Why is she so hated?
Why is she so hated?
Because she is black
that's the ugliest horse I've ever seen
Do you not see that smile?
she looks like a fucking horse
and is a communist
do the math
it's because she represents the counterculture that isn't popular with roughly half the population
>finds horses attractive
cool nigger
cause incels and Yea Forums
Because she creates cognitive dissonance for people that are mentally quagmired in their partisan echo chambers.
>Why is she so hated?
Because she's better at Twitter than Trump is, and that drives the trumptards into an impotent rage.
Shes a communist retard
> maybe if me say big word thay think me smart
Yikes
Cuz she won solely on the color of her skin, and not her qualifications. The Dem she beat had 30 years of political experience and a law degree. Her only "qualification" was she was brown.
she's not, but you were told she was.
there ya go
Because conservatism is the new cool epic on the webster xD
Donaldfags hate her because she's articulate and doesn't take shit.
So, will the world end in, like, 12 years or not?
Ben Garrison has to be the cringiest political cartoonist.
She isn't. We're very glad she is here, and there will be many more to follow.
Because imbred right-winged incels can't comprehend the thought of a woman telling them facts and giving them morality lessons. Actually, with nothing in their skulls, they can't and don't do much thinking in the first place.
because shes pretty wealthy and is working towards keeping you not
idk but id ram my dick in her ass
kek
Because she gets money and votes even though she's obviously mentally handicapped
Try harder
Because she's a woman, a minority, and a democrat. That's enough to make conservatards rage these days.
Thomas Sowell sells books on basic economics because he knows his market is too retarded to understand anything beyond the basics (yes, I know that one book exists but most retards scream about ''YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT BASIC ECONOMICS!'')
kek
I’m not a fan of hers, but this is cringey
>roughly half
She doesn't even represent her own district of 600k, but tries to rule over an entire country of 300 mil.
That and she doesn't know about anything that she talks about.
Kek, actually believing these are the reasons, the more i see this kind of shit the more i am convinced the Dems are the racist ones because they see everything through the racist lense.
Look. She's an ugly, stupid wetback bitch who is nothing more than a spokesperson for some other group of people.
because you sucked this dudes cock
Her tits arent even that great. That's a pushup bra
americans are ugly as fuck
Imma need to see those, I hope they’re a little saggy with big brown nips
Because Pelosi told me to.
Ocasio-Cortez majored in international relations and economics at Boston University, graduating cum laude in 2011.
After college, Ocasio-Cortez moved back to the Bronx and found work as an educational director.
Following the death of her father, she took on an additional job working 18-hour shifts as a bartender and waitress to help her mother—a house cleaner and school-bus driver—fight foreclosure of their home.
Ben Garrison is ahead of his time.
because donald trump and his supporters have taught america to hate people who arent white and stupid just like them
they couldnt get their wall.so they've moved on to racism
The quality is certainly anybody’s guess, but the size is not in question newfagit
fuck i need her naked.... now.
>he rates tits solely on size
>he doesnt realize pushup bras can take a girl from bs to DDs
Retarded faggot
She is the yuugest Dunning-Kruger experiment ever performed.
>Imagine being this disconnected
Wow.
and a woman. and people found her attractive. horse bitch
pretty much this
Nobody gave a rating except you, and that’s not a push-up bra
Fag
>fantastic tits
That's yet to be proven, unless you know something the rest of us don't.
her face reminds me of a freshly laid pile of butterscotch colored dog shit
It doesn’t, you’re just mad
>trump and his supporters
>hillary was actually pretty good
>america is racist and sexist
Because she looks like this fuck.
This. You take all that and then put it up against an old white incumbent that wasn't doing the job previously... AOC. Now you have a dumbass brown chick that doesn't do the job.
She thinks money can save the world and money is useless at the same time
>not a push-up bra
Prove it Poli-knight.
She has got the be the dumbest right-winger boomer.
Stupid triggered same fag is triggered.
Why would I give a shit if people think I’m smart or not? It’s an anonymous board you fucking retard.
Carefully look at that image op. It is now possible for such creature to be in a position of power.
Politically I can't stand her, but I would love to fuck her and see those titties unleashed.
"If we just redistributed the air, and paid for it like we pay our phone bill, the tire would be full"
Better to be quiet and assumed to be stupid, thank to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
She's the epitome of a dumb whore who's always running her mouth. If she didn't have tits and a twat, no one would give two shits about her.
