Okay lolicons...

Okay lolicons, how do you argue against this: Loli hentai should not be created because it implies that children can be found attractive.

Attached: 1556077415209.jpg (852x1200, 601K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pixiv.net/user/12244043/series/23830?p=7
pinterest.com/andy20101996/child-beauty-pageants/
kgh.pl/RslEt
kgh.pl/RZc6M
discordapp.com\invite\6H9PzSX
jaapl.org/content/42/4/404
google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Is Pedophilia a Sexual Orientation?
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I've been a lolicon for a few years but I don't find children attractive
Seen a lot of pictures and videos and shit like that just doesn't turn me on, unlike 2d

Attached: 1551279325491m.jpg (617x1024, 61K)

I don't.

Attached: It's this easy.jpg (245x206, 11K)

Well, given pedos exist, children can be found attractive.
If the question is whether they should be found attractive, it is a feeling, and telling someone they shouldn't have a feeling has not typically been successful.
If the question is whether that feeling should be indulged by consuming drawn porn, then we're back at the same arguments raging here for years.

OP gave up too quickly

Honestly I'm just trying to win this argument

Attached: Capture.jpg (607x643, 64K)

are they implying children aren't attractive? pedos are clear evidence that children, just like other people, can be attractive
even if you don't find them sexually attractive, they are attractive in their own innocent and child-like way but not in a way that a normal person would want to persue them

pussy, just link the twitter thread

Absolutely not, do you no how far removed from reality lolis are? Real children are dumb and annoying, and especially repulsive these days. Even then does the implication barely matter because any sane person that happens to like loli will not make the jump to molestation because of it, it's like saying people that lie to consume violent media become murderers and terrorists.

Yeah! Why did that cunt Michelangelo make all those paintings if none of them are fappable? Checkmate, atheists.

just tell them to differenciate children and drawings, if they can't see the difference it means they're mental, not lolicons

thought crimes are a plague. cultural/societal implications behind the "sexualization of minors" are worthy of debate, but such contentions are reachy.

they're just drawings nigger who gives a shit? I don't see any objective harm in giving people a safe, harmless, risk free, and legal alternative to abusing someone. I fail to see why such things are even a matter of debate.

Attached: 16.jpg (1280x1852, 357K)

Simple. No actual children are 2D. That means there are no children involved in hentai. No harm, no problem.

Attached: 47028347_1140731376090487_6876164249152913408_n.jpg (679x960, 51K)

implications aren't very meaningful without action so it's a non-argument.

Attached: da9237fb4d87bf438d22a13c1a35bf16.png (2048x2048, 1.69M)

actions begin as thoughts

but inaction is also an action.

Attached: 6e3210eb65add6aee100f610bf54eb1d.png (996x1768, 757K)

Why the fuck are drawings such a problem? Lolicons don't circulate or fap to CP because it's contentious as fuck. Even CP could be argued to be morally questionable at worst, as long as you don't circulate the stuff (there's the whole point about CP undignifying children, but this applies to literally everyone who shares nudes then later regrets it, child or not)... Despite that, lolicons moved to creating and fapping to drawings, eliminating any and all children involved, thereby nuking the entire moral problem. But you fuckers are STILL unhappy - even when the original problem has been solved entirely. When will you fuckers ever be happy?

I have a buddy who was bitching about loli and shota just the other day due to the discord ban of it, basically saying it should be illegal. I know for a fact that it all stems from him being molested for years by someone close to his family. Most people against this are post wall roasties or bugmen with too many feelings. It's a victimless fucking drawing. Why should anyone care? If anything it gives people an outlet rather than turning to real life loli porn.

Not all of them. But if your argument is that every child rapist began by thinking about 2D fictional girls in hentai that is just stupid. I don't think this is your proposition so I'll ask you to clarify.

Attached: illust_74187308_20190423_202024.jpg (1111x1553, 312K)

Children are going to be found attractive to pedos anyway. Shouldn't be charging people for thought crimes.

As an actual pedo, I have to make a choice. Do I download CP (illegal) or do I just look for some loli/shota on a weeb site (legal)? If both are illegal, both would be equally as difficult to obtain, and I would have no real incentive to choose the morally superior option. People who demand for banning loli are the same kind of retards who think banning one particular activity of bad people makes all bad people disappear.

Thought crime is ridiculous.
People have control over what they do with their thoughts. Again, you don't become a murderer for thinking about murdering somebody.

Based and cunnypilled.

This is just common sense.

