The leftist tech companies are obviously trying to divide and conquer here is the definition of Fascism from the...

The leftist tech companies are obviously trying to divide and conquer here is the definition of Fascism from the Merriam Webster dictionary
Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
early instances of army fascism and brutality
— J. W. Aldridge

Now go look up on google/Wikipedia what is the definition of fascism

Attached: 495bcfe642d7e136bcc7a7b61fafe226.jpg (559x722, 81K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Y9EgZYGL_Ec
youtube.com/watch?v=VybWkpt_3Jo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Lol so, banned from /pol/ eh?

POL is woke I am sharing with the new comers who don't belong on Yea Forums... p.s. that's you BisPOL POLisB

a general purpose less than 100 word dictionary definition and user written, general purpose information and reference page that's way longer have differences.

"No. After Noah Webster's death in 1843 and throughout the 19th century, Merriam-Webster produced the finest American dictionaries, building the reputation of the name "Webster's" to a point where it became a byword for quality dictionaries. But in the late 1800s and early 1900s, legal difficulties concerning the copyright and trademark of the name Webster arose, and eventually many different publishers—some rather unscrupulous—began putting dictionaries on the market under the Webster's name.

The net effect of the proliferation of Webster dictionaries is a reference-book marketplace in which consumers are unaware of or confused about what differentiates one Webster from another. In an attempt to draw attention to the issue, in 1982 our company changed its name from G. & C. Merriam Company to Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. In 1991, Merriam-Webster reinforced that move by introducing the phrase Not just Webster. Merriam-Webster™ to further identify and distinguish its products and to place greater emphasis on a tradition of quality Dictionary-making that we feel is uniquely ours.

Other publishers may use the name Webster, but only Merriam-Webster products are backed by over 150 years of accumulated knowledge and experience. The Merriam-Webster name is your assurance that a reference work carries the quality and authority of a company that has been publishing since 1831."


I'll take 150 years of accumulated knowledge over some 21th century rich mans definition any day of the week. But you keep building up your Fascists control I find it funny watching his puppets.

Attached: 53a9ebe49c3f6d11558a65ad2959ea06.jpg (563x738, 63K)

Attached: 63c6f8b8cb27ae1d7c5ed00cf4c11d97.jpg (500x662, 104K)

>I’m too stupid to use context or an understanding perspective with regards to viewing the evolution of a political party, and what it represents today
>in fact, I will weaponize my stupidity to further destroy any attempts to repair public discourse:

>lol Dems liked slavery 200 years ago they like it now lol
>lol socialism 200 years ago is exactly the same today
>lol the Nazis had “socialist” in their name so they must be Marxist

Sorry your liberal college didnt give you an actual dictionary jajajbuauhauhua the Merriam Webster dictionary is the official Dictionary used at oxford and contains almost every English word and is comprised of 470,000 entries.

Communism is Socialism just with more murder and socialism always leads to communism

Attached: 1552248176240.jpg (736x704, 162K)

Attached: 6183f0c0208dda69bffd6c0af7297b02.jpg (500x333, 37K)

Attached: 1552249077976.jpg (540x320, 36K)

>better double down on dumb

Wow getting shots from both sides. My point was one is a short description, the other is a longer in depth article meant to give examples and some explanation. So of course there would be differences. Even if the Webster had a second page as long as the wikipedia page it would likely have some pretty big differences than the few words of a dictionary definition.
A dictionary definition alone often inst that useful, and what your point is meant to be just doesn't come across. As for building up fascists, im an anarchist but nice assumption.

I attend the Catholic university of Leuven, 48th in world rankings and 31st in my subject. Why would they provide a dictionary in this day and age, its not a useful reference tool.

They arent even socialists

Catholic church is what gives all priests a bad name... riddled with pedophilia as bad as the fake America Jews and hollywood

Attached: 1552935236542.jpg (444x960, 46K)

lol Bernie isnt socialist? Obamacare wasnt Socialist? Hitlary is just a wolf in sheeps clothing.

Attached: 1551277897835.jpg (480x480, 24K)

They dont want to abolish private property, and have drect democracy of the workers, so no they arent.

Great definition of Trumptards.

kek, these are great. Like most people i am in fact aware that the catholic church has a problem with pedophiles. Its another reason im glad that im not religious.

that's communism you stupid shit and yes they're after freedom speech first after our network is killed then they go for guns and then private property they're clearly anti american commies

Attached: 1552248004984.jpg (400x600, 69K)

It's a good thing Catholicism is the only religion

never said it was, never said there was anything wrong with being religious.

So whats the difference between socialism and communism according to you?

>The leftist tech companies are obviously trying to divide and conquer
Yes, for the benefit of capitalism and for their own ethnic interests. They're neoliberals, biological Leninists, and Jews, not fascists.
>here is the definition of Fascism from the Merriam Webster dictionary
>Definition of fascism
>1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
I'd take issue with the general negative slant toward the ideology but first of all, the enemy takes pains to decentralize itself so there isn't one person to direct ire against. Secondarily, the enemy does not exalt a specific race, it merely denigrates one (whites). This is because it is in a certain sense the polar opposite of fascism.
>2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
Fascism is not solely defined by autocracy. Are kings "fascists"? Is Deng Xiaoping a "fascist" despite espousing Marxism-Leninism? The definition is overly broad and therefore useless.
>army fascism
Apolitical army control of the state is praetorianism, not fascism. Please use ideological words to mean what they mean and not as all-encompassing swears.