Stop b8ing nggr fggt
The us dollar is doomed to fail since our policies never change and our debt is never ending and always growing.
lol it's always the twat who thinks the word is too big who comes off looking like the dipshit.
Turns out some people are just smarter than you, dullard
She's an attractive young woman and a liberal.
That triggers pretty much all the impotent neckbeard sore spots.
This is true. I think a lot about whether we shouldt:
a) let's floor it and let it crumble
or
b) put the work in and try to repair it
With shits like AOC, option b isn't an option.
Only stupid white racist bigots are afraid of her and what she represents.
Correct. We can't BORROW and SPEND our way to prosperity...
If it crumbles our country will be in economic ruin and we won't be able to import anything. Since we barely manufacture anything anymore, we will devolve as a society and it will be ugly. Riots, killing, stealing on a scale like we've never seen.
What doe she represent? I'd like a list of what she is doing for the Bronx.
We need to create a nation of exports and stop letting so many foreigners come here to earn doctorates and then simply leave. A condition for getting a phd in america should be you live here for at least 10 years after.
Says the tit expert on Yea Forums.
rather than trying to prevent recessions, the government needs to allow companies to fail and allow recession to happen (part of the natural economic cycle). stop quantitative easing (money printing), stop asset inflation, and allow interest rates to rise. Higher interest rates will discourage borrowing and spending, and encourage personal savings. We must restart non-debt financed capital investment in this country - the true engine of a productive, sustainable economy.
we should have never bailed out the banks. nothing was "solved"... we just kicked the can further down the road. yes we postponed a crisis and what surely would have followed - a massive correction and recession. but we added a massive amount of debt to bail out failing banks, all in a misguided effort to avoid short-term pain. we should have never done that...
As time passes the distortions created by a centrally planned economy become more apparent, as assets continuously inflate and the country becomes mired in debt, it also becomes less and less competitive with the rest of the world. Additionally, the increased risk from our massively increased national debt calls into question the overall solvency of the currency, and we are already seeing other countries (our lenders) begin to move away from the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.
Once the crisis of confidence peaks, and the dollar loses its reserve currency status... it's game over.
Much of the world is looking closely at the petro-yuan. China is a massive threat to not only america but the world.
This is a much larger discussion, but...
>economic ruin
yes, I agree. But this country can sustain itself.
>we won't be able to import anything
Mmmm, yes but no. It's not like other countries don't use the USD and don't also have shitty economies. There would be some changes for sure, but I don't think it would be worse that 1910 (or so).
>we barely manufacture anything anymore
This is also true, but apart from TVs and smartphones, we still can. Yes, we may drive shittier cars and clothes dryers, but I don't think we'll turn in to Cuba.
>we will devolve as a society
I don't know what this means. We may become more frugal. But certainly fags and junkies won't become more prevalent. We won't have all the social programs we have now.
>it will be ugly
I think this also depends on the situation. I can imagine states bickering, but I don't see nationwide anarchy. Every state has it's own economy and imports/exports. Shit like the EPA and Dept of Education will be cast aside and communities will support themselves. There isn't actually much that the government provides that we (communities) can provide themselves, and money will just turn into goods.
yes absolutely correct, china is already making big moves to be the de facto world currency. the petro yuan had a stellar debut. china is one of our biggest foreign lenders, and are financing our consumption economy.
we don't need socialism or fair wages. what we need is a STABLE currency with minimal inflation. the more the government tries to manipulate the economy, the more is keeps distorting it ... soon $15/hour won't be enough, then $20/hour, and so on... we should be aiming to keep the prices of things as STABLE as possible. that's the best way to stimulate growth, just by keeping things stable and predictable.
rather than trying to prevent inflation and prevent an inevitable recession, the government needs to allow this recession (part of the natural economic cycle) to occur. interest rates need to be allowed to naturally rise, this will trigger a painful recession in the short-term - nonproductive businesses will close, jobs will be lost, but capital and labor will be freed up for use in other productive areas of the economy, but prevent even worse long-term pain.
msm is designed to keep us from learning that we live in a bubble economy about to burst. Assets are continuously inflating, giving people a false sense of wealth. Government inflation measures such as CPI have been repeatedly changed to understate inflation. Federal Reserve interest rate controls are effectively broken and stuck at or near zero for many years now. Inevitably, the rest of the world will realize we have no choice but to default on our obligations.