Attached: 358975bf77d86c954f230a537aa1d570.jpg (1280x960, 358K)

The reason CP is illegal is because by definition, you have to involve a child. Loli and other forms of fictionalized individuals (such as someone pretending to be a child, depictions of underage sex in writing, and so on).

If you believe loli is kiddie porn, then you HAVE to also believe pic related is a 16 year old girl and that video games are literally murder.

Attached: maxresdefault (4).jpg (1280x720, 171K)

had another argument with a buddy that was molested by a religious official as a child over the legality of child sex dolls, basically saying that they would encourage or reinforce their pedophilc urges and cause more rapes. I countered with the point that there was no scientific evidence to support that claim, and any evidence that does exist tends to support the contention that the occurrences of such crimes are reduced instead. I also said that such urges simply cannot be suppressed, that they are intrinsic to many of these people's very being. it'd be like a gay guy suppressing his love for penis, and that it's possible for them to be extolled in a way that doesn't harm others.

anyway, he got uber emotional about it and he became non receptive to my points. we're still friends but I feel like he resents me for my opinion a little.

Attached: --sumi-(monobeno)-monobeno-3955769.jpg (2128x3337, 1.53M)

STOP NOT DOING THAT!

Is that bad?

this entirely

many people don't realize what forces they're playing with when such a dilemma reaches this level of attention.

Extolled?

extolled may have been the wrong word, I meant to say something along the lines of appreciation but in a sexual manner.

Attached: d8b52049606a76532b33865ba1439414.png (2048x2048, 1.56M)

>Dating a girl
>She's pretty cool
>She doesn't think loli and such are wrong
fugg

Attached: LS_17.jpg (1280x1792, 383K)

I think OP just wanted an excuse to make a new loli bread.

Attached: 58_i4754l191m.jpg (1000x625, 89K)

there's already another one at but the OP went afk

Attached: 15.jpg (1075x1517, 507K)

Dude my gf is almost a loli, looks wise, we're 25. Maybe ecchi is closer, but she still my wittle one.

they're not children, they're cartoons

Mine too. We go snowboarding and she looks adorable in her jacket. She's about 5' flat.

Only problem is I don't know how to go into roleplaying it

Attached: LS_23.jpg (1280x1792, 543K)

Maybe OP doesn't like chocolate. IDK

Attached: 1526810382363.jpg (1024x576, 75K)

>taking away pedos' harmless outlet for literally the strongest human instinct
>sex crimes against children increase as a result
>"Hoo-ray! Muh protected the children!"

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 48K)

guessing this is about persona5?
if so aren't they like 17?
animated characters are ambiguous after puberty until their 30s

pls tell me what this comic is called

Attached: alium.jpg_large.jpg (706x722, 38K)

I'm guessing you could find it through the watermark

>implies that children can be found attractive
Like such bullshit ever happen in real life.

This is about the Fire Emblem loli that Nintendo posted

Attached: D5LMEh-W0AACmVk.jpg (1080x1215, 225K)

Watching paedos attempt sophistry to mininise their shame is a most rancid kind of cringe.

listen to your elders

Attached: LS_49.jpg (1280x1793, 510K)

Little Sis btw

Attached: LS_02.jpg (1071x1500, 357K)

Yeah, it's honestly a little sketchy early on. She knows she's small so I started making little jokes that weren't too on the nose and now it's kind of become what I was hoping. We're not very good at planning roleplay. It usually just happens in the moment so we just end up saying little things to set the scene as it were. I think we're starting to make a bigger thing out of it though because the general theme of her being a young girl has been pretty consistent.

Being attracted to small body figures isn't in itself wrong... by that logic dwarfs and short people shouldn't be allowed to do porn because they look like children... Obviously i don't have to point out the differences between a adult dwarf and a child.

Nobody's trying to elevate attraction to minors dipshit. We're trying to show that it's a complicated issue because pedos are humans too.

>are humans too.
humans are terrible though

Just because you don't have it or get it doesn't mean everyone who has it literally wants to fuck children.

I bet this is illigal

Nope

>"paedos"
fucking idiot

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 44K)

>it implies that children can be found attractive
so a form of art should be banned because it implies something? thats the most retarded reason i have ever fucking heard. i could understand if you were blatantly against the sexualization of children, even in fictional art form. but to word it like that is just so fucking autistic of you.

Seems to just add to his explanation. Some people are actually dangerous. Do we have any actual statistics on pedophiles vs active pedophiles?

do you know about that comic with the similar art style, but the characters are twins and switch places at one point? If so, do you have the name?

/thread

Porn depicting full grown adults is disgusting because it might inspire people to go rape full grown adults.

