Homosexuality can only destroy, never create.
Gay people can't actually experience love. Their "marriage" is a sick joke.
Being gay is a psyop pushed on vulnerable young men via websites like this, don't fall for it.
Being gay is an incredibly negative lifestyle choice. Why should gays be allowed to exist or have AIDS?
Homosexuality can only destroy, never create
Other urls found in this thread:
amp.theguardian.com
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
pixelcanvas.io
medicalxpress.com
cdc.gov
twitter.com
gay dudes are always mean. change my mind
You're right, OP. We should ban the AIDS. Nobody should be allowed to get it. Because banning things makes them go away.
Bump all gay people i ever met were either outright rude cunts or the definition of narcissistic,
Nobody cares what you think
>t. degenerate faggot
Faggot detected
I sent my son to conversion therapy, it worked
Story time, what'd they do?
t. Catholic
Showed him the evils of being a faggot and gave him a lot of hormones to correct it.
Easy as pie
Good man!
OP is absolutely right, this is why I like tomboy-looking traps with no boobs instead, fucking faggots liking dudes and stuff will burn in hell!
Cons:
-possibly go to hell if fundamentalist religious followers are right
-get lumped in with the worst examples where people try to use them as what they think a "normal" gay person is like
-AIDS and other STDs are risks if you do random hookups and don't know your partner (also true for straights)
Pros:
-dick is mad fucking good.
Can't believe that in 2019 This shit is still going down
amp.theguardian.com
>HOMOSEXUAL SPOTTED ON AMERICAN SOIL
>LETHAL FORCE ENGAGED
the real redpill is there's no such thing as being gay, it's not an inherent characteristic to be attracted to the same sex, the only thing that actually exists is sodomy, and the choice to commit sodomy or not.
Very true. Homosexual identity is a psyop.
I'm a straight white-ish male, of turski-balkani descent. Islamic family, non-relig. Myself. but you know? Homosex has been part of some cultures, written about in the old testament. The fact it exists, in ancient texts proves it's part of nature, but also, that modern homosex is not unethical to allow people to congregate
Imagine actually giving a fuck about what somebody else does that doesn't affect you in any way yet you whine about it
I can't imagine that. It's too retarded.
MODS!
MODS!
MODS!
MODS!
MODS!
MODS!
>this same thread topic again
Shall we start posting the gay porn to get this homophobe to fuck off?
I think they just want gay porn and this is their bait to attract it.
I couldn't care less. It pisses off anti-semites and "anti degeneracy" type all the same.
Laws???
>only destroy never create
Created the best music of all time.
>marriage is a sick joke
All marriage is a joke
>sites like this
op, you fag
> allowed to have aids
Your mom fucks niggers and got aids too
Bumping FOR GREAT JUSTICE!
make AIDS illegal?
Ah yes. Torturing your son because he likes men. Betcha he totally doesnt wanna hang himself now.
I hate you
I used to think this but recently got a job with 50+ yr old gay dudes as the CEO’s and they’re actually cool
Young gay dudes and flamers are the mean ones, you probably met gay dudes who were nice before and didn’t know they were gay, because the nice ones dont scream it at every opportunity.
Why would mods care for that :v
Sorry desu
How does homosexuality being legal affect you?
that's my dude
bless you, man
Cause say the wrong thing, BAM! Jail time...
Once laws were enacted, I recinded my support for your cause.
Theres no law against having wrong opinions in the USA user-kun
>The fact it exists, in ancient texts proves it's part of nature
That is a sophism, if it exists through centuries it doesn't make it fucking NORMAL.
Downs syndrome existed through fucking centuries, cannibalism existed through fucking centuries, mass murder, slavery, tortures all of them existed through fucking centuries. It doesn't make them normal.
"natural" and normal aren't the same thing.
Everything that exist in this world is natural, because nature is the world.
>that doesn't affect you in any way
it does, faggot.
