Loli Sex Dolls!

Loli Sex Dolls!

lolis are love, lolis are life

Attached: 1543735286812.jpg (2448x1836, 933K)

Other urls found in this thread:

files.catbox.moe/en21om.mp4
catdoll.club/index.php?route=product/product&path=59_92&product_id=83
hgdoll.net/146cm Christina Flat Chest EVO skeleton
cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/closing-arguments-child-sex-doll-trial-child-pornography-1.5125839
thechronicleherald.ca/news/regional/st-johns-man-accused-of-ordering-child-sex-doll-found-not-guilty-314874/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 1543735182937.jpg (2448x1836, 1.02M)

Attached: 1542763675556.jpg (1503x2672, 928K)

show me a pic or vid of someone fucking one

You mean child sex dolls

Attached: 1542764075936.webm (960x540, 786K)

only two i know of

Attached: 1559624881558.webm (1280x668, 1.89M)

Wow never saw this one before. Know the Doll? Moar?

Die soon, pedo

Damn this is fucking amazing.

No and no sorry

files.catbox.moe/en21om.mp4

Attached: DS-145.jpg (800x1200, 178K)

Anyone have original for these? I need sound

Attached: 1506053223626.webm (1920x1080, 1.63M)

thanks user

hot as FUCK

This is amazing. How much and where from?

Attached: shawn tae Bell.webm (1066x600, 1018K)

Any problems with customs

Ask the seller if they do "special line shipping." Otherwise if young-looking pieces of plastic are frowned upon in your country, try to find a seller within country so you don't have to import it, maybe.

Attached: pigroast.gif (370x281, 1.98M)

love it
got any more like it?

have a bump OP

damn son use some lube pls

Want

Attached: IMG-20190605-WA0001.jpg (990x1319, 189K)

How do I know if this file is safe?

it is you retard. just a video stream

probably costs $5k+, assuming you can even buy it and it isnt just for show

I clicked it's another video

because it has .mp4 at the end. no video or image file is unsafe. I posted it to catbox because it's 14MB and has sound

I don't have this , I want it,it's 2000

yes you retard

>it's 2000
That's it? How do you know? Where can you buy it?

Catdoll is the website

Now THIS is $5500

Attached: IMG-20190605-WA0002.jpg (1024x683, 63K)

sweet, they even have cheaper models. I might buy one.

body is alright but the face is pretty meh

Attached: IMG_6216-508x696.jpg (508x696, 90K)

The weird mouths is because it opens

Dolls don't really make much noise during sex.

That’s incredible, we’re is this one from?

the mouth isnt what bothers me. I just don't like that model's facial structure, mainly the nose and eyes

fucking hot, I would love to buy one
why so expensive tho

They make tons of squishing noises if you use lube. Fucking a doll without lube can damage the internals so you should always use it. It also makes the cum easier to clean out since the lube acts like gel and the cum slides out.

Ah you see it's supposed to be a specific loli

Trottla

american/10

fuck tha police coming straight from the loli house

Very nice. Risky but nice

The only risk is if a helicopter happened to fly over him while he was fucking and they mistaked it for an actual little girl

It’s handmade and uses an upgraded silicon substance and skeleton. It’s also supposed to be “realistic” from a self confessed “lolicon”

I've seen this car around town. Watch out pedo.

You go on doll shows in portland fairly regularly. Noone remains anonymous for long.

Attached: 1541601256694.jpg (768x1024, 295K)

A very lighty purple and wtf is that on the hood, Do i even dare ask?

Attached: 1450192927548.gif (135x101, 349K)

More you wonderfull bastard

Attached: 1556130367287.gif (500x500, 953K)

there's never enough videos of the loli looking ones being fucked. it's always the ones with big ugly tits slapped on.

those dolls are old and from what i heard, not that good for sex. I dont know of anyone that has owned one recently

Attached: cgnx752.jpg (683x1024, 146K)

Attached: 1468716140554.jpg (1024x683, 139K)

It's some kind of Love Live-type decal. This MFer pedo drives around the PNW area advertising his shit.

So? The fuck you going to do about it? Free country. I wish one of you Yea Forumstards would follow me home to my property. I'd be glad to put a bullet in your skull.

no, that's some type of ANIME. I don't know what show but it's anime.

No one follows anyone home to their own turf, to kill them. That's just asking to die. Keep your windows rolled up. It'd be so easy to toss a molotov into your lap.

i fully support this. one day real girls will be legal

It will never be 1803 again user

Lurking

Attached: IMG_20190427_200037X.jpg (1822x2429, 1.2M)

real ones will never be legal.
one day loli androids that have child-like ai will be possible though.

of course, there will always be a black market for 'real' girls, even if alternatives exist.

I think that "CHILD LOOKING DOLL" would be a better term.

loli already means child

Seems like you enjoy setting up photo shoots than fucking these dolls

The only reason you buy these is because you don't have the balls to fuck a real little girl.

