Non GMO vs GMO
let’s have a discussion, gmo helps in better spread distribution of food to people but can have ecosystem detriments
Non gmo is a more natural approach without harming the environment too too much, but is not viable in large populace circumstances
at 7 000 000 000 people organic isnt an option.
isn't this image wrong?
This
so, genocide?
>let’s have a discussion
What the fuck is this? Pol?
This is now a pepe thread.
Actually none GMO is arguably more harmful to environment. It requires more land and more resources like water and energy. In addition to this natural pesticides are not less harmful then genetic enhancements. With GMO you can keep pests away without hurting bees or other welcomed species. Overall natural crops are less efficient and as harmful to environment as GMO if not more.
that pic is bullshit
All produce and livestock are genetically modified you fucking fag. Theres a reason bananas don't look anything like they did in the 19th century, because we cross and selectively breed all of our food to make it less shit.
The problem is agri-corporation practices and widespread redundant use of pesticides