Also fascist here ama

Attached: D0dCmulXQAEJKvm.jpg (400x250, 18K)

Communism is following Carl Marx' political standards which is socialism free hand outs for bums

Attached: 1552248543995.jpg (500x281, 53K)

youtube.com/watch?v=Y9EgZYGL_Ec god what a beautiful speech

>Army fascism isn’t fascism
Idiot.

Fascism is a particular ideology. Praetorianism may be motivated by fascist ideology, as Franco arguably was, or it may be apolitical and merely interested in restoring "order," as Miguel Primo de Rivera was.

You don't know what fascism is. You throw it around like a curse word, the same as communism.

Attached: Dx05snlWoAAOZBI.jpg (467x609, 52K)

Attached: 1552248142495.jpg (631x430, 245K)

>You don't know what fascism is
Bullshit because clearly you lack the brain cells to comprehend the fact that Praetorianism is an ideology under authoritarianism which IS still fascism. Get fucked faggot.

but Karl Marx requires the abolishment of private property and ownership of the means of production (natural resources, industry, transport, housing etc) by the public, as in workers. Either directly by those workers using them, or to state of a government of workers.
So whats the difference between the two? Its still not clear to me in your example.
None of them want that, they are rich and utilize capitalism to be there. They want to have a little bit of change to how you regulate the capitalist market and try to improve the country from the bottom up a little. Like many countries do successfully.
Most of them also arent against terrorizing other countries to get cheap resources etc either, they dont want to allow them to develop and adopt anything like socialism or even protectionism.
So probably not socialists.

Not all authoritarian or totalitarian systems are fascist. Soviet Russia not fascist. The government of Iran is not fascist. Pinochet was not fascist. Despite all of them being authoritarian, they all espouse and attempted to implement radically different visions of society. Pinochet was an authoritarian capitalist; Stalin was an authoritarian Marxist, and the Ayatollahs were/are authoritarian reactionaries.

Fascism is an ideology, not a method of governance. Mussolini and Hitler were fascists. Peron was a fascist. Assad is a fascist, as were the other Ba'athists. You seem to be caught in a mode of thought whereby anything other than your utopian vision of libertarian capitalism is "fascist," when this is not the case. You must know what the enemy is in order to fight them, and they are definitively not fascist. That is an idea they have planted in your mind.

Attached: D1yVejkX0AMmgOR.jpg (545x768, 55K)

Attached: 1552248526680.jpg (426x426, 70K)

>Soviet Russia is not fascist
Stopped reading there. Please take a second to realize how retarded you are with political knowledge and fix it. You are brain dead.

The Dunning-Kruger effect is on full display here.
No, the Soviet Union was not fascist in any way. It was Marxist-Leninist, as China is now. Marxism-Leninism and fascism bear as much similarity to each other as either does to any form of liberalism.

Attached: 531d51eeb3fef8499372ecaf280db5b86c70fcb8386bba28d0a7f10fe6213e13.jpg (800x450, 42K)

So tired of this bullshit. Look up the party platforms from the 1800's sound familiar? No because the party's aren't the same dumbass.

Yeah you can shut the fuck up now you delusional retard.

No u, boomer. Keep trying to out-liberal the liberals as they genocide your children.

Attached: Dxv0MhVXcAAJme5.jpg (390x626, 54K)

this, /thread
like seriously how many people on this board failed fucking 10th grade history?

Once again, the right has shown they haven't moved past 100 years ago.

Attached: demhitler.png (309x540, 159K)

No serious ideological development has occurred for a hundred years, so you could forgive them if they weren't clinging to an ideology that was outmoded a hundred years ago (namely classical liberalism).

Hitler tried to save you from the modern left.

Attached: 1553884946910.jpg (1948x1093, 1.37M)

Hitler was a socialist lefty youtube.com/watch?v=VybWkpt_3Jo

Russia is a growing nation and a great ally to many good people

Attached: 1552248937770.png (494x265, 197K)

Attached: 1552490977710.jpg (958x870, 122K)

Lol. Conservatives supporting classic liberalism. That's hilarious.

I guess socialism isn't real socialism huh?

jews don't love jesus wtf u tryna pull nigga

Attached: 1553618227329.png (500x721, 451K)

Attached: 1552488433545.jpg (734x960, 92K)

But Jesus loves Jews,

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Attached: 1552661960788.jpg (300x300, 30K)

First off; all 'leftist' tech companies can only remain as profitable as they are if they remain further to the right financially than a lot of leftists these days. Capitalism is all that's really on the table for them, and they still dont want government hands in anything, in fact, they want their hands in government. If we streamlined the socialist structures already in place in America we could make a system that makes it way harder for money to get into politics, and for them to stop ignoring their human rights violations and shitty anti-worker policies.

>But Jesus loves Jews,
unot wut u said retard

Trump came promising a return to greatness that was vague and continues to be so
Therefore he is free to promote a cultural and political direction as he sees fit at the unwavering support of his base, and it will always be seen as Making American Great Again

A fascist society is chauvinistic in it's nationalism, and springs out of perceived victimization of the dominant social group by a minority, which is invariably tied to fears of marxism.
It redefines what it means to be a citizen, pushes for a return to traditional values, festihization of the military, and any criticism of this is spun as a threat to the "people"
With fear mongering on immigration and SJWs, the dominant political party in US politics is the GOP, which caters to white christian males and corporate interests.
The GOP and their voting base are exclusively loyal to Trump, who wages a war against the press to suppress descent while telling obscenely false lies that form a narrative that is contradicted by reality, and will freely reject science if inconvenient to it's ideology.
This is demagoguery.

Trumpism is Fascism.

Attached: 50464565_787666998245503_8934451734336503808_n.jpg (960x960, 98K)