Massive steel modern day structure burns for two hours. Turns into nothing but ashes

>samefag

Also Notre dame doesn’t have steel beams to melt

You wish don't you, retard?

Attached: dfdfghdfghdfgh.png (247x107, 4K)

Cant fly that fast that close to sea level but yea.

Something something jews etc

It descended 10,000ft/min, dipshit.

An airplane hit each tower.

Bit of a difference.

what happened with librechan?
please explain.

SNIFFSNIFFSNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

Hnnnngggggggghhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>There is no question that 911 was an inside job. But there's nothing you can do about it
This is the lie they have been trying to sell me all my life. I am 35 now, it took me quite a while to break free of the MASSIVE conditioning and mind control we are put through. Keep seeking truth, the path will be revealed to you.

each floor is one acre in size of concrete 4 inches thick.
do the math

They twin towers were offices full of furniture, paper, and electronics.

Notre Dame is made of stone and only the top part that was being renovated had scaffolding and was built with wood.

gross

Attached: 151468701001.gif (220x165, 61K)

The french are better builders.

wait he'll claim its a photo shop

I haven’t been on the Chan in literally 8 months. This is the first post I see. Nice to know only retarded children still post on the site.

Are you telling me there is some physical limitation to flying a certain speed close to sea level, or are you implying Mehmet and his buddies were keeping tight tabs on the flight regulations before smashing a passenger aircraft into a skyscraper?

>Turns into nothing but ashes
you forget the massive cleanup process bro?

Ashes, piles of rubble and twisted girders

Also note the height of the respective buildings. Shorter buildings have less stress and are more stable (dont flex in wind)

Reminder Americans lost their freedoms and do nothing about it because they're larping cowards.

Do u know what jet fule is?

and the area between is filled with paper lol

Are you retarded enough to think it was the actual concrete burning?

So are you, parenthetically.

This is true. I would know because amerilard..

i didn't.

>lost their freedoms
Amerifat here. You are misinformed

Attached: retardedthreadisretarded.jpg (480x360, 16K)

architecture was 600 times more sophisticated back in those days. also - no jet fuel this time.

I’m glad this happened I like tsa fondling my balls when I travel

Attached: 1DCB3270-5555-4629-9DD4-B8F88F54A8B9.gif (500x342, 1.72M)

I guess it says something about the build quality of European shit contra cheap American shit

is chartres cathedral and notre dame the same thing?

kek

>/thread your own post
Newfag

notre dame cathedral was built using legendary french stones. they're almost indestructable.

Neither was Building 7

Attached: build7.jpg (264x191, 6K)

Top kek

If you knew anything about metallurgy you wouldn't be acting like a retard.

That building didn't collapse until after 5pm that day. Wipe the drool off before you comment at least.

Photoshop

Stone structure lit on fire
-vs-
800ft tall steel frame structure slammed with an airplane with 4x the weight of Notre Dame sitting on broken heated beams which then crumbled and the falling weight crashing through each floor underneath it one at a time

Hmm... Hmm.....

Notre Dame was mostly made of wood. 600 years old wood. I know, that the concept of building old as 600 years is hard for americans but hey - thats fact.

greetings

Attached: 1552229167498.jpg (960x540, 72K)

Notre Dame didn't get hit by tens of thousands of pounds of plane going 600mph. It also wasn't full of multiple accelerants including jet fuel.

Look for the video of the other side. Theres a giant hole in it from debris. And if you could just imagine for a sec it was pretty hard to get a fire truck anywhere near it.

I'm not saying 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but we're focusing our energy on the wrong stuff here. It's completely plausible a plane weakened the building to the point it crumbled at the weak spot and took the building down with it as it crashed down.
Who did it is the real question.

America sucks

Only one had structural damage besides being on fire, want to guess which one?

Which ones?

