THE CONCLUSION = NO COLLUSION

The only funny thing about the left meming is how they think they're funny.
It's like that one weird kid in school who keeps repeating a joke that nobody laughs at because he thinks nobody heard him

I also think we should re-purpose Teflon Don

Neck yourself Reddit faggot

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 1553707467968.jpg (501x607, 63K)

Explicitly not.

Attached: IMG_20190419_215728.jpg (1080x192, 33K)

Attached: It's not like Trump is an idiot or something.gif (312x316, 1.97M)

>impeached by the end of the month
you mad cuckservatives

Attached: cortez.jpg (900x900, 62K)

Weak b8

Ag Barr lied, he said that the report left it up to him to decide if there was obstruction of justice. The report leaves it up to congress to decide if they want to pursue charges. There is a lot of evidence of obstruction.
latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mueller-investigation-report-obstruction-evidence-20190418-story.html

From what the leaders in the congress are saying, they don't want to do anything. In my opinion a political calculation to use the overwhelming evidence of obstruction as weapon during the election.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said recently that impeaching the president is "not worth" the political divisiveness it would bring to the country.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer,
"Based on what we have seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point," Hoyer told CNN. "Very frankly, there is an election in 18 months and the American people will make a judgement."

If trump somehow manages to still get elected. Pelosi is going to change her mind and actually go for impeachment.

Gotta get them coins aye?

Seems legit

Attached: 1532882444700.jpg (352x262, 30K)

The Trumplecuck tears and coping are delicious

You can't obstruct justice when there isn't a crime. Much like you can't commit murder without killing someone. Don't be retarded.

Attached: 1553488937435.jpg (500x370, 29K)

This but multiplied by 4
>having to actually explain this tho

>he *tried* to collude
the absolute state of lefturd kike copers

Yes, you can: attempting to obstruct an investigation, regardless of whether there is a crime for the investigation to uncover, is in and of itself a crime.

If the DNC paid for the Russian Trump Dossier, and set up the meeting with that Russian and Trump jr, and money and urainium changed hands with Russians, then how can the Mueller report conclude there was no collusion with Russia by anyone?

You sound fucking retarded

Incorrect.

Obstruction of justice does not require a crime, dumbass.

It obly requires an investigation.

>tick tock

Attached: IMG_7674.jpg (722x400, 74K)

>Being factually correct sounds retarded
Then I'm glad I sound retarded. I'd rather be right but sound dumb to idiots than wrong but sound reasonable to idiots.

I see we have someone who is unaware that attempted murder is a crime.

Its the same idiots who complain that politicians always lie, but don't give enough of a shit to actually understand what they said in the first place.

Maybe he knows murder and attempted murder are separate crimes?

Like you can't get charged with murder if you attempt it.

Colored kids are funny looking when they caught

Sorry, Wikipedia disagrees with you. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

You need to stop repeating what known liars say.

Prosecutors charging violations of Section 1519 must still establish either of the following:

The accused knowingly did the obstructive act with the intent to affect the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any U.S. department or agency or any case filed under Title 11; or
The accused knowingly did the obstructive act at least “in relation to or in contemplation of any such matter or case”.
Not on the list, however, is the requirement that prosecutors demonstrate to the finder of fact which specific “matter or case” the accused attempted to obstruct. That is a significant benefit to the government.[7]

What are you talking about? The dossier was handed to a Republican, the late John McCain, who was encouraged by Senator Graham to report on it.
Uranium 1 has been in the works for years, and was all done legally. Ya, I don't agree with giving our enemies nukes, but you know what? Trump just did that this year so fuck you and his Saudi friends.

Attached: 1555783067085.jpg (907x661, 164K)

They prefer you just call them Muslims
It's 2019 man

Buzz, Buzz

Attached: 1521058540091.jpg (850x644, 139K)

I think he is pointing out the innate fallacy of how the "no collusion" argument of Trumptards doesn't mesh with their other bullshit claims.

I prefer porch monkey.

