Cultures have a right to exist.
Multiculturalism has always led to war in the entirety of human history.
Cultures have a right to exist.
Multiculturalism has always led to war in the entirety of human history.
Don't you get tired of hating?
Nah, fuck culture and fuck traditional societies.
Citation required.
Also, fuck you for infecting /s/ with this bullshit
>Not believing in Evolution
Traditional societies are traditional for a reason.
Societies that don't value children, the family unit, or protecting their culture always die off.
white people have no culture
It's in the picture retard
Yeah, I'm gonna have to move the goalposts and ask for ACADEMIC citation.
Mind you, there's a real easy fix for this 'replacement'
>he thinks the nuclear family is traditional
Stop being 14
The census office isn't jewish enough for you?
do you understand what academic citation means?
Oh lovely, Wikipedia. We all know Wikipedia is a respected academic journal.
>I need daddy to say it
If you're too much of a nigger to follow their sourcing, you should never have graduated high school. If you never graduated high school MODS MODS MODS
If you actually read history, multiculturalism has never started a war; REACTIONS to multiculturalism have. No group of disparate, varied cultures has looked at ANOTHER group and said, "Let's go take them over!" The real story has always been, some variation of, "Keep our group pure!" or "I want my people to dominate that other group!" But multicultural societies rarely START wars. In fact, multicultural rise typically reduces the war output of a group. The Huns are textbook example: when they were JUST mongolian, they took over the 2nd largest empire in history. As they assimilated more and more disparate groups, their attacks waned until they just stopped. No one ever BEAT the huns, they ran roughshot over Germany and Poland, but by the time they had north african colonies they just got, sorta, tired of conquering and stopped on their own. Multiculturalism is largely why the leaders of Europe ARE white and not Mongolian.
Oh pray tell good sir, why are you calling upon the mods? What crime have I committed?
That picture doesn't have anything to do with your thesis. All it shows is the % of whites has gone down. Over that same period the US has started/participated in less wars as time has gone on, not more (WWII biggest war in Human history > Vietnam > Kuwait/Iraq > WoT). Also the time between wars has gone down over that time period (a mere 6 years after WWII Korea, 10 years later Nam, 15 years later, Kuwait, 20 years later WoT) If anything that picture proves that Multiculturalism creates a more peaceful nation.
>Multiculturalism has always led to war in the entirety of human history.
then don't start one this time
>No group of disparate, varied cultures has looked at ANOTHER group and said, "Let's go take them over!"
And then came liberal interventionism. But I can understand if you simply consider them jewish interlopers leading others around by the nose.
>less
Yet it has been at continuous, open-ended war for some 17 years. It glosses over the quantity of belligerence just as does saying the Hundred Years War was just one war.
If you say so. I'm still waiting on my citation in an academic journal
>Cultures have a right to exist.
Absolutely meaningless statement made with no relevant authority whatsoever
Nothing has any right to anything. Rights are not real. They are figments of narcissistic imaginations meant to rationalization self-importance.
Grow up.
What's wrong with census data?
America didnt start ww1 or ww2. Technically we didnt start Vietnam either.
Immigrants are flooding America and replacing whites both legally and illegally.
Eventually, multiculturalism will cause a civil war as it has done every single time in human history when 2 cultures disagree on things.
>hurr durr I disagree with someone so everything is just nihilistic and if you arent nihilistic you need to grow up
Oh my bad, I meant I wanted academic citation on the statement "Multiculturalism has always led to war in the entirety of human history."
America didnt start Kuwait either. If you really want to get technical. The trouble in the middle east was caused by the way euro fags post ww1 split up nations. Ww2 was also eurotards fault for the way they wanted to punish germany. Americas just come along to clean up your mess.
Tell me what imaginary authority of this world or universe has granted you rights because you decided you want them
Wielding your delusional constructs like they add meaning to your petty demands is exactly childish
By 2040 white people will be a minority in the USA. This is a fact. Just common knowledge. Google it.
Allah
>Americans just come along to clean up the oil
Fixed
No, that's an extrapolation, which is far more useful as a rhetorical device than a predictive device.
Name 1 successful Multicultural country in the entire existence of Human History that did not fight or war eventually.
They always war. They always split.
Pilgrims and Indians are a classic example of my point.
Pilgrims thought you could own land.
Indians thought you couldn't.
Those 2 cultures that can't coexist in the same place at the same time.
What's next?
Either they negotiate and compromise, or they war.
Natural rights retard.
Sorry, I'm feeling lazy. Please provide a link to your CITATION
So your imagination and sense of entitlement
Cool, that's meaningful and real
Yes if I was a Native American I would be fucking pissed. Get these cumskins out of my country.
>he thinks rights are natural
Appeal to authority. Ten yards penalty and also you're a cuck.
There is something most nations forget: they DON'T have to let immigrants in. Yes, they want in because your nation, for whatever reason, is amazing, it could be jobs, or the environment, or whatever draws them. Doesn't matter really. But the thing is, you are a sovereign nation, and you have the right to tell them to fuck off right back to where they come from. Is that a "dick move"? Sure, but if you are a nation with a small land-mass, like say England, or is an island, you do not have the ability to absorb a bunch of people for foreign lands who do not hold your common culture, may choose to not assimilate properly, and may be there for reasons you'd rather not.
It is perfectly OK to say "No."
I wish more nations would do that, honestly. I think the EU should not take in one damn Syrian until Israel takes in about 1 million. They have room, they just outright refuse. Fuck that. Middle Eastern nations should take care of other Middle Eastern nations--and like it or not, Israel is a Middle Eastern nation.
Until Israel steps up to the plate and fills themselves to the bursting point with Syrian refugees, no other non-Middle Eastern nation should have to take in even a single one.
CUMSKIN, hahaha, that's a good one.
fascist scum
And so, without any citation, it is obvious I have won this argument on the internet. Now bend over accept the rule of your new Nubian queen
This
The only reason they are letting in immigrants is to keep American wages low
>not knowing what natural rights are
If you were just plopped into the world like mincraft, and there was noone to stop you from doing something, it's your right to do it as long as it is moral.
Owning a gun for example.
You arent hurting anyone with a gun and the only thing preventing people from owning a gun is the threat of force and prison by a government.
That's only true in direct democracies. In any other sort of states, the surface ruling class serves at the pleasure of the elite class that pays them, offers them underage hookers and pure blow, etc.
The idea of elective aristocracy is defective. The USA needs a constitutional amendment to establish a binding national plebiscite. Without it, we are cucks.
>appealing to a social construct like morality to assert the naturality of a moral construct like rights
Sounds unnatural.
The graph is too blurry to figure out what it even says, and anyway it doesn't cite any sources.
I'm guessing you found some randomly coloured pictures of the US and hoped a few people might see them and agree with your white supremacy views.
There's no internet in all of human history. Just 28 years of it.
>can't click through to expand
>rebbit spacing
Phoneposters pls go back 2 rebbot
>thinking morality is just a social construct
12 year old Nihilist detected
>thinking morality isn't a social construct
Underage with daddy issues located
Stocking up on food and bullets for the civil war already
You know (((why))), don't you?