See how that doesn't work one way, why would it work the other?

Sorry user, don't know what you're talking about. Maybe it's on Sad panda?

Attached: Typical Parentals.jpg (1000x1500, 229K)

well fuck I should have saved it when I saw it

Is there a link to a site?

I found it on Sad Panda. But I'm sure there are collections out there.

Attached: Cheer1.png (625x800, 350K)

Its all on pixiv

Thanks

pixiv.net/user/12244043/series/23830?p=7

Attached: 1513825805259.jpg (746x957, 214K)

Attached: 1514864346446.jpg (654x1000, 285K)

fag

Attached: IMG_0922.png (750x1334, 259K)

Who fucking cares?

You are never change their stance,like they are never to change yours is pointless debacle.

There's depictions of every crime imaginable and it's totally legal. Why should a depiction of this be any different?

She loves that tiger costume and looks cute in it, she's an excellent dick sucker and loves when I cum in her.
Especially on this month... God I wish she was real bros

Attached: 308e031bb88f0e1f604f9d8bd7aec6d4.jpg (700x900, 167K)

Wow that's a classic. I remember when it was posted daily.

how can you argue against the pic you posted

I like how she ignored the black guy which one has the biggest dick but she just ignored it lol

he might be the biggest dick, but may not have one.

fuck off back to your 'whiteboys cannot X' thread.

as someone who has been molested atleast 4 times and groomed by a real pedo, drawings are drawings
who gives a shit

Was groomed into being a pedo's fucktoy for a while, kind of tinted my view on things. I'd rather loli and shota exist for these scumbags to beat it to so they don't hurt real kids.If you get rid of fake child porn, they'll just go after real child porn.

but inaction won't cause that person to harm a child.

y'all posting about being molested are fucking faggots
I enjoyed the sex i had as a child and made me alpha af

I love lolis

Attached: sensei_anone040.png (1280x720, 930K)

a man of culture.

Attached: 1547351291394.jpg (850x666, 111K)

It's legit one of my favorites. I wish I could have it as a book. But it seems mouthbreathers are winning the thoughtcrime fight.

Attached: cheer2.png (625x800, 337K)

Attached: cheer3.png (625x800, 326K)

Attached: __amayadori_machi_kumamiko_drawn_by_aki99__sample-dabe3d625c6fbcd91bc65c7ee379e3ec.jpg (850x979, 249K)

Who doesn't?

Attached: 1553110385051.png (725x1015, 484K)

Attached: 1553110171350.jpg (850x1133, 479K)

Attached: cheer4.png (625x800, 358K)

Attached: __akagi_miria_and_jougasaki_rika_idolmaster_and_idolmaster_cinderella_girls_drawn_by_kure_masahiro__ (850x885, 234K)

Sir u can post under age girls

Yes yes, all draw character have 18 yo

Attached: 550x620_D30.jpg (550x620, 142K)

>animal crossing pfp
99% sure this fag is a fucking furry
at least lolicons want to fuck other humans faggot

Attached: __asashio_kantai_collection_drawn_by_satou_kuuki__sample-6d504bcb16e80128044e3f4a345cc2be.jpg (850x1200, 134K)

Attached: __chloe_von_einzbern_and_illyasviel_von_einzbern_fate_kaleid_liner_prisma_illya_and_fate_series_draw (850x1238, 207K)

Does the FBI have the resources to scrub all "underaged representative" characters? No, far too much data. That includes even characters representative of 16 year olds.

It's not worth the time, effort, or money. The most they can do is add it to a list of charges for possession when you are investigated. But you'd likely have to be indulging in other illegal activities to do so. Anyone can draw a naked child, if they cared to.

>paedos
>sophistry

Look guise, it thinks it's smart.

I've been molested more times than i could shit, i don't think promoting sex with children is a good idea.

Attached: __cagliostro_granblue_fantasy_drawn_by_mapar__sample-3cfbd0313d2ba2e5ed45f12e6e5ed9af.jpg (850x1159, 191K)

Real kids are disgusting. They are dirty, they stink, they scream and fight, and they either rat a pedo out or die and get him the death penalty. I think sex with a loli sex doll is probably a lot better for almost all pedos. We really should make owning a loli sex doll and regularly fucking it a parole condition for any pedo we let out of prison. As soon as it stops reporting use, we need to go pick up the guy and see what he's doing instead.

Cp is illegal in the US because the government don't want to make a black market for it overseas

Right. Because it involves a real child.

