This is not a question meant to start outrage or crazy debates. Im neither in support or against Trump. It is just a question.
What is the realistic chance of him being impeached out of curiosity?
This is not a question meant to start outrage or crazy debates. Im neither in support or against Trump. It is just a question.
What is the realistic chance of him being impeached out of curiosity?
Zero percent now go back to police faggot
Unlikely if he doesn't get a second term.
Probably about 50/50 if he does.
He will not be impeached during first term. House will not waste time on bullshit impeachment proceedings because Senate will not vote to remove.
Only liberal faggots think he's gonna get impeached. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. Stop believing what the liberal media tells you.
You need to have evidence of wrongdoing to actually impeach someone.
Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship with someone he had authority upon which was a conflict of interest. It was not much but since this conflict of interest could be interpreted as rape because Monica Lewinski was not in a position where she could have said "no" to the man. If you ask me Bill Clinton is lucky to have only been impeached and not sent directly to jail.
trump on the other hand is just a loud mouth idiot who knows how to run a country and he did absolutely nothing wrong as of yet. This may change if someone brings evidence of wrongdoing but it's probably not going to happen because Americans are too retarded to know what an evidence actually is.
Somewhere between 0% and LOLNOPE.
If he gets re-elected by republicans who also don't bother to vote for the senate and the democrats get both houses of congress, then they still have to actually find some impeachable offense to throw at him. And since the two year investigation found nothing, it's unlikely. Unfortunately for them, they've actually accidentally proved that he's completely clean.
All the things his opponents think he should be impeached for are not illegal. The argument goes something like:
1) I don't like Trump
2) Get rid of Trump
3) or i won't like you too
People just have to understand and accept that despite a superior education in the arts, they can be wrong about a thing that a dumb middle-america guy got right.
>Americans are too retarded to know what an evidence actually is.
none whatsoever, he's not obstructing Congress, which is only their actual concern at all
>Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship with someone he had authority upon which was a conflict of interest.
He was impeached because he lied under oath. Committing perjury is a crime.
Very low, since the Republicans in Congress are willing to put up with anything and will lie to cover for him.
He's not getting impeached, but don't act like it wouldn't be justified. He's repeatedly broken his oath of office with his attacks on the first amendment, he's been violating the emoluments clause of the constitution since day 1, and there is quite likely enough evidence in the Mueller report to impeach him, otherwise he would have released it.
That was also a crime he committed. it's crazy how a little accusation can overshadow a big one sometimes.
he will be re elected after his second term if somebody is elected between his second and third terms, 8 years isnt the limit just the limit in a row
0%
the question we should be asking ourselves is another one i think.
does the political system as we know it still suit our society?
wouldn´t it be better to let artificial intelligence run most of our gouvernments tasks, because machines make decisions without any disturbing emotions.
Not gonna happen unless something comes up. Democrats know unless it has bipartisan support it will fail. This exactly happened to bill Clinton when Republicans went after him for the scandal.
If the impeachment does not have bipartisan support it will be seen by the public as a partisan witch hunt. This can actually help the person behind impeached, Bill Clinton's approval number shot up because of that after his impeachment.
This entire thread is just proof of the grip the alt right media has on our country, Trump has ALREADY BEEN impeached but the rethuglicans are orchestrating a massive media coverup
Here ... look carefully
wut
the alt right media?
BAHAHHAHA AFUCKING LIBERAL FUCKING FAGGOT HE WON YOU LOST NO COLLUSION
LOLOL AT LIBFAG OP
He's being investigated for several things and most of his closest people have been convicted or will be soon. The problem won't be lack of evidence.
More simply, getting rid of Trump by impeaching him is not a smart strategy for democrats. Those who believe he's a victim of "liberal media" (yeah, right) will just get more enraged, making the US even more unstable than it is. Democrats understand that impeaching him would be counterproductive and ultimately irresponsible.
It is possible that, if something really bad comes up, Trump will resign in exchange for a clean sheet. It happened with Republicans in the past - just check the story of Spiro Agnew, vice president of Richard Nixon.
Impeached for what? There has to be high crimes and misdemeanors. There's nothing there.
Chances of it happening at all are pretty hilariously low. If it did nothing happens because the Senate won't jump onboard without going blue first.
