CIRCUMCISION - Why do Americans love it?
CIRCUMCISION - Why do Americans love it?
IT'S "HYGIENIC"
Wish I hadn’t been. Statistically uncircumcised penis’s are slightly larger in average. Makes sense. You don’t have to recover from a major penis injury first thing after you’re born. Like “welcome to earth!, alright now we are gonna scar your dick for life!l”
pee pee no have stretchy coat
somthing, somthing... the jews
Because we got tricked into making it normal.
Kellogg, lingering puritan background, "masturbation is evil, genitals are bad and dirty", military helping normalize it (which is why it's a thing in South Korea too)
Basically a retarded bunch of bullshit and most of them can't admit to themselves it's a mutilation because admitting you're a victim kinda sucks
I kek’d hard
Because Americunts are all secretly jews and muslims.
Nothing how to bathe is a great skill.
At this point I think it's just a money-making scheme for pediatricians. At least in America where its done to mostly non-Jewish or Muslim boys, both of whom are snipped because of the religion.
The Kellogg's cereal guy famously hated the concept of sex, or sexual pleasure. He saw sexual intercourse as a necessary evil that should be performed only for the continued survival of the human species, and even then he was disgusted at the idea. It's rumoured he never had sex with his wife. I believe all of his children were adopted. One day he realised that amputating the most pleasurable part of the male body would probably decrease the amount of people having sex for fun, and it'd definitely make masturbation harder. He somehow managed to convince the American public to follow his insane plan. Now childhood genital mutilation is routine in America, and you get called an anti-semite for disliking that fact.
Americans are fucking insane.
Because we aren't a third world country. Because women laugh at uncut losers. They don't even make porn movies with uncircumcised men. Porn actresses won't sleep with the dick cheese. And that's saying something when whores won't touch the stank cock.
Salty.
I think it's more about power, and about making men into atomized slaves who serve their masters without concern about themselves individually or collectively.
When my son was born. When they took him away to get circ'd they brought him back and said to have a urologist do it because the foreskin wasnt formed all the way around.
Still charged for circ when the bill came.
>Because we aren't a third world country.
Hummmm....
Land of the free.
Not allowed the freedom to have your own penis mutilated before you're old enough to do anything about it.
Ridiculous country.
It may also have something to do with an awkward attitude many parents would feel about having to pull back the foreskin of the baby when bathing him. A throwback to the puritans' mentality, probably.
No wonder they're the biggest market for cuckold, femboy, sissy, trap and all other degenerate porn. Also this only contributes to the 'muh gender choice' bullshit. Having your sexual organs mutilated from childhood causes these types of deviant minds.
that's just more american retardery, you're not supposed to pull back baby foreskin, it's adhered to the glans until further on in childhood, up to the start of puberty. Forcing it back is what causes infections and phimosis later in life. There's no education here for this shit
I'm not a native American. I moved to the states when I was 6. Circumcision is definitely an American thing.
No, dick cheese isn't a thing unless you're a disgusting slob that doesn't wash. Sex is fine, and no, the extra skin isn't a nuisance.
I bet 90 % cut guys would not do it if you had to wait till you're 18 years old.
no fucking way is anyone coming at me with a knife to cut MY pee pee!
Jews
I didn't know you weren't supposed to retract it, but then again I've not had kids yet, but you're right.
I remember my dad one day showing me how to wash myself, but I was around 10.
Because an uncut cock looks like shit.
Females prefer cut. Have you ever seen a dildo which looks uncut?
>Have you ever seen a dildo which looks uncut?
yes, there are tons of them. Any dildo with a ridge behind the head is modeled after the retracted ridged band of an intact male. Have you ever scene a dildo with a circumcision scar on it?
>scene
seen, obviously
kek
Your cock is ugly, lamprey dick.
>Have you ever seen a dildo which looks uncut?
Not until now when I looked for one.
In any case, when you're uncut, the act of fucking naturally pulls back the foreskin.
>They don't even make porn movies with uncircumcised men
lmao what? Have you watched any porn in the last ten years? Intact guys are all over the place now. I swear it's like cutfags don't even know foreskin retracts
>no argument
nice one
Ive had more woman that react in a positive way to my foreskin than negative as long as you take care of it like anything else it looks fine. I will admit though uncut dicks look worse when flaccid
So you can get to the good part quicker just like that banana, noone wants to eat the peel dumb ass
>they pay for it
>the foreskin is then sold to cosmetics labs to test new products
of course [[[they]]] would encourage it
This. And sex is also "oh so much more" pleasurable.
OY VEY! IT'S BECAWZ DA JOOZ ARE GAWD'S CHOSEN!
Intact.
The word you're looking for isn't "uncircumcised," but "intact."
Calling an intact penis uncircumcised is like calling someone with legs unamputated.
South america is still vastly religious and circumsicion is a common thing performed by surgeons
I can't imagine why Americans are the only culture to modify a part of their body. No other cultures have tattoos, piercings, etc... No other cultures cut off GIRLS genitals at birth... Just Americans and boys and circumcision. This is the only example of this thing in any culture anywhere. Let's single it out.
intact is what you call a dog who hasn't been neutered, you fucking moron. holy fucking lol
by your own logic that you fail to apply to your own suggestion of "intact" you should just call it a Penis. Theres no reason to have a modifying word in front of it when it isn't modified. you just argued that yourself by saying the opposite word is wrong.
u jelly cutfags??
It's not just that, but I think it's like a 6-8 week healing process and you can't get a boner or you risk rupturing the stitches. What kind of grown man would go through that?
These threads really make me wonder what the percentage of uncut vs cut are commenting. It 'seems' like it's mostly uncut people either pretending to be cut and agreeing with other uncut people or just uncut people spouting their mouth to try and make themselves feel better.