>Wooden

Attached: 1548585960858.jpg (750x738, 283K)

>It's completely plausible a plane weakened the building to the point it crumbled at the weak spot and took the building down with it as it crashed down.
No that's beyond retarded. They pulled the building the down. We've know this for awhile.

Sure but it's a lot better than your shit hole of a country.

Attached: 1554171930858.jpg (638x498, 61K)

So what do you think happened? The conspirators were all like "Oh fuck, we forgot to make a plane hit that building, let's just blow it up anyway and hope nobody notices"? Nobody can be that fucking retarded.

One of those had load bearing structural damage and was on fire. Can you tell me which one?

One had a massive fucking plane smash into it and was tall rather than wide. How retarded are you?

Cool story bro. No one said anything about that, so umm.. idk, good job?

Also the structural columns and walls are not wood. They're stone. Stone doesn't melt or degrade under any kind of regular fire.
The wood you're talking about probably just held up plaster, not the roof.

What even is your point? Just another cheap unmeaningful shot at Americans so you could feel smug about something?

you sir are a fucking moron. building 7 is smoking. gun. answer: the jews

Do you not realize that the lizards are responsible you motherfucker, how dare you say the fucking government did it? The signs are all there the lizards did it read a book.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratesec

Attached: 1527797008731.gif (300x268, 522K)

Yes, but they're just the fall guy it seems. Billions of dollars we're made and transfered that day, and they got none of it.

cock en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverstein_Properties

Attached: 1543431146972.jpg (400x300, 36K)

Honestly the jews are my number 1 suspect. Israel even called it a good day, and America's been fighting their wars ever since.

Attached: 9-11 jews.jpg (640x405, 46K)

Attached: 1543702978464.jpg (500x664, 26K)

The recent 737 MAX crash clocked in at 575mph just before it crashed

i wonder if the saudi connection has anything to do with our VP and former oil executive finally breaking the barrier between corporations and politicians?

Attached: Dick-Cheney-evil.jpg (425x290, 34K)

yuuup

Attached: 1538446434037.png (261x193, 56K)

Fucking kek, my schmetzvas are schmolting

The Twin Towers collapsed at near freefall speed into their own footprints, taking the path of greatest resistance, but falling as if there was no resistance. Why? Because the resistance was removed using CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. It's so obvious, but there's still mostly willfully blind people who let themselves be convinced it was because of damage from fires. The first and last steel-framed buildings in the world to ever collapse from fires. What a joke to fall for the "pancake effect" nonsense. The massive steel support columns were cut diagonally to allow for freefall collapse. Building 7 was demolished just the same. Justified the global war on terror, the draconian Patriot Act, the invasion of Iraq based on some of the biggest lies ever told.

There are lots of examples of other steel skyscrapers with much bigger fires, burning for longer, and they NEVER collapse.
The Twin Towers and Building 7 were taken down using controlled demolition. They did not collapse because of damage from airplanes. Honest engineers and physicists see this clearly. NIST and Popular Mechanics are LIARS who help convince you retards that jet fuel memes made those buildings suddenly collapse straight down.

Attached: 9JK4n.jpg (1920x800, 138K)

And lets not forget that the sprinklers in that building were pretty much worthless. 9/11 might've been an inside job, but the official explanation is plausible. You know, if you had actually read it.

Not as much as all of Europe.

One didnt have an airliner fly into it intentionally fucktard

Fuel

Attached: 1548215704154.jpg (240x240, 32K)

What hit tower 7?

Airplane smash. Jet fuel hot

Tower 7 was hit with debris from the Twin Towers collapsed, and had fires on some floors. Then controlled demolition took it down nice and symmetrically, destroying numerous offices of government and private agencies.

This says it all.

Attached: The Smoking Thermite.webm (550x310, 1.88M)

No, it doesn't.

The answer lies in the math and science you decided not to learn in high school.

Tower 7 was left to burn for 8+ hours so the thermite could finally flash off and take the building out. The jet that was supposed to hit it, went down in Pennsylvania.