Attached: 1544967398587.png (447x393, 164K)

But to carry the analogy further, there are no attempted murder investigations, just murder investigations.

The point is the guy doesn't understand how obstruction of justice works.

THE CONCLUSION = NEVER LOOKED AT COLLUSION, ONLY CONSPIRACY

Your stupidity is not an argument.

Attached: 1532070660157.jpg (700x672, 50K)

Attached: reputation tarnish.jpg (491x470, 67K)

Wtf Donald, why weren't you happy with imbezeling and being a TV star.

Attached: 1500130585563.jpg (480x476, 35K)

The point is. No collusion. No crime. Therefore you cannot obstruct.
Stop wishful thinking. You sound crazy

>trying to make the person that won guilty of what you did to try and win since you have all the evidence

Maximus jewikus

Trips of truth
>check'd

Leftards sure do love beating this dead horse...

Rejoice, for the Lord is risen, and God Emperor Trump sits on the throne.

No Collusion?!
IMPEACH!!!!!

Attached: 1539703816502.jpg (719x712, 272K)

>just in case the right doesn't look dumb enough

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

Learn to read, no where does it say you have to be proven guilty of another crime to be charged with obstruction.

HE ain't getting charged with shiet u stinking ape

That's for congress to decide.

It also doesn't say he must be charged to commit obstruction. Learn. To. Read.

Hopefully there are no ways to influence politicians unfairly whew that would make things complicated

The Liberal intrusion is in confusion because the collusion was a delusion. Libs will need a transfusion of illusion because Trump was cleared by affusion in seclusion.

Attached: maga.jpg (659x659, 52K)

Kick off your sunday shoes

shes always so tense

must be the liquor addiction

Attached: 09-trump-thumbs-up.w710.h473.2x[1].jpg (1420x946, 63K)

nah just a bunch of contacts with Russians that Trumpers lied about a bunch and also welcomed Russian hacking and changed the GOP platform to be more Putin friendly and accepted 30million USD in Russian Rubles via the NRA and and and

fuck off you silly cunt

Except he wasn't cleared of obstruction, there is a mountain of evidence.

Except there was no crime to obstruct though

Attached: 1531432233138.jpg (344x311, 34K)

Didn't Mueller's team basically say something along the lines of "there was suspicious behavior, but we don't have enough evidence to make a solid conclusion that he did or didn't collude with Russia" which the AG then manipulated to mean "NO COLLUSION WE WON GUYZ!!!" ?

It really should be no surprise that the Mueller report isn't going to be the end of anything. The right will say Trump's exonerated, the left will say more investigations are needed, and we're going to hear about this shit for another two years if not longer.

Your new religion and it's imaginary evidence should be celebrated

Attached: 1555736034422.jpg (462x467, 54K)

But at least I am a stable genius

That's fallacious. There were several crimes on the parts of his associates and multiple ongoing investigations that he attempted to interfere with. Furthermore conspiracy and treason are crimes which Trump has very likely commited

The law is binary. As in..
1) charges (leads to trial & punishment)
2) no charges (nothing happens)
There is no sliding scale or subjection bullshit.

We have been sent to prove something someone else did. We can currently prove what happened but we can't show WHO did it without ruining our mealticket so better not to release anything until we are sure trump will get eaten alive by implications. Wouldn't want to make it look like this whole thing was a waste of time or have people think we are fully incompetent

Obstruction requires intent.

Attached: maxresdefault(4).jpg (1280x720, 40K)

Intent is very easy to prove

Attached: 1532220585156.jpg (955x500, 86K)

I wonder if the political shit posting will die down after he's out of office

Intent is just the absence of ignorance

Yes. Hence the full train of collusion memes 2.0

Attached: 1499642061022.jpg (902x1024, 136K)

If that were the case, the report would not have said otherwise.
Barry agreed with the report.
But please...go on. I'm sure you've found the one thing they all missed tho.

Attached: mustache-pointing-man.jpg (425x282, 16K)

He is a lil god. I love him

Uh....
Ok?
That doesn't change the fact that intent is required for obstruction.