Yes, circumcision does have downsides but most of them are from complications of the circumcision and nothing more.
Uncircumcised dicks have many more negative implications. Excess skin, damaged, sub-glans skin, increased risk of PPP, increased risk of STDs due to trapping bacteria/viruses in a moist environment, and quite a few more things.
I'm glad I was circumcised as a baby as I never would have done it as an adult unless it were necessary due to reduced effectiveness of natural healing because of age... but that's the only reason.
Your autism is showing. Using the word intact is ambiguous.
>Let's single it out.
Don't be that faggot
your insecurity is showing in your need for approval here buddy, you're not helping our argument.
either these are done to consenting adult or seen as barbaric by basically everyone
You know, I'm uncut so I wouldn't know what sex with a desensitized tip would feel like.
>risk of PPP
>risk
"oh no my dick has vestigial spikes made for pleasure"
and culture is culture, so unless you're in that culture, your point doesnt matter.
K.
Intact in place of uncircumcised. I thought you jew kikes were supposed to be smart.
>vestigial
Yea, no. PPP are a type of sebaceous cyst.
americans have no real culture
well, the natives did, and you sure showed them.
>or just uncut people spouting their mouth to try and make themselves feel better.
I'm uncut, but this isn't about me feeling better or making cut guys feeling bad.
It's just a discussion to try and get people to stop doing it to their boys.
> Uncircumcised dicks have many more negative implications.
Most studies related to that are biased of show so minute differences that should be disregarded.
Also, if you have basic hygiene, nothing bad will happen to you.
If the foreskin were unnecessary, we wouldn't have it.
Like nothing (i believe, obviously), coz most of the sensation would be like that of the shaft.
As all uncuts know prolonging the sensation in the tip is the key to increased pleasure.
Going slow is more fun than going at it like a jackhammer. Something that comes naturally.
there's a few theories around about PPP, one of the popular ones is that they're a less extreme form of the spikes cats have on their dicks
The human body has quite a few unnecessary parts left over from our evolutionary path, our dicks are no exception. That's not to say that foreskin is useless but it most definitely isn't required.
Yea, I've read a bunch of them. Our penises have sebaceous glands on the coronal ridge that can become blocked for various reasons resulting in PPP. They're common but aren't 'normal' as they're a dysfunction.
In all seriousness, the foreskin is VERY sensitive. On blowjobs, if the girls bites it gently it's almost impossible not to cum. Had that happen to me couple of times.
>It's just a discussion to try and get people to stop doing it to their boys.
it used to be a discussion solely to troll Americans damnit.
I'm okay with circumcision. The amount of adult males who aren't capable of taking 10 seconds to wash their dicks is a serious concern.
What you don't understand is that one unclean dick can cause extreme health risks to a women's vagina.
>tfw jews mutilated my dick
are they ever going to stop chopping up baby dicks?
>that one unclean dick can cause extreme health risks
cut or uncut.
I'm cut and my cock is 8 inches from base to tip (7 inch shaft so still above average) during sex I last on average about 45 minutes to an hour. My girlfriend's ex was uncut and she said he only lasted at most 5 minutes.
Not exactly sure what you're trying to show me here.
> The foreskin is a natural organ that all mammals are born with, and benefit in keeping for a lifetime.
The foreskin is not an organ. It may be skin, which is an organ, but that doesn't mean anything that has skin can be individually labeled as an organ.
Humans are the only animal who has an actual foreskin. Other animals have sheaths which are fundamentally different but serve a similar purpose of protecting the penis.
That "Intact = Don't Retract" section makes absolutely no sense. I thought maybe they were talking about babies but then they talk about the guy doing it himself while calling him a "young man".
>My girlfriend's ex was uncut and she said he only lasted at most 5 minutes.
could be anxiety or whatever.
Propaganda mostly people sort of just do as they are told
If you are not Jewish their is zero reason to circumcise your kids
a young boy will know the limit, he will feel it. at the correct time in his development it can be done without trauma. it's an instinctive thing.
the foreskin IS an organ
no idea why you would bring up animal penile. makes no sense
i'm sorry that jews tricked your parents into cutting off the part of your dick that gives you sensitivity. hopefully you'll be able to admit it to yourself one day
> no idea why you would bring up animal penile. makes no sense
How does it make no sense? The image I replied to literally talks about other mammals.
> the foreskin IS an organ
Feel free to Google the definition of organ.
> a young boy will know the limit
What do you mean by this? Are you saying that other non-doctors will be playing with little boy penises? Because the foreskin completely separates by age 6.
Do you let people chomp off your dick too you mutilated manbaby? Because dicks and bananas are obviously the same? With the amount of feeling you cutfags have left in your keratin covered sandpaper sausages that some rabbi happily licked the blood from, I'm not surprised that you would confuse your dick for a banana.
Circumcision practices belong to communities with low personal hygene and tribal spiritual believes. If you wash yourself properly on a daily basis you don't need to justify being a fucking barbarian by cutting a piece of flesh from someone else. The foreskin is a protective layer to shield your tip, much like an eyelid. You don't remove your eyelids to avoid that morning dirt in your eyes, you fucking wash them.
So you're such a cuck you're gonna mutilate your dick to impress chicks? holy fuck what a loser
Jews. It’s as simple as that.
This. The foreskin protects the glands until maturity. They are literally fused together the first 8-10 years of a man’s life.
Because the guy who invented corn flakes to make you poop in the morning was the founder of the NoFap™ movement. He advocated cutting the dicks of little boys without anesthesia to stop masturbating. If that didn't work he advocated slipping the foreskin up and suturing it closed with a silver wire to stop erections. He also wanted girls clits to be burned with phenol.
So all totally valid and sane reasons..
*6
Can you explain how?