Why would anyone actually wanna fuck a little girl irl. Completely self destructive and sounds 100x times better in fantasy. Why is it even a thing.

eh. more likely is becuase they want to fuck kids but dont want to go to prison and have the shit beat out of them every day while theyre there. less likely is they dont want to actually hurt a little kid that doesnt deserve a major trauma (life-altering or not)

Enjoy :^)

>less likely is they dont want to actually hurt a little kid that doesnt deserve a major trauma (life-altering or not)
most of the trauma only starts when they get older and are brainwashed by society to make them feel like shit for what happened. its the taboo nature that makes them feel guilty.

Men fucked lolis plenty of time in history and they weren't traumatized.

Attached: 1557448702528.jpg (612x612, 106K)

I've seen you, you sick fuck. You ain't got shit.

Attached: 1542763429072.jpg (1503x2672, 857K)

Attached: 1542763118654.jpg (2448x1836, 1.08M)

I'm not that guy. I'm saying if I were, I wouldn't be afraid of some idiot vigilante.

>too pussy to confront directly
>decides to do sneaky shit

Why the diaper? She's way too old to be wearing one. Even so, I never understood the diaper fetish. Diapers are for babies that shit themselves. If you pulled a diaper off, there's a good chance it'd be full of shit.

I'm wondering why no anons have posted chill pics of dolls in diapers this thread. only ones that involve intercourse, that I don't find that exiting either.

Attached: 8.jpg (1822x2429, 1.39M)

Damn she's hot! Is she one of the catdoll models? How much did you pay for her?

cute as fuck

You’re going to be raped and murdered in jail.

I'm just re-posting, don't own any SEX dolls only toy dolls.

Burn in hell Pedos, hope you guys get tortured.

Attached: 20549C88-9806-4217-BF3A-53FFCDDD8C7A.jpg (1122x748, 157K)

>Men fucked lolis plenty of time in history and they weren't traumatized.
I'm sure most of them were traumatized by it, especially the first time.
It's just that nobody cared back then. Little girls had to get used to living a traumatic life where they were basically chattel. Getting their cherry popped by some dude their father's age was the least traumatic thing that happened back in the shitty days.

Attached: Kids are dumb.gif (224x313, 1022K)

How does it feel? Is it comparable in weight? Can you feel the ribs and whatnot. How realistic to a real body?

Are the mouth and asshole also fuckable?

Fuck my country man. Those dolls are illegal here. You end up in jail if you buy one.

>diaper on a 8-9 year old looking doll
>camera zoomed in on the dick
2/10

see

for my fellow florida anons out of the loop.

Florida has banned childlike sex dolls that are "eerily similar to real human children."

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a bill on Thursday banning people in the state from owning the dolls. The measure had been unanimously approved by the Florida legislature.

The law "prohibits a person from knowingly having in his or her possession, custody, or control an obscene, childlike sex doll."

Democratic state Sen. Lauren Book, who introduced the bill, and other supporters argue that owning the dolls encourages "child predators."

"These are anatomically correct, lifelike silicone dolls that are eerily similar to real human children made for the sole purpose of sexual gratification,” she said in a statement. “Just as viewing child pornography lowers the inhibitions of child predators, so do these childlike sex dolls that have no place in the state of Florida.”

We know. And Sen Book (who happens to be my senator) is full of shit. She has no evidence at all for her claims. The only study she cited in supporting this bill was completely unrelated to dolls. It was a study of the effect of child pornography on prior sex offenders.
But people find dolls icky so that's apparently enough to pass a law unanimously in both houses.
That's our shitty legislature and governor.

Attached: M_118.jpg (1210x1613, 363K)

I HATE WOMEN
BUM BADUM BUM BUM BUM BUM

Attached: 1557183800064.jpg (1032x960, 326K)

She is a Catdoll 126cm Sasha. Sells for $1,200

Attached: IMG_20190428_152112X.jpg (1822x2429, 1.11M)

>I'm sure most of them were traumatized by it
What makes you think that? There's nothing traumatizing about sex unless you make it that way.

>Getting their cherry popped
You can have sex without doing that. Seems to me you think all sex is painful balls deep penetration while the guy is indifferent to the girls suffering.

So what will you do if you ever want another one? Can't you just have it delivered to an address out of state and transport it back home?

The law makes transporting into the state a felony.

Attached: M_123.jpg (1210x1613, 417K)

Attached: IMG_20190428_155643X.jpg (1822x2429, 1.14M)

Anyway, my plan is to leave the state. I don't really want to but I also don't want to risk losing my dolls if I'm somehow found out.
I am tentatively thinking of a challenge to the possession part of the law, but that hinges on willingness to go public as well as finding a civil rights lawyer willing to take the case pro bono.

Attached: M_115.jpg (1210x1613, 267K)

The law is only for those who get caught.

>
She is so pretty

Sounds way too costly. You're better off just moving.

Maybe so but I'm not so arrogant as to think I can't be caught.