If Trump wins 2020 the GOP is almost certainly going to keep what they have, probably making gains on top of that. If he gets term two he's not getting impeached. The whole Russia conspiracy theory the left has been banking on so completely for the last two years has really shit the bed for them. Outside of the fanatical far left people are not happy with the D's over this. At this point this clusterfuck is going to backfire spectacularly on them.
Bill Clinton was acquitted on all charges...
Impeachment is a political remedy, not a legal remedy.
A sitting president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached. It merely has to pass with both a 2/3 vote in the Senate and a 3/5 vote in the state.
Bill Clinton was impeached. This does not overturn his impeachment status, it merely prevented him from being removed from the office(probably because there were five minutes left in his presidential term and enough tax payer money and resources had already been spent on the old pervert)
Bill Clinton is one of two presidents to be impeached, the other being Andrew Johnson.
Zero
Your tinfoil hat is falling off there bud
Him being acquitted doesn't remove his impeachment status
He was also disbarred because he committed perjury
THE ONLY THING TRUMP WILL BE REMEMBERED FOR IS THE CALIBER OF THE BULLET USED TO ASSASSINATE HIM
>What is the realistic chance of him being impeached out of curiosity?
He's guilty of a lot of little crimes. Not enough to get impeached successfully with Pubs in senate.Probably enough to get relected.
Practically 0
Honest question (im not an american) People who still side with Trump, why?
Is it just to troll "libtards", is it just because you have always been a republican and for some reason you refuse to change party and just go with it? I am really interested in knowing how and why people still support him, not looking to diss on anyone, just really curious
Literally zero.
There isn't enough time left.
At election time it was because he was better than the other unfortunate candidates. He also says what’s on his mind, and does what he does without fear of what people will do or say about it, which is what the ideal American does
Low. Nancy Pelosi has said that it's not worth the time to impress since the Senate won't remove from office.
If this cuck wins a second term and the Dems take the Senate then almost 100%
>At election time it was because he was better than the other unfortunate candidates
How do you mean? He is not a politician? Why was he better? I get that he is better at promoting himself
About ZERO
Just like how he was only gunna make it a few months before he got impeached when he was elected?
Communist here. It was always blatantly zero percent. Just a generally pathetic reach by Democrats and centrists to deflect the blame for losing the 16 election (from colluding to push Clinton)
>he is not a politician
That’s a bad thing? I’d say most would think that’s a positive
zero.
he won't win in 2020, however.
It's ironic that the guy with the "more you know" photo doesn't know shit.
Bill Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.
>8 years isnt the limit just the limit in a row
incorrect
You do know that Clinton's impeachment had nothing to do with the anything sexual? He was impeached for perjury, lieing under oath.
Why?
You wouldnt hire a plumber to fix your car?
I don't think he'll be impeached, I think he's gonna lose this election due to being wildly unpopular. Then I think he'll end up in jail within a few years after the next president refuses to pardon him due to all this other shit that's coming out about the Trump Organization.
he's absolutely a politician, he's just not very good lying
50% approval. Not happening kid.
Just listen to Nancy P. "It's just not worth it"
>kek
Actually Clinton might not have lied under oath. He was asked if he's had sexual relations with Monica and said no. The interesting part is that the prosecutor had previously defined sexual relations as any actions committed with the intent to sexually pleasure the other. Bill argued that he didn't give a fuck if Monica got off and therefore his answer was technically honest. Suitsupply that definition she had sexual relations with him but he did not have them with her.
How is he unpopular? Stop watching Propaganda. And start using news aggregates.
Oh so wrong. It doesn't matter if it's in a row or not. Hello he can't even be VP or speaker of the house either because they're in line for the office
I would if he was a plumber by trade yet knew auto mechanics.
He is a capitalist and this is a capitalist society. I’m not super in to politics I don’t really give a shit about it much, but for someone like me who is most likely ignorant, it made sense why others voted for him. I mean heck, if anything it could be a positive he isn’t a career politician. For someone who hasn’t been doing it their entire life, to come in and win a presidential race like that speaks volumes
Not enough evidence to be able to impeach him.
Over Who? LMAO An old pedophile? A Commie? Some dumb colored bitch who preaches socialism?