She’s be a great porn duck meat

>Russians interfered massively because they percieved Donnie to be the weaker candidate
>Report says basically the white house was too dumb and chaotic to collude, just ate Russian scraps and clapped at Russian-backed events without actually planning anything.
>McGahn cucked Trump out of a constitutional crisis.
>"This makes us look good, fellow Trumpkins!"

bonus interracial porn picture

PS that pussy has a glass of water because he's afraid of booze. 1000% alpha there, brah.
.

Attached: 1_039.jpg (800x1200, 188K)

How about all of Trump's meetings where he directs his associates to commit crimes? That's conspiracy. If you prefer there's also the bountiful connections to the Russian government with the purpose of undermining the US government which is treason. But hey, if Clinton taught us anything it's that when it comes right down to it, you don't really need a reason for impeachment

Where have I heard the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence
bigthonk

Attached: 04.jpg (960x672, 76K)

It actually does. It is an intricate detail that CHANGES the FACT that "this is exactly what people think occurs" that you just sit there and repeat

The report said that it was outside of the scope of the report to charge the sitting president with anything. That's what impeachment is for

Change the channel, son.

Attached: 1555636461971.jpg (749x751, 95K)

Attached: 45.png (640x624, 327K)

>hopefully we can just say the word russians and the people won't ask for the details

Attached: fox-news-3-mexican-countries.png (595x322, 294K)

This is a legit meme? Cleetus, get your mountain dew and get back to the basement.

Attached: 1555779101453.gif (160x270, 864K)

I don't watch cable news. Try harder stormfag

>people with opinions are idiots haha

Actually, the report paints a pretty clear picture that Russia and Trump's camp were trying to collude but were too inept to make it work. Ironically, ineptitude may have saved Trump.

>That doesn't change the fact that intent is required for obstruction.

>It actually does.

So you're saying that obstruction no longer requires intent?

Quite an oversimplification, given DAs regularly decide to not prosecute crimes based on the fact that while they have some evidence of a crime, they don't feel they have enough to proove beyond a reasonable doubt...

And in the case of Mueller, he literally said (in the report) he was leaving the "decision to prosecute" to Congress...

IE he was deliberately choosing to not make the decision.

The importence of arguing politics with the lowest rung of society should offer a hint to what happened in the last election

>the report is clear

Pffft

>I can't just keep repeating my phrase?

Imagine that

Proof other than CNN?

Attached: 1499641646918.jpg (260x194, 11K)

Attached: 5B2EA7ED-FA80-4669-8193-B43A352FD46A.jpg (1080x828, 156K)

Attached: 519CA509-39B1-4DE1-B48E-09D1C437B353.jpg (671x1024, 73K)

Proof of a negative is not how the law works, maybe in your shithole it does though.

Being guilty until proven innocent is absolutely different than the other way around

That's a great point

Attached: in-2010-the-state-department-under-hillary-clinton-signed-off-15760797.png (500x565, 123K)

Attached: AC0DE71E-CCF9-4879-9DC3-9CDDC0FF0AEE.jpg (635x724, 131K)

Attached: 6511755F-F4A3-4B39-B1CE-F83C2DADA70E.jpg (673x1024, 72K)

>Quite an oversimplification
Unless you live in Mexico

Attached: 1538742931532.jpg (557x907, 87K)

Attached: FCAC3F36-D37E-404E-989C-31E854CD9B9E.jpg (720x720, 55K)

Too much reasonable discussion, more memes!

its all over now. the left just loves to lose.

Attached: 1554475035505.jpg (640x643, 40K)

Attached: EB989105-4BCD-4C41-A299-9ABF40D7F02D.jpg (754x1024, 99K)

She is dismissed because there is a reasonable chance she is on the scale

Attached: 1503012221506.gif (450x450, 850K)

Instance after instance of Trump's camp being in contact with Russian officials. Statements from both sides admitting they would benefit from Russian interference, and that the U.S. could help Russia, but only if Trump was elected. The report shows all of this.

