Name ONE WAY capitalism is better than socialism. One. I'll fucking wait

Capitalism got humanity to the Moon. Socialism got people to look at capitalists going to the Moon.

Name a single example of a functioning Socialist state.
By the way
Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are not Socialist, they are Neoliberal Capitalist Social Democracy, which even have lower corporate and estate tax rates than the United States does, in some cases even over half of what the US has for its rates.
Now, give me your wonderful functioning example.

The USSR was communist you fucking idiot

there is food

Guess who didn't land on the moon?

/thread

Now can someone show me some dead famous people? A new one for me today was Chris Farley, but I'd really like to see Hitler or Cobain.

as if going to the moon was/is an important step
it was just a massive waste of time and resources

take the goldpill and become free market capitalist user

Attached: image.jpg (1024x702, 135K)

You're right. I don't care about my child walking so I won't teach him to roll, sit, or crawl. Gosh, I'm so stupid.

Nasa was funded by the government. It wasn’t a capitalist foundation

Name one successful socialist county. One. I'll fucking wait

The USSR was an attempt at Authoritarian Socialism.
It was ideologically Communist, but in practice, never reached Communism, because Communism in theory requires the abolition of the state.
The issue is that Socialism itself isn’t even possible based on the concept of human variability in emotion, and prioritization based on greed. Humans prioritize themselves and their immediate family and peers over their country and countrymen by nature. On the calculation error, binary systems of approval cannot work in a market, because a market isn’t binary, it’s driven by impulse and emotion, and cannot be driven by necessity since human necessity is in itself weaker than human desire.

Oh look, it's another (((paid shill))) and/or 1st semester never-lived-in-real-life college student!

You still haven’t named one way capitalism is somehow better.

Dubz of truth

Capitalist countrys dont devolve into complete shitholes or end up killing millions of their citizens

That worked with 400,000 workers who did R&D and procduction from 100s of PRIVATE firms. The private sector made the moon landing happen. Don't even start with your bullshit, I've forgotten more about the Apollo program than you'll ever know. I'll utterly demolish you with facts and figures.

Get the fuck out of here commie. Only trhe lazy and the young want socialism, because they are too weak and afraid to be their own responsible adults. You fear capitalism, because you might fail. You're afraid to live, so you die in your socialist playpen. You're pathetic.

Instead they just kill other citizens in other countries. Also, pretty sure the US bombed its own cities, so......

>implying the US didn’t go to the moon just to beat the USSR at it

Without the threat of an October Sky, the US would’ve never gone to the moon. Or at the very least, they never would’ve gone to the moon anywhere near the time the soviets put a man in space.

When? Also bombing its own cities isn't the same as killing tens of millions of people. Another thing, acting like socialist countries dont go to war.

Name a single instance in which the United States “bombed its own cities”.
Also, you act as if Capitalism implicitly promotes violence, it would be moronic for any person indulging in Laisez-Faire Capitalism to indulge in violence in relation to possible potentional consumer-bases.
The reason why the United States as a nation is attacking other nations, is for the benefit of other nations who have requested these things to occur, primarily Israel, and for Globalist policy to be touted and for American Iron Fist mentality to be upheld, most Capitalists are against this, especially given that the government has effectively destroyed or damaged a possible international market opportunity (because mind you, morons such as yourself seem to believe that Capitalism is some sort of systemic concept rather than an evolution of bartering philosophy on a larger scale, ie markets)

Knight to King 7, checkmate.

First reply with dubs and ignored

Fully stocked shops

Philadelphia in the 70’s for one. Also, capitalism inherently promotes violence when we allow fracking, waste disposal into our water supplies, deforestation, low wages ect all in the name of free-market competition.

The capitalists running the oil companies fucking loooooove the violence America is committing against countries like Iraq and Venezuela. Iliminating governments with nationalized oil industries is the classic American way

Also random OP on Yea Forums go on Chapo

No bread lines, no mass executions.

>Capitalist running Oil Companies
Lobbying is not Capitalism, explicitly speaking, Lobbying would be outright banned in a Laissez-Faire economics driven nation, because of the very basic fact that it drives government preference and introduces subsidy which naturally creates inflation.
Also, Venezuela has never been under attack, it’s collapsing on its own, it cannot sustain the policy that it pushes, because a nation which is 90 percent reliant on its Oil exports is bound to fail if its policies are explicitly anti-capitalist or less market driven.
Also, Iraq being invaded was heavily promoted by Israel, which has the only lobbying group in the United States, and that lobbying group has undeniable power in Congress and its decisions.
I oppose Lobbying, since Lobbying is implicitly anti-capitalist, and if anything lobbying was spawned from Socialist concepts, specifically from Unions and Syndicates wanting a dedicated means by which to communicate their ills through lobbying groups.
Try harder.