Attached: I_096.jpg (1210x1613, 337K)

Fuck em. Wrap it in bubble wrap. Anything to spite these demonic kikes.

And "mainstream" doll hobbyists keeping their heads down and throwing their freedom away one state at a time...

Florida is one of the shittest states next to CA & NY to live in anyway. I would never in my life want to live there.

I get that and I'm not telling you to do anything you're uncomfortable with. I'm just saying, the general public doesn't deal with the law because they're either not doing anything, or smart enough to not be caught doing anything.
Just stick to one of those 2 categories and you'll be fine in whatever situation you find yourself in.

>thinking sex dolls aren't "pornography"
Nigger, it's this kind of mental gymnastics you put your brain through in order to justify your sick fantasies is the reason why that bill is about to become law.

Besides, I doubt you're stopping on using kid sex dolls.

Anyone have the vid of the guy fucking a young looking doll while his wife talks dirty and cheers him on?

You fuck dolls. Your brain is too warped to shoot a gun, much less aimed it at someone.

Well, yeah. I'm going to move.
The plan for doing a challenge would go like this: I take Misako, Willow, Annie and Isabella out of state with me. I leave Rosalita here in my storage unit. Then I fly back, rent a car and go fetch Rosalita out of storage and drive to the nearest police station and get myself arrested for possession.
I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that simple possession would likely be protected by Florida's constitutional right to privacy.
But as I said I need a civil rights lawyer who will take the case pro bono. I ain't spending my own money on this.

Attached: M_121.jpg (1210x1613, 401K)

>You fuck dolls
And that's good, user. We don't want people fucking real kids.

I've lived here 49 years of my life and I love it. It's worth the long steamy summer and the occasional hurricanes just to never experience sleet.

Attached: I_013.jpg (1613x1210, 343K)

Cute

i dont get it. how small are your dicks? im not being a troll or annoying religious person...i bought a litle school girl ona hole off line before and first time using it my dick ripped through the other side. my dicks not that big either its maybe 7.6-8" long and 5.8-6.2 in circ

Anymore? The pics are nice

Another asshole thoroughly convinced of his evidence-free hypotheses.

Attached: W_014.jpg (1037x1382, 233K)

>It's worth the long steamy summer
I can't stand hot, humid weather so I guess that's where we differ. I absolutely hate summer with a passion. Higher crime rates. More insects. More annoying people walking around. No thanks

Does EVO refer to DH168?

catdoll.club/index.php?route=product/product&path=59_92&product_id=83

To each his own.

Attached: W_151.jpg (1210x1613, 550K)

EVO refers to a more advanced skeleton that allows for more posing positions, like twisting or bending the torso, shrugging shoulders etc.

Attached: M_092.jpg (1210x1613, 306K)

It would be trivial to configure a web server so that it changes the mime type and just rename any file, or setup a rewrite rule directing you to another site.

A year ago I got mine. The next day someone claiming to be some Federal Police something or another called my work cell and asked my "name". I said "yes, this is my work phone" confused as how? He just said "be careful" and hung up.
Lol , idgf , I will claim to be a Jew which by blood I am so I can't get in trouble anyways.

>thinking sex dolls aren't "pornography"
The reason CP is banned is because it harms real children, there's no reason to ban plastic dolls or loli hentai, they aren't real.

So grab it with wget and then inspect the header before opening it.

out of all the states they could bann sex dolls why Florida? lmaoooooo Florida is crazy as it is, pedos are doing sex act with real children and the Governor is worrying about some lonely sperg with a 5,000$ sex doll. Jesus Fuckin Christ

I am sure one of the biggest issues for here and this info may be slightly out of data, but I belive florida is #3 in human trafficking.

So i am sure that may be playing a role.

Ah thank you guys!

Attached: IMG_20190428_162356X.jpg (2126x2834, 1.54M)

goys cannot telegonize (((their))) property and don't even want them to think about it literally.

Yeah it's stupid. The foster care system is literally losing kids. The Catholic church is running an international pedophile ring. But they target doll owners.
It's a classic case of do what'e easy, not what's effective.

Attached: I_070.jpg (1210x1613, 335K)

I'm guessing that's the next big development

That's not the point. The point is .mp4 does not automatically make a URL safe.

Son of a bitch. I have a 146 cm Molly, but I really, really want this doll. Is it new?

hgdoll.net/146cm Christina Flat Chest EVO skeleton

I think the first loop hole is the * realistic* part. Throw on some elf ears and you have a mythical creature.

Do any come like young teen, small boobs maybe?

That's true.

Attached: W_153.jpg (1210x1613, 486K)

Answers?

>telegonize
wat?

Attached: W_156.jpg (1613x1210, 436K)

sounds pretty based if someone actually just iced some investigation because it's a victimless crime

Nice ride

That's an underserved market. The mainstream sites do not want to sell teen-looking dolls with small boobs, and there's not enough demand among small-doll hobbyists probably. I don't know if B-C cup is small enough for you but this is a 146 Molly doll from dollforever

Attached: IMG_20190602_231233.jpg (1944x2592, 970K)

can't see the rest of the doll, so no idea if it's really loli doll or not.

