>it's impossible to bisexualize the general popu-
>Asked to plot themselves on a 'sexuality scale', 23% of British people choose something other than 100% heterosexual – and the figure rises to 49% among 18-24 year olds
yougov.co.uk
>One-quarter (25%) of people identified as something other than completely heterosexual, compared to 20% of people in 2015.
today.yougov.com
I think it has more to do with having to pretend people weren't in the past.
It's impossible to have a 50% bi population.
why?
There are no records of such behaviour anywhere in human nor animal history besides bonobos.
i grew up living next to a farm and found that animals hump each other all the time regardless of gender. dairy cows would often mount each other as though they were going to bone
im not saying this means its normal to have a 50% bi population but if you consider a human that humps another same-gender human to be something other than 100% hetero (as i would) then it doesnt seem out of place compared to animal behaviour
Yeah this is caused by unnatural inputs
People are getting convinced to be bisexual through porn and media
You've never been on a farm.
your mother belongs on a farm you noodle brained felcher
lol try telling that to ancient greeks
Don't forget the wankers straight men who enable female bisexuality because of "muh threesome".
People love to claim heterosexuality is natural. The way we were made by god.
Can't you inagine the evolutionary benefit of bisexuality in a hunter-gatherer society (aka 95% of our evolution)? Men and women fuck, the tribe owns the babies paternity, and men and women intrafuck to increase bonding between gatherer women and hunter men.
This is a totally reasonable way to organize tribes to outcompete and outkill all the other hominids that evolved at the same time we did.
I'm not saying this can be proven I'm just saying ~4000 years of agriculture based heterosexuality based nuclear families don't represent the majority of our evolution.
>inb4 muh civilization
Does anyone have that study where it showed people who had Autism and men who were very interested in STEM fields were way more likely to be transgender?
>the entirety of pre-abrahamic human culture suddenly never existed
you retard, for most of human history there wasn't 'gay' or 'straight' there was 'giver' and 'receiver' and people really didn't give a fuck as long as you kept it a private matter
>This is a totally reasonable way to organize tribes to outcompete and outkill all the other hominids that evolved at the same time we did.
If it's reasonable, show 1 successful society in human history to still do this.
I'll wait.
Every successful society in the world does 1 man and 1 woman in all different cultures and societies.
Japan, China, Europe, etc.
>I'm not saying this can be proven I'm just saying ~4000 years of agriculture based heterosexuality based nuclear families don't represent the majority of our evolution.
If what you are proposing had any utility or truth or advantage, 1 society on Earth that did this would show up and be more successful than ours.
You are retarded.
>you retard, for most of human history there wasn't 'gay' or 'straight' there was 'giver' and 'receiver' and people really didn't give a fuck as long as you kept it a private matter
Suddenly 1 group of people in Greece who practiced paderasty now means all humans are bisexual and we should structure our society after them...
the OP was about people not being 100% hetero. that doesnt preclude standard hetero life pairing. you can do 1 man 1 woman and still not be 100% hetero if those people each fuck a man and woman respectively at some point in their life
Your argument is meaningless. Just because it happened a little bit doesn't mean it's something that should happen.
The vast majority did not practice this shit.
The culture wasn't shaped to facilitate this shit.
The fact that our culture is promoting bisexuality and convincing more and more people to be bi and gay, that otherwise wouldn't have been, is damaging to any society.
There will always be a percentage of people who are susceptible to doing gay/bi stuff, but that percentage grows the more a society tries to grow it. (porn, forcing it to be culturally acceptable) all those things increase the percentage of people who would do bi/gay stuff and live in that way.
It hinders the rate at which we will procreate, and our procreation is now below replacement levels.
This is the death of our society in slow motion.
The one on the right because the only thing i don't like is the dick. On the left everything disgusts me, even the roast beef pussy
True.
But it doesn't help.
As you increase the percentage of people who are not 100% hetero, you also increase the percentage of people who choose not to go into standard hetero life pairing.
This will lower birth rates.
This will lead to a decay of culture over time.
The pic only proves that men should be attracted to B because it matches the female form more than A.
It doesn't prove that that is the way things ought to be or prove that that behavior is acceptable
The "receiver" in virtually all cultures across all known history was considered no longer a man. A slave or any lesser class male who "received" could be killed in many cases. A higher class male who took the D was immediately shunned by his peers and sent down to the lower classes. These things happened in the more tolerant societies. In many others, the mere accusation could get someone killed (raped and/or killed in the case of women).
Fuck your dishonesty and your convenient revisionism. Popular aversion to faggotry is as old as conscious life itself.
I clicked 49 pictures of fire hydrants to post this
it only causes a decline in culture if it is happening to that culture alone which suggests to me that perhaps we should instead focus our efforts or redirecting bisexualisation toward minorities and 3rd world countries
This is old news..
Alfred Kinsey (USA) did the first mass sexual behaviour survey in the 50s. His team had a way of getting people to be very honest. They discovered no one is actually 100% straight or gay.
So no, no one has been bisexualised.