DEUS VULT LOLI LOVERS! YOUR TIME HAS COME!!!
Paedo is a scholarly accepted spelling, as it hearkens back to it's Latin roots

Attached: Deus Vult.jpg (1280x720, 92K)

Well, children are found attractive. We cant just deny thay fact. The researcher has shown that allowing loli is the best bet for harm reduction, you may not like loli and find it gross, but hurting real children is far more disgusting and impactful. Therfore we should allow lolk.


Does that follow in your veiw?

whenever i drive over a bridge i think "what if i jumped off"

idk about you but i don't think i jumped off that bridge

>Real children should not be created because that implies that they can be attractive.

I've been hanging around the P5 community for a long time now. What's with the huge amount of these fuckers who screech "CP!!!!!" at every waking second of the day when it comes to sexualizing those teenagers, some of which are legal in canon before you meet them. Even if they weren't, they're fucking fictional characters. Drawings cannot have an age.

Anyway, I'm writing a fic where a loli female Goro gets kidnapped, gang raped, the drugged up and becomes a cock-obsessed whore. Keep an eye out for it. I'll probably post a WIP in loli thread here in case anyone willing to beta read it is around.

Attached: 1554239667878m.jpg (1024x724, 55K)

Gotta admit, thought you were talking about the MK version for a second, was thinking "well gee, that's a new one."

does anyone have some of renderanon's works

>use a 800 year old god as an example
real good example op

I would not argue against that, everyone actually knows children can be attractive, it's in our language, "Oh, look how cute she is!" the issue is entirely the ick factor some people have that some other people don't lie to themselves about that attraction.

Attached: 1556289780079.jpg (1080x1920, 389K)

Twas foolish to reveal yourself. Now prepare to die

Attached: Any last words loli lover.jpg (1000x800, 196K)

have you ever interacted with real kids?!?!?!!? theyre annoying shits that have no sexual attractiveness whatsoever. keep it 2d

my suggestion, do not try to get her to role play it ... if she goes there, fully enjoy it my bro, but if you bring it up, you're going to make her think, sooner or later, that the only reason you're with her looking all loli like, is because you like loli, and not her, and she'll ditch you

words of experience.

Attached: 1556167881235.jpg (800x1070, 525K)

Attached: Knight slaying loli lover.jpg (2244x2859, 563K)

Neat stuff but is it wierd to jerk off to child porn if you are a child

this totally

dude, me too, fist-bump
I fucking had 100's of sexual experiences as a child. I won't say it didn't affect me, it did, but it made me stronger, wiser, and kinder all at the same time.

Attached: 1556290008277.jpg (800x800, 153K)

post stories

Attached: 1547961493223.jpg (772x1000, 161K)

'nother nite bro, I'm closing down for the night.

Attached: 1556289597207.gif (544x296, 50K)

Looks like that loli lover kicked two of your boys' asses, what are you gonna do, bleed on me?

you should consider swallowing a razor blade

Attached: Dy2mC4fVAAAA9dg-orig.jpg (600x1113, 76K)

Maybe because it's easier to manipulate or rape a real child than a grown adult? I don't know lol

You've never slacked at work, have you?

never die

Attached: lolibooru 190901 apophis_str azur_lane bathroom black_hair closed_eyes flat_chest indoors long_hair (600x800, 293K)

Attached: 4cda5fe3d76e6d60626ead22cd59071d.jpg (556x800, 405K)

Attached: 430410bd6df2133c13892adba5e20acb92aa89767eb4c60ea1c4250781d03f52.png (1194x676, 500K)

Attached: 08.jpg (1063x1500, 526K)

Attached: d24b2963514f9fb649451ad9fbe1b168.png (800x900, 379K)

Attached: 7.jpg (1280x1869, 418K)

Loli doesn't look like children. It looks like exaggerated youthful characteristics.

Toddlercon on the other hand is degenerate. Some would say that this is a subset of loli, but I think that the problem is that there should be a separate term for loli that isn't meant to seriously look like children.

I have the brain capacity to distinguish between fantasy and reality. Watching a show about serial killers doesn't make me want to go murder someone, watching Bambi neither made me a hunter or a vegetarian.

Its sooo fucking cringey how hard you guys are defending your sexual feeling toward drawn children, saying its different from real life kids. Open your eyes and stop lying in order to comfort yourself, if you are attracted to drawing implying children, you're a pedo.

At this point its obvious you're trolling though, so no one is going to respond seriously.

Loli are the true form of elderly women.

If you don't believe me, go out and meet an elderly woman.

Attached: 1556323777068.jpg (800x600, 331K)

But people already find children attractive.