Hmm so wtc 7 building was struck by debris to the point it collapsed, but not any of the Closer buildings... that's wierd.

Attached: wtc.ht2.jpg (788x618, 65K)

Plane smash and steel is heavy also saying it was reduced to ash is retarded

You're right, maybe there was a little volcano next to that beam.

Things aren’t built to last like they used to, my grandmas toasters still kicking but mine that I bought from Chinese retards fell apart when I turned it on

Macron is way more inept than Bush

it says "hello molten aluminum!"

That's called designed obsolescence. They don't do that in skyscrapers.

Not saying yes, but yes

that shit was weakened by heat stoopid

Attached: 1552610315343.png (440x440, 197K)

Weird how more than 1 news station reported the (planned) collapse of Building 7 before it collapsed.

Attached: AccurateEmbellishedErin-max-1mb.gif (360x203, 806K)

Twin towers had airplanes fly into them
Notre Dame structure is mostly stone
The wood structure was for the roof and that collapsed in under an hour

/thread

Because when you're pulling off a secret plan to destroy several office blocks in a populated urban area you definitely need to give media early warning that a building is about to collapse because obviously none of them are going to have their cameras trained on it

You absolute fucking moron

The Empire State building was hit by a plane and it's still standing

Well, that and nobody planted demolition charges in the cathedral.

Office fires, including fires fueled with jet fuel, could not have and did not reach the very high temps requires to create molten steel. Pools of molten metal sat in the foundations for weeks after the collapse. Controlled demolition with incediaries like thermite created those ridiculously high temps. Not jet fuel >.

Do you think it was the mooslims

right or wrong this is a strawman argument
obviously the argument that the media is owned to the point of just being told what to say, not doing actual journalism

Thernite

Attached: barney-fife-i-dun-goofed-alternate.jpg (750x600, 66K)

It takes time and planning to set up a controlled demolition. They didn't make the decision to "pull it" the day of. This staged terror attack was not spontaneous. They didn't demolish building 7 to save any lives or reduce collateral damage. It was an opportunity to bring it down in the midst of the Twin Towers collapse. Its possible that the Pennsylvania plane was meant for Building 7. Regardless, you don't perform a massive controlled demolition without the setup.

Yes and I think they were allowed to do it and the buildings were rigged to cause a devastating murderous spectacle, that gave very powerful and evil people, the power to play god with humanity. Nearly every awful thing that's happened in the last 18 years, can be traced back to 9/11.

>Please explain.
why you wouldn't believe anything anyone says.

Every single person I have ask about building 7 is clueless. Local fire chief had no idea about building 7 and didn't believe me.

It really does, how could someone hit the exact right floor at 500+ mph. Especially a sandnigger.

Yes physical limitation.

Uh wat?

good reading comprehension there bud. I knew I could count on you to read the word 'aluminum' and know I actually meant 'steel'. fuckwit.

>Please explain.

One has jet fuel, the other has wood.

Planes are not difficult to fly, if you know what the controls do. Which they did. It's just throttle, yoke and rudder pedals.

No. what is jet fule?

Almost all of the highjackers were Saudi's, but Iraq and Afghanistian, and Osama, a CIA asset, was blamed. He was the controlled opposition patsy that was the face of the bad guys, even tho the USA buddies the Saudi's used their martyrs to help stage the false flag attack.

Attached: 3108cc2.png (516x384, 189K)

what "exact right floor" are you referring to?

any evidence?

Ya got me.
How bout those pools of molten metal tho? Prolly from jet fuel rite?

Please tell me more

Im pretty sure it would take quite some time to try and figure out which floor your supposed to hit, not like there was a big target on it. Plus a flor is only like 10 ft high, a slight breeze would change your course (or a 70+ mph updraft that skyscrapers are prone to producing).
But im sure you could do it right user, fuck logic.