How
If they are two consenting adults, why do you care desu
If we ban everything that twists you knickers, it'll be a bare cold world we wake to afterwards
I can't help but imagine someone so sad hates most everything.Fags are just the target you feel comfortable voicing, and they make you extra mad because you get those scary wiener tingles when you think about putting your tongue against their little fag dicks
>How
Homos are lowering birth rates; lowering birth rates, leads to lower industrial and military potential; which leads to lower chance of survival for all the nation in case of war. Only retard can't understand this.
>If they are two consenting adults, why do you care desu
If they would be just two consenting adults I wouldn't give a fuck.
But they tend to propagandize homosexuality, to children too.
The higher the rate of this propaganda, the more confused teenagers you will get; which leads to higher suicide rate and higher faggots amount, more of this faggots will be just a brainwashed poor bastards, who aren't actually homosexuals by the birth.
I'm not even mentioning that fag parades are aesthetically disgusting, and HIV spread among faggots
take you metaphors, and leave.
metaphor is not an argument.
you should be ashamed of yourself.
Pence you fucking samefagging faggot
the fact that hatred to faggots existed in ancient times proves it's a part of nature.
homo hatred is natural.
Tell that to the greeks and romans
Hatred towards homosexuals started with the stupidest religions that fucked human progress in science
>Homos are lowering birth rates
No, straight people choosing not to have kids is lowering birth rates by much more than could be accounted for with all the gays coming out.
>Also they say they aren't wrong and I think they are! They're even telling kids that it's okay to be who they are! Horror!
>Homos are lowering birth rates; lowering birth rates, leads to lower industrial and military potential; which leads to lower chance of survival for all the nation in case of war. Only retard can't understand this.
Homosexuality can be seen as a natural overpopulation preventative measure. The earth is overpopulated.
>If they would be just two consenting adults I wouldn't give a fuck. But they tend to propagandize homosexuality, to children too.
Then they arent consenting adults. You moved goalposts.
The more confused teens see fags and become fags, the fewer fags accidentally knock up whores, the less fag genetics exists. You should be thrilled.
>fag parades are aesthetically disgusting
if you change this to
>fags are aesthetically disgusting
I'll guess it's the source of all your other arguments.
Religiousfags disgust me. They all have the same limp wristed haircut and pastel clothes. And their confidence in their bullshit is infuriating. Having someone confidently misquoting their own fucking religious books in an argument, who when called on it doesn't even fucking blink? Fucking disgusting moron shit.
But I don't usually go bitching online about them. I usually don't even think about them. They undoubtedly are doing more harm with their anti-science shit, paying the current administration's faggots to cap acceptable language in government reports and defund shit that flies in the face of their bullshit.
I can't imagine the comparatively vanishing number of faggots in our country does anything like the damage these fucks do
No teen is going to see a wiener flopping in some fag's sex parade and suddenly forget how great titties are.
They were fags already.
Kids getting forcefed a bucket of bullshit every day by religiousfags doesn't cause anyone to bat a fucking eye though.
This
>Tell that to the greeks and romans
homosexuality wasn't considered normal in Greece and Roman Empire, it was something to ashamed of
religions are reflection of humanity morals
>religions that fucked human progress in science
religion FUCKING MADE ALL THE SCIENCE.
science was born in religious institutes, if you didn't know.
It's fucking ironic how faggots thing they are more enlightened than the majority of population, but they actually are pretty stupid and know fucking nothing.
pathetic
>religions are reflection of humanity morals
Oh look, another religious nut that is convinced morality wouldn't exist without religion; are you a closet masoquist too?
>No, straight people choosing not to have kids
this is a result of economical politics, governments are intentionally lowering birth rates. Homo propaganda is just a part of this, but it doesn't mean it is not a problem.
>Also they say they aren't wrong and I think they are!
Subjective idealist detected
It's not just my thoughts, there are objective criteria which make it wrong.