Cause shes fucking retarded her green new deal would make us a third world country in a fucking week
Kind of mind blowing that people exist who unironically believe this
The only thing that causes inflation is the Fed printing more money. Business and economic growth would be many time higher today if the government stopped entering trade wars and imposing regulation.
The consensus has already proven this.
>transporting money from one building to the other changes the weather.
OK kid.
>I haven't read anything about Green New Deal other than second hand on this board but here's my stupid opinion anyway
>Libtards will fight for the GND even though they know nothing bout it.
Tell me, what is the first thing that will be fixed?
Her GND is stupid and she's a fucking commie with buck teeth.
She does give me a weird boner though, she's kinda hot in her own spic way
You'd still be able to use cars and fly you know. Also no one will take away your burgers either.
kekked and checked
Except for the part where she wants to take away cars and planes. You even GND bro?
she's retarded.
lul
i don't hate her, she's just a complete idiot that thinks she knows everything. hell, even as arrogant as i am, by that age i knew that i didn't know everything.
and she's a really shitty bartender
Because she's stupider than fuck and acts like she's not.
How can we consider a guideline toward what we should strive for as definitive law? The deal is simply trying to steer us toward creating policies and laws that might help us live another couple hundred years.
I honestly can believe she's said this before
>policies and laws that might help us live another couple hundred years
Like what?
This is sourced from gp.org
We will:
1) "Invest in sustainable [locally owned] businesses..."
2) "Move to 100% clean energy by 2030." ... Here's where the confusion tends to spread. This is really saying that once we finally build an infrastructure, which each large city should already have, then we can strive toward promoting and hopefully eliminating the need for individual travel. Is it realistic? Hell no. However, in order to reach a goal we set out to achieve, sometimes we have to make the goal on one end of the spectrum to see what the ideal situation would look like.
There's more to this, if you have time, skim that link.
This quote is the confusing one actually, I forgot to include it in my last post: "...Replacing non-essential individual means of transport with high-quality and modern mass transit..."
it could be her shitty policies. or she was better in her old career as chatterer from the hell raiser series
AOC represents everything that the right hates and doesn't understand about themselves.
She is an educated liberal and a minority
She connects with similar millennials
She is feared by the right
And, most importantly, they hate her because the GOP told them to hate and ridicule her in what be a futile effort to protect themselves from more like her.
i won't be here in a couple hundred years. don't care. also not having kids. so i really dont care.
so why does pelosi and the rest hate her?
really though bro. cognitive dissonance didnt come from someone who was trying to efficately get a point across, it came from someone who had heard of it and got excited to use it lol.
lol if this is the case howcome ur first statement was all cognitive dissonance and pedantic an shit then u hit the guy back with "fck u twat me is jus smart"
>1) "Invest in sustainable [locally owned] businesses..."
What does this mean? Shop locally? It's already happening.
>2) "Move to 100% clean energy by 2030."
>100% clean energy
There's no such thing. Gasoline offers 40x-100x the energy density of Lion batteries, and we can't even keep those from catching on fire.
>build an infrastructure
For what?
>the need for individual travel
So the plan is that everyone stays at home?
>make the goal
Common rhetoric, but I don't now what this is. No one does.
>skim that link
I've read more about this shit in the last 40 years than you have by skimming some activist site. No thanks.
Then why does her own party shut her out? I don't remember Republicans doing anything to her.
>0 experience before elected
>is ruled by emotions rather than rational thought
>most of what comes out of her mouth is nonsensical at best
>somehow still massively popular despite obvious flaws
They hate her because she is the left's Trump.
Because social democrats always sell out the working class in the end, that's why we need a communist revolution in this country and not some Berniejerk.
Im not on aoc's side at all bud but its kinda not a free country if you dont have the option to leave...
I'll give you 3 and 4, but 1 and 2 aren't accurate.
Communists try to overthrow the liberals, not share a party with them and endorse them. And Stalin didn't kill 60 million people you Nazi simpleton, pic fucking related ought to put you in your place.
they hardly hate her, they're just concerned over her policy that they view as reckless to the party as she becomes a flashpoint for the GOP to rally their followers around i.e., "if you elect any Dem, then AOC will ruin America."