But he is still in office?

The head is too big

Attached: hildo eyes.jpg (625x500, 70K)

>THE CONCLUSION = NO COLLUSION

Factually incorrect.

They even had the same lawyer

Attached: 1553480265539.jpg (790x807, 115K)

>too long couldn't read
fix'd

Yes, which brings us back to the initial point, ineptitude is what prevented collusion, not lack of trying.

Attached: 35EE639E-5840-4E34-AF69-16EC4D52F9A1.jpg (580x282, 66K)

So there was no collusion?

Attached: FF9D963E-9C8D-451E-B1C4-E86F361B5A2E.jpg (534x960, 115K)

and yet not enough evidence for charges. only political points which will fade away. the left should drop it if they know whats good for them. the rest of the country is moving on.

Attached: F40B1856-7649-4C08-BE6E-3C4720B698BD.jpg (673x1024, 73K)

It is almost like the collusion was set up by something else and he couldn't run something he didn't design

Attached: F59B5F19-F23A-425E-B3A1-D805E8533295.jpg (1242x962, 159K)

Still with Hilary?? Damn that’s like 3 years ago user time to move on

Attached: 66E7415E-39AC-4752-91AE-4767BD31017E.jpg (413x416, 54K)

>(laugh = false)
Not only will that not compile but its (!laugh)

oh its ok. its more a commentary on her pussyhat army than her

Facts

Insults

Yeah, kinda like there's no murder when you pull the trigger but you were too stupid to put bullets in the gun.

Its ok.
I'm sure once the OTHER other report gets released, that will SURELY be the downfall of drumph.
Hang in there.

Attached: maddow-fake-cries(2).jpg (640x406, 56K)

Attached: 0B5EC6AE-8558-4A13-8D81-89E76327C74D.jpg (640x640, 104K)

That actually is no murder tho.
?

'Exoneration' and the report dropped Trump's approval rating 3 points - heading back towards where he was over the shutdown - 55 against, 37 for - worse than where he was when he lost the House by 10 million votes.

You didn't need this to be another hole in the hull of the Trumptanic, something to 'get over' - you needed this to be a witch hunt/frame job that united the country behind Agent Orange.

Instead you got a report full of Trumpies admitting that the 'Fake News' was true. That they ignored Trump. That he didn't even noticed he was being ignored. That this president is exactly as big a moron as we've been saying the whole time.

Good Luck, Cucks. I hope you realize whose really been getting shafted with this whole Trump thing. The GOP is fucked for a generation.

>laughs jewishly

It's not that Putin likes Trump, Russia just knew he would piss off more libs than Hilary would piss off repubs. Their goal is public dissent, and libs fell for it hard by becoming overly emotional in pretty much every way possible. Doubling down on SJW nonsense isn't winning them any points with those who have common sense.

Holy shit boys.
This is it.
Mueller is actually a Russian agent! That's why there was no recommendation to convict! Mount up!

Attached: 2u73l4.jpg (697x500, 83K)

The even funnier thing about the left meming is how the right gets so defensive even when the meme sucks.

>And they still call the left 'snowflakes'.

Right, it's attempted murder, which is still illegal. There is no attempted collusion, so Trump's failure to collude despite his best attempts was his saving grace.

And you are one of them

Attached: 2CFC0966-210D-4A7A-B37C-B1D3CAB6DDDD.jpg (640x640, 97K)

Top kek

Such an incompetent mongoloid...and the right can't get enough of his flaccid dribbling cock.

Lol have you even seen how those ANTIFA terrorists fight? It's pathetic. None of them seem to have an athletic bone in their body, since they all came from the generation where everyone was 'special and unique,' everyone got first place, and no one kept score in any of their games. You breed weakness when you dissuade competition.

Nobody is defensive here but you, snowflake.
Welcome to b.
You should lurk a while before posting.