LMAO
Tis True
Apparently he is better than everyone else though
Fox news, talk radio, infowars, brietbart, ect
>America is undereducated and does undereducated things
He doesn't lie very often. The only country he's really lying to... is Israel. :)
None of those are Alt-Right media.
Dude we watched him on national TV admit to obstruction of justice. It's not about if the evidence is there, it's about if impeaching him is a smart political play
Redundant argument is redundant, keep running in circles.
>What is the realistic chance of him being impeached out of curiosity?
near zero
Because until we can get a true White Nationalist president, he is the best alternative to the communist/socialist agenda coming out of the Democrats.
slim to none, especially since collusion with russia was debunked.
Let's be fair. If Obama or Clinton had some the same shit, they would have been impeached. How were libs supposed to know the cons had zero fucking brains or spines
I highly doubt you comprehend the laws you're speaking of.
I watched Hillary Clinton Fall while a group of people was trying to shove her into a van.
Her campaign also admited to destroying evidence physically and with software pertaining to the Email investigation the FBIbotched.
Top kek
Because the political foundation of America is no longer based upon critical thinking and common sense. Corrupt media has turned it into a football game, and no matter how shitty and retarded your quarterback is, you root for your team till the end. At least that's how the worthless right does it. Most of them can't even tell you honestly why they like Trump. That horror of a human being is just wearing a red jersey and that's all that matters to the Fox "News" sheep.
You think the Media that's is still in that Party's pocket would push that narrative to the public?
The fuck are you talking about he was not impeached because of some conflict of interest you fool
He was impeached for perjury
You dont even seem understand what rape means he did not force himself on her she wanted to suck his dick that's not rape
You are what's wrong with American please go read a book
0% chance there was no collusion, no obstruction. Last I checked you can't impeach the president because you don't like them. 2nd term who knows maybe he'll do something impeachable. ATM there are no grounds for impeachment.
>worthless right does it
Doesn't understand that the party has gone through a reformation. Something the LEFT still hasn't done and I have large doubts will ever happen successfully.
He probably should be, he's pathetic, but it won't happen. Those who want it to are far too pussified and ineffectual to do so, so he'll almost certainly last out his term and and the no-trumps will surge to the next election to make sure he doesn't come back and the next person will be equally pathetic in a different way while Trump's personality cult continues to worship him until they die
What a fucking dumb ass you are.
Ok there sparky. The law is fairly clear, when you fire the lead investigator into your own crimes, it's a blatant obstruction.
No impeachment, he gets re-elected in 2020, republicans take back house in 2020, grow senate majority in 2020. Dems continue shooting themselves in the foot and getting in their own way
You cannot change my mind
Clearly I was correct in my statement.
I don't think you can impeach someone out of curiosity.
Her campaign admitted to the same shit Dick Chenny did. Except he deleted 3 million emails. But hey Clinton's a criminal right?
70 percent in the house. They will likely impeach him for alleged speeding in 2005. There will be a year of investigations. They will grill and get guilty pleas out of people by threatening legal action against loved ones, the usual.
There is no reason to change your mind. Dems are fucked, and thank god emperor Trump for that.
Both acts are illegal you dumb fuck.
It is not currently politically solvent to impeach trump
That is the only real reason if he actually committed a crime or not dosen't really matter
Zero. It's always been practically zero, even if he did anything. Even if he should by all means be removed it is still practically.
Impeachments are extremely complicated messy affairs..
Any call for impeachment you've heard from news or Democrats are more call to banners for the voter base to stay charged and angry so they turn out to vote in greater numbers.
Let me guess. You think a modern day Republican would support Dick Chenny? LOL I would watch the Entire Bush Family Burn in Hell if it were up to me.
I think all needing is biased, but the "liberal media" is less politically biased and more sensationalism biased. Where as the alt right media is almost entirely politically biased.
Dunning-Kruger much?
highly unlikely, it will stir up more shit than its worth.... but thats assuming the Democrats arent pants on head retarded.... which is also very unlikely
gr8 b8 m8
What Alt-Right media? A couple of You-Tubers? Dude... look at who FOX News Just hired. Fox News is controlled opposition. They hired the same bitch that gave the Clinton Campaign the Debate Questions.