The one the thermite was on

Rest of the world here: No you really are misinformed. America is evil and you're "freedoms" are really just a way to passicfy and mind controll you.
Run while you can.

600 year old building didn’t have 2 fucking planes crash and explode into them.
The whole “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams” shit is stupid
Like it may not be able to melt steel but it can heat it up and weaken it. Making it not be able to support the heavy weight above it and thus crash

The official government report.

>15 of the 19 highjackers were Saudi nationals.

Attached: Screenshot_20190415-195836_Drive.jpg (1080x2220, 1.17M)

What thermite? No one uses thermite as a demolition device, and a 747 has gotta be the single worst way to set the stuff off.

Yup and it explains why he was "buried at sea". He was not killed that day by S Club 7 or whatever they are called.

The government report uses the words patsy and false flag?

why is a burial at sea necessary?

i think a jetliner hit the newer building. maybe it compromised the structure or something?

Yeah the math is the heavy concrete was not supported from the now weakened or non-existent floor below it

Attached: 1549599178311.gif (300x186, 446K)

Not until it becomes declassified in 30 years.

Attached: 1548586197051.jpg (750x1021, 279K)

Jet fuel melts steal beams, wood doesn't melt stone.

Attached: 911.jpg (390x450, 50K)

Attached: 1548586446496.jpg (750x573, 186K)

Awe yes user cause just knowing the controls means you’re skilled enough to actually fly one without experience

>/thread
What a faggot

only if its not steel. you look at a pool of molten metal and tell me which metal it is, as a construction worker or volunteer clearing the rubble. I'll be real impressed.

To hide the real circumstances of Osama's death, and keep his body from being examined, and because he and his family are friends of the Bush's.

But cuz it's his religious wishes to be buried at sea so he was allegedly thrown overboard, no questions asked. No body to examine. Just trust he was the bad guy and they killed him and now his body is at sea to peacefully transition to the afterlife. Thanks for your service to the illuminati!

Retards gotta tard!

Shaped charges are set off with electricity in actual demolitions. A simple metal sleeve welded to structural supports at an angle, filled with thermite and exposed to a strong open flame, would do the same job. Reminder that the floors where the collapse began were closed for the instillation of an Israeli art project before the incident. They were most certainly in the walls for this project. I do hvac and get into the ceilings and walls all the time, nobody bothers me ever. I could install anything and nobody would bat an eye, so they could as well.

you forgot obama

real man detected

all of this. seriously, thermite is noisy as fuck, slow, and it takes absolutely huge amounts of it to cut through steel. there's a reason it wasn't used to take down the towers. it's retarded.

so pakistan is in on it? because they arrived shortly after seal team 6 left, and they grabbed bin laden's wife and son. nice of the pakistan government to play along I guess.

sure kid

Most comprehensive argument for the truth. If you're stupid you'll ignore this

youtu. be/MP- Cunho7Ho

You do realize that the jet fuel doesn’t need to melt the steel to cause damage right? Like you’re heating it up past a point of it’s optimum strength...and also a fucking plane crashed into the side

obvious shop

The truth is that the gumbit is to inefficient to protect the peeps. OB had a message but nobody wanted to listen. Muh freedoms was strafed, protecc freedoms.

that's his standard reply

Attached: 1548586749998.jpg (750x524, 171K)

You forgot that part where the plane hit it at like 150mph

This

For people who think that 9/11 was inside job, who gained from it? What did they gain? Please explain

Lol get a load of this guy, he thinks there is "an exact right floor" you've got to hit to bring a building down like fucking jenga

They went to flight school. My brother in law had a little twin engine plane when I was a kid, Piper Comanche, I think. He took us up in it a few times and with just the experience of flight simulator games, I was easily able to fly it. It's not difficult at all in the air, it's preflight safety checks, takeoff and landing that take a decent chunk of skill. All things the hijackers didn't have to do.

being a warmonger is incredibly profitable

because steel beams melt jet fuel

>Nobody can be that fucking retarded.
You faggots had both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as candidates for president, so you can indeed be all levels of retarded.
You faggots also had your brightest economic minds with highest accolades and prestigious university backgrounds and diplomas, crashing the economy, so you can indeed be all levels of retarded.