Attached: istockphoto-135523970-612x612.jpg (612x408, 27K)

false. this is the direction of the country

thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/439722-pollster-says-there-is-a-shift-in-independent-voters-views-of

>THE CONCLUSION = NO COLLUSION

>You laugh now but just wait till we get the FULL MUELLER REPORT!!!

Trump asked his lackeys to commit crimes but they refused therefore the president is an innocent man - white trash logic.

Attached: 1555762653294.jpg (960x960, 86K)

Attached: Not pleased with Mueller.jpg (531x500, 68K)

Whatever you have to believe

This dog is literally smarter than Trump.

Attached: smart doggy.gif (370x319, 1.99M)

>clinton asked lackeys to cover things up and succeeded so trump is on trial

Hahahahahaha
The best part is that they still cant let go.

>ENGAGE THE REALITY DISTORTION FIELD

Attached: Crying-Liberal.jpg (800x419, 41K)

They finally got WiFi at your local Burger King eh? Dont forget to wash your hands user, I know how you can't afford toilet paper back at the trailer

Attached: shittyquote.jpg (703x829, 198K)

>The left can't meme.
>The right is meme.

i say we just let them go. the best thing for the country is to listen to how leftists really think. they actually believe the things they say every day. now its back to "IMPEACH!" as if they havent been saying that since he was elected.

You sound desperate.

WINNING

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

Learn to read, no where does it say you have to be proven guilty of another crime to be charged with obstruction.

you have to improve something existed to obstruct

Ag Barr lied, he said that the report left it up to him to decide if there was obstruction of justice. The report leaves it up to congress to decide if they want to pursue charges. There is a lot of evidence of obstruction.
latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-mueller-investigation-report-obstruction-evidence-20190418-story.html

Nice rhymes Dr sues

>citing wikipedia
Ishygddt

Go back to your basement and keep masturbating to pictures of Tromp and the American flag

Attached: supporters.jpg (500x375, 122K)

which justice was obstructed?

Attached: conclusion.png (663x205, 96K)

>trusting Wikipedia
>trusting MSM
>trusting any media
>trusting any person other than voice in your head
>trusting reality in general
>being this cucked

according to my reality im a helicopter. Lets see your anonymus sources disprove that

Cry harder

Attached: triggered.jpg (650x366, 60K)

The investigation existed for trump to obstruct

Why would you be crying about winning. Your dumb irrationality got you in this spot there's no collusion kill yourself

Attached: !cryingloserliberal2019.jpg (589x588, 87K)

So the investigation was proof the investigation was proof the investigation was proven?

Lol

Absolutely certain he has you intellectually you fucking autist

Attached: autism.jpg (250x250, 5K)

>we decided not to justice and in conclusion, nothing happened

Goodbye reddit.

I guess that means Mueller decided that Drumph was too much of an idiot to realize the Russians were working to get him elected

Attached: 1470761923823.jpg (702x960, 128K)

No its how obstruction charges work, if you obstruct a government investigation, it's a crime with punishment up to 20 years. The investigation doesn't even need to be about trump.

The left is so cringe that I honestly can't tell if this is low quality bait or if you actually buy this.

ahahaha burn hillary burn

Attached: 06161816.jpg (1242x810, 88K)

>if we felt like it, we would take action but after realizing how little we have to provide without consequence, we decided to go out for dinner instead

The fact that the Russians interfered in the election on Trump's behalf is not up for debate

Attached: 1502603504719.jpg (650x615, 102K)

>on trumps behalf
>literally a pitiful effort to show how easy americans are to screw with
>quick we need to focus on how planned it was and not the fact any idiot with extra money and a computer can swing an election

Putin proves how easy the election is to mess with and the top news ends up being who did it

Russian interference started, at least, in 2014.
Should we chase down Obama?

Attached: Screenshot_20190420-154614_Fennec F-Droid.jpg (1440x1067, 349K)

Doesn't understand the difference between participating with and being around during.

Deflect harder...

...nigger what?

