Who was the most successful pedo in history?

If they’re successful in being a pedohphile no one would know of their activities

or we could know but not do anything about it because they're above the law

Jimmy Saville is the perfect example of this while he was alive.
He openly alluded to it many times and he dressed like the biggest pedo.
Laughed all the way to the grave

Is his grave secured? I wanna fap over a loli on it.

>jesus was fictional
Are you actually retarded or just bait?
I'm not saying he's the son of God, but he was a real person

Pretty sure a lot of historical figures where pedophiles. Since ancient Rome times you could actually fuck little boys, and probably little girls too.

Attached: 654765.png (1873x723, 539K)

This moment is so delicious. Just as fucking stupid as any other average religious cunt. Opinions don't make you retarded how you arrive there should be a way higher priority. I am learning so much lurking .

> real person
Kek
You actually think Jesus existed?

Based on what?
Zero proof?
The bible?!

What a fucking retard.
I’m genuinely Kekking over here.

Attached: 63FC2F6E-F523-4AF3-ADD3-A12BF6AA86B1.jpg (800x581, 55K)

How tf can you deny the existence of mohammed and jesus? it’s well documented they existed.

Did you pick up your copy of "The God Delusion"?

There was a documentary few years back made by Mel Gibson, so yeah, he was pretty fucking real you stupid fuck.

Attached: vkNusfx.jpg (960x582, 60K)

Show me the documents.
Pro tip
The Bible and the Q’aran are inadmissible.

The one liberals keep trying to call out but can never find evidence for. Pizzagate or some shit I think they call it, where “allegedly” Bill Clinton has an island of loli slaves he vists.

Gepetto.
He wanted a real boy so bad, he made one out of wood, and it came to life.
He then had the boy stand behind him and lie to him for eternity.

Why are religionfags such easy targets?

Someone needs to get off Yea Forums and into a library for a little while. Plenty of history professors from top universities have covered this, and most of them have written books on it. Please don't act like you're a genius when you're not.

>a burial shrine preserved for 1700 years
>was there really a guy
Healthy skepticism is good. We're very quickly approaching moronic denial of physical evidence judging by the type of statements you're making.

Im actually atheist, but people with boners for proving god isn't real is just as annoying as bible thumpers

>numerous historians were writing during the time Jesus and Mohammed were supposedly alive.
None mentioned them.
Not one.
Not even once.

Pretty glaring omission for a historian to my document, not only the most important moment in their life, but the most important moment of mankind - the coming of the God Son.

2019 - still clinging to Bronze Age mythology

One person cannot have so much significance over 2000 years. It is clearly a fictional character.

More like Gepedo.

I'm not religious at all fuckhead, he was a real person. I even said he wasn't the son of God. Read more carefully.

>most
And more historians have debunked it.

You choose to believe the retards

>ne person cannot have so much significance over 2000 years.

>who is Alexander the Great

Nobody knows Alexander the Great. Everybody knows Jesus.

collin pharrell i think

>a place existed, therefore all mythology associated with it must also be true

Retards everywhere

Fucking socrates?
Get out retard.

Tiberius was up there

Doesn’t make you come off as any less #T R I G G E R E D.

Nobody knows Socrates. Everybody knows Jesus.

>Nobody knows Alexander the Great

>Except everyone with a basic education.

Even poor children in Africa have hear his name mentioned somewhere.

The difference with Alexander the Great....was that many historians, from the time he existed, wrote about him and his accomplishments , from different cultures, as both the vanquished and the victors.

>multiple unrelated sources coorberating evidence

Guess what Mohammed and Jesus don’t have?

More like annoyed really

> The people who chronicled Jesus were all Jews, therefore they are false claims

The irony at the end is kind of cute. It's adorable this moron thought anyone was going to bite on the strawman.

Try to say Alexander on a full public transport. Nobody gives a shit. Now say Jesus. Everybody turns their head.

>chronicled
The stories of Jesus, apparently written by the people who knew him, are inconsistent with themselves and each other, and only appeared a few century’s after when he was supposedly alive.

That’s like taking Spider-Man Comics as proof that Peter Parker is real.

You’re an actual retard

I would think just as many people give a shit. No body jumps lout of their seat or looks at you just because you say Jesus in public unless they think theres something wrong with you for just blurting out a name randomly

My point is everyone knows what Jesus means, but nobody gives a shit whos Alexander.

>any unexpected loud noise carries the same gravitas and urgency as Jesus
Sick argument for Jesus vs Alexander. You should buzzfeed editor.

