Well?

Well?

Attached: e40f85f9d6457e417dbb383597bc78d4e211675523000a90b8e70f2efb14a710.png (300x168, 125K)

The left one can actualy read her book.

One will detonate herself killing everyone in the vicinity, the other will push out a couple of kids and get fat. Guess which is which.

One of them is willing to seek justice while the other is willing to seek medieval punishment. Either way, both religions are insane and need to end.

Shaved. Not shaved.

Yes these are all true.

On the Left: Disagrees with homosexuality, but agrees to their right to exist peacefully, believes in freedom of speech, the right to defend your own life, and is part of the least racist, least sexist, least hateful, most prosperous country to have ever existed in all of human history.
On the Right: Believes that homosexuality is punishable by death, women are second class citizens, speech and religious affiliation should adhere strictly to Muslim values and that anyone defying those should be taxed, enslaved or executed. Also, has an intense hatred of Jewish people. Is a member of one of the least tolerant, most racist, most hateful ideologies in all of human history.

one kills people for fun

hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahhahahaaahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahahahahahahaha

>the least racist, least sexist, least hateful, most prosperous country to have ever existed in all of human history.
a country built by slaves, divided by a civil war that still lingers on in today's politics, never had a female head of state, and currently in debt up to its eyeballs to the Chinese. Oh, please.

Left one doesn't shoot innocent people.

well

Well

Well?

big hole with water in.

there is no difference, both are slaves to collectiv thaughts, or ideals/dogma

geography.

Nope. At the height of slavery, only 13% of the US population owned slaves, also the 3/5 compromise was intentionally designed to destroy slavery, which it ultimately did. Balck people between 1940-1960 were experiencing greater upward economic mobility that whites at the same time.

Eventually the US will have a female president, but who gives a shit about the genitals that someone has. Genitals do not make great leaders, values and policy do.

The debt the US has is a problem, I agree. However, considering that the US is using it's military to defend 1/3 of the world against, and provides the most food to the world, and is more generous then the next 10 countries combined, I don't think the US debt issue make it a horrible country, certainly not when compared to any single fundamentalist Muslim run country.

d'aw. you think you're smart. how adorable.

And nearly every modern country in existence has a similar or worse history. Your point? The ideology that was put into place has remained as a pillar of success. And this same ideology allowed the US to advance past simply allowing slavery (unlike Africa). It was passed on to the rest of the world as well, but they don't even fully understand it. Eh.

Also, who gives a shit about the sex of our heads of state? You're an idiot if you think that matters. The point is, there COULD be. There just hasn't been one that had the stuff for the job.... yet. Unlike countries like New Zealand which puts into power a moronic fool just because "VAGINA". Dumb fucking mongoloid cucks.

As for our """Debt""", we also have the highest GDP by a long shot, and a growing economy. Not perfect, and spending needs to be put back under control (hard to do with retards who want to follow the European retard model), but still not horrible. Either way, US is the best. You're just a butthurt Eurofag, mad about the impending break up and fail of the EU. Good thing the UK got out when they could. lol

Well put. Too bad the mouth breather will just TL;DR it because he's a mouth breather.

The only difference is who each of the women believes is God's final prophet, Jesus or Mohammad.

But they both believe in the same Abrahamic God.

well?

One on the left is for self defense and would probably stop the one on the right
One on the right would shoot up a school or other innocent civilians due to being a religious extremist/terrorist

>nearly
and there it is.

They're the same picture.
In all reality tho, the girl on the right is probably an all around better person

Attached: 17042553-FACB-463E-894C-80EA7A9056B9.jpg (634x646, 300K)

Not a terrific example. Want me to look up the domestic white caucasion USA terrorists who reference the bible before fucking shit up?

Yes, please do.

Then compare it to the total terrorist attacks in the same time frame, in the name of Allah, and tell us all which one has caused dramatically more death and destruction.

ok, cos this cunt: think you're both geniuses, let's dissect this point by point.

>Nope. At the height of slavery, only 13% of the US population owned slaves, also the 3/5 compromise was intentionally designed to destroy slavery, which it ultimately did.
13% of any population owning slaves is VAST in what are relatively modern times.

>Balck people between 1940-1960 were experiencing greater upward economic mobility that whites at the same time.
Relatively, perhaps, but that's because they were starting from a much lower level. Pretty obvious to anyone with any sense, surely.

>Eventually the US will have a female president, but who gives a shit about the genitals that someone has. Genitals do not make great leaders, values and policy do.
Sure, just a coincidence that the 44 Presidents up to now all just happened to be guys.