The only reformation it went through was when Reagan opened the executive branch doors for Wall Street and they have been slowly and methodically warping the party to serve their own greed and demented desire for power.
The real Republican party died almost 40 years ago. The sheep won't admit it.
So the Democrats are still the party of the KKK or did that party die too?
Do you want the fox news polls?
He's popular amongst 16 year olds, dude. He only seems popular because you frequent forums where he is. He is not doing well. He almost never actually was.
This isn't even a matter of left and right, and more "retard" and "can see when the country is being run by a 16 year old girl with a Twitter account". He won the election because the Dem voters base was pretty peeved about hillary rigging the primaries, and he lost the house in the midterms because he is, as the other user said "wildly unpopular".
It depends if he has committed an impeachable crime. As of yet there isn't one. Bla Bla indictments in the state of New York Bla Bla.
Nope.
It impeach him on anything almost always require a special council investigation outside of executive controls.
With the finalized Muller investigation, it means Russian collision is found not a credible allegation. If there is more information Muller will be heading a reopening of the case.
None of any of this seems likely in the near future.
I use News Aggregates you fucking illiterate cunt.
If they really wanted "alt-right" media they would be reading American Renascence or Nationalist Times. They don't know what real right wing media is.
No, the Democrats from then are elderly now and have become Republicans, as most all old people do.
LMAO Actually believing this.
Lol
Barr summary says no evidence of wrong doing. No more indictments.
Full report will say the opposite?
No you nitwit. It's not released because it contains information not releasable to the public. Once redacted and cross referenced is done it'll be released.
"Those People were bad. So I say they're on your side now."
So.. instead if selecting news outlets based on their reputation for reporting accuracy, you instead use an app or website that will give you anything from any website, including blogs... And you think that makes you more informed...?
I personally doubt him getting impeached. Its 2019, hes got another year, and in fact he might get realected.
>based on their reputation for reporting accuracy
So you get your news from where exactly that would match that criteria?
No no, answer my question.
Why are news aggregates better?
No, no answer my question. Or I'll call you a little faggot.
Most reps will vote for the guy with the R behind his name no matter how come they are because it's unfathomable to vote blue.
Not b8
Undsrageb&.
You can't be here if youre 17. Come back when you can have a conversation.
Why would I care what an illiterate little turd like your self wants?
You gonna cry, faggot?
You think this place is for big boys and girls?
If the right can call the centrist media liberal why can't the left call the right wing media the alt right media?
You missed the mockery
What Centrist Media?
Read up on Nixon's Southern Doctrine
trump sucks jew cock on the regular so he will never be impeached
Is it you? Any spells today? How you coping?
I think you mean assassinated like JFK.
People with IQs over 87 do not act like this.
Pretty much everything left of Fox but right of MSNBC
Awww... still crying like a little bitch, faggot?
Exactly how is MSNBC further left than CNN?
I thought this place was only for big boys and girls. Wasn't that your battle cry?
>realistic chance of him being impeached out of curiosity?
"Chance" isn't the question.
"Why" is the question.
Impeachment is the equivalent of indictment or arraignment. It just means someone has determined there's enough evidence to warrant a trial.
And while there's plenty enough evidence to warrant a trial, there's no real point because he'd be tried in the Senate, a body where as little as 6% of the voters control 40% of the seats with strong bias towards Republicans.
As long as they control the Senate, they won't convict him, even if he murders a baby on live T.V.
Out only real hope is that he won't win the primary in 2020. And while that seems unlikely, his current attack on Obamacare (which the republicans secretly love) might be the first step in that direction.
I mean look at how many homosexuals CNN has on the air? That's pretty progressive wouldn't you say. And in today's world, Progressive means Left.
Nil to none. The Democrats are raising a stink even after the Mueller report all but absolved Trump of any wrong doing. It's all political theater now with Democrats basically turning into conspiracy-spewing "Birthers" & "Truthers" in hopes it gets them enough votes to take the White House in 2020. Hence why polls show Dems approval plummeting & msnbc, CNN look like Alex Jones / Infowars clones with higher production value.
/thread
Pretty much.
We just have too much intelligence and morals to vote for the communist/socialist agenda.