Every body knows who superman is.

And they “know” that his false identity is Clark Kent.

Proves fuck all

>nobody

>except every major historian or high ranking military member or successful CEO

Nobody knows who is Superman outside of America. Everybody knows who is Jesus, even on Java island.

Nobody cares about historians. Everybody cares about Jesus.

uhhh japan loves spiderman

By Jingo.
Jeez.
Gee Wiz
Jimminy Crickets

If expletives are now proof of existence, then how come I don’t give a fuck?

Nobody cares about Japan. Everybody cares about Jesus.

This cunt thinks Loony Tunes are real.

>nobody knows
Superman has a larger global recognition than Jesus.
Most of the world is not Christian...most ARE exposed to American entertainment. Superman is the most instantly recognisable comic character in existence.

You’re genuinely retarded, but also ignorant.

Well now I feel uneasy learning that I am cyber-bullying the mentally challenged. Could I help you contact your care giver?

Attached: 1544912952038.jpg (313x286, 19K)

ITT: Everyones a fag for caring about what other people believe

Attached: t.png (896x604, 645K)

Say Spiderman to an average human on Earth, nobody knows what that is. Say Jesus, everyone turn their head. It is that simple.

Nobody cares about Jesus. Everyone cares about Trump

That sound you heard was the point, passing miles above your head.

Here’s your (you) kiddo.
Participation award

Wrong.

Huh?
You’ve never been to India
Or China I take it.
You know , where most of the worlds population live.

Actually retarded.

Who's in the news more? Checkmate

Kim Kardashian

Nope even she is a speck of dust compared to the media coverage Trump gets on a second by second basis

The guy who wrote Loita.
> writes a pedo book
> gets praised for it.

Jesus is more known than anything you try to say. Accept it, it is not that hard.

I am sure you think so, you didn't have to take the time to confirm. Smugness is truly an endearing quality in morons.

The point you made was too focused on making your line work but it didn't address the underlying issue that it's a shit metric to judge which entity is more famous by screaming the name in any public setting.

You want to do stand up, go do stand up. Don't coat your arguments in your material, you're not clever enough to see it to fruition in text.

More people know who Trump is.

He probably did exist as a person. Have to agree prob not the son of "God" tho

>never read Lolita
Why are Ameritards illiterate?

Gibson isn't exactly known for his scholarly credentials

Chairman Mao is more widely known, more influential, and actually existed.

Just because you’re ignorant and retarded, doesn’t change objective reality

What? Didnt you see his totally accurate portrayal of William Wallace in Braveheart?

Faggot.
You’re clearly talking to the wrong user, combining mine and some other anons post.

Because you’re retarded

A documentary by Mel Gibson is your cited authority??

He was on Joe Rogan, what the fuck is your problem? Guy is respected.

Youre talking to the wrong user. Thats the user you want to talk to

There is no proof he existed.
And more evidence that he was an amalgam or previously existing myths

Literally nobody knows about Mao. Literally everyone knows about Jesus. It is that simple.

He was on Joe Rogan, so that is a pretty big deal in credibility.

Nice cope faggot

Nobody knows Yeshua either.

Retards gonna retard

Sez you, retard

jesusneverexisted (dot) com

Because its easy to prove or disprove the existence of a human that lived over 2000 years ago. People still argue if Achilles was real or fictional. Believe what you want to believe. In the end it wont matter because you'll be as dead as they are in the future

wrong user, I think you want that user

Cool beans, which one is not you?

Billions know about Mao, loser.

This is satire, right?

Lewis Carroll

For his acting, sure, not for his scholarly credentials. Would you ask Stephen Hawking for acting advice?

You're an idiot

Notice the lack of “shouting a name in public” in those posts you gormless retard?

Dear Reddit,

Today some religious fag on Yea Forums challenged my intellect. I proceeded to enlighten him by calling him retarded and providing no factual basis on my part to disprove his theories.

Sincerely

user

Dang you showed him

Fuck are you so bent out of shape about? I connected the dots to be coherent if it's not an argument you want to make then make a different one. Make a point or go weep about confusing and overlapping ideas on anonymous boards somewhere else

Yea Forums - The optimum place to look for facts from people with idea what they are talking about

Wait.
So there are actually retards (I’m guessing Ameritards) that ACTUALLY believe that Jesus was real?

Are Americans REALLY that stupid?