Big lack of people talking about lesbians itt. What do the faghaters think of them
Tell that to the Romans who saw the idea of fucking another dude as the manliest shit to ever be done
en.wikipedia.org
>RELIGION MADE ALL THE SCIENCE
Need we remind you of the dark ages?
>objective morality
The only objective things about morality is that it's wrong to fuck kids
the romans didn't even have straight and gay. they had "poker" and "pokee", the latter of which was considered inappropriate for free roman men since it was seen as the losers position. it was also unacceptable to penetrate the roman boys because of this, so instead they would just rub their dicks between their legs, like any straight guy would. frottage, I think is the term.
>religion FUCKING MADE ALL THE SCIENCE.
yeah, sure. and Catholics, would invented the big bang and mandelien genetic inheritance and forced galileo to recant publicly more because he hated the pope than his already accepted science, these Catholics are a completely different sort than the american evangalist that insists that the world is 6000 years old, flat, and that blacks are the children of cain, and most of them haven't even read their own fucking bible from cover to cover, rather yet annotated versions or various religious apologies. the dumbfuck is incredible over here.
>Homosexuality can be seen as a natural overpopulation preventative measure.
How is it natural if it is achieved throw mass propaganda?
>The earth is overpopulated.
retarded myth
>Then they arent consenting adults. You moved goalposts.
And that's the problem. Go fuck your buddy silently, without letting the public know.
>It's not just my thoughts, there are objective criteria which make it wrong.
few things involved in the human condition are objective. state them.
fags aren't caused by propaganda
they're caused by boys that get excited over dick
>>The earth is overpopulated.
>retarded myth
fucking LOL. you gonna wait till we've got a full on Malthus' world going here?
Gay people existed before propaganda. Gay animals exist and they dont have propaganda or even complex language
>if you change this to
If you change it to something you perverse my words, this is not an argument.
And it is a great way to handle an argument by picking the least significant bunch of words and calling it the main point of my comment.
Good job, brainlet.
>Religiousfags disgust me.
I'm atheist.
>They were fags already.
All the psychological data tells that human personality is a result of the influence of the world.
>And that's the problem. Go fuck your buddy silently, without letting the public know.
I like that this implies you don't actually give a fuck, but fags make you feel queasy, so you'd rather they pretend not to exist so you don't have to see them.
I think you'd be all right if you decided to work less from your disgust and more from your indifference.
>I'm an atheist
Sure you are.
I like it loud frankly
>another religious nut
I'm an atheist
>is convinced morality wouldn't exist without religion
that's the exact opposite to my words.
I said that people are the source of the morals, and religion is the way they declared it.
religion was invented by people.
learn to read, faggot
>All the psychological data tells that human personality is a result of the influence of the world.
*doubt*
it's far more of a toss between genetics and environment, and it's likely genetic how much of an influence environment will have
Small admission. I've been distributing gay horse propaganda for decades in an attempt to influence horse politics.
>homosexuality can destroy
>on a board where people literally go on murdering sprees because they've failed to live up to the societal expectations of having heterosexual sex
>gay marriage is a joke
>40% plus traditional marriages in the states end in divorce
how can you be so butthurt and so stupid at the same time?
So many faggots larping as non faggots
are you suggesting that butthurt and stupidity have ever had a mutually exclusive relationship?
>projection
>Tell that to the Romans who saw the idea of fucking another dude as the manliest shit to ever be done
so some deviants said some shit, how is that reflecting all the society?
>Need we remind you of the dark ages?
It is natural that in some point of history religion became a political instrument, and in order to protect itself from being discredited became reactional towards science.
Dark ages don't deny the fact that religion gave birth to science.
It was seen as that by the entire society though. Did you even read the article desu?
>The only objective things about morality is that it's wrong to fuck kids
So at least you understand that there is an objective morality.
Why do you think this is the only objective morality then?
Do you know what historical materialism is?