Only people currently in office with rich enemies can be guilty of things

Neglecting literal timeline differences between inception and the ability to create

Be more left

There are more bitches in this thread than that wwyd to her thread.

Keep crying and yelling all the way down.

I'm literally jacking off to your tears.

>recites exact talking points of CNN
>claims he doesn't watch tv

lmao you aren't fooling anyone kid.

Russians were just having a giggle m8

>if they elected a black they'll definitely elect a woman

False

Weak

Neither of these refute that Russia interfered with the election on Trump's behalf. The second also doesn't point out anything that would incriminate Obama as he was not a candidate in 2014.

>directly says it wasn't on anyone's behalf
>ignore and repeat

So weak. Too much soy

The point isnt whether they interfered. It is whether trump was involved.
Mueller said no.
Keep holding out for the investigation into Mueller being a Russian puppet too tho. I'm about to cum.

>look mom!

>Directly says
No you didn't. I went back through your posts and at no point did you directly say it wasn't on anyone's behalf.
>Whether Trump was involved
He was the beneficiary.

Then you need to learn how to read

> (You)
>>Whether Trump was involved
>He was the beneficiary.

He was. Good job. Still doesn't show that he was involved.
I mean, unless you have info that Mueller doesn't? Maybe you have info Mueller doesnt?

>he happened to be the person that won and there isn't anything else to accuse

Please, show me the specific post in which you DIRECTLY stated it was on nobody's behalf.

I'll wait.

>NO COLLUSION NO OBSTRUCTION I WIN
>wawew wawew wawew there's some parts I don't like those are totally false the entire report is false except for that part which says I dindu nothing that one is 100% correct but otherwise is all 18 angerey dems

Attached: file.png (647x615, 287K)

Doesn't hillary and the left benefit from having something to accuse trump of?

I wrote the post lol

So link it. Shouldn't be hard.

But libtards will still continue to claim he did while trying to put someone like Clinton in power

...

You can benefit from actions you didn’t instigate or perpetuate.
For example:
>Someone steals my car
>get new car paid for by insurance
>????
>profit
I have profited from someone’s else’s actions that I had nothing to do with

I don't see a direct statement that it was on nobody's behalf in that post.

No that only happens when you plan it. 100%

And I don't have magic medicine that makes people smarter

says the pot to the kettle

>prove that I am not just interpreting things how I please in order to keep arguing

But you are doing such a good job

He is standing on the prepainted X, it has to be him.

Yeah -- who says that? Would an innocent guy say that...ever?

This level of cope

B-but, everyone is equal?

Does 'directly stated' man something different in your language?

Russia interfered, this fact is established.
Trump benefited, also established.
It was Russia's intent that Trump benefit, this is established.

What could it mean? It'S a MyStErY!

I did not state he instigated or perpetrated them. I said Russia did, on his behalf (i.e. intentionally for his benefit). These are facts already established in the Mueller investigation.

So he’s innocent

>it was russias intent

Look at that, he just inadvertently discovered there are more possibilities than his opinion

Cant obstruct a crime that didnt happen

Attached: donald-trump-02-ap-jc-180806_hpMain_4x3_992.jpg (992x744, 69K)

Except Russia didn't interfere and there's no possible way to know the source of the information stolen, just that it was leaked from Clinton's own illegal and irresponsible handling of classified information. I love how you lefties look past actual issues of national security and real obstruction of justice (destroying 30,000 emails along with laptop, tablets, and phones containing evidence) on your side to chase fairytales of Russia because you're too mentally inept to accept the results of a purely democratic election that you clearly lost.

Attached: received951914011075553416.jpg (700x898, 178K)

In regards to the fact that special counsels take years and hinder any real progress you can make with a Presidency, which it has. If you read just a FEW lines further, you'd see that. But you're retarded, so ://////

Attached: you_are_here.jpg (768x768, 175K)

Go to /pol/ retard

COLLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

His underlings refuse to follow his crazy orders...how can these Trumpsters support a President knowing even his cabinet don’t follow his crazy ass orders?

>Nobody notices the spelling error