CP "shouldn't be created" but it does get created all the time, at least with lolicon someone can fap to a drawing without that drawing involving a real kid getting dicked

Attached: 1556323080759.gif (480x360, 110K)

Bump

Just looking and jerking off are very very different

children can be found attractive though, that's not in dispute anywhere.

But children can be found attractive, as is evidenced by loli hentai being made.

Attached: 4L_jPq7V0dU.jpg (258x319, 16K)

Attached: 50cf7439a678871781e044fa0f56e15bbe76df8157a8e16dd49f3c6f9c189577.jpg (536x780, 26K)

Not falling for the bait. Also I can't un-masturbate myself 3000+ times now bitch.

all the decent panels have shit on them is this censored on purpose?

More like this one?

gonna do a late post on this one and probably say something already said, but children can be found attractive regardless of the existence of -any- pornography involving them or features resembling them.

Paedo Is actually correct. A pedophile would be more like a foot fetishist

I wanna cum inside an angel

Attached: d355eb8958a36996d83374c09c3f8f60.png (615x992, 553K)

Thats not an angel thats a chicken

Why? Some are naturally attractive. Some try to be. Some are ugly. It's nature. You can't argue with nature, unless you're a total retard.

I don't care I will luv and protect and snuggle and fug

Attached: ec80cf9ef23b8387b39bcb2740a24326.jpg (796x700, 100K)

goriland

My issue is, where's the line? A 2D drawing that approximates the appearance of a child is fine, right? What about one that used a real child as a reference? That's the indirect exploitation of a child for sexual reasons. How do you prove such a thing? Taking a hard line, erring on the side of protecting innocent victims is the only option.

And of course one can have a sexual proclivity towards lolis without acting on it towards children irl. It doesn't mean you should embrace or foster those thoughts. You can't have your fantasy, and you'd do well to abandon it and try to find a new one. Society will never allow you to pursue it.

Attached: tenor.gif (300x300, 1.89M)

Attached: 26d0b9eff96e5f1e235ef3dc826c20b3.jpg (803x603, 190K)

Attached: 6bbc681a2638c25f711564cd0a7a9edc.jpg (799x1282, 340K)

Attached: 9e767fff346b48ffbaab69142ae87c36.jpg (1115x868, 101K)

Attached: 008.jpg (1200x1739, 282K)

Attached: 01.jpg (1280x1813, 217K)

Attached: 0c64d54a3120319e012aaa451956848c.jpg (685x1000, 355K)

Attached: 32f4d2a563d9d769e13229c3baca6fdd.jpg (1000x1412, 973K)

pinterest.com/andy20101996/child-beauty-pageants/

I argue that with: ^^^ Explain.

Humans are going to sex everything. Especially when that thing is "taboo".

And to complete the idea that children couldn't be "sexualized" and paraded, you'd have to criminalize beauty and attraction.

And that is never going to happen.

Attached: 01.jpg (1200x1708, 260K)

Attached: 02.jpg (1200x1708, 243K)

but all of those look disgusting

Attached: 03.jpg (1200x1708, 286K)

Attached: 04.jpg (1200x1708, 272K)

Attached: 05.jpg (1200x1708, 311K)

Attached: 06.jpg (1200x1708, 363K)

Attached: 07.jpg (1200x1708, 297K)

Attached: 08.jpg (1200x1708, 306K)

Attached: 09.jpg (1200x1708, 160K)

All of those....are REAL. -_-
They happened to people. Who remember it.

Lolicon is 1 guy...in a room....with a pencil and paper.

Just fap to whatever you enjoy you shits. As long as you aren't hurting people, who cares?

Attached: 1d70a139d3dc2581c18a672cceff8fcf.jpg (758x1000, 492K)

Attached: 1556373950253.jpg (724x1024, 120K)

If we're not suposed to lust after children then why are they so sexy?
Checkmate.

What are the best legal JB sites to visit?

Attached: 1540350927818.png (850x1200, 860K)

Attached: 13433090_10154246165814320_1474244076281016119_o.jpg (579x1000, 36K)

Attached: 1549689924592.jpg (738x1440, 135K)

still getting used to this wickr thing
id polydud

Attached: 1555643760911.png (1084x900, 1.3M)

More please the pixiv link won't work or at least another link to try

this one always made be explode, good shit

Attached: 1364382640912.png (700x900, 298K)

Two words. Thought crime. Implications mean nothing. You cant arrest someone for art, let alone if theyre thinking about naked children.
Boom, bitch. Not even a lolicon. Just wanted to post.