Moral was born from objective reasons and need for survival of the population.
The only gay people I dont like are lesbians. They're worse than anything.
That's an interesting point actually. Technically, you could say that the Earth isn't overpopulated, it's just our current usage of resources is overstretched and can't be maintained at this pace. In terms of land use, I think it's fine. But obviously it'd only be fine for a while, then we run out of resources and see a massive population decline and a return to agricultural subsistence. I personally have hope that the energy crisis will be solved; my money's on nuclear fusion for a long term solution.
- not being able to give birth to a child,
- higher suicide rate,
- higher HIV rate,
- higher psychiatric problems rate.
>And HIV spread among faggots
>Was asked how it affected you
>Confirmed faggot
natural occurrence doesn't make it normal, it is still a deviation and isn't normal.
Since you're an expert on objective morality. Please put this debate to rest
>You see a runawaytrolley moving toward five tied-up (or otherwise incapacitated) people lying on the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that controls aswitch. If you pull the lever, the trolley will be redirected onto a side track, and the five people on the main track will be saved. However, there is a single person lying on the side track. You have two options:
>1. Do nothing and allow the trolley to kill the five people on the main track.
>2. Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.
Which is the more moral choice
Moving the goalposts. You originally said it was cause by propaganda and now you say it's natural but bad. Which is it?
the latter three are true of trailer trash too. I wish we could get those asshats to stop having a dozen kids apiece.
the lack of birth is what causes aids, since it made anonymous sex fun and easy for fags for a long time
I imagine spending half your life hated and maybe hating yourself when you start getting boners from seeing dick will contribute to 2 and 4.
It's fucking normal to feel queasy because of faggots, ha-ha, what is wrong with your brain?
Private aspects of your life should be private, if you are homosexual who cares? But The problem of homos it the mass hysteria around them.
That's what I'm talking about.
Hang on a second, I'm just a random dude that jumped into the thread at the mention of overpopulation. I don't think I'm an expert on objective morality. I'm familiar with this little test though. It's meant to illustrate the average persons willingness (or lack thereof) to kill an individual to save more people - highlighting how our emotional side overrides our logical side in situations like this. But as far as I can recall, the next part includes the option to push the person onto the tracks, not pull a lever. I'm assuming that was the next question?
>pretending this doesn't have a widely accepted objective answer
Another believer in magical properties of genes.
fags don't make me feel anything at all.
I imagine there'd be some impact on government spending, wouldn't there?
No. Read my post and answer my question. Dont dodge like a bitch
>It was seen as that by the entire society though
And what happened to Rome?
Op is gay ass nigger
Well I'd pull the lever.
Man, there are other ways to get HIV apart from sex.
Are you suggesting that Rome fell because of gay people? Rome fell because muzzies managed to kick their ass and divided the country
man, I don't even know how to respond to this
of course genes have a massive effect on personality, desire and everything else. they're the blueprints for the machine
little babies have dispositions, man. and they aren't just imprints from the parents
I raised four kids, and all of them were very different from one another
That's true, but let's be honest - the vast majority comes from homosexuals. Hell, AIDS was called GRIDS at one point.
Hey! Take that back. My feelings are hurt.
Do you think genes have no impact on your behavior?
five lives worth more than one.
being a pussy and take the responsibility is an immoral choice.
this "dilemma" is a dilemma only to retard who know nothing about history, army, economics and politics.
OP, I just wanted to say I've enjoyed debating with you. I'm heading off to get some sleep. I hope you can stop worrying about fags, so we can let them be fags in peace.
Have a good night, man
>being this retarded.
You are saying like on of them cancels the other.
They both are parts of the problem.
Once again lack of knowledge of dialectics leads to retarded mistakes.
You aren't as clever as you think you are.
Go to doctor than, you might be a neurotic type of person or already have some illness that makes you apathetic.
The ironies on this board are giving me vertigo lately, a welcome touch of oldfaggotry.