>The debt the US has is a problem, I agree. However, considering that the US is using it's military to defend 1/3 of the world against, and provides the most food to the world, and is more generous then the next 10 countries combined, I don't think the US debt issue make it a horrible country, certainly not when compared to any single fundamentalist Muslim run country.
never said anything about it being a horrible country, or worse than any Muslim state. just questioned the idea of it being the most prosperous nation in history. honestly, this is about the only one that the original post has a case for. but prosperity is very much a loose concept. prosperous for who? The US has a vast GDP, but whether that benefits all its citizens as much as smaller but more equal societies do is a case in point.

yes

oooh oooh, do we get to count the US incursion into Iraq? Cos that'll balance those numbers up pretty sweetly.

it's easy to tell the difference

Attached: B_AiI9_XIAA67_t.jpg (800x508, 99K)

wars for kikes don't count schlomo

Attached: 6ee.jpg (600x600, 55K)

that's in the name of cheap oil, you daft cunt
so they're exactly the same and yes

Does anyone have the edit ot this where it has a guy with a beard holding a telescope and a science book?

ME TRIBE BETTER DEN U TRIBE

Attached: gvg.jpg (1186x448, 85K)

about 5 bank accounts 3 ounces and 2 vehicles

yes, because things only ever happen for one sole simple easily definable reason, and are never ever complex. you drooling simpleton.

Um, if you are going to reference the pre-civil war era as "relatively modern times" than you need to expand your list of countries engaging in slavery lol The point is that the country wasn't "built on slavery".

Yes, however, if race was the continuous issue that people claimed, then Black people would have never been able to succeed. The fact that they did ( pre-civil rights era) is a testament to both opportunity available and the determination of Blacks in the US in spite of things like the Jim Crow laws that Democratics passed. Interestingly, the Jim Crow laws were passed to FORCE businesses to be as racist as the Democrats, because the owners of most businesses weren't interested in segregating their customers.

Again Genitals don't matter, and tell me how many women ran for office in comparison to men. But to your point, women weren't always allowed in politics. They also didn't pay taxes, weren't responsible for their debt, and weren't eligible for the draft. Which is why a great number of women actually fought against the right to vote. Personally I think that was wrong, and I am glad the US fixed that mistake. Now women can run for president, and will eventually win, so will a gay person, hispanic, and any other kind of intersectional attribute you want to use. Annnnd none of it will mean a damn thing, because policy and values are the only things that matter about leading a country.

Yes, and since that is in the same time frame, you also have to count all the deaths by ISIS along with it.

Try again. lol

Attached: 41cfa7fd4352aba4d7d770525ae6be5677b07d980c2cd3e9fee8f74fb932047d.png (449x1197, 55K)

Wow, I said that pretty well. Kudos to me.

In the meantime, the limited intellect of the one guy who wanted to make a counter point. . . I guess . . . not really sure since he never made a good one. Anyway, it's like arguing with a potato. lol I am out, it's been fun.

one actually kills people and the other just owns a weapon for protection.

rofl

you're taking shitposts seriously, friend
it might be time to take a step back from the keyboard for a few minutes

none ...they are all religious nuts
religious people are crazy
#Obama2020 ( Michael )

/thread

Attached: 1550743755751.jpg (500x281, 80K)

>least racist, least sexist, least hateful
Are you legit retarded or just slept through American History?

The left will fire her gun recreationally.
The right will fire it in war.
The left is a pussy and the right is not.

Well if he is so wrong then tell me a country which was least racist, least sexist, least hateful.

this is why there are so many americans pouring into middle eastern cities that totally aren't shit holes

How many times are you going to upload this fucking photo with the same bullshit thread? We already went over this. The one in the left is a terrorist who will shoot up her school and fuck kids meanwhile the one in the right is the fucking idiot religious bitch

What you're asking is a lesser of two or more evils situation. user was implying America was founded and continues to run on moral high ground... Which it certainly doesn't...

Attached: 1553507392380.jpg (480x306, 31K)

But the statement remains true. He wasn´t saying that America is without those things.
But the western world all around has the least problems in all the mentioned things, especialy compared to muslim majority countries.

Both are retarded, but the one on the right will die for her beliefs. The left is a coward who goes to Trump rallies.

>to have ever existed in all of human history.
You really think post colonial America fits that? That's what I'm getting at, pretty much choose any ancient civilization pre-abrahamic religion and it was better in those senses than the US ever was.

Attached: 1544133976-20181206 (1).png (684x1673, 663K)

its good when white people murder people because im a pepe nazi

Like, which one? Not to aggregate you, I am just honestly curious.

i think the argument here is on the lines of:
>what is the difference between URAAAAAA and AIAIAIAIAAA
answer: NONE

its not even white, its JEWS vs THE WORLD

the left one is stuck in the 19th century. the right one the 15th.