Nice pic, user. Also, I agree.
As if the Bae of Pigs was good at anything but knocking off Marilyn Monroe and getting shot.
she is a socialist
she says lets do this and lets do that but doesn't give any way of paying for her "progressive" ideas
sure it would be great if we could give everyone everything and welcome all immigrants into the country but it is not realistic and it would bankrupt us it's not a right wing or conservative conspiracy it's the facts I feel sorry for this country and the world for the future it doesn't look good
Build a mass transit infrastructure? For what? Mass transit is by far the most effective way to transport people. I never said that people would just stay at their home. The goal is to use mass transit over individual car travel. Think about it, moving a ton of weight to move one person vs using 10 tons of weight for 50 people (a bus). America's infrastructure is way behind the EU btw.
Also did you even see the source? That's literally what the green new deal is. Its not filtered through any news media outlet and turned into something it's not. It's up to you to use your thinking cap to actually reason through why they're doing what they're doing.
Someone post the nudes.
So, basically, Democratic Socialism looks cool, but you still get a smack to the face in the end. Got it.
Anyone else sick of the way everyone copies each others sayings? I swear to god sheep hear one person say unironically then they include it in every damn statement
that's funny. you seem like there's this line that defines socialism. Social Security, Medicare, the military, environmental policy, etc. can all be considered as socialist. She's not advocating taking over the means of production, she just wants people to have medical insurance. Just like congress enjoys.
Affirmative Action hire
1 is absolutely accurate. Aside from helping out the Bernie campaign, which doesn't fucking count because it's not political office she has 0 previous experience. And if AOC was ruled by rational thought she'd be able to string together a sentence when people ask her for details of the shit she proposes.
articulate with those teeth? My sides
Hell yeah, comrades all up in this shit.
she's the kind of person to assign a 5 page essay over christmas vacation, then not bother to read or grade them after we come back.
and let me say this about the new green deal. that was created to be a conversation starter, to spark thoughts about what we could be as a country, how we could significantly reduce our greenhouse gas production.
Is it a perfect plan? Far from it. Is it at least someone trying to ask, "what could we do to make a huge difference in this country?"
I'm sure some close people looked at it before she published it and said, "Trains, really?" But, I applaud her for taking the risk.
It's from the standard republican playbook.
1. The who be afraid of.
2. Blame them for all your ills.
3. Spins lie about "the good ol' days"
4. Tell them you will save them if they vote for you.
You know what would end carbon pollution far quicker than the Green New Deal?
Seizing the means of production.
It's okay if you're getting head from Ed in your bed! You can't control who you love, man! Stop the heterophobia.
Really though bro, cognitive dissonance is pretty common word in most people vocabulary these days.
Sorry if it doesn't "efficately" get the point across to you...
Different user.
No skin in the game. I just think it's embarrassing when halfwits try to paint superior vocabulary as a negative quality.
Because she's hateful
POST THE FUCKING DUDES.
righties S E E T H I N G
It was literally not meant to be passed. I can't believe everyone's missed the point of it, but then again I can.
Mass Transit is a subsidized failure wherever it exists. It's not fast, it's not cheap, and it's not green.
Yes, I've read all 4+ pages of the GND.
Is a superior vocabulary one that gets a point across
Its more than just that. I also believe that everyone in America should have very affordable (or free) health care. Healthcare costs and lack of coverage for all people is a disgrace. Congress should not have a plan that "regular" people can't afford. We need to stop fighting wars all over the world (many that we started).
Capitalism is what made this country and continues to keep this country the economic powerhouse that it is. We also need to provide better retirement living to our elders we shouldn't have any poor people in this country but a the "system" is broken. Families being on welfare for generations is a problem... I can go on and on
I took it as comparisons to Trump. If your greentext is AOC, then yes.
Wow
You're retarded.
>carbon pollution
i typically agree, but there are great examples of successful mass transit. London and New York couldn't exist without it.
CA high speed rail? Idiotic. Extending BART and electrifying CalTrain? Better. Replacing all mass transit with self-driving pods that are summoned based on demand? Now we're talking.
But... that would mean... the government taxes itself... with the money from the proletariat?
Nope.
I call it a superior vocabulary when some simpleton is accusing you of using "big words to sound smart".