There are no ribs, but the body is soft but firm and the weight is comparable to the same volume of meat.
The dolls have usable pussy, anus and mouth although the latter two have a higher risk of tearing.

Attached: A_BJ_07.jpg (1613x1210, 355K)

google "telegony"

My Bel's anus is alot larger. It tears super easy.
I kinda want that new Bebe. Bel can be her big sis.

Attached: 0314182005.jpg (2560x1920, 1.71M)

There are some really nice small boob teen dolls. Check out Debbie from doll4ever for instance. I find her quite attractive.

Attached: W_158.jpg (1613x1210, 402K)

Lol, I know what telegony is, it just didn't really make any sense in the context of your comment.

Attached: I_019.jpg (1613x1210, 399K)

Attached: I_021.jpg (1613x1210, 378K)

Attached: I_032.jpg (1613x1210, 318K)

Attached: I_038.jpg (1613x1210, 290K)

Attached: I_039.jpg (1613x1210, 266K)

Attached: I_043.jpg (1613x1210, 317K)

these dolls are fucking ugly

Attached: I_047.jpg (1613x1210, 317K)

Attached: I_048.jpg (1613x1210, 321K)

this is new

Hot as fuck. My dick is diamonds.

Attached: 1460219043599.jpg (708x538, 106K)

Attached: W_012.jpg (1037x1382, 238K)

>Eunoch
just why

>Die soon, pedo
>one day real girls will be legal
>you don't have the balls to fuck a real little girl.

Real girls are loud, disgusting, smelly, confused, evil little shits that spread illness. No way in hell would I ever want to fuck real.

bump

Attached: I_053.jpg (1210x1613, 318K)

Attached: I_055.jpg (1210x1613, 287K)

MODS!

FAG!

For what? Mineral oil suspended in a polymer matrix?

Attached: I_078.jpg (1210x1613, 398K)

Attached: I_081.jpg (1210x1613, 373K)

Attached: I_082.jpg (1613x1210, 354K)

Attached: I_083.jpg (1210x1613, 336K)

Attached: I_085.jpg (1210x1613, 329K)

Damn son your hands are so old you must cum powdered milk.

Still jelly tho kek

That's what five decades of sailing will do to Nordic skin.
I'm just lucky I'm not one giant melanoma.

Attached: W_011.jpg (1382x1037, 279K)

Dude you earned good enough to buy some loli dolls. You did fine enjoy retirement.

Attached: 1538007355886.jpg (367x271, 11K)

I plan to.

Attached: Bed_005.jpg (1613x1210, 374K)

You disgust me. Children are beautiful, majestic creatures.

Meh. I'm with the other guy. Children are annoying as hell and all my life I've avoided them like the plague.
I much prefer dogs. They're good company.

Attached: A_057.jpg (1152x864, 221K)

Wow, that’s amazing. I’d love to have her

NO

I mean this from the bottom of my heart: kill yourself, subhuman

It's cope because they can't have the real thing.

Attached: rind.png (1604x865, 85K)

Don't trust Jewish science

You guys got a gallery somewhere?

Attached: DSC_0433 - Copy.jpg (3600x2400, 1.84M)

Hi girls!

Attached: I_072.jpg (1210x1613, 356K)

Hi!

Attached: DSC_0479 - Copy.jpg (2400x3600, 1.51M)

Even if Rind's work is valid (and there are some significant methodological and sample bias challenges) there's a fundamental issue of capacity to consent. there's a reason we shelter children from all kinds of adult considerations like entry into contractual obligations. The human brain does not fully mature until adulthood.

Attached: IW_013.jpg (1613x1210, 304K)

i mean I knew people who own these are weird as fuck, but goddamn...
I thought it was a closet like fetish.
this nigga driving around in a pink junker painted with anime all around.
wtf

So cute.

Attached: M_066.jpg (1613x1210, 329K)

Child sexual abuse is a serious risk factor for a ridiculous amount of psychopathologies, this is not even discussed on serious academia. It just goes to show how little knowledge you are on the topic, plain obvious since the paper you posted is basically toilet paper. But apparently you can't tell that either, how sad really.

Attached: 1507937808504.jpg (645x729, 88K)

Oh come on. Embrace it! you know you want to. Let your freak flag fly!

The frontal cortex finishes developing at around 18 years old, it is the region of the brain in charge of decision making, that is why 18 years old is indeed the age of consent, it is not just a random number.

No one in their right minds would do such a thing.
I would actually like to indulge in ACTUAL real life pussy now and again.

are you telling me there is a difference between a 14, 18 and 22 year old girl in regards to decision making?

Yes, this is basic neuroscience.

you must a girl or very stupid.

Good counter argument, you absolutely fucked me up real hard.

