>Now: This blurry photo is totally enough evidence to convince me it's a real black hole!
>Those blurry photos of UFOs, Bigfoot, and the Loch Ness Monster are nowhere near enough to convince me they're real
Why are people so eager to believe any photo released by NASA when they've been faking pictures for decades?
Other urls found in this thread:
its not a photo you retard
Yesh, I agwee! Nassa is bad!!!1!11 fAke news!
sit down kid
>Why are people so eager to believe any photo released by NASA when they've been faking pictures for decades?
Why are people so eager to believe OP were no Russian troll from Saint Petersburg when they've been faking dissent in population for years?
Someone located a black hole and managed to get a photograph of it. No one cares if you choose to believe it or not...
Do you believe that somehow helps your argument?
>blurry
this photo is smaller than a pixel of Hubbles images
>NASA
Also, it's many lightyears across and had to be taken over a long period of time, then pieced together.
I care that dumb sheep like you believe it without the slightest bit of skepticism.
So how do they know it's really a black hole then? It could literally be a smear in the lens.
yes its points of data from radio telescopes presented in a way retards like you can understand
So you're retarded and this isn't bait xdddd
Why?
this + the earth is flat and the sun rotates around the earth, wake up you atheist mammals, may Lord forgive your sins.
And, of course, the earth is 6,000 yrs old.
So it's a fucking photo then?
It wasn't NASA
Thats a false equivalence for many reasons. One is the integrity of the source of the images. Big foot sightings are from hillbillies most of the time and you can never get a second pic cause "big foot must be a really good hider!" Black hole pic is from hundreds of scientists working together over 2 years.
Secondly, there's lots of non visual evidence to show that the black hole is there/exists, like the immense gravitational field it has on objects nearby. If Big foot was leaving foot prints, fur with a unique DNA never discovered before, or even corpses/skeletal remains, then we would have a reason to take the hillbillies more seriously. Same thing for the other hoaxes you name, unreliable sources and no side evidence to show they exist.
isnt it real because physics?
Counter question: why are you so eager to discount it?
You'll never see one with your own eyes and it will never affect you in any way.
There's also nothing to gain by the providers of the representation "tricking" you.
I did that shit in Photoshop in 5 minutes.
Why you post suck a shitty image of it then?
Because I helped process the raw data through boinc