Surely they’re trolling, or just pretending to be retarded for keks.
They can’t actually believe Jesus was real right?

If so, then no wonder Trump got elected. Imagine a nation being that retarded and poorly educated, with such a lack of critical thinking abilities.
It’s an indictment is what it is.

Attached: 1387A490-E88B-49D1-AFF2-E4CDD1EA2951.jpg (768x1024, 79K)

Why the fuck did you ruin my thread talking about Jesus? What the fuck is your problem?

You don't think there was a Jewish guy named Jesus that existed around 2000 years ago?

Jesus doesn’t exist retard

Probably a few hundred of them.
We’re any of them even remotely similar to the Jesus from the bible?
No. Not even slightly

>somebodies real name is Clark Kent therefore superman is real

Attached: 0906078288.jpg (1866x1620, 191K)

Why do you have to bring that faggot in to this?

Who is making that argument? The entire premise you're rejecting is "There was once a guy named Jesus."

searched the whole thread one of my two top choices was mentioned.
got to say it's up there between Lewis carroll and David Bowie.

Can you faggots stop talking about religion and history and talk about sexy little girls instead

this thread feels like retards baiting retards ad infinitum

Muhammad

Pedobear.

There is currently several men named Jesus

Are you talking about them?

No, you mean the Jesus mentioned in the bible.
That guy didn’t ever exist

Here's a question for the people who don't think Jesus actually existed: if he didn't exist, who made him up, and when did they do it?

Muhammad

Bill Clinton

Most philosophers are atheists. They're the most atheistic of all disciplines in fact. Those that are religious usually believe in something that seldom resembles anything established religions put forward.

They built and have maintained a tomb for a guy that didn't exist and someone 2000 years ago allowed it to happen without a body?

The entire point in the tomb and preserving it is that there was no body in the first place, and this was somehow proof that he existed?

How gullible are you?
Oh, “believing in the existence of Jesus” kind of gullible.

No, his name was originally Yeshua, Jesus came about through several translations.

Several historians mention Jesus. You can say it isn't enough evidence but I'd wager you believe many people existed that there is less evidence for then Jesus. Mohammad is indisputable. He was a dominant political figure, had lots of family, and had many contemporary sources. His existence is as co contentious as Henry the 8th...that is to say not at all. Atheist here.

>The entire point in the tomb and preserving it is that there was no body in the first place
All this grand conspiracy and you don't think they tossed a 33 year old recently crucified corpse in there for good measure?

None from the time he existed (no first hand accounts) and none from the surrounding cultures (no second hand accounts)

All historically documented accounts were centuries later. Completely unreliable as evidence.

At any point, feel free to engage your brain and think for yourself, retard

What, to prove that he didn’t rise up and get taken to heaven,

Wouldn’t that completely defeat the entire point?

/thread

Truth hurts faggot

Attached: photo_2019-01-29_11-21-28.jpg (720x960, 127K)

I am sure they could argue the soul went to heaven. It's not a hard con to sell considering everything else. There are greater benefits with the physical presence of a corpse of a 33 year old male they crucified.

Mao.
Deflowered scores, nay hundreds of prepubescent girls, often daughters brought to him by his devoted followers...

Living the life. Mao didn't bang if over 10.

>Most philosophers are atheists.
Time to stop posting.

And the consensus of historians was that Jesus existed. It isn't bright to suggest people who agree with the consensus of historians are stupid.
Paul was a contemporary. Historians believe he really persecuted followers of Jesus. Never did he try and defend that Jesus was a real person as if that was a common accusation. If people said Jesus wasn't real in that time his followers would have almade arguments for his existence. We don't see that because no one ever denied it from what we know. Jesus also had a brother that was alive during the writings of the New Testament and was one of the apostles. No one in the various letters we have debates the existence of Jesus. There isn't much historical evidence because he was considered unimportant in his lifetime.

>Most philosophers are/become diffused deists.

fixed that for ya.

If there’s enough evidence to condemn him in a documentary, then there’s enough evidence to prosecute him post humously

>no prosecutions

MSM believing retard

Look it up...they have done surveys of philosopher's beliefs that anyone can find. They've done it for all of academia. Philosophers are atheists by a very wide margin. Next closest are biologists I believe.

They didn’t argue that did they.
They argued that the corpse got up, walked around, said hello, let people stick their fingers in his wounds and then ascended to heaven on a chariot of fire.