I mean if they would put out a single bill that would actually help the Average American Worker then maybe I could see voting Dem once in a while, However...
All their current agenda is doing, is making it easier for us on the right to recruit. The farther left they go the more White Nationalists they create.
Unless something insane comes out of nowhere, somewhere around 0.00%.
>the Mueller report all but absolved Trump of any wrong doing.
Even in Barr's own words it "DOES NOT EXONERATE TRUMP", but does present evidence he obstructed justice.
See Also:
youtu.be
After Schiff gets a federal judge to release the Muellers grand jury material to the House Intel Committee? 100%
No it didn't, the barr letter, a 4 page summary put together in 48 hours on a 300 page report spanning 2 years did.
Agreed but
>Something insane
I don't care what side you're on, surely you'd agree a good question for me to ask you right now is "what's insane anymore though?"
>After the guy being pressured to step down by both parties goes to a federal judge
Sure.
not him, but which democrats have called for him to step down?
Slim to non unless barr is outright lying about the Muller report. Thanks to this damn investigation anything short of straight up treason wont be enough to get him impeached. Any other president would be facing impeachment over half the shit he's done
Pelosi the most notable one.
About zero
Nothing matters anymore, remember?
i can't seem to find that, got an article for it?
Schiff did nothing wrong, and all republicans can claim is the Barr report probably won't land Trump in jail (unless it's for obstruction).
Meanwhile, user's point (if overstated) is that Barr doesn't address the counterintelligence aspects of Muller's report. It's entirely possible Mueller proved Trump (and others) are under Putin's thumb somehow. Not a crime exactly, but it beggers the question: didn't your side have somebody, ANYBODY, better than this to run for President?
*the MUELLER Report
>The farther left they go the more White Nationalists they create.
Demonstrably false. The Right Wing Democrat Obama Administration saw a renaissance of American fascism. And the defeat of the even further Right Hillary brought it to full flower. Only Communism has ever supplied the adequate motivation to destroy the ideology of irrational violence.
So was Trump you fucking twink
are you really this retarded? you have to be charged with something to be acquitted.
>are you really this retarded?
That's the really scary thing about Trump.
He lives in his own little world, and it seems like his supporters are willing to believe along with him.
Let's take something really simple.
During the shutdown he complained about Republicans and Dems alike for not supporting the wall, claiming the 80% of Americans supported the wall. In reality, it's a little more than 40%.
He's still claiming he won a great victory in 2016, even though he's one of less than a half dozen presidents that took office while losing the popular vote, and his EC victory ranks 46 out of 58 presidential elections.
He's REALLY out of touch with reality, and yet his supporters really drink the Kool-Aide.
Ughh looks like he fucking has Confederate flag disease.
Why would Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the Poindexter who originally sicced Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Trump, the Dirty Cop who told Trump to fire FBI Director James Comey and then used the firing as his excuse to appoint a Special Counsel, sign off on the four page summary if it was bullshit?
Why would Attorney General Bob Barr release a four page summary to cover up all the terrible things that are really in the report knowing 1) he would someday release the full report and 2) the report is eventually going to leak?
And here’s my favorite…
Special Counsel Robert Mueller dropped a bomb on BuzzFeed after that hack outfit published fake news, so does anyone honestly believe Mueller would remain quiet if Barr’s four page summary was in any way misleading?
Would Mueller’s gang of assistant prosecutors and investigators, almost all of whom donated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, remain silent if the four page summary was a cover up?
Zero percent unless he does something really fucking retarded, which he probably would have already done if he was going to.
Wait and find out like the rest of us.
You are a cunt.
Just saying.
super secret police
>Why would Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein...
Politics.
>Why would Attorney General Bob Barr release a four page summary to cover up all the terrible things that are really in the report knowing 1) he would someday release the full report and 2) the report is eventually going to leak?
1) The full report will probably never be released.
The DOJ has already announced they will allow Trump to redact anything he likes from the report under Executive Privilege.
2) Leaks are easily dismissed as "fake news", especially by a president that lives in a world only loosely connected to reality.
>does anyone honestly believe Mueller would remain quiet if Barr’s four page summary was in any way misleading?