I don't agree that Rind's work is "toilet paper." But I do agree there are significant issues that his work misses.
His work is a valuable and at least partially valid contribution. That some people seize upon it to advance an agenda that is probably not valid doesn't change that.
In my ideal world this kind of distorted use of science wouldn't happen. But that's not the world we live in. But if we're to have any hope of getting to good policy, we all need to ty to look at all evidence with as unbiased a view as we can.

Attached: IW_025.jpg (1613x1210, 401K)

Agreed.

Attached: IW_018.jpg (1613x1210, 512K)

im just pulling shit out my ass like you are. show me a paper that says a girl makes the correct, mature choices are she ages past 18.

If you think there's no difference in the cognitive abilities of a 14 year old and an 18 year old you're a fucking retard

He is more of a siliconphile.
No children have been harmed you're the only one who's jimmies are rustled.

Attached: Snapshot_011.png (1024x768, 919K)

>But if we're to have any hope of getting to good policy, we all need to ty to look at all evidence with as unbiased a view as we can.
Pedophiles have a clear bias concerning the age of consent.

Yes.

Attached: IW_004.jpg (1613x1210, 373K)

why do you people act like sex is the end of the world?

And regular people don't? Parents want the State to help them keep their daughters from having sex.

Attached: DSC_0449 - Copy.jpg (3600x2400, 1.71M)

All I can say is I agree with 18 as the age of consent. So perhaps you're agreeing I'm not a pedophile despite my love of loli dolls?

Attached: Bed_006.jpg (1613x1210, 527K)

That looks like a boy doll? Jaime?
Please be a boy doll!

Why? you are clearly in denial, you wouldn't agree with me even if I showed you a pet-scan or even a frontal lobotomy of a developing brain.
It is literally like arguing if water is blue or colorless, that is how basic this is.
You can look it up for yourself, less than a minute of a google search.

>And regular people don't?
No.
>Parents want the State to help them keep their daughters from having sex.
They want the state to keep their children from being abused

how rich and what joh y'all got to afford more then 1 doll?

>you have an interest in arguing about this topic, this invalidates your opinion!
Nice fallacy.

"I'm not a boy!"

Attached: IMG_20190427_193525 X.jpg (1822x2429, 1.28M)

I'm just pointing out that it is very difficult for pedophiles to be unbiased about this at all. They tend to hold pro-contact positions as a rationalization and an emotional defense mechanism. After all, being a pedophile can't make you a bad person if there's nothing wrong with touching children.

I don't see how that is relevant. The AoC wasn't raised for that reason. It's like arguing about a cultural practice using genetics.

It isn't fallacious, pedophiles have in interest in justifying child molestation even if it is completely unjustified. I'm not engaging in a logical fallacy by noting the obvious fact that you would believe this even if everything the average normie believes about it is true.

>Child sexual abuse is a serious risk factor for a ridiculous amount of psychopathologies
Sexual abuse where violence or coercion is used, also cases where the environment the child grew up is already negative and would result in negative consequences even without the abuse, the studies done don't even try to consider these factors since all sexual contact of any nature is automatically viewed as sexual abuse.

Attached: 3333333.jpg (937x825, 456K)

I can say from personal experience that dolls are not a relatively expensive hobby. Over my lifetime I probably spent $400k at least on sailing. I probably spent $100k on strip clubs and hookers. I've barely spent $8k on dolls and accessories like clothing and photographic equipment. Quite the bargain considering the pleasure I get from it.

Attached: MW_005.jpg (1613x1210, 385K)

>Empowering Children Foundation

Damn it, officer turn around. He's right behind you!

Attached: IMG_20180709_192735.jpg (1536x2048, 1.09M)

That study is done to prove that sexual abuse is harmful, I'm using it as an example of how that kind of study is conducted and how it fits with what Rind has found about family environment being an important factor.

I don't disagree. But that applies to everyone. We all have to strive to overcome our biases.
I don't argue for tolerance of sexual contact with children. I strenuously argue against it for the reasons I've already stated up-thread. What I do argue for is evidence-based policy.

Attached: AMRW_003.jpg (1613x1210, 412K)

Attached: IMG_20180709_192743.jpg (2048x1536, 1.05M)

Kill yourself pedophiles or we will

Attached: independent-news-world-europe-chechen-authorities-tell-parents-kill-your-20983512.png (500x911, 115K)

>Empowering Children Foundation

Certainly. Living in a shitty family environment is probably a risk-factor for experiencing sexual abuse.

Then you clearly don't understand behavioral science. True, the age of consent in a beginning wasn't choose because of neuronal development since they new little about it, but it remained as it is solidified by modern research. If you really think the frontal cortex of a minor is capable of serious decision making you are trying to defend that the sun is made out of water.
It is by all means absolutely relevant.

Attached: 61bWtFMznSL._SL1000_.jpg (1000x1000, 98K)

It's essentially an ad hominen, you want to discredited any argument not on its merits, but by attacking the person.

Attached: DSC_0553 - Copy.jpg (2400x3600, 1.28M)

Attached: 37b86737.jpg (1786x1200, 427K)

>that fucking pic

My goddamn sides.