He had 100% hetero/homo/asexual spaces in his scale for a reason.
Yeah exactly
WW3 will happen soon
I agree with you
I was being sarcastic
The majority of giraffe sex is gay sex
its weird that you care enough to pull up stats, holy shit
That's surprising. Most people seem like faggots
Shit. I actually meant to reply to the guy you replied to. That guy's a retard
Bisexuality it's the biggest thread to the Western world after Jews.
It's hard to tell a male giraffe from a female giraffe. That's why traps aren't gay. If they look like chicks and they're the only ones sucking dick, it can't be gay
>Immigrants
>Jews
>Porn convincing people to do bisexual and gay stuff
>Media convincing people to think humans are a cancer on the planet
When is WW3?
We need a PURGE
Like I said before, not including the average people who promote bisexuality on their partners and fuckbuddies it's being dishonest.
no it's not, it's poverty keeping the birthrate down in the west. you need a dual income household now, no more staying home with the kids while the breadwinner's at work. women haven't conspired against men, they just won't fuck you.
>women haven't conspired against men
When I mentioned women?
It's partially that too.
It's Immigrants keeping wages low.
It's Bisexuality and nihilism and hedonism keeping people from procreating.
It's Feminism for pushing women into the workforce (doubling the number of workers without demand thus lowering wages. supply and demand)
It's Jews for peddling all of this garbage.
WW3 soon bois
B, but only because the tats on A are utter cringe.
Oh, and B has a gorgeous cock.
huh, i assumed this was to do with women apparently choosing women more over men, apologies.
you think if the work/life balance was better most people wouldn't want to settle down and start a family? it's hardwired mate, social engineering can't undo that
Jewish isn't a race.
Don't forget the reason Silicon Valley and commerce companies are silencing anti-immigration people.
If your orientation is so weak that you can turn bi/gay merely from being exposed to the act I question just how strong your orientation was in the first place.
bonobos.. our closest living ancestor.
nice argument bro
also it's all over history, Abrahamic religions hated on it cuz all the gay sex happening in the pagan religions in the cradle of civilization caused a ton of stds to go around. look it up yo.
>if you say it is ok to be gay then people will choose to be gay
Wow heterosexuality so fragile.
British people? Gay? No.
I know I'm not supposed to say this, but both of them are gross to me.
I remember watching that picture ages ago before all the trans shitstorm, and one was supposed to choose the more feminine looking person. However, these days, both of that humans have their own identities.
Less than a 100 years ago it was dangerous to be openly gay. Even now this isn't always safe, even in fucking Paris!
People probably learned to hide their gayness rather than there being less faggots around
neither, well maybe both if you take at least 10 to 15 years off their age. Pedo Force!
You can convince people to do anything if you tempt them and make it look cool
>wow all the sex and cumming I want without doing anything productive?
It's not just being gay even though gay guys are the most depraved hedonistic people on the planet. The average number of sexual partners of gay men vs straight men is way higher
It's also Tinder and other hedonistic apps.
>make it look cool
Japan is guilty as fuck in this.
Fuck Rin Tohsaka.
Fuck Shinji Ikari.
Fuck the Utena cast.
Fuck yuri.
Fuck yaoi.
Dudes are way easier to fuck than women are tho. This is true no matter is bi homo or straight
Bullshit
Making being gay look cool convinced and brainwashed young, impressionable kids to be open to doing gay stuff
When 1 identical twin is gay, the other twin is only 75% likely to be gay as well.
Being gay isn't a just a gene. It has to be induced with culture and life experience for it to turn on
So your text is conjectural word salad, so it will be ignored. Instead I will respond to the picture. Yes, you can in fact say neither. Both are totally repulsive. Let me use an analogy to explain. For the purposes of this argument, your genitals make up about 5% of what you are. Lets say I have prepared two sandwhichs for you. One of them is 95% shit, the other is 5% shit. Is either one of them going to make you hungry? Shit fetishists need not apply.
Yes, that's how genes work. You figured it out.
Still tough, what the heck does it matter, let people be whatever they want. Overpopulation is a problem already and it's not like we're throwing a bomb on africa anytime soon
>Overpopulation is a problem already
You are a nihilist retard if you actually believe this
Bullshit. We are closer to chimpanzees.
I shouldn't believe that? Sure.
But it's not like a growing population is something we need right now, nor is a declining one a problem. As long as old people keep dying at least.
I'm not , retard.
I don't think that's true, please cite your sources. Last time I checked both species were genetically equidistant from people.
Is this really the most appropriate place to have this kind of discussion?
What would be a better board?
Doesn't surprise me. That's a fag country.
Yeah, but bonobos suck. Those hippy monkeys don’t count.
America is there as well.
I don't know, they solve all their problems by fucking. But you gotta face facts man. You are as much "hippy monkey" as you are chimp. Both species kinda represent us at our extremes. You have a rapacious species of thrill killers, and a horny species of sexual degenerates.
I wish that I was more like a chimpanzee. I wish that I had longer arms and bigger teeth