If some cunt wants to jack off to drawn kids they could do whatever they want as long as they aren't paying for or supporting the people who are actually raping, kidnapping, abusing, raping, and murdering children.

Attached: 1549328662890.jpg (717x1012, 677K)

>Where do you draw the line
If there was a child that was harmed for the drawing (irl cp was used as ref [posession] or a child was made to do weird things [abuse and rape]) to be made; or the drawing infringes on the rights for privacy of an individual (random facebook image of a girl playing in the park got a nude edit)

>society will never allow you to pursue it
True, but I would argue most people who look for it in porn wouldn't look for it irl too. If people's fetishes for porn matched irl fetishes there would be a lot more incest and bestiality in the world.

exactly. it'd be no different than incarcerating someone for believing in the wrong religion.

Attached: 1523351342445.png (1280x1280, 371K)

Attached: 1556130043658.png (823x1195, 896K)

Attached: 1549168848835.gif (300x550, 319K)

I don't understand that, because some children are attractive and some not.

Pixiv is a japanese site, and so they have retarded censorship laws. Most things on pixiv will actually be a series of images, one censored, one uncensored.

No loli artist I'm aware of uses CP as refs. I certainly don't. It's a bitch to obtain and it defeats the whole point of lolicon/shotacon. For references when drawing stuff that is very difficult to draw, most artists refer to existing drawings, refs of "petite" adults, posable 3D anime models (software), and imagination.
They age 3D refs down, which sometimes causes the artists to draw breasts on lolis which shouldn't have breasts, and they sometimes have very weirdly shaped undersized breasts which are anatomically incorrect as fuck.

many of them use 3D models and dolls as references. If they want something more 'lively' they often times go with petite pornstars and legal age models.

Attached: 1556232644036.jpg (800x600, 260K)

Aye, that's what I said.

I was saying that that would be the only way where it would be harmful.
The fact that it's so absurd and no artists actually does that adds to the absurdity of freaking out over loli.

Everyone is attracted to different things kinda like how you’re attracted to cock you fucking faggot

Attached: 252B22D3-0A9C-4FDA-8741-A714DF227C89.jpg (413x395, 61K)

honestly this

some people are about rape porn but would never go about raping someone because of the real-world moral and legal ramifications. But they get their fix via SIMULATED rape porn. Just because it's a worse topic doesn't change the fact that it's a harmless outlet

Attached: 1556384499614.jpg (1074x1518, 540K)

cheers

If you are reaching this far why not go all the way and ban piper parry from porn.

The Kangaroos already tried that. Didn’t go well.

>No loli artist I'm aware of uses CP as refs
so you dont know anything?
>defeats the whole point
lmao no
>most artists refer to
haha nice assumptions

Does anyone have a source or pics like this?

Attached: 1555703359473.jpg (554x800, 82K)

Attached: 1495828615951.jpg (750x550, 118K)

Like this:
Just kill yourself, faggot

Attached: 1556192778388.jpg (900x1130, 427K)

I wanna cum on Elf's yummy tummy

Attached: 1535213731147.jpg (1024x1638, 127K)

Attached: 1550650652910.png (676x800, 348K)

Attached: 1541859943166.gif (490x303, 1.3M)

Did they fucking really?!
I can't find anything about that.
If you would please lshare I'd love to hear. It's always nice to laugh at the auzzies

>you don't have proof that artist don't go to extreme length to find cp for simple refs
so are you saying you do?

The ovas are so fucking good

easy. loli =! children

I want Elf to breastfeed me with her tiny little bewbies

Attached: 1556023963188.jpg (795x1124, 463K)

Y artíst design lolis in Unreal Engine with Quixel that would be GREAT

Attached: 1555659977212.png (850x1200, 926K)

.JSON ??

I worked in the games industry for a few years before getting fired for saying the N word. Not gonna say who I worked for or what I worked on, but I have experience with Unreal Engine 4 and 3D modeling software. I COULD animate some doujinshi-style porn featuring my favorite lolis.

Attached: 1556372024221.jpg (452x650, 90K)

do you have an account?

there are censored verisons and uncensored versions below it.

