Rind et al...

Rind et al. was a survey in which 70% of the cases of the "abused" in childhood report that this did not damage them and that the experience was positive.
At the time it was a bout of controversy, they tried anyway to condemn the study, proved by A + B that pedophilia is not something monstrous, and the article was condemned on behalf of a flat militancy. And the worst thing is that they could not prove otherwise. It was kind of when it was in antiquity and some scientist said that the earth was round and was condemned for it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

Attached: 999892615345.jpg (576x576, 154K)

Other urls found in this thread:

dur.ac.uk/anthropology/mandrills/sexual.dimorphism/
newsweek.com/calling-prophet-muhammad-pedophile-not-protected-free-speech-court-rules-1189031
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>controversy
>biased study made by pedophiles

NEXT.

Prove it.

Sage. Fuck off pedophile.

Pedophilia will be legalized.
Deal with it.

That's some cheap ass bait

It's not a bait

Being attracted to a prepubescent person is mental illness.

Being gay was a mental illness, 32 years ago.

Of course it is, and an old one; within the next few years the LGBT will alienate the degenerates that were taken after the Q was implemented, and you pedo idiots will have a harsh step back.