Notre Dame was built to withstand a direct nuclear blast so the preachers had somewhere to hide their boys during the world wars.. The towers were only built to withstand wind and clouds.

The global shadow government aka the illuminati aka the powers that be aka the man behind the curtain aka power obsessed psychopaths staged the attack for all sorts of fun outcomes. Global war on terror to let the allies run roughshod through the middle east, pass laws for our safety that chip away more freedoms, create division and xenophobia which keep them in control...

This

It was not an inside job, but it was definitely a tragedy taken advantage of.

What was gained? Government authority. Rights were stripped. Nations were invaded.

The Patriot Act basically did away with the US's Bill of Rights. Now, speech can be silenced, homes can be searched, and people can be arrested, detained indefinitely without trial, and required to incriminate themselves, all while denied the presence of a lawyer, if the "terrorism" word is bandied about.

Many dangerous precedents were set. Test cases were made, to gauge the reactions of the people.

The people lost much. government gained considerably.

Yes but who? Do you really think a country would kill 3000 of its own people just wage war? Why not wage war for literally any other reason? What makes 9/11 an inside job but any other terrorist attack over past the decade isn’t also an inside job?

Everywhere else they are called "rocks" and they are almost indestructable too.

NAFTA protests squashed. 'Hanging Chad' rigged election forgotten. Massive new law enforcement powers. And two oil wars served up on a silver platter. Since then, it's opened up many other avenues to play god with humanity as well.

But there are pics of structural beams cut at angles and eyewitness accounts of pools of molten metal in the basement levels, 1st responders likened it to a foundry....so uhhh, something melted metal.

Any proof?

>What did they gain?
An excuse for privacy invasion for profit.

Everywhere else they are called "rocks" and they are pretty hard to destroy too.

Still not a proof of an inside job and the metal was melted then maybe jet fuel does melt steel beams under certain conditions

Notre Dame was built to withstand a direct nuclear blast.

Fucking....what? I really must have my timeline of atomic sciences mixed up by most of a millenium.

the gay niggers did it

Attached: BNecb2q[1].jpg (462x462, 31K)

we haven't fought one war for israel

*Something, Something, DEEP STATE. something Something SOMething JEWS!*

If there was solid proof, the world would explode and we couldn't make enough guillotines to keep sharp ones in service.

it's not obvious to the world's engineers, why is it obvious to you?

resistance is not a mechanical term btw.

You must really be a scared blind faggot to think 9/11 wasn't an inside job.

You complete idiot.

Resistance is a common sense term, if you cant see that many floors of building offers resistance that air would not, I'm sad for America's public school system.

the art project was austrian, i repeat AUSTRIAN

It is obvious to engineers and architects and physicists and anyone with common sense who take one look at it. The problem is that the ones who write about it play along with the blatant fraud.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth is a good example of professionals who aren't afraid to say what the evidence actually shows - controlled demolition.

Concrete dust.

So? I've got nothing against kangaroo lovers

>Do you really think a country would kill 3000 of its own people just wage war?
do you really think they wouldn't?

i'll point you back to but you're likely a troll/shill

Small plane.

if you are trying to mechanically explain a collapse or failure you wouldn't use resistance.

The fact is the towers did not fall at free fall speed or even that close to it. Just because someone on youtube says they did does not make it so. As you watch the collapse you can see that the debris that was falling during the collapse falls at greater rate.

Doesn't answer the question. None of you truther faggots ever can answer it. Keep drinking the Infowars koolaid you fucktards.

Winrar.

modern buildings are shit.
old buildings are THE shit.
also, it took 200 years to build that cathedral, this piece of crap ugly eyesore (it's a shame people died, but the building was shit looking) took 10.