I'm saying that in a vast majority of cases this influence is overvalued.
There are a lot cases of identical twins (they have absolutely the same genome) grow up with very different personalities.
Don't think that genes are some magic stuff. That's all I'm saying.
Rome fell because it couldn't handle the slaves, which were the real majority of the roman population.
There was a "real citizens" who were slavers.
And all this "Roman culture" is a culture of an absolute minority of the rome - the indolent so called "elite" of the rome.
I'm not telling that rome fell because of faggots, I'm telling that it is a wrong way to prove the point, by giving an example of the failed empire.
You could get it from sharing heroin needles with someone who had gay sex. Or getting a blood transfusion from someone who had gay sex. Or being a woman who has sex with a man who had gay sex. Lots of ways
Is that it? I thought you were gonna follow that up with something.
Hurr dee durr dee dee faggot. Self-hating faggots are the worse kind of faggots.
I meant to respond to this one.
OP, every fucking time I see you thread I get in to post some baiting comment and always end up brainstorming all this faggish idiots.
Bless you, man.:)
Whoosh.
Or sharing heroin needles with someone who never had sex with a gay, or blood transfusion from someone who never had sex with a gay, or being a woman who had sex with only straight male partners.
Your know how not to get it?
Practise safe sex.
I'm guessing you mean there's a chance non-gays would be affected by HIV due to gays. I feel like the odds of that happening are so low in comparison to tax payers forking out cash for healthcare for people affected by HIV, but to be fair, I don't know the numbers - but when PrEP trials started, that cost taxpayers $1.5 million dollars in Australia. That's just PrEP trials, that doesn't include other forms of healthcare that are subsidized by the government. Still, even if it is low, it's a guarantee you'll have to pay for it eventually. Whereas I think the chances of me getting HIV from a tainted blood transfusion are pretty low. That being said, there's still a risk and the risk is pretty significant if you do end up copping the hiv.
I mean is that somewhere close to what you were insinuating with your passive aggressive little "whoosh" comment?
Are you gonna follow this up or what faggot
There is in UK.
I don't care Thu, but the second we got hate incidents I lost my support for community, as they wield it like a hammer with 1% provocation.
I hope you guys fix that problem.
Not Anson you refer to but no, whit like your reply is like a trigger for some. Stop being so damn self righteous
>OP asked how fags affect him
>OP says fags giving each other AIDS affects him
>OP is accurately informed that it only affects him if he has the gay
>Retaliates by saying some shit about tax funded healthcare projects, which are a drop in the bucket compared to military funding which is blatant payoffs to the corporation's who build for the military, charging hundreds of dollars for screwdrivers, or tax cuts for the rich which have never before measurably improved the economy, let alone your lot in life
Sorry user, but you're hating the wrong people. I know it's hard to hear you have the gay, but it's okay to be gay, haven't you heard?
Haha nice troll.
>Homosexuality can only destroy
Destroy what? Gays make up only a sliver of the population. How will they destroy the fabric of society?
>Being gay is a psyop pushed on vunerable young men via wbsites like rhis one
HAHAHAHAHAHA sure you might have the people on /lgbt but pretty much every other board pushes against homosexuality.
>Being gay is an incredibly negative lifestyle choice
I could see how you could argue that.
>Why should gays be allowed to exist or have AIDS?
They have a life just loke you. Besides, if gays were all rounded up and put into death camps, I'm fairly sure your faggoty ass would be the first to go.
You won't realise most gay people are gay because they don't really show it. Only the poeple who deserve to be unironically called faggots do the degenerate shit you see at pride parades
More gays mean more women for heterosexual men
What does military funding have to do with homosexuality? And by the way I'm not arguing for anything, I'm just pointing out that the odds of you getting HIV from tainted blood is probably astronomically lower than the impact it has on the community in other ways - which even then can be considered as insignificant compared to other things. But we're not talking about other things are we?