Attached: Tormented Cats 02.jpg (254x266, 40K)

Even beyond the underdeveloped frontal cortex, you have to consider how hormonal imbalances affect decision making. Always add this in, or the retard pedos will say

>hurr durr so age of consent should be 25 since its not done developing until then

Attached: 61LHEl-tTvL._SL1350_.jpg (900x1350, 128K)

that asian one is so cute

Attached: c1509469694107.jpg (1200x675, 109K)

Attached: DSC_0517 - Copy.jpg (3600x2400, 1.78M)

Attached: 6545871.26.jpg (1905x1034, 332K)

>putting panties on it

Attached: Quotsix+years+after+the+internet+began+bullying+jessi+who+_ca4c23cdc4c32af0488f6e02a46e827c.jpg (453x500, 54K)

That's my waifu Misako. And yes she;s really cute.

Attached: M_078.jpg (1613x1210, 322K)

The argument is not constructed from rational disinterest. It is little more than a means of self-justification for pedophiles. That is a fact, not a logical fallacy, and dismissing it as just being a fallacy is the definition of a fallacy fallacy.

Attached: Image-38.jpg (3024x4032, 1.75M)

>that puffy vulva

Attached: 1459622997127.jpg (383x750, 82K)

Attached: c1528353471585.jpg (600x783, 126K)

Women on the pill shouldn't be allowed to have sex and sex during PMS is rape due to a lessened cognitive capability.

Attached: 1537934852080.jpg (900x1200, 263K)

i just love how women can have any type or size of sex toys they want, but as soon as men do it it becomes a problem

Sex should only occur within marriage for the purpose of reproduction and hedonism is the cancer that is killing society.

If this is real (and I have my doubts) then shame on the company that ships a doll in that position. That's riking significant damage of both knees and hips.

Attached: M_021.jpg (1210x1613, 306K)

Pedos really are pathetic.

>underdeveloped frontal lobe
>PLUS
>hormonal imbalances due to puberty
>"hurr durr, I'm gonna pick only one, and try out reductio ad absurdum"

Gotta love the Japanese. Nobody even bats an eye.

Attached: M_079.jpg (1613x1210, 340K)

I'm pretty sure that thing is cast in that position. it's not like a doll with a skeleton, more like a very big onahole

Attached: DSC_0636 - Copy.jpg (2400x3600, 1.41M)

The last things that get developed are signalling potentiation, dendritic morphology, modulatory pathways, etc. they don't affect tremendously the behavior of the individual, it's actually done to make processes more efficient. In theory, as long as the brain gets stimulated it never technically finishes developing, but around 18 years old the main cortico-cortical pathways, thalamo-cortical loops and their respective neurotransmitters tonality finishes developing (relatively of course).

>>underdeveloped frontal lobe
>>PLUS
>>hormonal imbalances due to puberty
So prepubescent children are fine, since they are only affected by one factor as well.

Attached: cunnypepe.jpg (734x734, 160K)

Attached: 1559401886304.jpg (460x276, 20K)

no you are arguing that water that is 18 years old is somehow different than 17 year old water.
girls are dumb will always be dumb.

Who's this cutie?

The problem with that logic is, you can keep going down one year at a time until you're fucking newborns. You have to draw a hard line somewhere, and there's really nothing wrong with 18.

That doesn't look like an argument, mate.

How about that one girl who did the salt milk videos with her dad? She turned out perfect, that is until her mom got convinced she had to get back on her ex-husband. Then she forced her daughter to confess against her dad resulting in prison time.
When is comes to sex, age is kind of irrelevant. What matters is societies view on it. Society views underage sex and bad so children view this as so.

Sure dude but you are clearly dumber.

I agree wholeheartedly.

Attached: waifu.jpg (671x664, 133K)

As if you deserve one for such a retarded attempt. But fine, if I must.

The brain is so significantly underdeveloped at that age, it becomes a disqualifying factor on its own.

Wow, that was tough.

>When is comes to sex, age is kind of irrelevant. What matters is societies view on it
Peak postmodernism

>salt milk

I know I'm gonna regret asking, but what does that mean exactly? I think I got a pretty good idea, but tell me anyway.

I still fail to see how this is more relevant than outside factors. Most people don't wait for their last dendrite or whatever to finish maturing to start masturbating and neither they wait to start having sex
At least in my country, the situation got to a point were they are testing giving condoms away for free in some high schools.
My point is that cultural changes like religion, etc are more important to decision making than neuroscience, at least when it comes to this subject.

Right.
there's no perfect line. But as a matter of policy there has to be a line somewhere and 18 is a reasonable choice.

Attached: I_005.jpg (1210x1613, 322K)

Should women with low IQ also not be allowed sex then?
Also why is having sex a bad decision when there's kids who fuck as soon as they hit puberty with other kids. What's wrong if someone responsible is doing it instead with them?