>dubs
>gives exactly what OP asked
>no reply

Attached: 1515298418589.jpg (241x210, 15K)

The US has done nothing to Venezuela as a country, your cognitive dissonance is showing. The only thing the US did was direct targeted financial punishments to individuals in the Venezuela govt. who were breaking international law. You drink so much MSM koolaid you are blind drunk to what actually happened. You can't even start from a point of reality so why do you think your argument holds any water?

You're sunk, communist. Just like Venezuela, under the weight of its own lies.

> t.

Attached: A53KbeG_d.jpg (640x816, 77K)

20 chicken nuggs $4!

In 1985 the police of the city of Philadelphia dropped a bomb on a house that was home to the black liberation group MOVE, killing 11 members of the organization including 5 children. The rest of your post is also not correct, but this is probably what the person was referring to.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOVE#1985_bombing

mashable.com/2016/01/10/1985-move-bombing/

npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/05/18/407665820/why-did-we-forget-the-move-bombing

Fracking isn't even bad really

Also, expanding on my previous post.
Saying that individual capitalists enjoying the success of lobbying (a government practice which is anti-capitalist by its very nature to rig the game) is endemic to Capitalism, or that Capitalism is to blame, is like saying that you refuse to drink Water because water has been used for torture methods like waterboarding.
Your disdain is with people playing the game rather than the game itself, and to claim that the game is at fault because players managed to force the DM to change the rules for them and to rig it in their favor, should be something you should be taking up with the DM and with the players who pushed the DM to rig for them.

>Bombing a known terrorist organizations headquarters is comparable to bombing a city.
Also, i love how you claim the rest of my post is incorrect while providing no argument or citations to back that claim up.
Very good, let me suggest a few things
1. Go back to or as you like to call it, leftypol
2. Neck yourself

imma bout to end this whole thread. The United States is both, but more on the capitalist side. We still have the every man for himself rule, but we also have socialsm stuff like medicare or medicaid. Basically, everyone has to do their own work and they can get whatever they want with their reward, but if you actually can't work like if the economy is in a recession or you're on workers compensation, then you will get help from the government.

Not really, most technological processes are made by non-profit institutions, while capitalist research does very little, because it's to expensive and not very effective if you can't share your results with others

more people are incentivised to be more productive and innovative. costs that are controlled by supply/demand prevents shortages of scarce goods/resources/services.

they (generally) have much higher income tax which you conveniently left out.

Guys. Can we just agree that with the current human mindset of greed and selfishness both systems turn into shit? If that mindset would change we probably wouldnt even need a system at all...

Found the Liberal, time to perish

Attached: 4L_ZOtyc2Mq.jpg (453x604, 64K)

then why bother responding to a political thread, its just gonna be shitters yelling at shitters, theres really no point.

dont forget tulsa, oklahoma when the us army bombed black wall street

>human mindset of greed and selfishness
kill people with this mindset and others will live happily ever after in socialism

>conveniently
Yes, a higher income tax across the board, one where low income brackets including those nearing poverty level pay up to 60 percent of their income.
When referring to Capitalism, you refer to the market, having incomes taxes to cover social services doesn’t make your nation socialist, because social services is not what socialism is.
Socialism is defined as workers ownership over the means of production by proxy of a government entity, whether the socialism is authoritarian or democratic in nature, that basic premise must be met for socialism to exist.
As such, none of the scandinavian countries are Socialist, and instead are highly capitalist, considering they have the easist accesibility to the market, and rank amongst the top 30 for laisez-faire market policy.

Niggers have a hard time.

implying socialists arent engaging in thinly veiled greed and envy regarding people making more money than they do.

kill these too and others will prosper

>Tulsa
Law Enforcement of Tulsa (which barely participated) and an Angry mob of private citizens is not the United States Goverment, and so that example is moronic, since you claimed that “The United States bombed its own cities”, and not “Private Citizens who had a riot, who we’re then stopped by the Tulsa Police Department, which used bombs on both sides”