Further to that point about gays being allowed to exist; it's ridiculous. Even if you rounded up every homosexual and have them murdered, it wouldn't stop children from being born who are gay. You'd just create a society where we'd constantly be killing 3% of the population because they're attracted to the same sex. It's weird.
Help us
It's a strange point to take up so vehemently. I can agree that homosexuality could be seen as maladaptive, that it's probably paired with a lot of negative health outcomes, but I don't know - what's your point? What do you think can be practically achieved with some vitriolic hatred towards gays. Unless you can figure out some way to cure 'the gay', then it's neither here nor there. Your outrage is just impotent.
OP here the guy you're responding to isn't me.
>Destroy what? Gays make up only a sliver of the population. How will they destroy the fabric of society?
They destroy themselves through their lifestyle choice. It's incredibly sad and I find it very difficult to watch them do it.
>HAHAHAHAHAHA sure you might have the people on /lgbt but pretty much every other board pushes against homosexuality.
Yeah, it's a minority pushing this psyop on all the boards.
>They have a life just loke you. Besides, if gays were all rounded up and put into death camps, I'm fairly sure your faggoty ass would be the first to go.
I said nothing about death camps.
I don't want anyone to die. I want a society that prevents them from making the choice to be gay. Nobody is born gay.
Being gay is a choice they make.
I have gay peeps in my family, no probs at all, but the second one of them tries that shit, imma lose it.
I've worked on a couple of the pride marches and one thing I can't understand is the sheer overwhelming hostility expressed between your L /G/B/T/etc groups: literally argue over the colour of the sky....
If they were left to gay people only, the events would never happen at all...
You’re more gay than they are cuz you keep constantly worrying about what 2 dudes are doing with their cocks all the time.
There's a biological component to homosexuality as well.
medicalxpress.com
>Homosexuality can only destroy, never create.
Doesn't realize that without the gay he wouldn't have a computer to troll.
Are taking about the fact that gays don't affect you unless you are one. You are in fact a massive gay.
Yeah... b-burn the gays...
Hmmm? What's this?
what a retarded article.
They aren't taking in account the influence of the parenthood qualities, yet they claim that homosexuality is "formed inside mothers womb".
What a fucking joke.
It's a complex fucking problem, such a narrow profiled "research" is unacceptable.
>i only accept facts that cater to my opinion
Now seems like a good time to remind everyone in this thread that anime is a gateway into the homosexual lifestyle.
It means your parents aren't responsible for your homosexuality, only you are. Why are you trying to shift responsibility onto others?
>I only project my degenerate psychic to those who point on my delusions
>irrelevant.jpg
And western cartoons arent?
look at steven universe.
English, mongoloid?
Yes, western cartoons as well. If I were a conspiracy theorist I might go so far as to say that a certain group of people has an agenda to promote homosexuality.
article claims that they proved homosexuality to be formed in mothers womb.
>It means your parents aren't responsible
brainlet
Faggots are formed by the environment they grow up, that's why propaganda must be stopped.
Let me guess. Op was rejected by a hot lesbian and now hes seething?
then how do you explain the existence of people who have no interest in intercourse with the opposite sex? they can't be asexual, they still want sex, but with people of their own gender. i suppose you think they're lying? even that doesn't make sense.
gay people clearly exist.
Who gives a shit about cartoons? I doubt the OP needed their help finding whatever short direct path got him there.
Not my native language, so suck it, faggot.
This comment is still pointless and retarded.
amirite fellow clean-knobbed heterosexual
>propaganda must be stopped
me. I love this shit
HOW DOES THIS IMAGE MAKE YOU FEEL?
No, that's not what I just said you idiot.
I don't think you care about the truth, I think you're just concerned about reaching the conclusion you've already come to. For starters, if you knew anything about how research is done you wouldn't say they've proven anything, which the article didn't say either. They said the findings suggest that biological components play a significant role in determining sexual orientation. They even say this needs to be replicated. The fact you just brush it off as retarded says more about you than it does about a 15-20 year study conducted in tandem with Harvard and UoT.
