My IQ is 169. For those of you unfamiliar with IQ, this means I have "genius-level" intelligence.
I also have synaesthesia, and absolute pitch. Things as diverse as math, music, and art come naturally to me and I get straight A's without studying much at all. I also am able to understand music at a deeper level than most people.
While most people my age spend their free time listening to mainstream music, I spend my free time listening to works such as Jerry Garcia Band's Cats Under the Stars, Frank Turner's Sleep Is for the Week and Love Ire & Song.
All this and I'm an 18 year old still in high school.
it's fucking not, you've obviously never worked with wood
Ian Cruz
Winner
Connor Rivera
make a drawing and mark every six inches and count how many segments you from from 3 feet of wood. that's how i solved it.
William Nelson
For someone so smart, you sure don't know how to punctuate very well.
Anthony Gray
Youre a fucking liar. You wouldnt be in high school at 18 with a 169 IQ and since you also have synaesthesia plus the IQ you would have been put in a charter or performing arts school by now.
Robert Wilson
>marking it out first Unless you know your sawblade very well you'll end up with 0 or 1 six-inch pieces, kek
Hudson Reed
Cut it and try
Jeremiah Brown
i don't have the material or tools or even a place to do any experiment like that
Jack Rodriguez
Ok Sheldon
Jayden Edwards
And that folks is the difference between people who know shit and people who KNOW shit
Jose Miller
Bait, and for the record, you spelled synesthesia wrong
IQ of 149 and mensa member here, and guess what, I dont give a shit about studies or flexing cause my family is rich as fuck, I own a restaurand and im riding an m3 e92 daily at the age of 19 kek
Liam Allen
Wrong. You divide before multiplying. See The answer is 9.
Jaxson Miller
bait
Cooper Morales
If ur such a genius why’d u stay in high school still at 18
A laser absolutely could not cut it without loss. How do you think laser cutting works?
Any application that is going to require laser cutting is gonna need precision on that same level, just saying
Jaxon Morris
Nah they prolly read Finnegans Wake & understood perfectly
Jordan Robinson
Can you catch a football though?
Blake Torres
>genius >18 years old >still in high school
Luis Phillips
I bought an e93 recently, tbh it's nice but I'm glad I got it used.
Sebastian Nguyen
Cool bro, I got 150, let me guess. You struggle having normal relationships with others because you cannot connect to them on a personal level and have some sort of addiction?
Camden Gray
How wide is it?
Dylan Evans
*inb4
Nicholas Reyes
Gonna need proof of her bust
Christopher Price
5, last one doesn’t count as being cut
Lincoln Wright
>I also have synaesthesia uh huh, thats a condition that causes confusion of the senses, you to hear colours, taste sounds etc, music wouldn't come to you at all nice try kid
Chase Lee
Any cut involves microscopic loss, yes. But are you going to cling to an autistic definition of a 6" piece? It's like saying "draw a circle" and then pointing out that no one has ever drawn a perfect circle because it's impossible to draw a perfectly rounded circle at a microscopic level, even with a computer. You know what a fucking circle is. You know that a 5.999" inch piece of wood is effectively 6".
Jace Smith
Really? 150 is the minimum IQ for Mensa >tryhard
Jeremiah Perry
no, it's not right to left you nigger, the 2 is directly multiplying the (1+2) you HAVE to do that first. Besides the 2(1+2) is on the right so by that niggerlicious logic you would still do it first
for it to be the division first it would have to be (6 / 2)(1+2) = 3*3
I have taken differential equations and 3 semesters of calc based physics I have never gotten this wrong
What shithole third world country do you live in? You certainly could never attend university level classes without being able to do basic math in the western world.
Luis Morales
CHECK YOUR ANSWER WITH A CALC IF YOU ARE STUPID
ITS 9
Elijah Foster
Yes, that is what I have been saying all this time. You must have meant to tag this guy
Jaxon Lee
>wolframnigger.cum doesn't understand basic algebra >user must be wrong
with most calculators you have to spoonfeed it what you want. To any mathematician with 3 brain cells the 6 is being divided by the quantity 2(1+2). So you would have to be specific and type 6*(2(1+2))
what is more important is the conceptual understanding of why you are doing the calculation and that would dictate whether the (1+2) varies jointly or inversely
Adam Reed
What is more likely: a calculator that can do almost any equation is wrong? Or a random moron on an anonymous image board can't do basic math?
You're wrong and it has been explained to you more than once why you are wrong. You clearly can't admit defeat even when you don't have a leg to stand on. That's fine. Just don't reproduce. The world has enough stupid people in it.
Carter Richardson
>be specific and type 6*(2(1+2)) I meant 6 ÷ (2(1+2))
Brandon Garcia
I'm done trying to explain to you why you're wrong. Here, I started a new thread just so someone with more patience than me can walk you through it. Maybe a special needs teacher will see this thread and help you out.
IQ tests most of the time aren't accurate and the amount of IQ tests that are out there in the world you're most likley to get a high score in one and a retard score in another you're not special and you're not a genius you like a moron there is no definitive way to accurately measure IQ quit acting like a faggot who watches rick and morty
Easton Russell
hope come i score less than 100 on all iq test i take then? like 10 of them
Ok I see my misunderstanding now. The 2 right next to the (1+2) really fucked me up and I just couldn't see why someone would put them next to each other if they weren't meant to be multiplied first. I think for the most part that's why a lot of people like me get confused, because you wouldn't generally write a statement like that, I always put a symbol between all quantities that aren't "connected", like 6 ÷ 2 * (1+2), or for what I was thinking I would put 2(1+2) on the bottom of a fraction
I truely have never had this issue in all of high school, physics, calculus, programming, etc. xD glad I'm just looking like an idiot on Yea Forums instead of real life
It's okay. At least you eventually figured out what you were doing wrong. Most people just tell themselves that they're brilliant and continue being morons, especially online.
>My IQ is 169. For those of you unfamiliar with IQ, this means I have "genius-level" intelligence. >All this and I'm an 18 year old still in high school.
kek
Charles Ward
You are still going to get your shit kicked in by life and the best part is that it's coming soon. Enjoy spouting that shit off and being ostracized.