H a w t
discord..gg/Wyjrw8J ((remove the extra dot.))

Server with no rules! Post whatever you want without risk of ban.

Gore.

Controversial topics.

Shitposting autism.

!!!

And sorry for the shit grammar I'm drowsy as fuck

>Also why is having sex a bad decision
Because orgasm is not the only thing worth living for, you fucking pervert

>I'm not a pedophile
You are definitely a pedophile.

based
best thread on b

>Should women with low IQ also not be allowed sex then?

My sister-in-law is the dumbest bitch I ever met. Never should have had kids. Almost every year, right before Christmas, she would announce she was pregnant. Every year. She never knew who the father was. She almost always miscarried due to her excessive drug habit.

>TL/DR: YES

>cultural changes are more important to decision making than neuroscience

Okay fine, let's go with that logic. In our culture, we abhor pedophilia. And really, the point isn't that underage people are incapable of feeling sexual, it's that they're inexperienced in the ways of the world, and how manipulative people can be. Thus, they're more likely to be taken advantage of. We don't allow them to make their own health decisions, we don't allow them to decide where they live, we don't allow them to decide much of anything because they're prone to making really shitty decisions.

I'm telling you things as they are. If people want to believe the earth is the center of the solar system that is up to them. But they are clearly wrong. Wouldn't you agree?
If tomorrow we decide that patients with pneumonia won't receive any treatment what so ever just because we want, are we correct? knowing that giving them some good old amoxicillin would save their life. Of course not. Saying that "I'm doing it because that's the way we do it" is an awful, awful counter argument.
The problem here is that these kind of knowledge is only shared by a very small group of people, average individual barely know we have a sponge inside our heads, but that doesn't make that thought right by any means.

I would pay to watch you fuck your doll while I jerk off

Wrong amigo its 25 to 27.


18 is a made up number.

With other kids, at least there's a chance they're not just being manipulated. With an adult, you're not talking about someone who is just discovering sexuality, and wanting to explore. They're someone who knows what they want, and knows the right words to say and things to do to manipulate someone into doing it. Especially if that other person knows nothing about all that.

It's okay if a 12yo boy wants to be a girl.
Leta give him hormones that will forever affect his, I'm sorry "her" sex life.

But no fuck no if she wants to bang an 18yo guy. She clearly cannot consent to that decision.

Sure, he's wrong. That still doesn't justify banging kids. Sorry, guys. This is one war you'll never win.

What would be the biggest issue if the age of consent was lowered to age of puberty instead of 18? What would the biggest problem be for society to face then?

I talked about it on further posts if you are actually interested. (I doubt it tho)

I'm not saying it's not true, just that I don't understand the relevance of that fact.
That makes more sense.

No, it's not okay to give them hormones and let them transition at that age. It should be legally defined as child abuse and be grounds for having your kids taken away permanently, zero visitation.

cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/closing-arguments-child-sex-doll-trial-child-pornography-1.5125839

damn canada sucks hope he makes it

In many places it's lower, even in the US, 16-15 even 14 and everything still works fine, you only believe strongly in the magical number 18 because it's what you have been told it is correct where you live.

You fucked up real hard but proving false claims that the frontal cortex fully develops around age 18.

Its 25 nigga, 18 is just a number so they can recruit the young.

TBF if u raise kids up well enough that wouldn't be an issue. They're not stupid but older women especially young women arnt that different either.

Because it's a fact, it's reality, is things as they are, no biased, non subjective, is how things happens.

thechronicleherald.ca/news/regional/st-johns-man-accused-of-ordering-child-sex-doll-found-not-guilty-314874/

nvm he made it. thank god, freedom still lives

The US: Sex with kids is wrong.

Also the US: Child brides are legal.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 105K)

there you go

Well I guess my question then is what does that mean to you? If you define someone who is attracted to the physical form of girls but repulsed by actual children and has a firm moral conviction that sexual contact with children is evil as a pedophile what conclusions do you draw from that? Is my situation something which should be condemned and even criminalized? If so, why?

Attached: Bed_017.jpg (1210x1613, 408K)

Not at all. I'm not saying a 17 year old is mentally retarded and an 18 year old is perfectly capable. I'm saying there needs to be a line drawn, and 18 works just fine. There's no legitimate reason to reduce it. If lower ages work in those countries, great. There's no rule saying we should set it as low as humanly possible without fucking everything up.

been lurking for a while
just want to throw this fact out there
age of consent is fourteen in italy and germany
also in germany you can be in a relationship with a fourteen year old as long as you are not in a position of power

So in other words, kids with shitty parents deserve to be taken advantage of sexually?

I know you don't really think that, but that's what that argument implies.

There's no rule saying that we should set it as high as possible either.

kys

And nobody is arguing in favor of moving it up.

Eat all the dicks.

Society's influence on you has made you feel like that. You like what you see but not what you hear. Thats an artificial boundary build up from being told repeatedly by society that the real thing is wrong. Whereas if society didn't tell you I doubt you could not be attracted to the physical body without also wanting the real thing.

