Which do you prefer? i see both used all the time; it seems like everyone has their own personal favorite

Which do you prefer? i see both used all the time; it seems like everyone has their own personal favorite

Attached: cssc.jpg (124x141, 5K)

Attached: 1wSidHZ.jpg (720x720, 29K)

Exactly

your are is the gentleman's choice

Attached: banana fistbumpnana.png (516x526, 276K)

Fucking dumbass. It isn't a matter of opinion.

I prefer you're but I try to use your because it's proper english.

thou art
Fat-kidneyed rascall, learn to speak properly.

Its not?

It isn't a matter of opinion.. You are, and you're are the same, but your is something else..

your a faggot

Attached: businessdrunk.jpg (413x395, 61K)

your are a faggot

Attached: 1484685929531.jpg (811x589, 53K)

your
could of
than

>Your're isn't an option
Clearly a retard

it isn't, your doesn't mean you are.

youre are're

im a fan of both of those before they started getting talked about. they put in a lot of work with minimal letters required

Hey, fools!

I want to murder everyone that uses could of, should of or would of. Your/you're is almost excusable but should of is just plain illiterate.

U’r

You're a faggot if you don't exclusively use you're

Exclusively? You're philosophy has some holes.