Obviously your vocabulary is superior to theirs or they wouldn't be such an insecure little bitch about it.
yeah, so many issues. just be glad we're not India - that's poverty on a whole different scale.
I agree that we spend too much on the military - but we do have emerging threats such as China.
That's the embarassing thing about these threads. Someone finally stands up for healthcare available for all and she gets shat on. Almost certainly by people with poor or non-existent healthcare that would benefit from her policies.
>London and New York couldn't exist without it.
They could, and their taxes would be cheaper because of it. These places only have Metro because of traffic and housing density, not because it's cheap.
No one hates her here. You'll be getting all kinds of constructive criticism about this young Congresswoman, though.
Wait what's wrong with highspeed rail? It's better in literally every way.
no, they couldn't. obviously, you haven't been there.
>BART
>CalTrain
Both of there hemorrhage money and are very inefficient. If the taxpayers didn't pay for them they would be nonexistent and no one would notice.
she is the libtard version of trump
She has no real plan. Like she wants to get rid of airplanes, but has no idea how to replace them, affordability and quickly.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Traffic is at gridlock levels now during rush. The working population couldn't get into manhattan in the morning without the subway.
Did you read what I said? I've been to NY, not London. They exist because the city's fucked with traffic, not because it's cheap or green. They all operate at a net loss.
IT'S NOT BECAUSE IT'S CHEAP OR CLEAN, IT'S BECAUSE THE CITY IS CHOKED UP.
Fuck dudes... Nothing to do with saving the air or carbon or money or green shit. Dammit man.
you're so retarded it's cute. notice how the picture says russia and not the soviet union little retard?
That's because most of the killing happened in the other soviet block states like Ukraine.
how is high-speed rail better? it encourages suburban sprawl and isn't competitve past 200 miles vs airlines or driving.
For example, in CA we have the I5 that stretches from SoCal to NorCal. They want to build high-speed rail. tickets cost $100+ round trip. How does that work for a family of 5? And, what does that family do when they get to their destination via train? Rent a car! Business people will fly and pay a little more.
Finally, if you think trains reduce threats of terrorism, consider hundreds or thousands of miles of high-speed rail tracks that need to be protected.
It's both. Public transit is 10x or more energy efficient than cars. Also the city wouldn't function without it. You can't build enough roads to Manhattan to support the population that moves in and out of it every day. Literally 4 million people enter and exit during rush.
Don't take the piss out of free shit. When the robots take over the work (in about 10 years) not having free shit will only be for the most cringe and bluepilled types...
Yes, because the state and the economy would be in the hands of the proletariat. It's not in the proletariat's interest for the Earth to fry, so it won't. Leave the state and economy in the hands of the bourgeoisie and it will.
>$100+ round trip
Norcalfag here.
That was their estimate back when the projected cost was something like 2 billion. Then they added a bunch of stops so SF to Bakersfield was now like 8 hours. Then they revealed it was not high-speed, but regular-speed, and the cost went up to over 10 billion. Now it's dead in the dirt (thank god) with no recourse for taxpayers all over the country.
Now I understand hipsters
i don't disagree. But, BART is relatively effective with strong ridership. But, we do need to figure out how to make it more effective. All mass transit is based on century old designs. We need to re-think these existing right-of-ways to become flexible and autonomous.
>Public transit is 10x or more energy efficient
Is that why it's always broke? How is taking half your passengers twice the average distance efficient?
>the city wouldn't function without it
Fucking hell man. That is a local traffic problem. That is the only thing it allieves. Not electricity or whatever. Nothing to do with glaciers and shit.
Now I'm not sure if you missed my /sarc or if I'm missing yours...
your statement doesn't make sense. mass transit allows those cities to exist just like police and firefighters are required. would you spend a dime to get thosands of dollars of tax revenue? of course you would. Light rail in San Jose? You could probably stop it today and only low income people would be impacted. And, if you're part of the GOP, we already know how you feel about low income folks.
POST THE FUCKING NUDES.
I... I can't keep going. You fags are too retarded. Mass transit is and always will be broke. Period. It's too inefficient and slow and restricted. You guys keep going like, "Socialism, we just need to do it better, but with trains." It will never work.
She deserves death
it saddens me to know people think this moron is intelligent in any manor, someone who doesn't even know what a garbage disposal is "intelligent"? fuck me....