The team found that mothers of gay sons, especially those with older brothers, had significantly higher antibody levels to both forms of NLGN4Y than did the control samples of women, including mothers of heterosexual sons.
If you knew anything, you'd know that's pretty significant. I get you hate the gays and all, but don't be such a stubborn cunt, it just makes you look stupid.
Do you have down syndrome? Where's your handler?
>We're not talking about other things.
We were talking about the fact that the answer to the question of how it (gays existing) affects you, you (or the user you wordlessly stepped in in place of) have an answer including 'faggots give other faggots HIV'. That this only effects fellow faggots means that by definition for it to effect you (or the user you are arguing for) you (or they) have the gay. Sorry but that's how it is.
You have the gay. It's fine though, acceptance is growing. In fact with how hard you're closeted I suspect you have the BIG gay.
Life is making me gay, the problem?
I find men disgusting, i just want the love and attention and that's not something girls give me.
I hate this gay world, it makes me wanna an hero.
Well, no one ever said the thing was full of people, if you get it to drift that shit will derail and kill no one, so the meme answer is the correct answer.
Or maybe you end up killing everyone, and that's also good because you can come up with a deep philosophical explaination on why all life is invaluable.
What are you a fucking child? Snap out of it. HIV affects gays and non-gays, but affects gays more than non-gays. I don't care that gays exist, I'm not lobbying for them to be executed you nonce. I was just pointing out that HIV affecting non-gays is such a non-issue that healthcare subsidies for people affected by HIV probably have a more significant impact.
Did I clear that up for you you mental midget? Just to clarify - I don't give a shit if you're gay, which you clearly are. No one gets this defensive unless they're protecting the closet they're so deeply entrenched in.
>Gay in the closet trying to tell the straight man he is gay while having the big gay.
Sorry user. It's okay. I won't stop you sucking cock, unless you try to suck mine because no thanks.
Of course you don't address what I just said. Just back to the name calling. God you're stupid. kys
>HIV affecting non-gays is such a non-issue
not the other guy, but about a third of all HIV cases in the US aren't gay or bi
(cdc.gov
Yeah but what's the likelihood of the average heterosexual contracting it?
For heterosexual men it's 0.04%, for women it's 0.08% and for drug users it's a whopping 0.67%.
Yes it is. I just sucked a lovely fat 7incher, it was like a bucket of cum flooding my mouth and throat. Now I'm going to fuck myself silly with one of my dildos. Have fun thinking of this while you rag out at being in the cloest
hay my dude as a bi person im willing to explain my point of view, you willing to listen?
Why gay not OK?
>Why should gays be allowed to exist or have AIDS?
You sound like a humanitarian. OP wants to get rid of AIDS from the gay population.
OP 2020
Where you find these? I think they are cute, not as nasty as I though they will be
OP believes that gays choose to be gay, and that if it's a choice, that they should just not be gay and all gay propaganda should be done away with, and then no AIDS and stuff like that.
what do you mean "average heterosexual"? how are these unnormal heteros contracting it then? by being secretly gay?
They're above average - they get more girls than me and it bothers me a lot.
Mods
You said it yourself.
>No one gets this defensive unless they're defending the closet they're so deeply entrenched in
You have the big gay. Sorry. It's fine, I won't judge you for it.
So we're both 'big gay'? Are you.. are you coming on to me?
Bro I already told you I don't want you to suck my cock. Calm down you faggot.
Sounds pretty gay to me buddy. Only fags say things like, 'big gay' and 'bro' at the beginning of sentences.
The leather club's two blocks d o w n
Only a faggot would know where a club like that was.
No YOU are the gay, etc
Stop being gay
Enough with the gay
Holy shit defensive faggot.
It's OKAY. You can be gay. I don't care.