 1 conversations.
Wait, I don't need to, you're right there.

Why did you object to me chastising that poster. I assumed that I was addressing him he whole time. What did you butt in for?

Because what you said was retarded, plain and simple. Disgust isn't a reason to stop something. That you haven't realized I held a mirror in front of you so far speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence and by proxy, self analytical capabilities.

It is also unethical. Do not sexually abuse your animals. Disgust is also important to human health and well being.

Kek

>Unethical
extremely debatable
>Do not sexually abuse your animals
If a dog mounts you, no sexual abuse is happening, unless you have a really shit, warped definition of sexual abuse.
>Disgust is also important to human health and well being.
It's actually irrelevant and unhealthy, which is why we have people in care, healthcare and surgeons.

It is abuse though or at least sexual assault

agree, we should imprison the dog for taking that willing human partner's innocence.

It's that true? Somewhere I read ape don't talk just because they don't want.
Nothing physically stops them from talk, they just didn't want to do it.
But it could be fake.

All lower Animals involved in bestiality should be euthanized and dismembered. All human participants should be imprisoned

And he thinks I'm the disgusting one, when you wish harm on two creatures who haven't wronged you in any way.

sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/why-monkeys-can-t-talk-and-what-they-would-sound-if-they-could

Let us not forget how many zoonotic diseases exist.

True, though very few among domesticated pet species.

If people start ducking dogs, canine distemper might make the jump, or rabies may become a std. I do not want to die seizing and spasming from some bitch, in the metaphoric sense, not the literal.

They are just stupid and lack the control then huh?
Amazing how some fo them could learn sign language, I mean maybe not a full conversation but at least a "no" or "mama" thowe words are easy as fuck to say, even for our babies.

Very few compared to human diseases, and if your dog/animal is well taken care, won't have any of them. Not an argument.

boooo

>
interesting no one wanted to follow this up

Attached: nala_by_reallynxgirl.jpg (800x550, 83K)

I feel like fucking a dog would be bad for my mental well being. I believe that it May be the same for many others. It is better not to.

Ditto

>CAAAAANNNN YOUU FEELLLLL THE LOOOVVVEEEE TOOONIGHTTTT?

I feel like you existing would be bad for my mental well being. I believe that it May be the same for many others. It is better not to exist for you.

Anyway, this is pretty funny, we're entering belief territory now. I would ask you if you also believe in a god but frankly, I don't fucking care. You're just gonna come up with dipshit arguments anyway where you think your belief is somehow more valid than any belief I would pretend is mine.

Lets just consider that having sexual relations with an animal is not all that bad. It certainly is not good in any way that is a net benefit. Why bother with something that potentially may be bad, or simply neutral, when you can do something good?

Congratulations, you've just discovered amorality, babbies first philosophy and debate word.

Regardless, I do not like beastiality and would prefer that harsher punishments for it were enforced.

You're making assumptions though. In the hypothesis that the OP created you can't say that "it certainly is not good in anyway that is a net benefit."

Especially considering that their hypothesis states that animals are way more loyal than humans. And that they are have the same level of consciousness as us, so having sex with them if there's some level of love / emotion would seem "natural" in that world. Imagine being in a loving relationship where you could get sex on the regular AND your partner will not cheat on you ever.

The hypothesis OP created is a work of fiction, it exists solely on assumptions.

Animals do not understand the implications of this thing. It is like banging retards, but animals are even less capable of comprehending they world around themselves.

If dogs and shit were just better humans then why the fuck are we even alive? It'd be our asses in the cages if they weren't dumb as rocks. I'd be a fucking humanist any day sign me up nigga. Let's just commit mass genocide, it's us or them.

I do not like disingenuous people, stupid people, people that punish others because they don't follow their belief, people that impede on other people's freedom, people that are incapable of critical thought, people that cannot spell words correctly, people that cannot discern two different posters, people that accuse other people of things, people with belief systems, people that call for harm on other people, people that use "evil" as an argument for anything, people that are incapable of comprehending any argument, people that call for harm on animals, people that ask for dismemberment of anything.

Your punishment would so severe because you hit all these criteria.

Cowabunga it is then

Attached: 1556924494672m.jpg (1024x1012, 128K)

And you fail to realize that the world that they created would imply that they would understand these things because they have our level of understanding...

have sex

You're comparing the real world animals too much to this fictional world. The fictional world involves animals who have sentience and human-like intelligence with all the attributes that the OP mentioned.

Have sex