But they don't make any money! And what does it have to do with the climate?
You dipshits are gonna make me anhero. Did your parents have any children that lived?
>And, if you're part of the GOP, we already know how you feel about low income folks.
How do I feel about low income folks?
It's not always broken, I take it to work everyday, it's 2x-3x faster than taking a car. You have no idea what you're talking about, just stop.
It should also be obvious why 8 train cars carrying 800 people emits fewer emissions than 800 cars.
except the part they're building from Fresno...anyway, high speed rail doesn't work in CA because the infrastructure isn't there at the destination points due to geographic distance.
Exactly. Well, the voters see that, not the Democrats.
nicely constructed argument...sorry you can't keep up.
us pop 1920 - 106,021,537
us pop 1950 - 151,325,798
manor manner
ahh so that's why people listen to her, i see she has huge... brains... i was wrong all along.
Yes, I am sure it's quicker than a car - now stay with me - but it's an expensive alternative to alleviate traffic. That's all.
If there was no traffic, a car would be your quickest, cheapest, cleanest method of travel. Just like the rest of the country.
please eliminate your gene pool...
>If there was no traffic
Good to see we're living in hypothetical land instead of the most densely populated urban areas on the planet. Nobody gives a fuck if a car is more efficient in Nowhere, Ohio.
disruptor in short
No, it's because you can travel the same distance for a fraction of the price, or pay a little more and take a plane and get there in a fraction of the time. The 1900s Caliphornia train offers zero advantages.
i think we're in violent agreement. previous poster said, "high speed rail is dead in CA" and they're still wasting money on it.
Because she is a millennial who learns things solely from Google on-the-fly. She probably read "how to be a senator for dummies". Her skin color has nothing to do with her hatedness, other than the Democrats in power who "chose" her and promoted her. She's not black and she is not a person of color, she is Hispanic. If that was the case, then Italians are people of color. She probably read headlines and not the articles and she believes everything she reads.
in any MANOR as in no matter what estate shes in she's the DUMBEST IN THE FUCKIN MANOR stop exposing yourself
What part of a city reducing traffic by taxing the residents to support a metro system is equivalent to saving the planet?
vagina
giggle. r u trolling?
COW FARTS ARE KILLING THE PLANET!!!!!
It reduces emissions by putting people in a single digit number of train cars instead of hundreds of cars. You're literally too stupid to be alive.
You mean "feared". With muriKKKans it's hard to tell the difference.
we responded to the idea that "ALL" mass transit was losing money and useless. and, it reduces emissions from the only other viable alternative
No. It doesn't. It's the next best thing to driving a car. If it were cheap and effective, there would be no cars at all. You're literally too stupid to be alive.
Exactly! She is the "make it there by bravado and no substance" candidate.
She's dumb as a potato.
>"ALL" mass transit was losing money
It does
>it reduces emissions from the only other viable alternative
Running trains, busses, and subways 24/7 is cleaner that someone driving a car for 20 minutes?
Again, it alleviates traffic. That's all. There are no other benefits.
Amanda Wenk!
you've got to separate yourself from extremes - you seem to think everything is black and white.
tough competition
He's some dumb kid in the middle of the country who has never ridden mass transit baiting for (you)s
>hasn't done anything
>feared
If I did that I would literally not be able to think.
i guess i just can't grasp the point you're trying to make. many cities couldn't exist without mass transit.
You're being trolled
What extremes? So far the argument has been "My city has metro, that makes it clean."
And then these other fags follow your foolishness.
I don't know if I can put it more simply:
- AOC thinks trains are cheap and save the envoronment.
- I say they have nothing to do with the environment, they just alleviate traffic at the taxpayer's expense.
- You guys say trains are quicker than driving in crowded cities and "you're retarded". I'm not arguing that point. That was never the point.
he's pretty effective at it, staying right on the margin of logic. well done, sir troll.
I mean it's kind of sad getting your jollies from pretending to being a retard on the internet, but yes, job well done
The environmental benefits are well studied, fuck off retard transit.dot.gov
How did you niggers pass the captcha?
Not reading your activist blog. Probably some Trump collusion.
If trains and buses and subways are such a fast, cheap, and clean mode of transportation, why hasn't everyone jumped on board? I take it because everyone but NY and SF is retarded.
She dum
I don’t hate her. I think she’s awesome!