Are you sure about that? Because there are plenty of people, specially femnists, that say that an age gap realtionship between a 18 year old and 30 year old is wrong.

Imagine being a nation cucked by feminists.

Attached: feminists.jpg (3370x290, 200K)

>has a firm moral conviction that sexual contact with children is evil
You can be a pedo and believe that, I've seen some.

Alabama: You sickos like kids. This disgusts my 14 year old wife.

So would a society with a low age of consent such as 13 not be that different to a society with a higher age of consent?

I think we all know feminists are generally retarded these days.

>Delaware maintained its age of consent at 7

Christ alive, Delaware.

But they have a lot of influence still.

So you're telling me I have no moral agency? I reject that.
To me, the essence of evil is abuse of power. All my moral understanding derives from that. I don't agree that absent our society's norms I wouldn't have that fundamental understanding.

Attached: IW_007.jpg (1613x1210, 403K)

another part of the argument is how you classify pedophilia
sexual orientation
or
mental illness

i prefer to classify it as a sexual orientation since classifying it would only cause for people to seek a cure, but if they do find a cure they would probably use on others who arent straight

So people want to fuck young sex ready but underage girls but cant. Ok...

It's a mental illness, and as a pedo I really hope for a cure.

meant to put mental illness after classifying

>tfw no pure Christian 14 year old wife

Not sure what you want me to say. I'm not arguing for raising the age of consent, and I've yet to hear a good argument for lowering it.

>muh feminist boogeyman
Good goy

Just that you were wrong in saying that no one is arguing for it to be increased, they are.

So what does "pedo" mean in that context? Isn't the point to prevent harm to children? What is the societal value in condemning someone who's morals prevent them from doing such harm?

Attached: Bed_008.jpg (1613x1210, 365K)

thats the thing though
40 years back if people were to find out if you were a homosexual you would get lynched, beaten and killed
now present day its pedophiles getting it instead

if a cure were to be found it would only cause more harm than good, because if you can cure pedophilia you can cure homosexuality

That is actually pretty well known.

We have different ages for when a person is considered capable of doing different things, like driving, drinking, voting, diying for Israel etc. The different ages are roughly based on the dangers and the possible harm caused by these actions; without the use of violence or coercion sexual contact is not necessarily dangerous or harmful, therefore there's little reason to prohibit even a young person from engaging in it.

Attached: eternal question.jpg (1280x720, 154K)

I meant no one in here. You posted an argument against something I never argued for.

But society is the one that told u it's an abuse of power. Whereas it wouldn't be the case thinking like that. Age difference is the only problem in this power issue but in general women are weaker than men anyway more emotional and less logical at that too so it wouldn't make sense to even think that your abusing power. Otherwise any normal relationship would be classed as abusing power because men have a natural advantage over women. The average women cannot be more logical and mentally better developed than the average man provided they are the same age. So that would mean any same age relationship is also an abuse of power which can't be the case.

>fuck society
Why don't you go join the trannies on tumblr in trying to destroy civilization?

Kids? Yea that's wrong.

You are 100% right that banging kids is wrong and I 100% agree with it.

However banging adolescents, that's 100% normal in a Male human.

Also, banging dolls that look like kiddos? Ehh I dont care what people do in the privacy of their own homes.
So provided that the dolls look like 13 or above then its perfectly normal.
Case and point? Hebephilia has been argued against for years now and every single year the consensus of the psychology community deem it normal. Which is why it's never been nor will it ever be in the DSM.

According to society its perfectly fine.

>40 years back if people were to find out if you were a homosexual you would get lynched, beaten and killed
Good
>you can cure homosexuality
Good

You talk society, but society has pretty unanimously decided that women are as capable as men in every way - anything else is your personal opinion.

And do you remember that girl that convinced her boyfriend to commit suicide? Kids are having sex, today - and they abuse each other. You bear the burden addressing this if you want to argue that any other sex is bad.

Nonsense. I've had multiple relationships and there was no imbalance of power. If you genuinely believe what you're saying you need to do some self-examination because you clearly lack an understanding of respect for others.

Attached: M_089.jpg (1210x1613, 305K)

Being a pedophile means that have you have sexual desire and fantasies involving prepubescent children, nothing less and nothing more, even if you feel that those feelings are wrong and try to supress them, you still are one.

"Not necessarily" doesn't mean "definitely not"

You can definitely harm someone by manipulating them when they're mentally weak. Since being young increases the chances of that being the case, we have laws to protect those who are most vulnerable.

I also don't think kids should necessarily be punished for exploring their sexuality with each other. Only if one of them is obviously manipulating the other. And until we have a mind reading device, we can't trust any adult who says they mean no harm. The potential consequences are too grave.

Those have absolutely nothing to do with decision making skills or the ability to make full decisions.
Your decision making skills will fully develop around 25 or so.

>So what does "pedo" mean in that context?
Someone with a primary or exclusive attraction to children