Attached: f0d80fc613f9f5a047f0376afccbd4294055c74625ce98d2deb0c59e77501b35.jpg (848x1200, 201K)

Attached: 1556014261948.jpg (1600x1200, 961K)

Attached: 1538304696200.jpg (500x687, 323K)

Attached: 01.jpg (1280x1829, 205K)

Attached: 04.jpg (1280x1825, 152K)

Attached: 06.jpg (1280x1822, 229K)

Attached: 28.jpg (1280x1825, 157K)

Attached: 29.jpg (1280x1823, 281K)

Attached: 30.jpg (1280x1820, 238K)

Attached: 31.jpg (1280x1830, 326K)

Attached: 32.jpg (1280x1825, 135K)

Attached: 33.jpg (1280x1816, 214K)

Attached: 34.jpg (1280x1826, 198K)

Attached: 35.jpg (1280x1826, 279K)

I want a translation for pic related

Attached: Image001.jpg (1920x1080, 452K)

Attached: Image029.png (1920x1080, 521K)

This try to get close to reality but you need to live the experience to draw some decent scenarios

for a second i thought she was hitting a fat vape

If you are going to try to translate, at least get it right...

I disagree with that on a fundamental literary and artistic level. That's like saying in order to make a compelling action movie with believable explosions and blood n gore n sheeit you have to live through it.

I've drawn furry porn for people to feed my sushi habit during school and I only used Disney movie characters as reference. I find furfag shit abhorrent btw

Attached: 1556386239368.jpg (708x1000, 126K)

Some Ch@ns
>.New XXX imageboards. Dont thank ))


kgh.pl/RslEt
kgh.pl/RZc6M

Why the FUCK haven't you joined this server yet?
discordapp.com\invite\6H9PzSX

[-zls

Sorry but i'm not translating just the keyboard is auto-correcting the words to spanish

In Road Warrior the director says that forma the crashes scenes he remember when his friend passed away on a car crash and he see it when it happen and other dead friends

keyboard is auto-correcting to spanish? WTF are you trying to say?

If I try to write in English this is the result

> Ir i rey ti write un English this es the resultado

learn English faggot

same user?

Attached: 0cd2569448cd92401c25ceeab882cfe9.jpg (1156x1920, 798K)

Attached: 1556389670546.jpg (900x1200, 262K)

Attached: 89e3c81210a11ce6c9f6ba7ff3ea2fca.jpg (899x1280, 152K)

learn to use a phone you retarded spic
also you have to be over 18 to browse this site

I know a liltle but not the whole concept of your language.

Yes

27

Me

Psychologist fag reporting in.

Pedophilia can, and should be to my opinion, considered as a sexuality as people who are actual pedophiles can't feel sexual attraction toward anybody except children.

This is no excuse to their act (if ever they do act on it) but considering that I'm OK w/ lolis if it prevent some of them from actually touching a child to get off.

Can you do something productive for us then and produce some academic literature so we can move towards a better future?

That's why this is supouse to be.
Lolis prevent more pedophiles

Attached: 1554579052121.jpg (1425x1437, 527K)

Based psychologist bro
Actual decent smart words
As long as it stops people from touching kids it's good in my book

They are just closet pedophiles. That's it.

I will try

More raph and filo please

nah, by definition there is no -necessary- correlation between lolicon / pedophiles / child molesters

Attached: 1553311204775.jpg (850x1047, 644K)

They tried banning flat chested/A-cup porn because they claimed it supports child pornography. The world lol’d.

Remeber that time a guy nearly went to prison for watching Little Lupe, and she had to testify that she was of age?

Ok first there is this

jaapl.org/content/42/4/404

This discuss the misconception of pedophilia as child molestation. The DSM, which is like the bible of psychopathology, is apparently making the difference between the two pretty blurry when studies on the matter never proved than being sexual attracted to a child systematically leads to child molestation.

I know the research that exists now, we need more/new studies and eventually a push to adjust the status quo

Attached: 1554488295728.jpg (1213x896, 101K)

Banning a-cups... The people behind it are either insane or genuine pedophiles that are trying to hide the skeletons in their closets.

Attached: 73242552_p1.jpg (1000x1400, 313K)

gross

Attached: 1554578603678.jpg (684x969, 304K)

Apparently, researchers on the matter do not talk about sexuality but sexual orientation. So they never consider sexual preferences without sexual orientation.

In that case we shoud consider heterosexual pedophilia.

google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Is Pedophilia a Sexual Orientation?

There you go. There must be other but I enough work already. You can find a great amount of information on google scholar

I like the hysteria. Imagine being so hated you trigger people just by existing. It’s pretty funny.

>Murder?
A-OK.

>Finding a kid cute?
Castrate, burn with chemicals, and gut their organs.