How does being Puerto Rican make her a wetback? You can’t even get your racist terms right.
She’s awesome!!!
She needs to be told when when not to clap when the President speaks.
>she’s awesome
at what?
Yea Forums gold account
Same way honkeys can be niggers and spics can be white trash. Where u been?
It wasn’t too far to move.
It was always right there.
She is fucking retard.
>Yea Forums capitalism
ftfy
because i want her to piss in my mouth & i know she wont
>couldnt get their wall
>500 miles being built
it's lo-info clowns like you that are gonna give us another 4 years of that asshole. wise up.
Because you keep making threads about her.
Because she now controls legislation and talks to powerful men like she's an equal when she's really just a retarded ex-bartender.
Shes a girl from Westchester who underperformed in everything she ever did. 90% of her tweets are false (not even bias...just blatantly based on WRONG info). She's an over-hyped cunt from middle-upper class suburbs acting like she's your friend.
I don't give fcuk about her horse smile but 'communist' that's fcuking retard and dumb shit. She needs to die.
>t. virgin
I'm married m8. I know a pushup bra when I see one. Stop whiteknighting a donkey faced idiot.
Better at Twitter...yea, thats the qualification retards like you look for when voting. Soundbites is the sport of libtards
Nah, this is the left's Trump
en.m.wikipedia.org
AOC is controversial. I agree with most of her ideas, they could work at a nationwide scale. Sawant is an activist imbecile who has accomplished nothing.
kek
>taught america to hate
>moved on to racism
You're not mad at Trump, you're mad at your dad.
>they could work at a nationwide scale
Name one...
Just listen to her talk, you fucking moron.
Because she's ignorant, catastrophically stupid, and a communist.
Any have that creep shot pic of her ass?
Besides Bernie, she's the most popular politician in America. If she is hated, it's just a few fringe groups.
What the fuck are you smoking?
WWI was started by Empires
WWII was started by the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany (Nazis), Imperial Japan, and Italian Fascists.
Jesus Fucking Christ we need to euthanize fucking Stalinists.
as reflected in her 20 something approval in the fucking district that elected her. jesus dude, try harder. she's a 2 and gone. unfortunately, she will reap the benefits of a former congressman the rest of her sorry ass life
maga faga's need to have an enemy. a face they can hate. not so hard to figure out/
NO, not a supporter of her, or most of her policies.
because she's as dumb as you are
Because about 1/3 of Americans are uneducated morons who don’t understand that her policies are to help them. Thank you Southern “education” and homeschooling
>taking my money and giving it to Tyrone, pedro, and Hassan
Fuck off liberal scum
because she being ignored as she should be and she's picking and screaming over it. so it becomes annoying
name one that will help
this will be hilarious because if it does happen people will realize that the means of production are protected by very expensive and numerous weapons. It will be a good way to lower the population once the military comes to shut you down. Communists think theres going to be like 300million people in their cause but they would be lucky to reach 100,000 depressed coke adicts around the world
>How does being Puerto Rican make her a wetback?
racists, like trumpies, don't "know" anything.
They just repeat the words their leader tells them.
"fake news"
Everyone has, you fuckwit.
he writes those books because not everyone is an economist or has been to university and gotten a degree in economics. and if you are to debate topics that pertain to economics, it is your obligation to understand its in's and out's. as for how everyone is dumbed down are retarded, yes; the niggers and mexicans are lowering the national average iq- not to mention the "feel the bern" highschool dropouts
>calls people trumpies
>accusing people of parroting
go to bed
youre both embarrassing yourselves with that vile shit. how shameful of you both
just like trump
>transit.dot.gov
>activist blog
Dude, quit eating paint chips.
no u
they kinda are
thats why i left NYC
great place, but you gotta leave before you become one of them
Putting buttplugs in cows to reduce emissions
so tax the rich to pay for buttplugs?
I dont hate her. I hate the white males with glasses who worship her.
Anyone considered shes basically the left-wing Trump?
Incels calling other people incels. I hate white males like you.
I'd like to see her with a buttplug in. Also, while on her knees with ten big dicks gangbanging her throat.
You're all about that BBC, huh user?
Well I didn't specify that, but I'd like to see that too. I'd say 5 black guys, 5 white. All with huge dicks and big balls that need to release their love juice all over her face.
gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
Because she is easy to hate.