Untitled

kys

It's bad notation, but I'll do it anyway
>16 / 2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1
>16 / 2[8 - 3(2)] + 1
>16 / 2[8 - 6] + 1
>16 / 2[2] + 1
>8[2] + 1
>16 + 1
>17

it's 5 IDIOT

Attached: 1555707938056.jpg (480x854, 190K)

no

1.8

retard

Attached: 1555708514228.jpg (1000x1000, 321K)

81

this

Attached: experts agree, you are retarded.jpg (790x570, 30K)

have fun going through life as a retard

jesus fuck...

Attached: 1555707818602.png (654x493, 35K)

Holy shit imagine being this retarded

>adding extra parenthesis
>still retarded

Attached: did you think I wouldn't notice..jpg (175x19, 2K)

wrong

Attached: 2019-04-19 17_24_29-_b_ - . - Random - 4chan.png (27x58, 1K)

Attached: 1555708845037.jpg (1000x1000, 590K)

You never did learn your PEMDAS did you?

>people diving 16/2 before multiplying the 2*2
peMDas
m before d
the answer is 5 no matter how retarded you are you cannot change math

5 because the 16/2*(xxx) have the same denomitator

First parenthesis/brackets
>16 / 2 * (8 - 3 * 2) + 1
Multiply before subtracting within parenthesis
>16 / 2 * (8 - 6) + 1
>16 / 2 * 2 + 1
Division/Multiplication left to right
>8 * 2 + 1
Finally addition / subtraction
>16 + 1
>17

16 / 2 * [ 8 - 3 * ( 4 - 2 ) ] + 1
16 / 2 * [ 8 - 3 * ( 2 ) ] + 1
16 / 2 * [ 8 - 6 ] + 1
16 / 2 * [ 2 ] + 1
8 * [ 2 ] + 1
16 + 1
17

Multiplication and division are the same rank, in which case you solve them in succession. That is 16/2*2=(16/2)*2 if you want to visualize it. For examle 2*3*4*5 will be [(2*3)*4]*5, and 2/3*4/5 will be [(2/3)*4]/5.

Yes, and it means, specifically:
>parenthesis
>exponents & roots
>multiplication & division
>addition & subtraction
>you execute them in that order primarily
>but any same-level operations happen left-to-right
OP uses shit-tier notation purposely to bait retards. Like you

>m before d
Go look up PEMDAS right now. I'll wait.

>Division/Multiplication left to right
no, you can't do that

PEMDAS is an acronym for the words parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction. Given two or more operations in a single expression, the order of the letters in PEMDAS tells you what to calculate first, second, third and so on, until the calculation is complete
kys idiot

The ÷ is bad notation. You'll get
16÷2(2)+1 which is 16/2*2+1. You do the order of operations left to right and get 8*2+1=16+1=17.
However, the ÷ is also interpreted by some to be the division between the entire product on the left by the entire product on the right, so 16÷2(2)+1 would actually be 16/[2(2)]+1 which basically is 16/(2*2)+1. By the order of operations, you do parentheses first, so
16/(2*2)+1=16/4+1=4+1=5.
The ÷ is nowadays used mostly to attract controversy and debate between people where they argue about what it actually means, thus the problem ends up not being about math at all, and is instead about semantics. It's just bad notation and should not be used

Here's a grade-level explanation for your grade-level intelligence

Attached: pemdas.jpg (765x486, 49K)

Forgot to add that a divison can be written as multiplication like this:
16/2*2=16*(1/2)*2

>you can't do that
what, follow the universally agreed upon order of operations? I just did.

Once the 2 is left in the parentheses, you start from the beginning of the problem.
Its 5. Multiplication and division are done from left to right.

Literally what? You mean 16/2*[(2)]+1 is 5, but 16/2*2+1 is 17?

Literally yes. Its the exact same equation, you fucking mongoloid. But if the parentheses help you organize the problem a bit better, so be it. Just realize that once everything is done in between these things: ()
You go from left to right until its been solved. Most of us can actually think ahead, and don't need to simplify it to the point of our own confusion, kek.

Imagine unironically saying 17

Attached: 1555563730930.jpg (360x295, 18K)

/thread

Assuming it's 16/(2*2), it's 5
Otherwise it's 17
Fuck your shitty bait thread
Sage

seriously, who posts the right answer in a math thread? Yea Forums is for baiting new fags xD

Well, if you unironically claiming that, I don't know what to tell you to help you. And if you happen to be right, an awful lot of steel structures should be failing right about the time they had been built.

You can't assume in such an equation. You are saying "I want to understand the problem this way and then the result is x". You can't bend math rules like that....

90

Attached: 1555430120104.png (1300x1500, 715K)

obvious joke but walk me through how you managed to do it

SADMEP
16/2*[8-3*(4-2)]+1
8*[8-3*(4-2)]+1
9*[8-3*(4-2)]
9*[5*(2)]
9*(10)
90

Attached: 1555440147971.jpg (556x730, 72K)

17 you fucking brailet.
Anyone that said 5 is a 5yo.

semteen

This. You fucking brailets.

8x10+1

It's 90. I teach math 94 at a Seattle College
and I'm a member of antifa, so I'm write.

Attached: 1555695211121.gif (311x362, 1.91M)

One, two, thirty three,
we support sanctuary cities

it's 5

Your write.

His rong

i love these thread

16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16/2[8-3(2)}+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
8(2)+1
16+1
=17

Fake photo shop

Methinks you replied to the wrong user.

5

that's right for the wrong reasons, it has nothing to do with numerators or denominators it's just divide before multiply, 16/2 then *2 not 2*2 then 16/4