Vintage versus Contemporary:

Vintage versus Contemporary:
I saw some vintage porn recently, and I was struck by
how much more attractive the girls were then. What happened?

Attached: vintage-746.webm (640x448, 1.95M)

Less race mixing
Less inflammatory diets
No PFOA chemicals
No internet to ruin your reputation
Holy shit her tits.

Plastic surgery got cheaper. Oh, and when the porn industry really took off the girls started to burn out faster. Pic slightly related

Attached: houston.jpg (1663x2495, 379K)

Mainstream bullshit. Changing tastes. Degeneracy. Sad
>pic probably unrelated I dunno cuz I can't see thumbnails right now

Attached: 76c40a64b7dd91b4388666b5290382e30eed2c3f69365889cbb242c4ff460df0_1(1).jpg (712x712, 132K)

>Less race mixing
This is the main part of their faces looking better. The main part of their bodies being better is more of a national/global focus on taking care of one's self.

Not everyone having the means to make it meant producers could have standards.

Based

>Holy shit her tits.
She is in this Ron Jeremy video that is older than I am, so she is my Mom's age now;
but I don't care, I love her look and her sexuality, and I just wonder who she is.

Attached: vintage-Ron_Jeremy-96.webm (640x448, 1.96M)

also notice on average how much larger the men's testicles are

today's soy boys have shriveled up little balls, one of the reasons why we see so many sissy and trap threads, which have a common denominator, small testicles

I think holding the gangbang record for a time is more than slightly related

would not fuck with a stolen dick

Porn used to about projecting yourself into the scene as the man fucking the woman
>NOW
it's about projecting yourself into the scene as the woman.

>holding the gangbang record
...so what is the gangbang record?

What the fuck porn are you watching?

>how much more attractive the girls were then. What happened?

I dont know if they were more attractive but I think they were more relaxed and enjoyed it more. Back then only horny men watched porn so the girls didn't really have to worry about their friends and family clicking on some web link and seeing them getting plowed.

porn isn't about worshipping how hot women are, now it's about pseudo gay sex with women.

Literally nothing. Women who look like that still exist all over the place, however what type of woman sells movies, mags and subscriptions has changed with societal standards of beauty. In 50 years, the women in porn will likely have a completely different aesthetic as well.

I know this will make me sound like a fag, but the dudes were much better in porn from the 90's. They were ripped and buff and had big dicks. They were fucking studs. Today, you got all these skinny dudes with nasty tattoos and beer guts and mediocre cranks and it just makes it unappealing.

Camera quality was much MUCH worse back then plus feminism hadn't shit the bed yet

...so true. I saw some old videos made on VHS vidcams that were shit-tier quality.
Don't know what "feminism" has to do with anything, though.

Attached: babes.jpg (1280x947, 417K)

I think it's Samantha Fox.

Wow this is actually more boring than the shit they show on cable these days.

...what-everrr, Grandpa.

If you're not watching some hoe with a fat cunt slamming a bad dragon through her small intestine why bother?

blacked, legalporno, etc.. no heterosexual human male watches that shit for pleasure. That garbage is for in the closet types who hate women.

Still not sure what kind of deranged poem you are watching or where you get the idea that porn was ever about worshipping women. You sound like a deranged lunatic.