Mueller wrote (according to Barr) that there was sufficient evidence to indict Trump for obstruction, but didn't want to set the perciient of indicting a sitting president himself.
He's clearly waffling.
And don't forget, EVERY SINGLE PERSON involved with this report is a Republican, so it's understandable if they aren't particularly hostile to the POTUS.
>unless he does something really fucking retarded,
Like calling on Russia for help during a live televised rally?
I really don't have the time, but try this once:
Google "retarded things trump has done"
>About 10,200,000 results (0.42 seconds)
>Politics
Not a reason.
>The DOJ has already announced they will allow Trump to redact anything he likes from the report under Executive Privilege.
Not true. That's not even what was reported on MSNBC.
>Mueller wrote (according to Barr) that there was sufficient evidence to indict Trump for obstruction, but didn't want to set the perciient of indicting a sitting president himself.
False. MSNBC: Mueller also made no determination on whether Trump himself obstructed justice.
>And don't forget, EVERY SINGLE PERSON involved with this report is a Republican, so it's understandable if they aren't particularly hostile to the POTUS.
False. "Would Mueller’s gang of assistant prosecutors and investigators, almost all of whom donated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, remain silent if the four page summary was a cover up?" Didn't see many Republicans donating to Hillary's campaign.
this post is the truth. Truth is something that conservatives cannot handle. Instead they worship a man who can't go 2 sentences without lying
Regardless of how you personally feel, Trump is quite unpopular, and in fact only being held up because Fox news spins every story into one that is favorable to him.
Once Fox dumps him, it's GG for trump
Nobody has even seen the report but Trump already successful brainwashed his dumbfuck supporters. It didn't take much these retards will believe anything "HUR DUR MUH EXHONERASHUN"
zero
Beats the fuck out of dur hur muh Russians. So feel free to shut your cock holster.
By killing the people who dissent.
This is how fucking stupid these people are. No amount of evidence, no length of investigation will ever appease these worthless rats. Just fucking find these people and shut their fucking mouths up for good.
>>Politics
>Not a reason.
Politicians aren't motivated by politics?
>>The DOJ has already announced they will allow Trump to redact anything he likes from the report under Executive Privilege.
>Not true. That's not even what was reported on MSNBC.
>implying MSNBC is a font of lies
Here, yes I know it's the Rolling Stone, but they're quoting Lindsey Grahm.
rollingstone.com
>roughly 24 hours earlier Graham said that a version of the report would be available to the public in “weeks not months,” and that the Justice Department would consult with the White House in case the president wanted to invoke his executive privilege to redact certain portions.
>: Mueller also made no determination on whether Trump himself obstructed justice.
That's not quite what Barr wrote:
>The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.
>he report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.
>The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
>>And don't forget, EVERY SINGLE PERSON involved with this report is a Republican
Mueller is a Republican. Comey is a Republican. Barr is a Republican.
>Beats the fuck out of dur hur muh Russians.
>implying every single intelligence agency in the country DIDN'T warn us that Putin was interfering in the election
From the Barr letter:
The report outlines the Russian effort to influence the election and documents crimes committed by persons associated with the Russian government in connection with those efforts. The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime.
And let's not forget, even Barr says the report doesn't exonerate Trump on obstruction charges.
Low, but indicted after leaving office, practically certain.
Since the Democrats have a majority in the House, they could, in theory, start an impeachment attempt at any time. The chance of it being successful, since he's been absolved of collusion with the Russians? None.
>Since the Democrats have a majority in the House, they could, in theory, start an impeachment attempt at any time.
True.
hey could not on start an impeachment, they almost certainly
>The chance of it being successful, since he's been absolved of collusion with the Russians? None.
The House could quite easily impeach him for a variety of crimes.
The Mueller report (according to Barr) says
>“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
...but that's not the same as saying conspiracy or coordination didn't happen.
Besides, Trump is has committed a variety of crimes since he's been in office.
None of that really matters though, since impeachment only leads to trial in the Senate, and the GOP will vote "not guilty" even if Trump rapes an infant on live T.V.
No, U.
How is he a lawyer with an office in Harlem right now if he was disbarred?
Let’s see the report.
discord
(O)---|16|---(O)
.gg/vvftDyy