Just in recent history, many of the isolated Nativate American tribal nations had no sense of misogyny, property, or race. Globalism spreads and aggregates the development of knowledge and resources, resources are finite and and facts can sometimes be unwanted/harmful to a communities sense of being and self. This creates xenophobia which manifests in alienating and demonizing cultural aspects outside one's own. So as I previously stated, pretty much choose any isolated pre-abrahamic civilization.

Attached: 1543669213112.jpg (707x613, 214K)

trips of truth

Attached: 1462509827563.gif (400x300, 525K)

I dont think I can agree with that notion. While maybe not a matter of Race, the Native americans were extremly tribalistic and brutal to one another.
They invented many forms of torture to deny each other the ascendence to heaven.
On the Theme of sexism there are no prove that the Tribes were much more progressive than the Americans of today.
There were clear segregations betwenn woman jobs and men jobs.

>nearly every modern country in existence has a similar or worse history.
The fuck you mean nearly? Every modern country has a fucked up past. Name one that doesn't.

That isn't a fair comparison. First, I am not sure that the misogyny aspect could even be quantified, but on face value, doesn't seem likely. Their view of property was different, but tribal warfare and brutality over territory certainly existed. And most importantly, they were a racially homogenous group. So really, they only point you can make with relative certainty is the one about race.

You also completely ignored prosperity, which even is everything you had mentioned was accurate, your point still fails because any isolated group at any point in history never achieved the things he listed all at once.

isolated Nativate American tribal nations
>or race
how isolated are we talking about? like they never saw another tribe? cuz if they did they would fucking kill them. Natives were savages like any human being that ever existed. they had wars over territory, women, items and religion... its was same shit. just because they lack a concept of personal ownership doesn;t mean they didn't feel more entitled to material entities than the other group of people.
we evolve like chimps do- if you have a group large enough they will separate and start fighting the other group they recently separated from... nothing new.

Both counter arguments are self defeating as they claim abstraction, which stems from the original statement.

Also: Tribalism ≠ Racism

"Segregation" between male and female roles also ≠ misogyny. That's simply exploiting the strengths of which biology granted you, e.g. strong back = hunting/manual labor and breast feeding = child rearing.

We did this yesterday to

But the first point then would simply mean that the native americans were not racist, because there were no other Races around. Which, in my opinion, is not a great achievement to be honest.

Also, if the segregation of the sexes is not sexism, then why is it one of the biggest talking points of modern feminism. From all we can see, male chiefs were vastly overrepresented in leading Roles in the Tribe, Hunters were overrepresented male.

lol tell that to 98% of the content here.

The one on the left is good. The one on the right is bad. Boy, you're stupid!

I won't do anal with the one on the right.

The one on the right has the gun because the one on the left keeps invading her homeland and bombing her cities every decade or so. The one on the left believes that they are entitled to all the oil that belongs to the one on the right and will topple governments and back rebels to make sure the oil flows cheaply from Righty's to Lefty's Homeland.

>But the first point then would simply mean that the native americans were not racist, because there were no other Races around. Which, in my opinion, is not a great achievement to be honest.
Look who's finally starting to get it...

Attached: 1543213296786.jpg (480x608, 126K)

I wanted to say one is from a shithole country... but that might be a little confusing.

Right blows up a room full of people, left only blows people who aren't her husband

Attached: 56425611_10210467684367220_599418954523344896_o.jpg (720x1088, 63K)

Right is defending her country from foreign invaders, left likes to use props for attention and IS NOT AFRAID to ask to speak to the manager

Attached: 56433427_836654240010760_8816999655989575680_n.jpg (450x640, 42K)

Based and redpilled

1.5 million civilian casualties, whewlad, not looking good for christfags

Lol that's not for protection, that's a prop

>thinks The Bible is just a prop

The Bible protects me from any evil doers that might want to harm me.

Attached: Bible verse.jpg (2162x1063, 152K)

Trips

You wouldn't stick your dick in the muzzie for $1 million dollars, but you'd sure as shit put your redneck babies in the trashy white bitch then let her raise it alone with her brother in a doublewide in Alabama.

Certainly protects your virginity, not that it needed any extra protection

Lol those were your brother's babies all along

I rarely cringe at religious stuff as I got older but fuck me.

Your mom is calling you for your tendies. Plus, your Bronie fedora arrived in the mail today.

Attached: 1503544115638.jpg (464x357, 57K)

>built by slaves
nice meme

God is gay

Sage

Well the Whitehouse at least

There isn't one.

Meanwhile arab nations still have active slavery

Well, Mauretania at least

Sorry you lost your way brother

Life is more than about simple and selfish carnal pleasures.

Attached: Jesus forgives.jpg (800x1000, 93K)

Honestly you've got a good point.

Yes I can see how someone who is completely un-educated on islam and arab nations could think that

citation needed

No he doesnt. First that's a fake Muslim they would never give a woman a gun, where is her head towel at? Second Christian's are great. But you to butt hurt to know that.