Only the most retarded snivelling shit for brains would even entertain the notion that is ‘could’ be possible, let alone actually believe it

Don't worry. I didn't expect Yea Forums to know what they're talking about. I was just hoping you would actually shut up instead of insisting on talking shit.
>inb4 I was pretending to be retarded

philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl

Atheism. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Attached: 1552640772224.jpg (480x236, 11K)

Dan "run while you can" Schneider

If I you're under the notion that i am religious you've pulled it out of your ass. My entire position is that believing that a 33 year old who the stories referenced in one form or another didn't exist is just as retarded as subscribing to the idea of Western religion. Your drive to discredit even the basic of information is obsession.

Yeah I just posted the Phil survey. 72% atheist...12 % other than atheism or theism. Now shut your fucking mouth.

Attached: 0139258752.jpg (1866x1620, 193K)

All “historical” evidence for the existence of Jesus is “religious” evidence.

The myths and events of Jesus’ life were recycled common stories from Jewish/roman/Greek mythology.

And even the earliest ‘religious evidence’ dates from decades after Jesus supposedly existed.
The gospels contradict with each other and with themselves.

Actual historians , not religiotards entertaining Ameritards, concur there is no reliable evidence that he ever existed and was a myth, like Zeus, Thor Mohammed or any other mythical figure

Prove it

Attached: 1554727819016.jpg (894x894, 368K)

Again, shit for brains who doesn't know anything, the historical consensus of HISTORIANS, not theologians was that he existed. Based on how historians weed through fact and fiction. You can continue to believe whatever you want, but don't fucking lie by quoting a few historians who are outliers as the only historians. You aren't an expert, you aren't a trained historian, I doubt you know the criteria by which they judge accounts mythology or history. Your opinion is worthless.

The current ones, or historic ones?
Current ones wouldn’t surprise me, they are godless animals that ought to be put up against the wall for their heinous heresy, historical ones give me doubt, but these Modernists and Postmodernists are even more disgusting animals that ought to be gutted alive like a fish and beaten with iron sticks as they bleed out, flopping like a fish, terrified at the comming darkness, or praying to god they so stupidly denied, Atheists are the worst type of animal, ones that gather their surperiority from laughing at people who just wanna share the glory of Okran other people, while spouting their mindless drivel about fucking sky fairies, thinking themselves intellectual while masturbating with bananas and using strawmen like they’re farmers or smth...
Fuck!
Good thing Atheists are on the decline, no one will miss them

The correct response is, "Shit, I guess I was wrong and I apologize for talking out of my ass and acting like a fucking retard."

What's my motivation? If I am going to undertake the task of proving a guy existed 2000 years ago it better be for a lot more than impressing internet randos.

If you start spouting retarded shit, at least prove it you fucking subhuman trash
You’re probably just another disgusing fat atheist anyway, post a dick pic!

Attached: 34AEA4F6-5FAE-47A0-AE6A-AF1722DE84FA.png (500x719, 143K)

How do pedos dress?

Actual HISTORIANS from reputable centres of learning , not from Ameritards shit-tier religious colleges have NO evidence for him existing.
Believe what you want to believe. But recognise that it’s a BELIEF that you have chosen to allow residency in your head rent free.

Shame you’re wrong. You tried so hard

You can keep embarrassing yourself, dude. I'm not stopping you.

Attached: 1554348752655.gif (230x237, 754K)

>dementia the post
What an odd and inefficient way of farming dick pics.

At any rate, I am going to tear your dumb ass apart and go to sleep.

>If you start spouting retarded shit, at least prove it you fucking subhuman trash
>No, you mean the Jesus mentioned in the bible.
>That guy didn’t ever exist
Prove it.

What a Jewish thing to say there, rabbi Bergstein Blattmann

OY VEY why do you still believe in religion? HOLOCAUST! HOLOCAUST! HOLOCAUST!

history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

>Muhammad is as fictional as Jesus you retarded cunt.
They are both historical figures. Don’t believe in god fine. But this is retarded. They both very likely existed.
>May as well say Wile E Cayote is guilty of harassment
What the litteral fuck does this mean?

Dutchfag here, dunno who the man was. But even if he was a high official and he layed even one finger on my child. I would hit him in the face with a brick and made sure he can only eat again via food insertion.

