ITT: Most useless amendments

ITT: Most useless amendments

Attached: 2nd.png (561x958, 580K)

The ones that let Monkeys and women vote.

but we didn't win Vietnam or Afghanistan

Question is...who is gonna do all those things you claim will just be there if the gov goes off the deep end. Some weird black op proxy army? Yea probably looking 80% "desertion" with gear being taken. Sorry shit ain't gonna fly, refuel, shoot, reload itself......

Attached: 1468942341342.jpg (480x598, 35K)

Because no tyrannical government

Anything tyrannical would have won those wars.

Attached: kh.jpg (968x681, 82K)

You do realize that if there was a real revolution, the military would break up and pick sides too right?

you're the most useless amendment, retard

This.

Op argument overestimates the willingness of the military to murder their own countrymen.

it's just feeding the dumbs.

Attached: Vietcong1968.jpg (220x331, 26K)

This is true, we should all give up our weapons and let the government fuck us in the ass.

you already get fucked and you say thanks you like the good patriot you are.

The population lost. We bombed those people into the stone age and all the population of those countries had to do was walk forward and they didn't.

maybe you dont live in an area with psychopath sorcerers and schizophrenic, delusional and gay people running rampant, but the threat of violence for self defense keeps a lot of people in check.

Attached: 1537048396876.jpg (1024x1019, 301K)

Good luck taking the guns away from the blacks you Jim Crow lover.

>psychopath sorcerers and schizophrenic, delusional and gay people running rampant

lets give them easy access to guns, sound awesome

my state has some of the toughest gun laws, hence why they use psychotic mind games and shit as their weapon of choice.
faggot

Attached: 1518327306401.jpg (318x350, 30K)

Source?

like the navy, nukes or fighter jets would be involved in a civil war that would be comprised of mainly door to door combat. try not to be so stupid in the future, op

And bring their toys with them, naturally.
But until then, at least you've got a Constitutionally protected* right to own a gun
*offer not valid in any state with common sense

Attached: 1.jpg (534x514, 39K)

Attached: Boring.jpg (793x724, 226K)

mercs from middle east

you will never survive in tiny holes in the ground. you don't have jungle to hide. your surviving is based on the supermarket. you will not stand for 3 month.

Let me just 'shoot' this thread down.
West Yuropoors can't understand because their minority and crime problem isn't like ours.
>Guns cause crime
Minorities and psychopaths cause crime.

Attached: Guns.jpg (960x524, 63K)

>Americans
>tiny holes in the ground
pick one

Attached: amerimutts.png (960x540, 773K)

You're right. the biggest crimes in the last 75 years have been committed by US Americans.

british neets are the fucking neetest boi

correct

Attached: D6IF5qkW4AAKZu_.jpg (640x595, 111K)

And your argument is what?

SOME FOLKS ARE BORN...

MADE TO WAVE THE FLAG...

Imagine being this pathetic you're still trying to disarm the wisdom of the founding fathers

Poland?
Bahahaha!

someone forgot japan 1945

13th amendment is the most useless amendment.

Right...let's ask Venezuela how that's turning out. Fucking moron.

OOOOOOO RED WHITE AND BLUE

There are plenty of forests, mountains, deserts, jungles, swamps, and any ecosystem you can think of in America. The military here wouldn't go against the civilians unless they were leftists

they are training them to be more ready to do so with at least as of now unknown results.

pre modern warfare, guns were around 80-90% accurate, but only hit 10-20% of the time, not because the guns where shit, but because people were VERY hesitant to kill other people. so we got to training them to shoot first think later, and that's how modern soldiers are fucking brutally efficient.

however, if you make one side the other, like lets say the west and east coast, or city dwellers and country folk, you have a rift that could get them to act.

you ban guns, the murder rate goes up, the violence rate goes up.

the only thing keeping many people in check is there are 300 million guns in civilian hands, and you don't know where they are.

lol

>then in what meaningful sense is your life valuable?

so a life without guns is not valuable. phew
US americans are delusional and proud of it

governments have gone off the deep end and the military has readily followed and obeyed the orders of tyrants in the past.

Its asking how is something valuable not worth protecting

Attached: gunz2.jpg (1354x406, 117K)

personally, look at australia and uk which had their rates significantly jump and it took 10 years and a global trend to less violence before they could declare the policies a 'success' because the crime rate went lower then when they had guns.

the situation is just completely fucked up over there.
here in germany (inb4 muh refugees) barely anyone has guns. i know like 3 people, ones a cop and two are hunters.
shits fucked for you guys tho. every nigger and his uncles running around with a fucking AR-15.
good luck with that.

>>Translational
>>Ok the argument is full proof but fuck you it stands in the way of enslaving you

Now imagine if you weren't a pussy and actually fought back against the invading savages and your all powerful nobility pretending to be a modern government