Attached: FCD25D03-A2DE-4631-87A8-E28E6C9650BD.png (756x1024, 836K)

click the first google scholar result

Artist name is 1=2

Search that name on gelbooru or other hentai image sites and you'll find his shit

Wanking to a anime toddleris finding them """""cute"""""

ur a fuckup, I hope someone sees you looking at pictures of animated naked kids

LOL you masturbate to ugly things.

No response in an hour, you found the pedo. Naise.

>Coming into a pedo thread.
>Thinking finding pedos is an achievement.
Anything to boost your ego, amirite?

loli thread, not pedo thread

you'd think people would realize where they are

Attached: 1440759850114.png (250x250, 70K)

Pedo In denial

I'm surprised this thread is still alive.

Yea, sure, whatever floats your boat.

Attached: C6949DB4-E86B-4285-8F78-1B771744112E.png (811x1024, 1.17M)

In no way does lolicon have a -necessary- correlation with pedophile
>Pedophilia is used for individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children aged 13 or younger
Its just one of my -many- attractions, not primary nor exclusive

im about to lewd pic related, but i need some references. any ideas what pose i should lewd her in?

Attached: zz.jpg (468x1042, 115K)

Embrace the truth, brother. Loli threads are pedo threads. Don't be ashamed of your degeneracy.

Same, especially considering this is Yea Forums. I've seen threads on /trash/ 404 faster than this.

Attached: sample_9f3d86fc2f06c436e2d7f7d63608bfca.jpg (850x737, 60K)

You're attracted to children. You're a pedo

>No loli artist I'm aware of uses CP as refs.

its impossible to tell unless you have the drawn pic and real pic side by side, and of course no one is going to do that just to prove to some naive retard user on the internet that artist trace real CP.

drawn images on a piece of paper are not children. if you think that you need to get to a mental hospital asap.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), in order for pedophilic disorder to be diagnosed, the following criteria must be met:

--Recurrent, intense sexual fantasies, urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger) for a period of at least 6 months.
--These sexual urges have been acted on or have caused significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
--The person is at least 16 years old, and at least 5 years older than the child in the first category. However, this does not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.

A lolicon doesn't qualify for any of these criteria, your move.

Attached: 1555453320093.png (800x600, 450K)

fuk

Attached: 962ed0d97695df0b3e930a1a73d23b38.png (960x640, 488K)

Also, not ashamed of anything. Lolis are amazing and I'm happy they are in my life =3

Attached: 1553455956645.jpg (1061x1448, 1.03M)

This is great, any more?

in other words, kids can also be considered pedophiles.

This user gets it. Depictions of things =! the things themselves.

Attached: 1556047082109.png (552x779, 311K)

Im not the one who writes the definitions

Attached: 1554486623501.jpg (1082x1567, 556K)

do it my dude

"Sir, you can't draw little girls having sexual relations."
"All drawn characters are 18"

im just pointing out how retarded the laws are.

biologically there is no real difference between a 13 and 18 year old. the problem is what they are force fed throughout life. babied and sheltered till 18 and once 18 comes along they are kicked out without a clue on how to survive and must learn how to survive on their own.

By definition, yes. But socially, no.

Legally they can be too.

What do you mean biologically? You know there are hormones and chemicals in our bodies that either increase or decrease dependent on things like age/puberty/environmental factors?

Socially 14-15 year old boys get away and are even praised for getting laid by a 21 year old woman. i mean the woman prob still goes to jail, but the boy gets all kinds of claps and medals. no mental damage done. but a little girl? they behave as if she got her limbs chopped off one at a time.

where are the loli/b/ros?

Attached: 1556311730255.jpg (3000x2286, 1.95M)

LOL

Hormones is irrelevant here. hormones increase and decrease at ALL stages of life past puberty constantly.

thicc loli best loli

Attached: 5818388531.jpg (2112x1614, 142K)

Haha wouldn’t it be crazy if little girls started an ‘I need feminism because...’ trend based on that double standard? Haha

in the sense probably that by 13 you are pubescent and the distinction between 13 and 18 is arbitrarily set by the government

Attached: 1553465260206.jpg (1024x748, 99K)

guess we are done here

Attached: 1556029813396.jpg (1016x1500, 356K)

Let's not kid ourselves. We all wanted to get raped by our hot teacher when we were high schoolers, I could count at least 3 teachers I wanted to fuck back in middle/high school days.

It's a really great fantasy that I still have to this day.

It's a double standard if the gender roles were reversed, yes. But when you understand why it's a double standard it starts to make sense. It doesn't make it okay, but it makes sense.

It's not that difficult to find CP if you have a room temperature IQ

>mental gymnastics the post
These are drawings of children, sorry to break it to you dumb fuck