Attached: 1554756326212.gif (360x240, 1.25M)

>Among scholars of the New Testament of the Christian Bible, though, there is little disagreement that he actually lived. Lawrence Mykytiuk, an associate professor of library science at Purdue University and author of a 2015 Biblical Archaeology Review article on the extra-biblical evidence of Jesus, notes that there was no debate about the issue in ancient times either. “Jewish rabbis who did not like Jesus or his followers accused him of being a magician and leading people astray,” he says, “but they never said he didn’t exist.”

google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

Tl:dr you’re a fedora tipping faggot

image search savile, you'll see

Probably any Renaissance guy you can think of because they were really into fucking little boys. Read The Vampire Armand.

The guy behind 1st studio Siberian mouse maybe?

Now now kiddo, just calm down and I will help you to take that broom out of your ass. Is that okay?

Attached: 1554738696397.gif (250x166, 227K)

Thread successfully diverted

>only religion fags believe a guy existed

I’m agnostic but I have a theory that people as closed minded as you not only believe in god, but hate him so you convince yourself you don’t believe at all. It insulates you from your own belief that god is real, a dick, and will probably cast you into hell because, well he’s a dick.

don't you still fuck farm animals over there in clog land?

Lol, so you really think that bunch of guys just woke up and said: oh, let's just make-up a person that we'll praise and make a religion around them? Even if so, wouldn't it be simplier to just pick a random charismatic guy and use him?

Do you really ingnore all the sources on Mohammad like Hadith? You know, by that time, it just happened that there were not too many a)non biased foreigners and b)literate guys around... Yet, you can still use fucking google and try something like "Historicity of Muhammad" or anything similar. Yes, first source is wikipedia and you need to be careful regarding the sources, but it contains fucking picture of the non-muslim fragment where the Muhammad is mentioned. I am not trying to convince you that he was a god or whatever, but the historical figure is real and he ruled the people and waged many wars.

And yes, for the rest (like marrying him the LG), you simply won't find the evidence we are used to these days. But just the thought of some group celebrating a literal straw man and writing fucking ton of bookd on his deeds (including how he slept, what haircut he preferred etc) is just riddiculous. Plus, they didn't only take his figure and erased all the negative things. They changed themselves according to his image, including things that were weird or unusual; whatever he did was holy for them, be it cutting the moustache or fucking LGs

I’ve seen him. Not my point. How did Jared and that penn state asshole dress?

Now on another note, would you suck god's cock if he could change himself into this beautiful trap with a 12 inch cock? Reply or your mom will die.

Attached: 1554496152688.jpg (750x858, 511K)

well this thread certainly went off the rails

No, those are our neighbours. The incestious degenerate British.

Attached: d34n0s4-02b9d51a-9ba6-427e-acff-e1dccb8bfc14.jpg (432x456, 86K)

not now he's been dead a while.

Have you been living under a rock?

Jeffrey Dahmer literally told cops he was fucking a 15yo boy when gays were frowned upon and smoothed talked past them. Not necessarily a pedo but close enough and that's pretty damn successful.

Dan "Please mister, slower" Schneider

>among these people who’s job depends on the bible being true, they say the bible is true

Wow.
Such evidence
Much historical.

who cares what bible scholars think?
They are literally magic bean salesmen

Did you read your own links.
There is zero historical evidence to prove he existed

Caligula

Trump is the head of an international pedo ring.
He got hooked after fucking his daughter

Attached: D130A11E-05F6-4FEC-9A46-1C1F10F9226D.png (512x512, 448K)

Attached: 2571753567.jpg (2112x1614, 141K)

From that same article
“ there is no physical or archaeological evidence of the existence of Jesus”

Nice cope faggot

I knew it!

seriously? first time I've heard of it,
> researching intensifies.

Jesus big gay

Attached: 3f97dc1a-6af5-4ad4-8732-3b1668ec2e64.jpg (881x1024, 142K)

I would have to say the most successful pedo would have to be Eugène Henri Paul Gauguin. He was a wildy famous and successful artist who moved to French Polynesia and fucked kids to his hearts content.

Jesus of Nazareth was a real man back in those times. He was one of many 'prophets' who were peddling their cults at the time. Most of those prophets are forgotten because their cults didn't catch on. Two prominent 'prophets' who have had their cults survive are Jesus of Nazareth and Mohammed.

Agreed. Have to side with user here. I genuinely don't think jesus existed.
Pic unrelated

Attached: 1462389485666.jpg (507x800, 104K)

>real man
A real man , who’s life happened to mirror exactly the myths and story telling legends from centuries before he was ‘supposedly’ born.
Ie; a fake man

Retards can’t cope.

Santa Claus didn’t exist either faggots