Floors are not marked on the outside of buildings. You would just be guessing.

Bullshit.

"In the period leading up to 9/11, a group of Israelis (non-U.S. citizens) managed to secure “temporary construction” passes to perform work on the 91st floor of Larry “pull it” Silverstein’s leased WTC 1. These passes gave them access to the entire WTC complex. The pretense was an art project called the “B-Thing” and the group is called Gelatin."

Attached: uberSwag.png (1021x721, 774K)

/thread

AE 9/11 has gotten nowhere in the scientific community, absolutely nowhere!

An airplane hit one and not the other.

gelatin was austrian

No, an airplane didn't hit Building 7. But the twin towers did.

/thread

Attached: George Bush.jpg (590x396, 46K)

nerve gas

The Twin Towers absolutely collapsed at near freefall speed. The collapse took the path of GREATEST RESISTANCE (straight down into itself, where all that steel should be) but fell fast and free as if there was zero resistance. Because there was no resistance. The buildings didnt have massive randomly sized chunks fa over to the sides, leaving the vast majority of the buildings standing. The wall panels shot outwards hundreds of feet, and the buildings went straight down into it's own footprint. This is reality.

Attached: Jew_Call.jpg (1127x1005, 283K)

You did it. You blew the case wide open. Now what are you gonna do?
Jack shit, faggot.
You're gonna go back to tightening your tinfoil hat and jerking off to Alex Jones ASMR.

Attached: Kawakami_Cut-in.png (872x632, 117K)

>it took 200 years to build that cathedral
It's a shame nobody thought to put a sprinkler system or something in it. Don't old buildings still have to meet safety code regulations?

Attached: Drag-in-continuum-flow-vs-Altitude.png (850x432, 29K)

15000, 20000... does that equal your life? if you are married???
they seem to underestimate people

How is there still a thread after this?

Attached: NrcAEzF.gif (312x176, 882K)

near free fall speed is not at all the same thing as free fall speed, the collapsing floors didn't offer much "resistance" as you call it from the every expanding dynamic load.

watch the towers collapse again and maybe set it to half speed, you will visibly see pancaking, it's clear as day!

I guess it would be better not to talk about it. Would that make you less upset about hearing the truth about 9/11?

I've spent 15000 on a bike I totalled in a week. lol.
>wouldn't commit suicide for that much. sorry, I don't think anybody would, more since you can't use money if you are dead.

Notre Dame wasn't hit by a plane retard

Wait a sec. Is the lie that 9/11 was an inside job or that there’s nothing you can do about it?

Today, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) acknowledges that WTC 7 fell at a rate of free fall (or the rate of gravity) for a period of approximately 2.25 seconds before it started to slow down.1 David Chandler, a physics teacher who has studied the behavior of WTC 7 extensively, explains the significance of free fall in the article titled “Free Fall and Building 7 on 9/11”: 2

Attached: 6PjxZ8B.jpg (612x612, 56K)

I visibly see squibs fire off early and during collapse. I see symmetrical collapses of steel framed skyscrapers that would have never burnt down from those fires. Pancake effect wouldnt happen in 16 seconds. Slow it down to any speed you want, the towers disappeared straight down, smooth and resistance-free. The pancake effect is a joke and you fell for it.

this actually makes sense. Saudis are US allies, they buy a ton of arms from them, they fucking trained osama bin laden (!!!), and no one, I repeat NO ONE, would choose the date 911, except an american.

A muslim would choose an important day from their faith. Islam is a scapegoat, a reason to sell arms in a world that would be otherwise in peace.

yes the agree that for a portion of the collapse it appears to be free fall speed, however they also say that the measurements are not precise, they are only going from observable data, that is plotting pixel points based on known scale and then extrapolating distance traveled over time, not precise in the least.

Yeah but they were both on fire, so...
Explain that retard.

This is Trumps fault.

those are not squibs, the symmetry of the fall has to do with gravity being the predominant force. the joke is that you think you are smarter than engineers

Religion of peace.

anonfile.com/UaT4l4ecn7/03D84CB6-934D-46D3-95AF-B7F9F4D17108_MP4

NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1) precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence, and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades, N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A).
>try again

you forgot the part that the bomb sniffing dogs were removed from WTC 2 weeks prior for thermite to be painted on

they might have disabled something because of the renovation works.
if that was the case, then we have arson.
if we think arson, then quite possibly was one of the builders , with easy access to the roof that was highly flammable.

because speed and weight defines how hot a fire is

because jet fuel also caused tower 7 to burn

The exterior panels that first struck the ground were detached from the main portion of the building. of course they were at free-fall they were off the building you fucking mongoloid.

9/11 was a planed inside job.

Notre Dame was lit by a muslim.

see why they instantly said it WASN'T arson. it would prove 9/11 narrative false.

Let a redneck explain

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

That's how the fucking NIST determined speed of fall, argue with them you retarded fucking cretin

I'm smart enough to learn from honest engineers.

White people deserve this because they did bad things.

fucking soyboi

muh white guilt

ITT

Anons who never laid one brick on top of another in their whole sorry lives explaining building construction.

you are not an engineer. you are not a scientist of any sort.

steel beams do not need to melt to lose structural integrity

this is the reason why you don't need to melt steel to make a knife, you just heat it up and it gets softer. if a metal structure is softer and it is under load, it will collapse.

close, but thats the sad, sorry state our education system is in

Endless and invincible stupidity still blathering in 2019 about aircraft collisions somehow converting entire billion ton concrete reinforced steel structures to airborne dust, leaving only holes in the ground.
Argument = pointless

Attached: 1503658109661.jpg (520x520, 66K)

It has hallow structure and isn't super strong just by design.

Lol this dude thinks that brick laying (something bigger slaves in Egypt did 4k years ago) makes him qualified as an engineer. Get back to work Pedro, that brick ain't gonna lay itself.

And more importantly. Will collapse unevenly and not fall perfectly into its own footprint.

K

So steel weakens from heat.

Does weakened steel explain the collapse you witnessed?

Really tho?

Don't make 'em like they used to anymore

test

Attached: USS_New_YorkMadeWith911Steel.jpg (3888x2592, 1.95M)

You fags who accept the official story have to lie to yourselves to gobble up that load of horseshit. It must make it easier when the rest of the idiot's around you, and mainstream media say it too. Keeping the hard truths out if your heart because its too scary.

Lmao

Allahu Akbar

Attached: qaarn2fag7bsbllny0y1.jpg (1600x900, 254K)

Weren't the buildings designed to collapse like that as to not risk it falling over onto other buildings?

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

Probably a hydrocarbon? What are you getting at

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

They weren't designed to spontaneously collapse at freefall, no.

They were designed to withstand a hit from a smaller airplane, and they did withstand the hit. Then they were brought down with massive controlled demolition.

Makes sense.

Wow, look at this half of one side of this building! Its totally fine and i bet the other 80% of it is too. This is conclusive evidence of the existence of lizard jew George Bush.

Tower 7 was parked like a car in front of a fire hydrant, so they knocked it down to get more water

Wait really?

Lol, dude with a rod of "structural steel" to explain how jet fuel fires could weaken massive steel support columns to fail all at once.

Jet fuel can't melt leaded glass, OP.

The cathedral isn’t 600 years old you fucking moron. It’s 859 years old

They couldnt run the hose thru the building so they brought it down real quick. They are allowed to do that cuz the curb was marked red.

>Planes hit
>Couldnt put it out
>Didn't want to leave an ugly building for disassembly
>well clean it up later
>let's make an organized mess
Controlled demolition wasn't done before planes, it was aftet

Jet fuel can't melt my anus, so why can it melt steal beans?

I lived in NYC. They would never do that.
Firefighters love to take any chance to destroy personal property on the clock.

Nothing about this makes sense, except the obvious point that controlled demolition occurred after the planes hit.

God was protecting notre dame

Wtc was a monument to evil capitalism

youtube.com/watch?v=4LUDXpMhkNk

youtube.com/watch?v=4LUDXpMhkNk

Melting point steel: 1370°C
Melting point stone: 2750°C

Indiana will never be the same.

there is absolutely zero evidence of controlled demolition.

it's only obvious to conspiracy theorists

Fagtowers aren't steel structures but concrete structures with a steel frame whose length/width was a paltry unit compared to height which equated to an unstable vertical structure more easily brought down with structural damage as there is a massive downwards force and lack of proper horizontal distribution.

Nothing but evidence of controlled demolition. No evidence of a gravitational collapse.

Everything about the nature of the collapse screams controlled demo.
Unburnt iron oxide (thermite) in all dust samples. Disintegration of concrete. Extremely high temps created pools of molten steel.

Steel skyscrapers disappear in 16 seconds and you let yourself be convinced it was from fires.

>Everything about the nature of the collapse screams controlled demo
kek
You've never read a science paper in your life have you?

unburnt iron oxide... you mean rust which is located on every steel beam even before construction is completed
concret tends to turn to powder when crushed not sure how this is evidence for demolition
office fires can peak at 1800f one with keroseen and a whole plane made of aluminium along with other oluminium in the building could hav very likely created molten aluminium and puddled.
sky scrapers that where hit with a plane going at 430-480mph then had jet fuel on them can definitely collapse them that quickly.

Hearing something a hundred times is the same is hearing it once, really.

Attached: 258lqd.jpg (300x300, 28K)

you don't know that! maybe one one allah akbar'd a sesna into it

how about you go walk off the ice wall, dumbass

one was hit by a fucking plane you retard.

So this is how I see the whole controlled demolition thing happening...

>demolition expert and conspirator (probably George Bush himself actually) enters one of many offices in the north tower
>"uh excuse me ma'am can we just move you for a second? I need to get in here real quick."
>he's carrying a crate of explosives
>blasting caps falling out of his fucking pockets
>"oh uh... sure... what's up?"
>"just gotta change this fluorescent light fixture..."
>smashes a hole in the wall with a sledgehammer to get to the support column
>wraps the fucking column in explosives
>looks at the light
>"yeah the light looks good actually... guess I fixed it"
>he saunters off, smirking, having pulled off such masterful slight of hand
>"just gotta do this 200 more times..."

>There is no question...
no, there are many questions regarding your insane conspiracy theory. you are to stupid to see it

Dumbass. The explosives were planted while construction took place. The whole point of the building was to blow up so America could blame ISIS as an excuse to invade Israel and steal their oil supply.

So what utopian free country do you live in

It’s flammable

600 mph ? Pardon

>except all that shit in the sandbox hurrdurr

>pic related

Attached: 1_roads.jpg (696x343, 71K)

More than any other cunt tree ! Absolutely astronomical debt, corrupt government, FBI CIA work against each other ruining the cuntree. Kennedy and twin towers and god knows what else home grown cuntree destruction!!

cheney was the driving force behind the iraq war

as for afghanistan, that did little to help israel

what other wars?

syria? we were the last to enter that confict.
Libya? That was Britain and France, we were just the supporting team

The steeple collapsed that pretty structural

A B-52 flew into the empire state building in 1945, it didn't even partially collapse.
Steel and concrete is stronger than aircraft aluminum alloys.

Well said.

Please explain to me why your mother did not have an abortion.

Said the "Free" Russian.

pure kerosene oil

Jet fuel melted steel beams.

Attached: 1502584087194.jpg (685x567, 72K)

JET FUEL CANT MELT STEEL BEAMS